Hemodynamics and Anatomy of Elastase-Induced Rabbit Aneurysm Models: Similarity to Human Cerebral Aneurysms?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Burleson AC,
   2. Turitto VT

   . Identification of quantifiable hemodynamic factors in the assessment of cerebral aneurysm behavior: on behalf of the Subcommittee on Biorheology of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemost 1996;76:118–23

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Castro MA,
   3. Burgess JE,
   4. et al

   . Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Hassan T,
   2. Timofeev EV,
   3. Saito T,
   4. et al

   . A proposed parent vessel geometry-based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture. J Neurosurg 2005;103:662–80

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Jou LD,
   2. Lee DH,
   3. Morsi H,
   4. et al

   . Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1761–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Shojima M,
   2. Oshima M,
   3. Takagi K,
   4. et al

   . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Shojima M,
   2. Oshima M,
   3. Takagi K,
   4. et al

   . Role of the bloodstream impacting force and the local pressure elevation in the rupture of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2005;36:1933–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Steinman DA,
   2. Milner JS,
   3. Norley CJ,
   4. et al

   . Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:559–66

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Karmonik C,
   2. Yen C,
   3. Diaz O,
   4. et al

   . Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms: importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1391–98, discussion 1398

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Parlea L,
   2. Fahrig R,
   3. Holdsworth DW,
   4. et al

   . An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1079–89

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Raghavan ML,
    2. Ma B,
    3. Harbaugh RE

    . Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Ujiie H,
    2. Tamano Y,
    3. Sasaki K,
    4. et al

    . Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495–502, discussion 502–03

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Weir B,
    2. Amidei C,
    3. Kongable G,
    4. et al

    . The aspect ratio (dome/neck) of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2003;99:447–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Avolio A,
    2. Avolio A,
    3. Farnoush A,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamic models of cerebral aneurysms for assessment of effect of vessel geometry on risk of rupture. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:2351–53

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Piccinelli M,
    2. Veneziani A,
    3. Steinman DA,
    4. et al

    . A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1141–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Ingebrigtsen T,
    2. Morgan MK,
    3. Faulder K,
    4. et al

    . Bifurcation geometry and the presence of cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2004;101:108–13

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Frosen J,
    2. Piippo A,
    3. Paetau A,
    4. et al

    . Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Sequeira A,
    2. Rannacher R

    1. Zeng Z,
    2. Chung BJ,
    3. Durka M,
    4. et al

    . An in-vitro device for evaluation of cellular response to flows found at the apex of arterial bifurcations. In: Sequeira A, Rannacher R eds. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Wien; 2010:631–57
18. 18.↵
    1. Sakamoto N,
    2. Ohashi T,
    3. Sato M

    . Effect of fluid shear stress on migration of vascular smooth muscle cells in cocultured model. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:408–15. Epub 2006 Feb 16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Altes TA,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Short JG,
    4. et al

    . 1999 ARRS Executive Council Award: creation of saccular aneurysms in the rabbit—a model suitable for testing endovascular devices. American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:349–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Fukuda S,
    2. Hashimoto N,
    3. Naritomi H,
    4. et al

    . Prevention of rat cerebral aneurysm formation by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2000;101:2532–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Kondo S,
    2. Hashimoto N,
    3. Kikuchi H,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral aneurysms arising at nonbranching sites: an experimental study. Stroke 1997;28:398–403, discussion 403–04

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Thiex R,
    2. Moller-Hartmann W,
    3. Hans FJ,
    4. et al

    . Are the configuration and neck morphology of experimental aneurysms predictable? A technical approach. Neuroradiology 2004;46:571–76

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Sadasivan C,
    2. Cesar L,
    3. Seong J,
    4. et al

    . An original flow-diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Ding YH,
    2. Danielson MA,
    3. Kadirvel R,
    4. et al

    . Modified technique to create morphologically reproducible elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2006;48:528–32

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Ding YH,
    2. Dai D,
    3. Lewis DA,
    4. et al

    . Can neck size in elastase-induced aneurysms be controlled? A prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2364–67

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Ding YH,
    2. Dai D,
    3. Lewis DA,
    4. et al

    . Can neck size in elastase-induced aneurysms be controlled? A retrospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1681–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Ujiie H,
    2. Tachibana H,
    3. Hiramatsu O,
    4. et al

    . Effects of size and shape (aspect ratio) on the hemodynamics of saccular aneurysms: a possible index for surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1999;45:119–29, discussion 129–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Ebina K,
    2. Shimizu T,
    3. Sohma M,
    4. et al

    . Clinico-statistical study on morphological risk factors of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;106:153–59

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Zeng Z,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Durka M,
    4. et al

    . Sensitivity of CFD based hemodynamic results in rabbit aneurysm models to idealizations in surrounding vasculature. J Biomech Eng 2010;132:091009

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Heywood JG,
    2. Rannacher R,
    3. Turek S

    . Artificial boundaries and flux and pressure conditions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1996;22:325–52

    CrossRef
32. 32.↵
    1. He X,
    2. Ku DN

    . Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:74–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.
    1. Hendrikse J,
    2. van Raamt AF,
    3. van der Graaf Y,
    4. et al

    . Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Amin-Hanjani S,
    3. Ruland S,
    4. et al

    . Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1470–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.
    1. Vriens EM,
    2. Wieneke GH,
    3. Hillen B,
    4. et al

    . Flow redistribution in the major cerebral arteries after carotid endarterectomy: a study with transcranial Doppler scan. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:139–47

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Mantha A,
    2. Karmonik C,
    3. Benndorf G,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamics in a cerebral artery before and after the formation of an aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1113–18

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Meng H,
    3. Woodward SH,
    4. et al

    . Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Yilmaz C,
    2. Utebay B,
    3. Kalaycioglu S,
    4. et al

    . Non-visualization of the internal carotid artery with a normal ipsilateral common carotid artery Doppler waveform: a finding suggesting congenital absence of the ICA on colour Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2006;79:108–11

    CrossRef
39. 39.↵
    1. Short JG,
    2. Fujiwara NH,
    3. Marx WF,
    4. et al

    . Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits: comparison of geometric features with those of human aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1833–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Kadirvel R,
    2. Ding Y-H,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . The influence of hemodynamic forces on biomarkers in the walls of elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2007;49:1041–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Klucznik R,
    3. Benndorf G

    . Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics—preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209–15

    PubMedWeb of Science