Evaluation of CT Perfusion in the Setting of Cerebral Ischemia: Patterns and Pitfalls

References

1. 1.↵
   1. de Lucas EM,
   2. Sanchez E,
   3. Gutierrez A,
   4. et al

   . CT protocol for acute stroke: tips and tricks for general radiologists. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1673– 87

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581– 87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Dzialowski I,
   2. Hill MD,
   3. Coutts SB,
   4. et al

   . Extent of early ischemic changes on computed tomography (CT) before thrombolysis: prognostic value of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score in ECASS II. Stroke 2006; 37: 973– 78. Epub 2006 Feb 23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Furlan A,
   2. Higashida R,
   3. Wechsler L,
   4. et al

   . Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study—a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999; 282: 2003– 11

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Schramm P,
   2. Schellinger PD,
   3. Klotz E,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours' duration. Stroke 2004; 35: 1652– 58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Silvennoinen HM,
   2. Hamberg LM,
   3. Lindsberg PJ,
   4. et al

   . CT perfusion identifies increased salvage of tissue in patients receiving intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 3 hours of stroke onset. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1118– 23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Meuli R,
   3. Browaeys P,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of CT perfusion and angiography and MRI in selecting stroke patients for acute treatment. Neurology 2007; 68: 694– 97

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Hellier KD,
   2. Hampton JL,
   3. Guadagno JV,
   4. et al

   . Perfusion CT helps decision making for thrombolysis when there is no clear time of onset. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77: 417– 19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Parsons MW

   . Perfusion CT: is it clinically useful? Int J Stroke 2008; 3: 41– 50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Rai AT,
    2. Carpenter JS,
    3. Peykanu JA,
    4. et al

    . The role of CT perfusion imaging in acute stroke diagnosis: a large single-center experience. J Emerg Med 2008; 35: 287– 92

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Srinivasan A,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Al Azri F,
    4. et al

    . State-of-the-art imaging of acute stroke. Radiographics 2006; 26 ( suppl 1): S75– 95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Srinivasan A,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Lum C,
    4. et al

    . Processing and interpretation times of CT angiogram and CT perfusion in stroke. Can J Neurol Sci 2005; 32: 483– 86

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    Food and Drug Administration. Update on Safety Investigation of CT Brain Perfusion Scan. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm185898.htm. Accessed December 8, 2009
14. 14.↵
    The American Society of Neuroradiology and American College of Radiology Statement on CT Protocols and Radiation Dose. Available at: www.asnr.org/asnr_acr_ct_dose.shtml. Accessed January 8, 2010
15. 15.↵
    1. Knoepfli AS,
    2. Sekoranja L,
    3. Bonvin C,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of perfusion CT and TIBI grade in acute stroke for predicting thrombolysis benefit and clinical outcome. J Neuroradiol 2009; 36: 131– 37

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Schaefer PW,
    2. Barak ER,
    3. Kamalian S,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative assessment of core/penumbra mismatch in acute stroke: CT and MR perfusion imaging are strongly correlated when sufficient brain volume is imaged. Stroke 2008; 39: 2986– 92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Meier P,
    2. Zierler KL

    . On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954; 6: 731– 44

    FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Konstas AA,
    2. Goldmakher GV,
    3. Lee TY,
    4. et al

    . Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Part 1. Theoretic basis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 662– 68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Rostrup E,
    2. Knudsen GM,
    3. Law I,
    4. et al

    . The relationship between cerebral blood flow and volume in humans. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 1– 11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Heiss WD

    . Flow thresholds of functional and morphological damage of brain tissue. Stroke 1983; 14: 329– 31

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Flanders AE,
    3. Velthuis B,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 979– 85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Reichhart M,
    3. Thiran JP,
    4. et al

    . Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 417– 32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Schramm P,
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Fiebach JB,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2002; 33: 2426– 32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Murphy BD,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. et al

    . Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006; 37: 1771– 77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Fischbein NJ,
    3. Smith WS,
    4. et al

    . Accuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 104– 12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Furlan AJ,
    2. Eyding D,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. et al

    . Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS): evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours after stroke onset. Stroke 2006; 37: 1227– 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Albers G,
    3. Al-Rawi Y,
    4. et al

