Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

The Varying Porosity of Braided Self-Expanding Stents and Flow Diverters: An Experimental Study

A. Makoyeva, F. Bing, T.E. Darsaut, I. Salazkin and J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2013, 34 (3) 596-602; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3234
A. Makoyeva
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.M., T.E.D., I.S., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Bing
bService de Radiologie A (F.B.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Strasbourg, Strasbourg 1, Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.E. Darsaut
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.M., T.E.D., I.S., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
cDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (T.E.D.), University of Alberta Hospital, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Salazkin
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.M., T.E.D., I.S., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Raymond
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.M., T.E.D., I.S., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Devices. The first set of experiments is shown, in which various devices were used. Note the similar pattern shared by all braided devices, with a concentration of stent struts in the midportion of the device, compacted between relatively porous segments. The phenomenon, more marked with increasing compaction (as shown on the right side), leads to heterogeneities in porosity along the length of the same device.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Zones. The 3 characteristic zones are illustrated in a severely compacted HPS (A). Progressive approximation of the tubes (axial compression) leads to decreasing porosities of the compaction Zone3, but Zones1and2 remain relatively unchanged, as shown in B (HPS in 2-mm tubes). Axial compression leads directly to a shortening of Zone3, but the transition Zone2 length remains relatively unchanged (C). The same phenomenon was reproduced with the FD48 (compare B and D), with porosities reaching 0 with severe compaction.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Compaction and diameters. Effects of 2-mm (left column) and 4-mm compaction (right column) and of tube diameters (2–3.5 mm) on the compaction Zone3 and the transition Zone2 of the HPS are shown (A–H). Note that tubes of decreasing diameters lead to increased compaction of Zone3 because the transition Zone2 increases in length as tube diameter decreases. The relationship between the length of the transition Zone2 and the size of tubes is illustrated in I for both the HPS and the FD48.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Curvatures and FDs. Curvatures affect porosities of the convexity and concavity of FD48. The effects are limited to the compaction Zone3, the transition Zone2 being relatively spared.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Concavity at 45°(A, C) and convexity at 135°(B, D) of expansion Zone3 before (A, B), or after (C, D) the stent is compacted. Curvatures affect the porosity of the convexity and concavity sides of the compaction Zone3 (E), whereas the transition Zone2 remains virtually unchanged by comparison (F, showing the porosity of the transition Zone2 with different tubes and different curvatures).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Stenoses can occur at the level of device extremities (A–D); the stenosis is more severe when the length introduced inside the tube is insufficient (compare A and B), and eccentric when the device is curved (D). The relationship between stenoses and length of device introduced inside tubes is shown for FD48 (E) as well as for the 48-wire stent-in-stent endoluminal flow-diverting devices (F).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    In vivo and in vitro observations. Photographs of 4 autopsy specimens of aneurysms treated with HPSs (A, B) or FDs (C, D) are compared with 4 photographs of benchtop studies designed to mimic in vivo findings (E–H). Note how neointima formation (A–C) tends to be limited to the less porous compaction Zone3, and how the transition Zone2, lacking neointima, may be responsible for failures. The in vivo stent stenosis (D) is reproduced inside a tube (H).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Device characteristics

