Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePediatric Neuroimaging

Maturation of the Olfactory Bulbs: MR Imaging Findings

J.F. Schneider and F. Floemer
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2009, 30 (6) 1149-1152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1501
J.F. Schneider
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Floemer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of time-related maturational changes of the olfactory bulb (OB) on MR imaging may help early identification of patients with abnormal OB development and anatomic-based odor-cueing anomalies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two separate reviewers retrospectively analyzed coronal T2-weighted spin-echo MR images of the frontobasal region in 121 patients. There were 22 patients who underwent MR imaging examinations several times, accounting for a total of 156 studies. Age range was 1 day to 19.6 years. OBs were bilaterally identified in all cases and categorized according to their shape and signal intensity.

RESULTS: Three different anatomic patterns were identified. In pattern 1 (median age, 15 days; age range, 1–168 days), the OBs were round to oval with a continuous external T2-hypointense rim and a prominent T2-hyperintense central area. In pattern 2 (median age, 287 days; age range, 4 days–22 months), the OBs were U shaped, with thinning and concave deformation of the superior layer. A hyperintense central area on T2-weighted images was still visible. In pattern 3 (median age, 5.2 years; age range, 107 days–19.6 years), the OBs were small, round, or J shaped with a more prominent lateral part. No difference in signal intensity between the central area and the peripheral layer was identified anymore.

CONCLUSIONS: The OBs show time-related maturational changes on MR imaging. There is a progressive reorganization of the peripheral neuronal layers and signal intensity changes of the central area, which are completed at the end of the second year, paralleling cerebral maturational changes.

Normal anatomy of the olfactory pathways and many congenital or acquired anomalies have been repetitively described.1–6 Despite considerable advance in knowledge regarding the complex neuronal network associated with olfactory stimulation, information describing the normal maturation process in the neonatal period and childhood is scarce. There is experimental evidence that anomalies of the face are linked to abnormal development of the olfactory placode and bulbs.7 The importance of early detection of congenital anomalies of the development of the olfactory bulbs (OBs) is not only to identify patients with odor-coding deficiencies, but also to trigger thorough examination of the frontobasal area and midline structures, which are embryologically related, and to look for associated cerebral malformations. Because it is recognized that OBs and nerves are not real cranial nerves but extensions of the telencephalic vesicles, we postulated that their maturation should parallel cerebral maturation and be detected by MR imaging. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to identify and characterize age-dependent maturational changes in the OBs and tracts.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Two reviewers retrospectively analyzed all routine brain MR examinations done at our institution between January 2004 and January 2007. The local ethics committee approved the study. Examinations were excluded in cases of preterm neonates, incomplete visualization of the OBs, and evidence of brain malformation or generalized brain pathologic conditions.

A total of 121 children were considered eligible for the study, of which 22 children had 2 or more consecutive studies. There were a total of 156 cranial MR imaging examinations, of which 57 were multiple follow-ups. There were 66 boys (55%) and 53 girls (44%). Age range was 1 day to 19.6 years (median, 373 days). Written informed consent before examination was obtained for all patients.

Image Data Analysis

Cranial MR imaging examinations were performed on a clinical 1.5T MR imaging system (Picker 1.5T; Picker International, Cleveland, Ohio) and included coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence, which is part of our routine examination protocol. Scan parameters were TR, 8490 ms; TE, 119 ms; matrix, 256 × 384; FOV, 160 mm; section thickness, 3 mm; NEX, 2; and number of sections, 31. The OBs were identified as prominent structures located above the cribriform plate with a posterior thinning into the olfactory tracts, which could be followed in all cases up to their frontobasal and, sometimes, to their limbic projectional areas. Visual inspection on coronal T2-weighted FSE images were consensually analyzed by 2 observers (F.F. and J.F.S.), and the OBs were discriminated according to their shape and signal intensity pattern.

Median age and demographic distribution graphs were performed with JMP software (JMP IN, version 5.1.2; SAS, Cary, NC).

Results

Immediately after birth, at a median age of 15 days (age range, 1–168 days), the OBs had a round to oval shape in 69 studies. At that stage, a continuous external T2-hypointense rim that demonstrated the same signal intensity as that of the cortical layer of cerebral hemispheres, and a central T2-hyperintensity correlating with the signal intensity of the cerebral white matter were seen in all cases (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Pattern 1 of OBs (black arrows) shows a continuous external neuronal layer and a central area of T2-hyperintense unmyelinated white matter.