    . The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005; 36: 66– 73. Epub 2004 Nov 29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Davis SM,
    2. Donnan GA,
    3. Parsons MW,
    4. et al

    . Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 299– 309. Epub 2008 Feb 28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Nguyen TB,
    2. Lum C,
    3. Eastwood JD,
    4. et al

    . Hyperperfusion on perfusion computed tomography following revascularization for acute stroke. Acta Radiol 2005; 46: 610– 15

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Marchal G,
    2. Young AR,
    3. Baron JC

    . Early postischemic hyperperfusion: pathophysiologic insights from positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999; 19: 467– 82

    PubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Alexandrov AV,
    2. Black SE,
    3. Ehrlich LE,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of hemorrhagic transformation occurring spontaneously and on anticoagulants in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 1198– 202

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Marchal G,
    2. Beaudouin V,
    3. Rioux P,
    4. et al

    . Prolonged persistence of substantial volumes of potentially viable brain tissue after stroke: a correlative PET-CT study with voxel-based data analysis. Stroke 1996; 27: 599– 606

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Reichhart M,
    3. Cuisenaire O,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of admission perfusion computed tomography and qualitative diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 2025– 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Albers GW,
    3. Alexandrov AV,
    4. et al

    . Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. Stroke 2008; 39: 1621– 28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Sparacia G,
    2. Iaia A,
    3. Assadi B,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion CT in acute stroke: predictive value of perfusion parameters in assessing tissue viability versus infarction. Radiol Med 2007; 112: 113– 22

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Eastwood JD,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Wintermark M,
    4. et al

    . Correlation of early dynamic CT perfusion imaging with whole-brain MR diffusion and perfusion imaging in acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1869– 75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Eastwood JD,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Azhari T,
    4. et al

    . CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology 2002; 222: 227– 36

    PubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Mayer TE,
    2. Hamann GF,
    3. Baranczyk J,
    4. et al

    . Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1441– 49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Reichenbach JR,
    2. Rother J,
    3. Jonetz-Mentzel L,
    4. et al

    . Acute stroke evaluated by time-to-peak mapping during initial and early follow-up perfusion CT studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1842– 50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Miles KA,
    2. Griffiths MR

    . Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 220– 31

    FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Aviv RI,
    2. Mandelcorn J,
    3. Chakraborty S,
    4. et al

    . Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scoring of CT perfusion in early stroke visualization and assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1975– 80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Kloska SP,
    2. Dittrich R,
    3. Fischer T,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion CT in acute stroke: prediction of vessel recanalization and clinical outcome in intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2491– 98

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Lin K,
    2. Rapalino O,
    3. Law M,
    4. et al

    . Accuracy of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score during the first 3 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: comparison of noncontrast CT, CT angiography source images, and CT perfusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 931– 36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Parsons MW,
    2. Pepper EM,
    3. Chan V,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion computed tomography: prediction of final infarct extent and stroke outcome. Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 672– 79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Nagahori T,
    2. Hirashima Y,
    3. Umemura K,
    4. et al

    . Supratentorial dynamic computed tomography for the diagnosis of vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2004; 44: 105– 10, discussion 110–11

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Mori S,
    2. Obata T,
    3. Nakajima N,
    4. et al

    . Volumetric perfusion CT using prototype 256-detector row CT scanner: preliminary study with healthy porcine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2536– 41

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Mori S,
    2. Endo M,
    3. Nishizawa K,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 56– 61

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Sheikh K,
    2. Schipper MJ,
    3. Hoeffner EG

    . Feasibility of superficial temporal artery as the input artery for cerebral perfusion CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: W321– 29

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Sanelli PC,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Eastwood JD,
    4. et al

    . The effect of varying user-selected input parameters on quantitative values in CT perfusion maps. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 1085– 92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Murray AD,
    2. Staff RT,
    3. Shenkin SD,
    4. et al

    . Brain white matter hyperintensities: relative importance of vascular risk factors in nondemented elderly people. Radiology 2005; 237: 251– 57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Hatazawa J,
    2. Shimosegawa E,
    3. Satoh T,
    4. et al

    . Subcortical hypoperfusion associated with asymptomatic white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 1997; 28: 1944– 47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. O'Sullivan M,
    2. Lythgoe DJ,
    3. Pereira AC,
    4. et al

