Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
Open Access

Effect of Tonsillar Herniation on Cyclic CSF Flow Studied with Computational Flow Analysis

S.O. Linge, V. Haughton, A.E. Løvgren, K.A. Mardal, A. Helgeland and H.P. Langtangen
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2011, 32 (8) 1474-1481; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2496
S.O. Linge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Haughton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.E. Løvgren
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.A. Mardal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Helgeland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.P. Langtangen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    The idealized model (A) of a subarachnoid space with herniated tonsils and the original model (B) with normally positioned tonsils. The models are shown with sagittal MR images illustrating a typical normal individual and a typical Chiari I malformation. For the normal model, a midline sagittal plane is shown and for the tonsillar herniation case, its paramedian through the nearest tonsil. A white reference line indicates the midpoint of the model at the correlate of the craniovertebral junction. The extensions to the model to facilitate the description of boundary conditions are demonstrated by the red lines. Anterior is to the reader's left and posterior to the right.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Sagittal plane sections showing flow velocities in the Chiari model at the time when the caudal volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.25 seconds, A) and when cranial volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.75 seconds, B). C and D, For comparison, corresponding sections in the normal model are shown. Velocity scales in are the same as in A and B, respectively. The plane selected for the Chiari model is paramidline to demonstrate the extension of the tonsils into the spinal canal.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Axial sections show flow velocity at the craniovertebral junction in the Chiari model at the time when caudal volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.25 seconds). B, For comparison, a corresponding section for the original model (without tonsil herniation) is shown at an equivalent time in the cycle. Note that the distribution of peak velocities in both models is similar and that in the presence of tonsillar herniation, velocities are more than double those in absence of tonsillar herniation.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Axial sections showing the LR (A) and AP components (B) of the flow velocity vector at the craniovertebral junction in the Chiari model at the time when the caudal volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.25 seconds). C and D, Similar velocity components are also shown, when cranial volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.75 seconds). Velocity scales are the same as in A and B, respectively.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    A single frame from the particle-tracking display for the Chiari model shows a complex pattern of CSF movement in 1 portion of the subarachnoid space. Note the arrows in multiple directions. The animation (http://home.simula.no/∼sveinlin/CSFChiari.m1v) displays CSF movement by means of particle tracking (left) and color coding (right) over 5 cardiac cycles, while the model is rotated 360°. The particle-tracking animation displays the direction of CSF flow; the color animation displays the velocity of flow. For the color display, velocities of ≥6 cm/s in the caudal direction are displayed in blue and ≥6 cm/s in the cephalad direction in red. The displays show complex flow patterns, especially when flow direction reverses. Flow transiently occurs in a direction perpendicular to that of the SI. Flow direction in different locations in the subarachnoid space changes at slightly different times in the cardiac cycle. Peak velocities in both caudal and cephalad directions appear to be reached in the spinal canal before they are reached at the craniovertebral junction. In comparison with the normal model (http://home.simula.no/∼sveinlin/CSFnormal.mpg), greater velocities are found in the craniovertebral junction and greater complexity of flow is demonstrated as flow direction changes.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Peak velocity components (absolute values) for the Chiari model (solid lines) and the normal model (dotted lines). The SI (black), LR (red), and AP (blue) velocity components are shown in 4 axial sections at 4 different times during the flow cycle, when flow changes direction from cranial to caudal (t = 0.00 seconds), at maximal caudal flow (t = 0.25 seconds), when flow changes direction from caudal to cranial (t = 0.50 seconds), and, finally, at maximal cranial flow (t = 0.75 seconds). Sections are 1 cm apart, with section 1 located at the craniovertebral junction, and sections 3–7, at successively more inferior locations, with section 7 being near the tip of the tonsils.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    Peak SI flow velocities at the time when the caudal volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.25 seconds), shown as a function of the axial section for the Chiari model and the normal model. Section 1 is at the craniovertebral junction, and section 8 is just below the herniated tonsils. Sections are 0.5 cm apart. The peak velocity for the Chiari model is greater at the foramen magnum and increases less steeply with distance.

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    Axial sections showing flow velocity at the craniovertebral junction in the Chiari model at the time when flow direction changes from cranial to caudal (A) (t = 0.00 seconds) and when flow direction changes from caudal to cranial (B) (t = 0.50 seconds). C and D, For comparison, corresponding sections are also shown for the normal model at these times in the cycle. Note that oppositely directed flow is observed at the boundaries of the subarachnoid space (ie, there is synchronous bidirectional flow). The velocities are greater in the Chiari model. Velocity scales are the same as in A and B, respectively.

  • Fig 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 9.