    HPSFD48SSFD36SSFD48SSFD64
    Nominal stent diameter × length (mm)4.5 × 303.5 × 213.75 × 323.75 × 323.75 × 32
    P89 ± 1.5%77.2 ± 2.9%72.4 ± 3.1%70.3 ± 2.8%66.0 ± 2.6%
    PD (pores/mm2)0.6 ± 0.56.3 ± 2.55.6 ± 1.48.2 ± 2.210.2 ± 2.9
    Number of wires16 struts48 braided wiresOuter: 16 struts; inner: 36 braided wiresOuter: 16 struts; inner: 48 braided wiresOuter: 16 struts; inner: 64 braided wires
    • Note:—SSFD indicates stent-in-stent endoluminal flow diverting device.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 3
1 Mar 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Varying Porosity of Braided Self-Expanding Stents and Flow Diverters: An Experimental Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Makoyeva, F. Bing, T.E. Darsaut, I. Salazkin, J. Raymond
The Varying Porosity of Braided Self-Expanding Stents and Flow Diverters: An Experimental Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2013, 34 (3) 596-602; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Varying Porosity of Braided Self-Expanding Stents and Flow Diverters: An Experimental Study
A. Makoyeva, F. Bing, T.E. Darsaut, I. Salazkin, J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2013, 34 (3) 596-602; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3234
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Subacute Stent Deformities as an Underlying Reason for Vessel Stenosis after Flow Diversion with the p64 Stent: Review and Discussion of Biologic Mechanisms and Consequences
  • Braid stability after flow diverter treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Comprehensive Analysis of Post-Pipeline Endothelialization and Remodeling
  • Predictors of the Effects of Flow Diversion in Very Large and Giant Aneurysms
  • Predictive score for complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow-diverter stents using machine learning
  • A realistic way to investigate the design, and mechanical properties of flow diverter stents
  • Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device Sizing Based on Conventional 2D Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: An Agreement Study
  • Ostium Ratio and Neck Ratio Could Predict the Outcome of Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow Diverters
  • Toward Better Understanding of Flow Diversion in Bifurcation Aneurysms
  • Flow-Diversion Effect of LEO Stents: Aneurysm Occlusion and Flow Remodeling of Covered Side Branches and Perforators
  • Flow Diversion with Low-Profile Braided Stents for the Treatment of Very Small or Uncoilable Intracranial Aneurysms at or Distal to the Circle of Willis
  • Compacting a Single Flow Diverter versus Overlapping Flow Diverters for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Computational Study
  • Virtual-versus-Real Implantation of Flow Diverters: Clinical Potential and Influence of Vascular Geometry
  • Compaction of flow diverters improves occlusion of experimental wide-necked aneurysms
  • The Added Value of Volume-of-Interest C-Arm CT Imaging during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Pipeline endovascular device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms at the level of the circle of Willis and beyond: multicenter experience
  • Preliminary experience with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device: technical note
  • Flow diverters: inter and intra-rater reliability of porosity and pore density measurements
  • Visual Outcomes with Flow-Diverter Stents Covering the Ophthalmic Artery for Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms
  • The Success of Flow Diversion in Large and Giant Sidewall Aneurysms May Depend on the Size of the Defect in the Parent Artery
  • Enhanced Aneurysmal Flow Diversion Using a Dynamic Push-Pull Technique: An Experimental and Modeling Study
  • Building Multidevice Pipeline Constructs of Favorable Metal Coverage: A Practical Guide
  • Variable Porosity of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Straight and Curved Vessels: A Guide for Optimal Deployment Strategy
  • Crossref (73)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Medical Textiles as Vascular Implants and Their Success to Mimic Natural Arteries
    Charanpreet Singh, Cynthia Wong, Xungai Wang
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials 2015 6 3
  • Variable Porosity of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Straight and Curved Vessels: A Guide for Optimal Deployment Strategy
    M. Shapiro, E. Raz, T. Becske, P. K. Nelson
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 4
  • Visual Outcomes with Flow-Diverter Stents Covering the Ophthalmic Artery for Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms
    A. Rouchaud, O. Leclerc, Y. Benayoun, S. Saleme, Y. Camilleri, F. D'Argento, M.-P. Boncoeur, P.-Y. Robert, C. Mounayer
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015 36 2
  • Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following pipeline embolization
    Maksim Shapiro, Tibor Becske, Peter K. Nelson
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2017 126 2
  • Flow Diverters for Intracranial Aneurysms
    Yazan J. Alderazi, Darshan Shastri, Tareq Kass-Hout, Charles J. Prestigiacomo, Chirag D. Gandhi
    Stroke Research and Treatment 2014 2014
  • Hemodynamics of Flow Diverters
    Ronak Dholakia, Chander Sadasivan, David J. Fiorella, Henry H. Woo, Baruch B. Lieber
    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2017 139 2
  • Pipeline endovascular device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms at the level of the circle of Willis and beyond: multicenter experience
    M Martínez-Galdámez, A Romance, P Vega, A Vega, J L Caniego, L Paul, I Linfante, G Dabus
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2015 7 11
  • Building Multidevice Pipeline Constructs of Favorable Metal Coverage: A Practical Guide
    M. Shapiro, E. Raz, T. Becske, P. K. Nelson
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 8
  • Enhanced Aneurysmal Flow Diversion Using a Dynamic Push-Pull Technique: An Experimental and Modeling Study
    D. Ma, J. Xiang, H. Choi, T. M. Dumont, S. K. Natarajan, A. H. Siddiqui, H. Meng
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 9
  • Increasing Flow Diversion for Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Using a Single Flow Diverter
    Jianping Xiang, Ding Ma, Kenneth V. Snyder, Elad I. Levy, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Hui Meng
    Neurosurgery 2014 75 3

More in this TOC Section

  • Factors Associated with Major Re-recanalization
  • A Key Factor Shapes LS-DAVFs EVT Outcome
  • Optimizing Voxel Size in 3D Rotational Angiography
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire