Tactile Sensory and Pain Networks in the Human Spinal Cord and Brain Stem Mapped by Means of Functional MR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Meyer R,
   2. Ringkamp M,
   3. Campbell J,
   4. et al

   . Peripheral Mechanisms of Cutaneous Nociception. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2006
2. 2.↵
   1. Creac’h C,
   2. Henry P,
   3. Caille JM,
   4. et al

   . Functional MR imaging analysis of pain-related brain activation after acute mechanical stimulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1402–06

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Hansson T,
   2. Brismar T

   . Tactile stimulation of the hand causes bilateral cortical activation: a functional magnetic resonance study in humans. Neurosci Lett 1999; 271: 29–32

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Blatow M,
   2. Nennig E,
   3. Durst A,
   4. et al

   . fMRI reflects functional connectivity of human somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 2007; 37: 927–36

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Dunckley P,
   2. Wise RG,
   3. Fairhurst M,
   4. et al

   . A comparison of visceral and somatic pain processing in the human brainstem using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 7333–41

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fairhurst M,
   2. Wiech K,
   3. Dunckley P,
   4. et al

   . Anticipatory brainstem activity predicts neural processing of pain in humans. Pain 2007; 128: 101–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Govers N,
   2. Beghin J,
   3. Van Goethem JW,
   4. et al

   . Functional MRI of the cervical spinal cord on 1.5 T with fingertapping: to what extent is it feasible? Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 73–81

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Madi S,
   2. Flanders AE,
   3. Vinitski S,
   4. et al

   . Functional MR imaging of the human cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1768–74

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Stracke CP,
   2. Pettersson LG,
   3. Schoth F,
   4. et al

   . Interneuronal systems of the cervical spinal cord assessed with BOLD imaging at 1.5 T. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 127–33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Yoshizawa T,
    2. Nose T,
    3. Moore GJ,
    4. et al

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor activation in the human cervical spinal cord. Neuroimage 1996; 4: 174–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Komisaruk BR,
    2. Mosier KM,
    3. Liu WC,
    4. et al

    . Functional localization of brainstem and cervical spinal cord nuclei in humans with fMRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 609–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Kornelsen J,
    3. Bergman A,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive assessment of the injured human spinal cord by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 59–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Kornelsen J,
    3. Lawrence J,
    4. et al

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging based on SEEP contrast: response function and anatomical specificity. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 843–50

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Krause V,
    3. Malisza KL,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of contrast changes in functional MRI of the human spinal cord at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 833–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Stroman PW

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of neuronal function in the spinal cord: spinal FMRI. Clin Med Res 2005; 3: 146–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Agosta F,
    2. Valsasina P,
    3. Caputo D,
    4. et al

    . Tactile-associated fMRI recruitment of the cervical cord in healthy subjects. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 340–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Stroman PW

    . Discrimination of errors from neuronal activity in functional MRI of the human spinal cord by means of general linear model analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 452–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Kornelsen J,
    3. Lawrence J

    . An improved method for spinal functional MRI with large volume coverage of the spinal cord. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 520–26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Tomanek B,
    3. Krause V,
    4. et al

    . Mapping of neuronal function in the healthy and injured human spinal cord with spinal fMRI. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 1854–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Field MJ,
    2. Bramwell S,
    3. Hughes J,
    4. et al

    . Detection of static and dynamic components of mechanical allodynia in rat models of neuropathic pain: are they signalled by distinct primary sensory neurones? Pain 1999; 83: 303–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Rainville P,
    2. Feine JS,
    3. Bushnell MC,
    4. et al

    . A psychophysical comparison of sensory and affective responses to four modalities of experimental pain. Somatosens Mot Res 1992; 9: 265–77

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Figley CR,
    3. Cahill CM

    . Spatial normalization, bulk motion correction and coregistration for functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord and brainstem. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 809–14

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Figley CR,
    2. Stroman PW

    . Investigation of human cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord motion: implications for imaging spinal cord structure and function. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 185–89

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. McGonigle DJ,
    2. Howseman AM,
    3. Athwal BS,
    4. et al

    . Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000; 11: 708–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Ashburner JT,
    3. Kiebel SJ

    . Random Effects Analysis. London: Academic Press; 2007
26. 26.↵
    1. DeArmond SJ,
    2. Dewey MM,
    3. Fusco MM

    . Structure of the Human Brain: A Photographic Atlas. New York: Oxford University Press; 1974
27. 27.↵
    1. Tamraz JC,
    2. Comair YG

    . The brainstem and cerebellum. In: Atlas of Regional Anatomy of the Brain using MRI. New York: Springer; 2006: 227–55
28. 28.↵
    1. Kimberley TJ,
    2. Lewis SM

    . Understanding neuroimaging. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 670–83

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Leitch J,
    2. Cahill CM,
    3. Ghazni N,
    4. et al