    . Patterns of cerebral blood flow reduction in patients with ischemic leukoaraiosis. Neurology 2002; 59: 321– 26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    1. Huynh TJ,
    2. Murphy B,
    3. Pettersen JA,
    4. et al

    . CT perfusion quantification of small-vessel ischemic severity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1831– 36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    1. Waaijer A,
    2. van der Schaaf IC,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. et al

    . Reproducibility of quantitative CT brain perfusion measurements in patients with symptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 927– 32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Grayev A,
    3. Rowley HA,
    4. et al

    . Variability of clinical CT perfusion measurements in patients with carotid stenosis. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 955– 61

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Huang BY,
    2. Castillo M

    . Radiological reasoning: extracranial causes of unilateral decreased brain perfusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: S49– 54

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Waaijer A,
    2. van Leeuwen MS,
    3. van Osch MJ,
    4. et al

    . Changes in cerebral perfusion after revascularization of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: CT measurement. Radiology 2007; 245: 541– 48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 58.↵
    1. Neumann-Haefelin T,
    2. Wittsack HJ,
    3. Fink GR,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI: influence of severe carotid artery stenosis on the DWI/PWI mismatch in acute stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 1311– 17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    1. Soares BP,
    2. Dankbaar JW,
    3. Bredno J,
    4. et al

    . Automated versus manual post-processing of perfusion-CT data in patients with acute cerebral ischemia: influence on interobserver variability. Neuroradiology 2009; 51: 445– 51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. 60.↵
    1. Kang KH,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Kim SY

    . Quantitative cerebrovascular reserve measured by acetazolamide-challenged dynamic CT perfusion in ischemic adult Moyamoya disease: initial experience with angiographic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1487– 93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
61. 61.↵
    1. Smith LM,
    2. Elkins JS,
    3. Dillon WP,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion-CT assessment of the cerebrovascular reserve: a revisit to the acetazolamide challenges. J Neuroradiol 2008; 35: 157– 64

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Rim NJ,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Shin YS,
    4. et al

    . Which CT perfusion parameter best reflects cerebrovascular reserve? Correlation of acetazolamide-challenged CT perfusion with single-photon emission CT in Moyamoya patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1658– 63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Dillon WP,
    3. Smith WS,
    4. et al

    . Visual grading system for vasospasm based on perfusion CT imaging: comparisons with conventional angiography and quantitative perfusion CT. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26: 163– 70

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    1. Laslo AM,
    2. Eastwood JD,
    3. Pakkiri P,
    4. et al

    . CT perfusion-derived mean transit time predicts early mortality and delayed vasospasm after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 79– 85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
65. 65.↵
    1. Nogueira RG,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Roccatagliata L,
    4. et al

    . Intra-arterial nicardipine infusion improves CT perfusion-measured cerebral blood flow in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced vasospasm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 160– 64. Epub 2008 Oct 22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
66. 66.↵
    1. Majoie CB,
    2. van Boven LJ,
    3. van de Beek D,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion CT to evaluate the effect of transluminal angioplasty on cerebral perfusion in the treatment of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2007; 6: 40– 44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
67. 67.↵
    1. Carlson AP,
    2. Yonas H

    . Radiographic assessment of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the physiological perspective. Neurol Res 2009; 31: 593– 604

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. 68.↵
    1. Zubkov AY,
    2. Rabinstein AA

    . Medical management of cerebral vasospasm: present and future. Neurol Res 2009; 31: 626– 31

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    1. Royter V,
    2. Paletz L,
    3. Waters MF

    . Stroke vs. status epilepticus: a case report utilizing CT perfusion. J Neurol Sci 2008; 266: 174– 76

    CrossRefPubMed
70. 70.↵
    1. Masterson K,
    2. Vargas MI,
    3. Delavelle J

    . Postictal deficit mimicking stroke: role of perfusion CT. J Neuroradiol 2009; 36: 48– 51. Epub 2008 Oct 5

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
71. 71.↵
    1. Hauf M,
    2. Slotboom J,
    3. Nirkko A,
    4. et al

    . Cortical regional hyperperfusion in nonconvulsive status epilepticus measured by dynamic brain perfusion CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 693– 98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text