Is It Possible to Recognize Cervical Artery Dissection on Stroke Brain MR Imaging? A Matched Case-Control Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Schievink WI

   . Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001;344:898–906

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Debette S,
   2. Leys D

   . Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:668–78

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Engelter ST,
   2. Brandt T,
   3. Debette S,
   4. et al

   . Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2007;38:2605–11

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Latchaw RE,
   2. Alberts MJ,
   3. Lev MH,
   4. et al

   . Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40:3646–78

   FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Fairhead JF,
   2. Mehta Z,
   3. Rothwell PM

   . Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke. Neurology 2005;65:371–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Halliday AW,
   2. Lees T,
   3. Kamugasha D,
   4. et al

   . Waiting times for carotid endarterectomy in UK: observational study. BMJ 2009;338:b1847
7. 7.↵
   1. Bossuyt PM,
   2. Reitsma JB,
   3. Bruns DE,
   4. et al

   . Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Radiology 2003;226:24–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Mokri B,
   2. Houser OW,
   3. Sandok BA,
   4. et al

   . Spontaneous dissections of the vertebral arteries. Neurology 1988;38:880–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Provenzale JM,
   2. Morgenlander JC,
   3. Gress D

   . Spontaneous vertebral dissection: clinical, conventional angiographic, CT, and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:185–93

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Arnold M,
    2. Bousser MG,
    3. Fahrni G,
    4. et al

    . Vertebral artery dissection: presenting findings and predictors of outcome. Stroke 2006;37:2499–503

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Zangerle A,
    2. Kiechl S,
    3. Spiegel M,
    4. et al

    . Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: predictors and prognostic implications. Neurology 2007;68:39–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Georgiadis D,
    2. Lanczik O,
    3. Schwab S,
    4. et al

    . IV thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke due to spontaneous carotid dissection. Neurology 2005;64:1612–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Derex L,
    2. Nighoghossian N,
    3. Turjman F,
    4. et al

    . Intravenous TPA in acute ischemic stroke related to internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology 2000;54:2159–61

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Lavallee PC,
    2. Mazighi M,
    3. Saint-Maurice JP,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2007;38:2270–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Baumgartner RW,
    2. Georgiadis D,
    3. Nedeltchev K,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2008;39:e27–28

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Schabitz WR

    . MR mismatch is useful for patient selection for thrombolysis: No. Stroke 2009;40:2908–09

    FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Albers G,
    3. Al-Rawi Y,
    4. et al

    . The desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text