Local Anesthesia with Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Vertebral Fracture Trial (LABEL): A Report of Outcomes and Comparison with the Investigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST)

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Buchbinder R,
   2. Osborne RH,
   3. Ebeling PR,
   4. et al

   . A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 557– 68

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Kallmes DF,
   2. Comstock BA,
   3. Heagerty PJ,
   4. et al

   . A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 569– 79

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Patrick DL,
   2. Deyo RA,
   3. Atlas SJ,
   4. et al

   . Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 1899– 908, discussion 1909
4. 4.↵
   1. Roland M,
   2. Fairbank J

   . The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3115– 24

   CrossRef
5. 5.↵
   1. Trout AT,
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Gray LA,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of vertebroplasty with a validated outcome measure: the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2652– 57

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Gray LA,
   2. Jarvik JG,
   3. Heagerty PJ,
   4. et al

   . INvestigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 126
7. 7.↵
   1. Dworkin RH,
   2. Turk DC,
   3. Wyrwich KW,
   4. et al

   . Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008; 9: 105– 21

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Farrar JT,
   2. Young JP Jr.,
   3. LaMoreaux L,
   4. et al

   . Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149– 58

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Ostelo RW,
   2. Deyo RA,
   3. Stratford P,
   4. et al

   . Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 90– 94

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Amar AP,
    2. Larsen DW,
    3. Esnaashari N,
    4. et al

    . Percutaneous transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal compression fractures. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 1105– 14, discussion 1114–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Barr JD,
    2. Barr MS,
    3. Lemley TJ,
    4. et al

    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 923– 28
12. 12.↵
    1. Hodler J,
    2. Peck D,
    3. Gilula LA

    . Midterm outcome after vertebroplasty: predictive value of technical and patient-related factors. Radiology 2003; 227: 662– 68

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Trout AT,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . The effects of cement volume on clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1933– 37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Buonocore M,
    2. Aloisi AM,
    3. Barbieri M,
    4. et al

    . Vertebral body innervation: implications for pain. J Cell Physiol 2010; 222: 488– 91

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Bolster MB

    . Consternation and questions about two vertebroplasty trials. Cleve Clin J Med 2010; 77: 12– 16

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Orr RD

    . Vertebroplasty, cognitive dissonance, and evidence-based medicine: what do we do when the ‘evidence' says we are wrong? Cleve Clin J Med 2010; 77: 8– 11

    FREE Full Text