    . Spinal cord and brainstem activation in carpal tunnel syndrome patients in response to noxious stimuli: a spinal fMRI study. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 17th Annual Meeting, April 18–24, 2009; Honolulu, Hawaii
30. 30.↵
    1. Stroman PW

    . Spinal fMRI investigation of human spinal cord function over a range of innocuous thermal sensory stimuli and study-related emotional influences. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 10: 1333–46
31. 31.↵
    1. Ochoa JL,
    2. Yarnitsky D

    . Mechanical hyperalgesias in neuropathic pain patients: dynamic and static subtypes. Ann Neurol 1993; 33: 465–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Yezierski RP,
    2. Wilcox TK,
    3. Willis WD

    . The effects of serotonin antagonists on the inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract cells produced by stimulation in nucleus raphe magnus or periaqueductal gray. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1982; 220: 266–77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Besson JM

    . The neurobiology of pain. Lancet 1999; 353: 1610–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Willis WD,
    2. Westlund KN

    . Neuroanatomy of the pain system and of the pathways that modulate pain. J Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 14: 2–31

    PubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Gardner E,
    2. Marin J,
    3. Jessel T

    . The Bodily Senses. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000
36. 36.↵
    1. Kennedy PR

    . Corticospinal, rubrospinal and rubro-olivary projections: a unifying hypothesis. Trends Neurosci 1990; 13: 474–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Baumeister AA,
    2. Anticich TG,
    3. Hawkins MF,
    4. et al

    . Evidence that the substantia nigra is a component of the endogenous pain suppression system in the rat. Brain Res 1988; 447: 116–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Sotres-Bayon F,
    2. Torres-Lopez E,
    3. Lopez-Avila A,
    4. et al

    . Lesion and electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area modify persistent nociceptive behavior in the rat. Brain Res 2001; 898: 342–49

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Fields HL,
    2. Basbaum AI,
    3. Heinricher MM

    . Central Nervous System Mechanisms of Pain Modulation. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2006
40. 40.↵
    1. Monhemius R,
    2. Green DL,
    3. Roberts MH,
    4. et al

    . Periaqueductal grey mediated inhibition of responses to noxious stimulation is dynamically activated in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neurosci Lett 2001; 298: 70–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Sillery E,
    2. Bittar RG,
    3. Robson MD,
    4. et al

    . Connectivity of the human periventricular-periaqueductal gray region. J Neurosurg 2005; 103: 1030–34

    PubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Waters AJ,
    2. Lumb BM

    . Descending control of spinal nociception from the periaqueductal grey distinguishes between neurons with and without C-fibre inputs. Pain 2008; 134: 32–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Logothetis NK,
    2. Pauls J,
    3. Augath M,
    4. et al

    . Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 2001; 412: 150–57

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Menon RS,
    2. Ogawa S,
    3. Kim SG,
    4. et al

    . Functional brain mapping using magnetic resonance imaging: signal changes accompanying visual stimulation. Invest Radiol 1992; 27 (suppl 2): S47–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Ogawa S,
    2. Tank DW,
    3. Menon R,
    4. et al

    . Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 5951–55

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. McKiernan KA,
    2. Kaufman JN,
    3. Kucera-Thompson J,
    4. et al

    . A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation in functional neuroimaging. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 394–408

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Liu WC,
    2. Feldman SC,
    3. Cook DB,
    4. et al

    . fMRI study of acupuncture-induced periaqueductal gray activity in humans. Neuroreport 2004; 15: 1937–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    1. Maihofner C,
    2. Neundorfer B,
    3. Stefan H,
    4. et al

    . Cortical processing of brush-evoked allodynia. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 785–89

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Schweinhardt P,
    2. Glynn C,
    3. Brooks J,
    4. et al

    . An fMRI study of cerebral processing of brush-evoked allodynia in neuropathic pain patients. Neuroimage 2006; 32: 256–65

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Witting N,
    2. Kupers RC,
    3. Svensson P,
    4. et al

    . A PET activation study of brush-evoked allodynia in patients with nerve injury pain. Pain 2006; 120: 145–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Witting N,
    2. Kupers RC,
    3. Svensson P,
    4. et al

    . Experimental brush-evoked allodynia activates posterior parietal cortex. Neurology 2001; 57: 1817–24

    CrossRef
52. 52.↵
    1. Peyron R,
    2. Schneider F,
    3. Faillenot I,
    4. et al

    . An fMRI study of cortical representation of mechanical allodynia in patients with neuropathic pain. Neurology 2004; 63: 1838–46

    CrossRef
53. 53.↵
    1. Kiernan JA,
    2. Barr ML

    . Barr's The Human Nervous System: An Anatomical Viewpoint. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998
54. 54.↵
    1. Willis WD,
    2. Coggeshall RE

    . Structure of the dorsal horn. In: Sensory Mechanisms of the Spinal Cord 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1991: 155–84
55. 55.↵
    1. Carpenter MB

    . Core Text of Neuroanatomy. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1991