Utility of the K-Means Clustering Algorithm in Differentiating Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Benign and Malignant Neck Pathologies

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Vandecaveye V,
   2. De Keyzer F,
   3. Nuyts S,
   4. et al

   . Detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion weighted MRI after (chemo)radiotherapy: correlation between radiologic and histopathologic findings. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 960–71

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Vandecaveye V,
   2. de Keyzer F,
   3. Vander Poorten V,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of the larynx for tumour recurrence by diffusion-weighted MRI after radiotherapy: initial experience in four cases. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 681–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Maeda M,
   2. Maier SE

   . Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of head and neck tumors. J Neuroradiol 2008; 35: 71–78

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Srinivasan A,
   2. Dvorak R,
   3. Perni K,
   4. et al

   . Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: early experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 40–44

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Wang J,
   2. Takashima S,
   3. Takayama F,
   4. et al

   . Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 621–30

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hartigan JA,
   2. Wong MA

   . Algorithm AS136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 1979; 28: 100–08

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. MacQueen JB

   . Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, California: University of California Press; 1967: 281–97
8. 8.↵
   1. Kanungo T,
   2. Mount DM,
   3. Netanyahu NS,
   4. et al

   . An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2002; 24: 881–92

   CrossRefWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Holzapfel K,
   2. Duetsch S,
   3. Fauser C,
   4. et al

   . Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 381–87

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Vandecaveye V,
    2. De Keyzer F,
    3. Hermans R

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in neck lymph adenopathy. Cancer Imaging 2008; 8: 173–80

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Maeda M,
    2. Kato H,
    3. Sakuma H,
    4. et al

    . Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1186–92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text