Multicenter, Intraindividual Comparison of Single-Dose Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Double-Dose Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for MR Angiography of the Supra-Aortic Arteries (the Supra-Aortic VALUE Study)

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wardlaw JM,
   2. Chappell FM,
   3. Best JJ,
   4. et al

   . Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:1503–12

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Debrey SM,
   2. Yu H,
   3. Lynch JK,
   4. et al

   . Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2008;39:2237–48

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Menke J

   . Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2204–16

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Remonda L,
   2. Senn P,
   3. Barth A,
   4. et al

   . Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213–19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Tomasian A,
   2. Salamon N,
   3. Lohan DG,
   4. et al

   . Supraaortic arteries: contrast material dose reduction at 3.0-T high-spatial-resolution MR angiography—feasibility study. Radiology 2008;249:980–90

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Unterweger M,
   2. Froehlich JM,
   3. Kubik-Huch RA,
   4. et al

   . Dose optimization of contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1797–805

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Jourdan C,
   2. Heverhagen JT,
   3. Knopp MV

   . Dose comparison of single- vs. double-dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: intraindividual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:557–63

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Pediconi F,
   2. Fraioli F,
   3. Catalano C,
   4. et al

   . Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) vs gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): improvement in intravascular signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio. Radiol Med 2003;106:87–93

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Pintaske J,
   2. Martirosian P,
   3. Graf H,
   4. et al

   . Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Gadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41:213–21

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Rohrer M,
    2. Bauer H,
    3. Mintorovitch J,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 2005;40:715–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Gerretsen SC,
    2. le Maire TF,
    3. Miller S,
    4. et al

    . Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries. Radiology 2010;255:988–1000

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Knopp MV,
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. von Tengg-Kobligk H,
    4. et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:694–702

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bueltmann E,
    2. Erb G,
    3. Kirchin MA,
    4. et al

    . Intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic vessels at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:695–702

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Prokop M,
    2. Schneider G,
    3. Vanzulli A,
    4. et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2005;234:399–408

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Hendrick RE,
    2. Haacke EM

    . Basic physics of MR contrast agents and maximization of image contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:137–48

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Stein PD,
    2. Chenevert TL,
    3. Fowler SE,
    4. et al

    . Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 2010;152:434–43,W142–43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Woodard PK,
    2. Chenevert TL,
    3. Sostman HD,
    4. et al

    . Signal quality of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine pulmonary MRA examinations exceeds quality of MRA performed with double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:295–301

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Achenbach M,
    2. Figiel JH,
    3. Burbelko M,
    4. et al

    . Prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 0.5 molar gadobenate dimeglumine and 1.0 molar gadobutrol in contrast-enhanced run-off magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:1166–71

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Balci NC,
    2. Inan N,
    3. Anik Y,
    4. et al

    . Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard-dose gadopentate dimeglumine for delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol 2006;13:833–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Schneider G,
    2. Maas R,
    3. Schultze Kool L,
    4. et al

    . Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison. Invest Radiol 2003;38:85–94

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Maravilla KR,
    2. Maldjian JA,
    3. Schmalfuss IM,
    4. et al

    . Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology 2006;240:389–400

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Rowley HA,
    2. Scialfa G,
    3. Gao PY,
    4. et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions: a large-scale intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadodiamide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1684–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Seidl Z,
    2. Vymazal J,
    3. Mechl M,
    4. et al

    . Does higher gadolinium concentration play a role in the morphologic assessment of brain tumors? Results of a multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobutrol versus gadobenate dimeglumine (the MERIT study). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1050–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. von Tengg-Kobligk H,
    3. Wilkinson ID,
    4. et al

    . Influence of human serum albumin on longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates (R1 and R2) of magnetic resonance contrast agents. Invest Radiol 2006;41:222–28

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Pirovano G,
    2. Munley J,
    3. Schultz C,
    4. et al

    . Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a review of published cases and results from three prospective observational studies. In: Proceedings of the European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, Austria. March 1–5, 2012
28. 28.↵
    1. Spampinato MV,
    2. Nguyen SA,
    3. Rumboldt Z

    . Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadodiamide in the evaluation of spinal vascular anatomy with MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1151–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Pan XM,
    2. Saloner D,
    3. Reilly LM,
    4. et al

    . Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:82–88

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Anzalone N,
    2. Scomazzoni F,
    3. Castellano R,
    4. et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 2005;236:204–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science