At a median age of 287 days (age range, 4 days–22 months) the OBs demonstrated thinning and slight concave deformation of their superior aspect, leading to a U-shaped appearance in 48 studies. The periphery still showed identical signal intensity to the cerebral cortex, and the central area also showed similar signal intensity compared with cerebral white matter (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Pattern 2 of OBs (black arrows) shows a thinning of the superior aspect and a still T2-hyperintense, not yet fully myelinated, central white matter area.

At a median age of 5.2 years (age range, 107 days–19.6 years), the OBs demonstrated an adult-type form that was smaller than those of the previous stages, with a predominantly round or slightly J-shaped aspect in 39 studies. In many cases, the lateral part of the bulbs was more prominent than the medial part. The central part was no longer distinct from the periphery and, as in the previous stages, showed a signal intensity that was identical to the myelinated cerebral white matter (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Pattern 3 of OBs (black arrows) shows a slightly J-shaped form with a more prominent lateral neuronal layer and a now fully myelinated central white matter area.

No correlation with the sex of the children was found. Age distribution according to the form and signal intensity pattern of the OB can be seen in Fig 4.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Demographics and age repartition according to the MR imaging pattern of OBs.

Discussion

MR imaging has been successfully used to analyze the normal adult anatomy of the OBs1–4 and to depict abnormal olfactory pathways.5–7 Embryonic and fetal maturational changes have been studied in a fixed specimen.8 To date, only 1 study has reported on the appearance of fetal OBs in vivo.9 Our study focused on postnatal development, and our results demonstrate that OBs are well-organized structures that undergo a predefined and predictable maturational process, with rapidly developing olfactory activity ensuing.

Olfactory activity has been demonstrated to begin in utero, with an active intake of chemosensory information as part of the normal fetal experience that shapes the development of subsequent chemosensory sensitivities and preferences. The immature fetal brain is able to register amniotic odor or cues.10 Neonates actively encode odor cues associated with their mothers’ breast and discriminate the odor of their mother's skin or milk from those of other mothers. This ability allows them to modify their feeding behavior according to the milk flavor.11–13 In general, the neonate brain is extremely receptive to the odor environment. During the first years of life, the role of olfaction is probably very important to mother-child bonding.14

In opposition to other cranial nerves, with the exception of the optic nerve, the OB is a true neocerebral extension. The primordial of the olfactory apparatus appears in late somite embryos as 2 ectodermal thickenings, the olfactory or nasal placodes situated above the stomatodeum and below and lateral to the forebrain. By the proliferation of the surrounding mesoderm, these placodes become depressed to form the olfactory pits that represent the future site of the olfactory nerve. Further growth of the mesoderm causes the epithelium of each nasal placode to lie in the medial and lateral walls of the upper fifth of the corresponding nasal cavity. Conversely, the neuroblasts in the olfactory epithelium itself differentiate into nerve cells and give origin to olfactory nerve fibers that grow toward the apical region of the corresponding cerebral hemisphere. In their course, the fibers pierce the roof of the cartilaginous nasal capsule, which has developed around the primitive nasal cavity. They penetrate into the apical region of the hemisphere, which projects ventrally toward the olfactory placode, which in turn will become the elongated OBs. Eventually, the extension of the ventricular cavity into the OBs will become obliterated.

Reflecting their embryologic origin, the external layer of the OBs, as suggested by our study, consists of a rim of neurons originally derived from the cortex of the telencephalic vesicle. Cytoarchitectural studies have shown that in rodents, peripheral neurons are, to some extent, derived from migratory neurons originating from the prestriatal subventricular zone but can also originate from progenitor cells organized around the core of the OBs.15,16 A similar migratory pathway has only been identified once in humans,17 but this finding is controversial.18 These peripheral cells will eventually serve as a relay to the olfactory neurons from the nasal cavity. Therefore, considering that primary olfactory neurons project from beneath and from the side into the OB, the first maturational change we could recognize was a thinning of the upper aspect of the bulb itself, which might reflect reorganization of those neuronal layers that do not receive olfactory inputs. At the periphery of the OB, the external olfactory nerve layer and the glomerular cells layer located immediately beneath show a prominent lateral and inferior protrusion, whereas the superior aspect is extremely thin to nonexistent (Fig 5). The asymmetric laminar neuronal distribution has been demonstrated in rodents and is seen more pronounced in adult humans.19 This is in contrast to embryonic and fetal human specimens, in which an even, circular distribution of the peripheral layer of the immature OB is seen.8 In the later stages of postnatal development, we observed that the lateral part of the OBs (which becomes somewhat J shaped) will become more prominent than its medial counterpart. This can be attributed to the fact that the lateral stria as a posterior extension of the OB is the predominant anatomic bundle that projects to the primary olfactory centers of the limbic system.20

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Schematic drawing with a coronal cut through the OB, demonstrating asymmetric neuronal layering in an adult OB. a, Nasal olfactory epithelium. b, Cribriform plate. c, Glomerular layer. d, Mitral cell layer. e, Olfactory bulb. f, Olfactory tract.

Considering the central area of the OBs, it not only consists of bundles of axons that project to the primary olfactory area but also consists of a rich extracellular matrix and multiple interneurons coming from the anterior part of the ganglionic eminence (aGE). These axons and synaptic networks undergo progressive myelination that is reflected by the fact that the signal intensity of the center of the OBs parallels the signal intensity of the cerebral white matter. On the other hand, there is reduction in an extracellular matrix and a corresponding reduction of signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Both processes lead to almost identical signal intensity between the central and peripheral layers after the normal adult-type pattern is reached. As shown in Fig 3, pattern 2 was seen only up to 22 months after birth, confirming that the adultlike pattern 3 is seen in all cases after completion of the second year of life. This parallels the visual end of myelination, as seen on T2-weighted images for the cerebral white matter. It has been postulated that this central T2-hyperintensity could represent fluid-filled remnants of the ventricular cavity extension into the OBs as in other mammals,17 which has been disputed18 and is not reflected by our results.

The interpretation of our results is subject to some limitations. First, although all 3 maturation steps of the OBs do always occur, there is a large interindividual variability in the timing of maturation that seems to be less regular or predictable than cerebral maturation. For instance, the adultlike pattern 3 could be seen as early as 3 months after birth but was the single pattern recorded in children older than 2 years. Moreover, in all children with repeated MR imaging examinations, it was possible to show intraindividual age-related changes. Serial examinations of the same children clearly depicted all 3 presented patterns as an organized temporal process (Fig 6). This finding strengthens the hypothesis of a consistent maturational process, albeit not as strictly timed as in the cerebral hemispheres.

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Serial MR imaging examinations (from top to bottom: ages 2 months, 8 months, and 18 months) in the same child show all 3 maturational steps.

In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate that OBs show time-related maturational changes. There was a progressive reorganization of the peripheral neuronal layers and central structures, leading to an adultlike aspect in all children no later than the end of the second year, paralleling maturational changes of cerebral white matter.

References

  1. ↵
    Suzuki M, Takashima T, Kadoya M, et al. MR imaging of olfactory bulbs and tracts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:955–57
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. Yousem DM, Geckle RJ, Bilker WB, et al. Olfactory bulb and tract and temporal lobe volumes. Normative data across decades. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;855:546–55
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Held P, Seitz J, Fründ R, et al. MRI detection of olfactory bulb and tract. J Neuroradiol 2000;27:112–18
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Iida Y, Naito M, Asahina N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the olfactory apparatus. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:869–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Magnetic resonance imaging of the olfactory apparatus. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996;8:80–86
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Li C, Yousem DM, Doty RL, et al. Neuroimaging in patients with olfactory dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:411–18
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Cohen MM Jr. Malformations of the craniofacial region: evolutionary, embryonic, genetic, and clinical perspectives. Am J Med Genet 2002 :115:245–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Müller F, O'Rahilly R. Olfactory structures in staged human embryos. Cells Tissues Organs 2004;178:93–116
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Azoulay R, Fallet-Bianco C, Garel C, et al. MRI of the olfactory bulbs and sulci in human fetuses. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:97–107
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Delaunay-El Allam M, Marlier L, et al. Learning at the breast: preference formation for an artificial scent and its attraction against the odor of maternal milk. Infant Behav Dev 2006;29:308–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Schaal B, Marlier L, Soussignan R. Olfactory function in the human fetus: evidence from selective neonatal responsiveness to the odor of amniotic fluid. Behav Neurosci 1998;112:1438–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. Cernoch JM, Porter RH. Recognition of maternal axillary odors by infants. Child Dev 1985;56:1593–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Varendi H, Porter RH, Winberg J. Does the newborn baby find the nipple by smell? Lancet 1994;344:989–90
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Hall B. Changing composition of human milk and early development of an appetite control. Lancet 1975;1:779–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Shapiro EM, Gonzalez-Perez O, Manuel García-Verdugo J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the migration of neuronal precursors generated in the adult rodent brain. Neuroimage 2006;32:1150–57
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Liu Z, Martin LJ. Olfactory bulb core is a rich source of neural progenitor and stem cells in adult rodent and human. J Comp Neurol 2003;459:368–91
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Curtis MA, Kam M, Nannmark U, et al. Human neuroblasts migrate to the olfactory bulb via a lateral ventricular extension. Science 2007;315:1243–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Sanai N, Berger MS, Garcia-Verdugo JM, et al. Comment on “Human neuroblasts migrate to the olfactory bulb via a lateral ventricular extension”. Science 2007;318:393 ; author reply 393
    PubMed
  19. ↵
    Maresh A, Gil DR, Whitman MC, et al. Principles of glomerular organization in the human olfactory bulb–implications for odor processing. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2640
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Shipley MT, Reyes P. Anatomy of the human olfactory bulb and central olfactory pathways. In: Laing DG, Doty RL, Breipohl W (eds). The Human Sense of Smell. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;1991 :29–60
  • Received July 4, 2008.
  • Accepted after revision December 17, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 6
June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maturation of the Olfactory Bulbs: MR Imaging Findings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J.F. Schneider, F. Floemer
Maturation of the Olfactory Bulbs: MR Imaging Findings
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2009, 30 (6) 1149-1152; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1501

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Maturation of the Olfactory Bulbs: MR Imaging Findings
J.F. Schneider, F. Floemer
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2009, 30 (6) 1149-1152; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1501
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantitative Analysis of the Olfactory System in COVID-19: An MR Imaging Study
  • Olfactory Bulb Signal Abnormality in Patients with COVID-19 Who Present with Neurologic Symptoms
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI-Based Morphometric Parameters for Detecting Olfactory Nerve Dysfunction
  • MR Imaging-Based Evaluations of Olfactory Bulb Atrophy in Patients with Olfactory Dysfunction
  • Crossref (24)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Correlation between olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function in children and adolescents
    T. Hummel, M. Smitka, S. Puschmann, J. C. Gerber, B. Schaal, D. Buschhüter
    Experimental Brain Research 2011 214 2
  • Odor identification testing in children and young adults using the smell wheel
    E. Leslie Cameron, Richard L. Doty
    International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2013 77 3
  • A Comparative Olfactory MRI, DTI and fMRI Study of COVID-19 Related Anosmia and Post Viral Olfactory Dysfunction
    Duzgun Yildirim, Sedat Giray Kandemirli, Deniz Esin Tekcan Sanli, Ozlem Akinci, Aytug Altundag
    Academic Radiology 2022 29 1
  • Olfactory Bulb Signal Abnormality in Patients with COVID-19 Who Present with Neurologic Symptoms
    S.B. Strauss, J.E. Lantos, L.A. Heier, D.R. Shatzkes, C.D. Phillips
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2020 41 10
  • MR Imaging–Based Evaluations of Olfactory Bulb Atrophy in Patients with Olfactory Dysfunction
    M.S. Chung, W.R. Choi, H.-Y. Jeong, J.H. Lee, J.H. Kim
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 3
  • Quantitative Analysis of the Olfactory System in COVID-19: An MR Imaging Study
    E. Altunisik, A.H. Baykan, S. Sahin, E. Aydin, S.M. Erturk
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021 42 12
  • Neuroradiological Basis of COVID‐19 Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Claire Jing‐Wen Tan, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Xin Yan Tan, Hui Ting Liu, Chong Boon Teo, Anna See, Shuhui Xu, Song Tar Toh, Si Wei Kheok, Tze Choong Charn, Neville Wei Yang Teo
    The Laryngoscope 2022 132 6
  • Imaging of lamination patterns of the adult human olfactory bulb and tract: In vitro comparison of standard- and high-resolution 3T MRI, and MR microscopy at 9.4T
    Hartmut P. Burmeister, Thomas Bitter, Patrick M. Heiler, Andrey Irintchev, Rosemarie Fröber, Matthias Dietzel, Pascal A. Baltzer, Lothar R. Schad, Jürgen R. Reichenbach, Hilmar Gudziol, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Werner A. Kaiser
    NeuroImage 2012 60 3
  • The Shape of the Olfactory Bulb Predicts Olfactory Function
    Xiaoguang Yan, Akshita Joshi, Yunpeng Zang, Francisca Assunção, Henrique M. Fernandes, Thomas Hummel
    Brain Sciences 2022 12 2
  • Olfactory bulb ventricles as a frequent finding—a myth or reality? Evaluation using high resolution 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    H.P. Burmeister, T. Bitter, P.A.T. Baltzer, M. Dietzel, O. Guntinas-Lichius, H. Gudziol, W.A. Kaiser
    Neuroscience 2011 172

More in this TOC Section

  • Neuroimaging Delineation and Progression of SLSMD
  • fetal brain development of 10 weeks gestation
  • CHARGE fetal MRI clival cleft
Show more Pediatric Neuroimaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire