Aberrant Diffusion and Geometric Properties in the Left Arcuate Fasciculus of Developmentally Delayed Children: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Filippi CG,
   2. Lin DDM,
   3. Tsiouris AJ,
   4. et al

   . Diffusion-tensor MR imaging in children with developmental delay: preliminary findings. Radiology 2003;229:44–50

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Sundaram S,
   2. Sivaswamy L,
   3. Makki M,
   4. et al

   . Absence of arcuate fasciculus in children with global developmental delay of unknown etiology: a diffusion tensor imaging. J Pediatr 2008;152:250–55

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Wilson BJ,
   2. Sundaram SK,
   3. Hug AH,
   4. et al

   . Abnormal language pathway in children with Angelman syndrome: a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Ann Neurol 2009;66:S109–09

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   1. Yamamoto N,
   2. Tamada A,
   3. Murakami F

   . Wiring of the brain by a range of guidance cues. Prog Neurobiol 2002;68:393–407

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. O'Donnell LJ,
   2. Westin CF,
   3. Golby AJ

   . Tract-based morphometry for white matter group analysis. Neuroimage 2009;45:832–44

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Smith SM,
   2. Jenkinson M,
   3. Johansen-Berg H,
   4. et al

   . Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Lee JE,
   2. Bigler ED,
   3. Alexander AL,
   4. et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter in the superior temporal gyrus and temporal stem in autism. Neurosci Lett 2007;7:127–32

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Basser PJ,
   2. Mattielo J,
   3. Le Bihan D

   . MR diffusion tensor spectrography and imaging. Biophys J 1994:66:259–67

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Basser PJ,
   2. Pierpaoli C

   . Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;111:209–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Batchelor PG,
    2. Calamante F,
    3. Tournier JD,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of the shape of fiber tracts. Magn Res Med 2006;55:894–903

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ashburner J

    . A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 2007;38:95–113. Epub 2007 Jul 18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Kelin J,
    2. Andersson BA,
    3. Ardekani J,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009;46:786–802

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Wilke M,
    2. Schmithorst VJ,
    3. Holland SK

    . Assessment of spatial normalization of whole-brain magnetic resonance images in children. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:48–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Diaz RM,
    2. Arencibia AQ

    1. Brun A,
    2. Park HJ,
    3. Knuttsson H,
    4. et al

    . Coloring of DT-MRI fiber traces using Laplacian eigenmaps. In: Diaz RM, Arencibia AQ(eds). Computer Aided Systems Theory (EUROCAST '03), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2809. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain: Springer Verlag, 2003;564–72
15. 15.↵
    1. Yuan W,
    2. Holland SK,
    3. Schmithorst VJ,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor MR imaging reveals persistent white matter alternation after traumatic brain injury experienced during early childhood. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1919–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Alexander DC,
    2. Pierpaoli C,
    3. Basser PJ,
    4. et al

    . Spatial transformations of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1131–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Xu D,
    2. Mori S,
    3. Shen D,
    4. et al

    . Spatial normalization of diffusion tensor fields. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:175–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Li X,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. et al

    . Landmark-reference voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor images of the brain stem white matter tracts application in patients with middle cerebral artery stroke. Neuroimage 2009;44:906–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Xu Z,
    3. Guo L,
    4. et al

    . A hybrid approach to automatic clustering of white matter fibers. Neuroimage 2010;49:1249–58

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Ruiz-Alzola J,
    2. Westin CF,
    3. Warfield SK,
    4. et al

    . Nonrigid registration of 3D scalar vector and tensor medical data. Med Image Anal 2002;6:143–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N,
    2. Landeau B,
    3. Papathanassiou D,
    4. et al

    . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Yekutieli D,
    2. Benjamini Y

    . Resampling-based false discovery rate controlling multiple test procedure. J Statist Plann Inference 1999;82:171–96

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Kumar A,
    2. Sundaram SK,
    3. Sivaswamy L,
    4. et al

    . Alternations in frontal lobe tracts and corpus callosum in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Cereb Cortex 2010;20:2103–13. Epub 2009 Dec 17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Paul LK,
    2. Brown WS,
    3. Adolphs R,
    4. et al

    . Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:287–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Rüenker AE,
    2. Little GE,
    3. Suto F,
    4. et al

    . Semaphorin-6A controls guidance of corticospinal tract axons at multiple choice points. Neural Dev 2008;3:34

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Stuebner S,
    2. Faus-Kessler T,
    3. Fischer T,
    4. et al

    . Fzd3 and Fzd6 deficiency results in a severe midbrain morphogenesis defect. Dev Dyn 2010;239:246–60

    PubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Steinel MC,
    2. Whitington PM

    . The atypical cadherin Flamingo is required for sensory axon advance beyond intermediate target cells. Dev Biol 2009;327:447–57. Epub 2008 Dec 30

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Rodriguez-Gil DJ,
    2. Greer CA

    . Wnt/Frizzled family members mediate olfactory sensory neuron axon extension. J Comp Neurol 2008;511:301–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Lie C,
    2. Nathans J

    . An essential role for frizzled 5 in mammalian ocular development. Development 2008;135:3567–76. Epub 2008 Oct 2

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Mori S,
    4. et al

    . Axonal growth and guidance defects in Frizzled3 knock-out mice: a comparison of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging, neurofilament staining, and genetically directed cell labeling. J Neurosci. 2006;26:355–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Abrahams BS,
    2. Tentler D,
    3. Perederiy JV,
    4. et al

    . Genome-wide analyses of human perisylvian cerebral cortical patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:17849–54. Epub 2007 Oct 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Alarcón M,
    2. Abrahams BS,
    3. Stone JL,
    4. et al

    . Linkage, association, and gene-expression analyses identify CNTNAP2 as an autism-susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet 2008;82:150–59

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Poot M,
    2. Beyer V,
    3. Schwaab I,
    4. et al

    . Disruption of CNTNAP2 and additional structural genome changes in a boy with speech delay and autism spectrum disorder. Neurogenetics 2010;11:81–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Vernes SC,
    2. Newbury DF,
    3. Abrahams BS,
    4. et al

    . A functional genetic link between distinct developmental language disorders. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2337–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Vargha-Khadem F,
    2. Gadian DG,
    3. Copp A,
    4. et al

    . FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005;6:131–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Bergouignan L,
    2. Chupin M,
    3. Czechowska Y,
    4. et al

    . Can voxel-based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression. Neuroimage 2009:45:29–37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science