    Sagittal plane sections showing pressure distributions along the cord in the Chiari model at the time when flow direction changes from cranial to caudal (A) (t = 0.00 seconds) and when flow direction changes from caudal to cranial (B) (t = 0.50 seconds). At these times, the pressure gradient along the cord is at its maximum. At the times of maximal caudal (C) (t = 0.25 seconds) and cranial (D) (t = 0.75 seconds) flow, the pressure gradient was at its minimum. Pressure scales are the same as in A and B, respectively.

  • Fig 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 10.

    Axial sections showing pressure at the time of maximal cranial flow (t = 0.75 seconds) in an axial section in the Chiari model (A) and in the normal model (B). The sections are 2 cm below the foramen magnum (Section 5). The increased in-plane pressure gradient in the Chiari model correlates with the increased in-plane flow velocity components. C and D, The corresponding LR velocity components are shown for the Chiari and normal models, respectively. The pressure scale in B is the same as the one in A, and the velocity scale in D is the same as the one in C.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Pressure differences between top and bottom of the model at 4 points in time during the flow cycle for the Chiari and the normal modela

    ModelPressure Differences (centimeters of water) Top to Bottom
    SystoleDiastole
    t = 0.00 secondst = 0.25 secondst = 0.50 secondst = 0.75 seconds
    Normal0.660.10−0.64−0.07
    Chiari0.750.13−0.74−0.09
    Increase14%30%16%29%
    • a The gradient follows by dividing the difference by the distance from top to bottom. The 4 times correspond to when flow changes direction from cranial to caudal flow (t = 0.00 seconds), when caudal volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.25 seconds), when flow changes direction from caudal to cranial flow (t = 0.50 seconds), and when cranial volume flow rate is maximal (t = 0.75 seconds). Note that the minus sign appears when pressure is highest at the caudal side of the geometry (ie, related to cranial flow). Note also that data from the times of flow reversal (ie, t = 0.00 and t = 0.50 seconds) are arbitrarily included in systole and diastole, respectively.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Axial section pressures (maximum and minimum) in the Chiari model l, for the same sections as in Table 1a

    SectionChiari Model, Axial Section Pressures Pmax/Pmin (centimeters of water)
    SystoleDiastole
    t = 0.00 secondst = 0.25 secondst = 0.50 secondst = 0.75 seconds
    119.85/19.8319.97/19.9620.16/20.1420.02/20.01
    319.81/19.7919.96/19.9520.21/20.1820.02/20.01
    519.77/19.7519.95/19.9420.25/20.2320.03/20.01
    719.70/19.6919.93/19.9220.31/20.2920.05/20.05
    19.57/19.5619.91/19.9120.44/20.4320.04/20.04
    • a In addition, 1 extra section (bottom row) is used 2 cm below the tip of the tonsils. Note that data from the times of flow reversal (ie, t = 0.00 and t = 0.50 seconds) are arbitrarily included in systole and diastole, respectively.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Axial section pressures (maximum and minimum) in the normal model, for the same sections as in Table 1a

    SectionNormal Model, Axial Section Pressures Pmax/Pmin (centimeters of water)
    SystoleDiastole
    t = 0.00 secondst = 0.25 secondst = 0.50 secondst = 0.75 seconds
    119.92/19.9119.99/19.9920.09/20.0820.01/20.01
    319.90/19.8919.99/19.9920.11/20.1020.01/20.01
    519.86/19.8519.98/19.9720.15/20.1420.01/20.00
    719.80/19.8019.96/19.9520.21/20.2020.00/20.00
    19.67/19.6619.94/19.9420.33/20.3320.01/20.01
    • a In addition, 1 extra section (bottom row) is used 2 cm below the tip of the tonsils. Note that data from the times of flow reversal (ie, t = 0.00 and t = 0.50 seconds) are arbitrarily included in systole and diastole, respectively.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 8
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Tonsillar Herniation on Cyclic CSF Flow Studied with Computational Flow Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.O. Linge, V. Haughton, A.E. Løvgren, K.A. Mardal, A. Helgeland, H.P. Langtangen
Effect of Tonsillar Herniation on Cyclic CSF Flow Studied with Computational Flow Analysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2011, 32 (8) 1474-1481; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2496

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Effect of Tonsillar Herniation on Cyclic CSF Flow Studied with Computational Flow Analysis
S.O. Linge, V. Haughton, A.E. Løvgren, K.A. Mardal, A. Helgeland, H.P. Langtangen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2011, 32 (8) 1474-1481; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2496
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cerebro-spinal Flow Pattern in the Cervical Subarachnoid Space of Healthy Volunteers: Influence of the Spinal Cord morphology
  • Spinal Fluid Biomechanics and Imaging: An Update for Neuroradiologists
  • Simulating CSF Flow Dynamics in the Normal and the Chiari I Subarachnoid Space during Rest and Exertion
  • Patient-Specific 3D Simulation of Cyclic CSF Flow at the Craniocervical Region
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Dynamic CT Myelography: Patient Positioning
  • Evaluation of SIH MR Scoring Systems in Normals
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire