Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Postoperative Evaluation of Changes in Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Graft Using Superficial Temporal Artery Duplex Ultrasonography

A. Nakamizo, T. Inoue, Y. Kikkawa, K. Uda, Y. Hirata, K. Okamura, M. Yasaka and Y. Okada
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 900-905; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1468
A. Nakamizo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Inoue
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Kikkawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Uda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Hirata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Okamura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Yasaka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Okada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extracranial-intracranial (ECIC) bypass grafts have been assessed postoperatively by various neuroradiologic techniques. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate postoperative changes in ECIC bypass graft by using superficial temporal artery duplex ultrasonography (STDU). Furthermore, this study assessed the ability of STDU to predict cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients who underwent ECIC bypass procedure for atherosclerotic internal carotid artery occlusion were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent single-photon emission CT and STDU preoperatively, 14 days after, 3 months after, 1 year after, and 2 years after ECIC bypass.

RESULTS: The diameter and flow velocities of the ipsilateral superficial temporal artery (STA), and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) showed increase during the first 2 weeks and then remained stable, whereas CVR showed a constant improvement up to 2 years after surgery. The STA diameter and mean STA flow velocity correlated significantly with CVR at 1 year after surgery (r 2 = 0.1232 and r 2 = 0.08716, respectively; P < .05). A cutoff value of 1.8 mm STA diameter was determined as the most reliable value to predict CVR greater than 10% at 1 year after surgery. The positive predictive value was calculated as 96.6%, the negative predictive value as 43.8%, the sensitivity as 75.7%, the specificity as 87.5%, and the likelihood ratio as 6.056.

CONCLUSIONS: ECIC bypass grafts can be assessed postoperatively in a noninvasive fashion with STDU. This technique provides information regarding patency as well as quantitative assessment of bypass function. Moreover, STDU is useful to predict CVR improvement.

Since the introduction of extracranial-intracranial (ECIC) bypass in 1969,1 the procedure has been used for the effective treatment of internal carotid artery occlusion and middle cerebral artery stenosis.1–4 Although 1 international randomized trial reported that ECIC bypass surgery was not effective to prevent stroke, that study may have been limited by its broad inclusion criteria.5 By contrast, a randomized trial of strictly selected patients with severe cerebral hemodynamic failure has just been finalized in Japan (Japan ECIC bypass trial: JET study; unique trial number C000000144).6 Previous studies suggested that improvement in blood flow via ECIC bypass correlated with presurgical cerebral hemodynamics.7–9 Indeed, many authors demonstrated that patients with impaired vasodilatory ability to a physiologic stimulus were at very high risk for subsequent stroke if not treated.10–13 Such hemodynamic conditions have now been recognized as reduced cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVR).14–17

Catheter- and MR-based angiography are typically used to evaluate the postoperative bypass patency.1,5,18,19 Because such anatomic grading systems assess the patency alone,20 they are not adequate tools to predict the blood flow arriving to the brain and, consequently, the outcome. Therefore, other modalities are needed to assess the function of ECIC bypass. Although the short-term effects of ECIC bypass on cerebral hemodynamics have been investigated with various neuroradiologic techniques, including positron-emission tomography (PET),21–23 single-photon emission CT (SPECT), and xenon-enhanced CT scanning,8,16,22–24 these modalities are complicated, expensive, time consuming, and invasive because they expose patients to radiation, making them ill suited for use in the outpatient setting or for long-term routine follow-up of ECIC bypass. As a result of the unavailability of simple assessment techniques, only a few reports have been published on postoperative maturation of bypass grafts.25,26 For example, Murata et al26 used near-infrared spectroscopy to demonstrate that ECIC bypass maintained cerebral blood oxygenation at 1 year postoperatively, which suggests that the superficial temporal artery (STA) flow increased gradually for a certain period postoperatively. We recently described the usefulness of STA duplex ultrasonography (STDU) in the assessment of short-term perioperative changes in STA flow velocity and diameter after ECIC bypass.27,28 The ipsilateral STA mean blood flow velocity is a highly sensitive parameter to predict regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory at 14 days after ECIC bypass in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion or middle cerebral artery stenosis.

The goal of our study was to perform a similar analysis on a longer (2 year) time scale. Internal carotid artery occlusive lesions were assessed, and the hypotheses were proposed: 1) ECIC bypass continues to develop both morphologically and functionally after surgery, resulting in improving cerebral hemodynamics over time; and 2) STDU provides the ability to noninvasively assess both the patency and the function of ECIC bypasses and to easily predict cerebral hemodynamics even in the outpatient setting.

Materials and Methods

Patient Population

Forty-five consecutive patients who underwent ECIC bypass procedure (ie, anastomosis of the STA and MCA) for internal carotid artery occlusion in our institution from May 2001 to November 2006 were enrolled in this prospective study. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of our institute. All patients gave informed consent to undergo cerebral angiography and the ECIC bypass procedure. In accordance with the entry criteria for the JET study,6 the following criteria were adopted as indications for ECIC bypass: rCBF of the ipsilateral MCA less than 32 mL/100 g/min (corresponding to 80% of normal value), and a CVR less than 10% in a quantitative SPECT study with a acetazolamide (ACZ) challenge. Angiographic confirmation of bypass patency was obtained at 14 days after surgery in all cases. All patients underwent MR angiography, SPECT, and STDU before, 14 days after, 3 months after, 1 year after, and 2 years after ECIC bypass.

Surgery

All STA-MCA anastomotic procedures were performed by the same neurosurgical team. Anesthesia included fentanyl citrate, thiamylal sodium, and propofol. Single STA-MCA anastomosis was performed in the patients whose anterior or posterior STA branch was not suitable to harvest or who had severe arteriosclerosis obliterans preoperatively. Blood pressure was controlled to a target of less than 150 mm Hg systolic and 90 mm Hg diastolic in all patients with use of nitroglycerin and/or diltiazem for 7 days after the surgery.

SPECT

The SPECT apparatus consisted of the PRISM 2000X device (2-head SPECT system; Picker, Cleveland, Ohio), and iodine 123 N-isopropyl-p-[123I]-iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP) was used as the tracer. An elliptical region of interest, more than 16 cm2 in size, was placed in the cortical area in the MCA territory of each side. Areas of infarct, if present, were carefully excluded from the region of interest, if possible. We measured the resting rCBF values quantitatively by using autoradiography.29 The rCBF values were also measured after the ACZ challenge test. We expressed CVR using the following equation: CVR = (post-ACZ rCBF-resting rCBF)/resting rCBF.

STDU

An HDI-5000 (Philips, Bothell, Wash) with a 12- to 5-MHz linear array transducer was used for STDU. Subjects were examined by well-trained and experienced sonographers. The sonographers were technicians who had been educated in basic sonography technology and human anatomy. In addition, they received 3 months to 1 year of training, including use of the sonography system, reading procedures, and quality-control programs. For the examination of STA, each patient was examined in the supine position with the patient's head facing the contralateral side. The transducer was placed in the temporal region in close approximation to the external auditory meatus, and STA was displayed on the B-mode image with color Doppler. The diameter of the bilateral STA was measured. On the longitudinal scans, the sample volume was set within the STA at a point proximal to its bifurcation. The incident angle between the STA and the Doppler beam was kept at 60° or less. Range-gated pulsed Doppler sonography was used to measure the blood flow velocity of the STA. We measured the absolute value of peak-systolic, end-diastolic, and mean flow velocity of bilateral STAs by using the maximal frequency envelope.

MR Imaging

We performed MR imaging preoperatively, 2 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery by using a 1.5T whole-body MR imager (Magnetom Symphony, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; and Signa Infinity Excite, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis). In all patients, the diameter of STA at 1 year after surgery was measured at just proximal to the surgical bone defect of the temporal bone on thin-section enhanced axial MR imaging.

Data Analysis

Changes in parameters of STDU and SPECT were observed, and the relationships between the parameters were investigated. To analyze postoperative change in STDU and SPECT parameters, we obtained a dataset from 30 patients who were observed for 2 years after surgery. For unpaired t test and linear regression analysis, we obtained a dataset from 45 patients who were observed for 1 year after surgery. The Friedman test with post hoc Dunn test was used to assess differences in STA flow velocities, STA diameter, rCBF, or CVR before and after surgery. The unpaired t test was used to assess differences in STA diameter or STA flow velocity according to CVR. Linear regression analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the correlation between STA diameter of MRA and STDU, and between changes in CVR and the mean STA flow velocity or STA diameter. Cutoff values were defined for STA diameter. Sensitivity, specificity, and the likelihood ratio were calculated to predict postoperative CVR higher than 10%. In all procedures, a P value of less than .05 was considered to represent statistical significance.

Results

Patient Population

Thirty-five men and 10 women (mean age ± SD, 62 ± 7.8 years; age range, 45–78 years) were included. With respect to cerebrovascular risk factors, hypertension was present in 32 patients (71%), diabetes mellitus in 21 (47%), hypercholesterolemia in 25 (56%), smoking in 24 (53%), and chronic alcohol use in 28 (62%). Initial symptom was transient ischemic attack in 16 patients (36%) and brain infarction in 25 patients (56%). Two patients had previous brain infarction. Eighteen patients underwent single STA-MCA anastomosis, and 27 patients underwent double STA-MCA anastomosis. Of these, 30 patients were observed for more than 2 years after surgery. Complications were not observed for any patients undergoing the STA-MCA anastomosis procedure. There were no neurologic symptoms or new ischemic lesions on the MR imaging during the observation period. STA diameter of MRA correlated with that of STDU at 1 year after surgery (r2 = 0.1208; P < .05).

Postoperative Changes in STDU Parameters

Flow velocities of the ipsilateral STA were significantly higher at 14 days after ECIC bypass compared with before bypass (27.2 ± 6.2 cm/s preoperatively vs 57.1 ± 23.8 cm/s 14 days after surgery, P < .0001 in mean flow velocity; 13.9 ± 4.2 cm/s preoperatively vs 40.2 ± 18.0 cm/s 14 days after surgery, P < .001 in end-diastolic flow velocity; 64.3 ± 18.7 cm/s at preoperatively vs 91.5 ± 33.7 cm/s 14 days after surgery, P < .001 in systolic flow velocity). Furthermore, these values remained stable between 3 months and 2 years after surgery (Fig 1). The diameter of the ipsilateral STA was also larger at 14 days after ECIC bypass compared with before bypass (P < .0001), and these values remained stable between 3 months and 2 years after surgery. There was no statistical difference in STDU parameters between single and double anastomosis at 1 year after surgery (data not shown).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Postoperative changes in systolic (A), end-diastolic (B), and mean (C) STA flow velocity (FV), and diameter or STA (D). *P < .01, **P < .05, n.s. = not significant.

Postoperative Changes in SPECT Parameters

The resting rCBF and CVR of the ipsilateral MCA territory were significantly higher at 14 days after ECIC bypass compared with before bypass (P < .0001 in each). Resting rCBF remained stable between 3 months and 2 years after surgery (Fig 2). By contrast, CVR continued to increase gradually until 2 years after surgery (1.6 ± 13.7% preoperatively, 22.2 ± 14.9% 14 days after surgery, 27.4 ± 22.2% 3 months after surgery, 29.0 ± 20.0% 1 year after surgery, and 36.1 ± 20.8% 2 years after surgery). There was no statistical difference in SPECT parameters between single and double anastomosis 1 year after surgery (data not shown).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Postoperative changes in resting rCBF (left) and CVR (right). *P < .01, **P < .05.

Correlation between STDU Parameters and SPECT Parameters

Among the 3 parameters of STA flow velocity (Table 1), the mean STA flow velocity had the strongest correlation with CVR (r2 = 0.08716; P < .05; Fig 3). STA diameter also correlated with CVR (r2 = 0.1232; P < .05). Both correlations were stronger at the 1-year time point than at the 3-month time point (data not shown). Resting rCBF did not correlate with any parameters of STDU.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Correlation between STDU parameters and SPECT parameters at 1 year after surgery. Mean STA flow velocity (mFV) and CVR (A), systolic STA flow velocity (sFV) and CVR (B), end-diastolic STA flow velocity (EDV) and CVR (C), and STA diameter and CVR (D).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Correlation between STDU parameters and CVR at different time point after surgery

Predictive Values of STA Diameter for CVR Greater than 10%

At 1 year after ECIC bypass, 82% of patients demonstrated CVR greater than 10%. The Student t test revealed a statistically significant difference in STA diameter between patients with high CVR (>10%; n = 37) and with low CVR (<10%; n = 8; P < .01) 1 year after surgery (Fig 4). This difference was more significant than at 14 days (P < .05) or 3 months after surgery (P < .05). The Student t test also revealed a statistically significant difference in STA flow velocities between patients with high CVR and with low CVR at 1 year after surgery (P < .05 in systolic flow velocity, P < .01 in end-diastolic flow velocity, P < .001 in mean flow velocity). As shown in Table 2, a cutoff value of 1.8 mm was detected as the most reliable value to predict CVR greater than 10%. The positive predictive value was calculated as 96.6%, the negative predictive value as 43.8%, the sensitivity as 75.7%, the specificity as 87.5%, and the positive likelihood ratio as 6.056.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Difference in diameter of STA (A), in systolic flow velocity (B), end-diastolic flow velocity (C), or mean flow velocity (D) between patients with low CVR (<10%; n = 8) and with high CVR (>10%; n = 37) at 1 year after surgery.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Predictive values for cerebrovascular reserve capacity higher than 10% at different cutoff values of diameter of STA at 1 year after ECIC bypass surgery

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that STDU can easily and serially confirm the patency and long-term changes in bypass morphologic features and function after ECIC bypass. Furthermore, STA bypass grafts were stable at least until 2 years after surgery.

Bypass failure occurs at an average of 2.7 years after surgery.30 However, modalities for long-term postoperative follow-up of bypass grafts function (eg, PET and SPECT) are not cost effective for serial use in the outpatient setting. Amin-Hanjani et al31 reported that quantitative MR angiography could directly measure flow in milliliters per minute in the vessels of interest. Our study demonstrated that STDU is likely of similar usefulness. In contrast to SPECT, MR imaging, or DSA, STDU is noninvasive, is available at the bedside or outpatient clinic, and is well suited for serial examination without any contraindications. Arakawa et al32 previously described the usefulness of STDU in the evaluation of STA flow velocity. They indicated that the end-diastolic flow velocity ratio of the operated STA to the contralateral STA is a highly sensitive parameter to evaluate the extent of the bypass flow.

Previous studies have described short-term data for STDU in the perioperative evaluation of ECIC bypass grafts.27,28 For example, Inoue et al28 demonstrated that mean STA flow velocity significantly correlated with resting rCBF at 14 days after ECIC bypass, whereas mean STA flow velocity and STA diameter did not correlate with CVR. In our study, there was no correlation between STDU parameters and resting rCBF, but STDU parameters correlated with CVR at 1 year after surgery. The mechanism underlying the disappearance of the correlation between mean STA flow velocity and resting rCBF at 1 year after ECIC bypass remains unclear. In the postoperative developing process of the bypass, there might be a limitation in the dilation of the STA, and the increase in rCBF might depend only on an increase in the STA flow velocity, whereas rCBF might be maintained constantly not only by the STA flow velocity but also by the dilation of the STA after establishment of autoregulation. A possible reason for the lack of the correlation between STDU parameters and CVR at 14 days after ECIC bypass is that the STA was maximally dilated in the immediate postoperative period because of preoperative impairments in cerebral hemodynamics; in other words, the vasodilatory ability of the STA had not yet recovered. Our study focused on CVR rather than on resting CBF because postoperative improvements in CVR may result from newly established collateral vessel from the extracranial to the cerebral circulation, especially in view of the substantial anastomotic filling of cortical vessels.8 Although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, results from our study suggest that the matured STA may have the ability to respond to physiologic stimuli.

Another goal of this study was to assess the ability of STDU to predict CVR reserve and address whether this technique may by an adequate replacement for SPECT for the serial follow-up of bypass graft function. Many investigators have reported that patients with impaired CVR are at particularly high risk for subsequent stroke.10–13 Our study demonstrated that an STA diameter of 1.8 mm was a valuable cutoff value for the prediction of reserved cerebrovascular capacity. In the population in our study, all preoperative STA values were less than 1.8 mm. However, the STA in some patients with transdural anastomosis (ie, Moyamoya disease) are large, even preoperatively. In such patients, this cutoff value may not be reliable. Regardless, for clinical use in the general population, a 100% positive predictive value at 2.2-mm STA diameter and a 100% negative predictive value at 1.0-mm STA diameter are likely useful.

Our study had some drawbacks. We did not measure flow velocities and the diameter of STA before and after stimulation challenge. It would be helpful to confirm the theory that the STA was able to dilate in response to stimuli. In addition, we did not perform an outcome analysis because no patients demonstrated any cerebral ischemia during the observation. Additional follow-up is needed to clarify whether this technique can be used to predict adequacy of flow for the prevention of future strokes.

Conclusions

ECIC bypass grafts can be assessed postoperatively in a noninvasive fashion with use of STDU. This technique provides information regarding patency as well as quantitative assessment of bypass function. Moreover, a cutoff value of 1.8-mm STA diameter is useful to predict CVR improvement.

References

  1. ↵
    Yasargil MG, Yonekawa Y. Results of microsurgical extra-intracranial arterial bypass in the treatment of cerebral ischemia. Neurosurgery 1977;1:22–24
    PubMed
  2. Chater N. Neurosurgical extracranial-intracranial bypass for stroke: with 400 cases. Neurol Res 1983;5:1–9
    PubMed
  3. Gratzl O, Schmiedek P, Spetzler R, et al. Clinical experience with extra-intracranial arterial anastomosis in 65 cases. J Neurosurg 1976;44:313–24
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Sundt TM Jr, Whisnant JP, Fode NC, et al. Results, complications, and follow-up of 415 bypass operations for occlusive disease of the carotid system. Mayo Clin Proc 1985;60:230–40
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1191–2000
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    JET Study Group. Japanese EC-IC Trial (JET Study): Study design and interim analysis (in Japanese). Surg Cereb Stroke 2002;30:97–100
    CrossRef
  7. ↵
    Iwama T, Hashimoto N, Takagi Y, et al. Predictability of extracranial/intracranial bypass function: a retrospective study of patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Neurosurgery 1997;40:53–59
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Schmiedek P, Piepgras A, Leinsinger G, et al. Improvement of cerebrovascular reserve capacity by EC-IC arterial bypass surgery in patients with ICA occlusion and hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. J Neurosurg 1994;81:236–44
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Yamashita T, Kashiwagi S, Nakano S, et al. The effect of EC-IC bypass surgery on resting cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve capacity studied with stable XE-CT and acetazolamide test. Neuroradiology 1991;33:217–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Grubb RL Jr, Derdeyn CP, Fritsch SM, et al. Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA 1998;280:1055–60
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Kleiser B, Widder B. Course of carotid artery occlusions with impaired cerebrovascular reactivity. Stroke 1992;23:171–74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Yonas H, Durham SR, Smith HA. Natural history of patients defined by assessment of cerebral blood flow reserve. In: Schmiedek P, Einhupl K, Kirsch CM, eds. Stimulated Cerebral Blood Flow. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;1992 :215–19
  13. ↵
    Yonas H, Smith HA, Durham SR, et al. Increased stroke risk predicted by compromised cerebral blood flow reactivity. J Neurosurg 1993;79:483–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Ringelstein EB, Sievers C, Ecker S, et al. Noninvasive assessment of CO2-induced cerebral vasomotor response in normal individuals and patients with internal carotid artery occlusions. Stroke 1988;19:963–69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. Sullivan HG, Kingsbury TB, Morgan ME, et al. The rCBF response to Diamox in normal subjects and cerebrovascular disease patients. J Neurosurg 1987;67:525–34
    PubMed
  16. ↵
    Vorstrup S, Brun B, Lassen NA. Evaluation of the cerebral vasodilatory capacity by the acetazolamide test before EC-IC bypass surgery in patients with occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1986;17:1291–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Widder B. The Doppler CO2 test to exclude patients not in need of extracranial/intracranial bypass surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:38–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Kodoma T, Suzuki Y, Yano T, et al. Phase-contrast MRA in the evaluation of EC-IC bypass patency. Clin Radiol 1995;50:459–65
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Praharaj SS, Coulthard A, Gholkar A, et al. Magnetic resonance angiographic assessment after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:439–41
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Jack CR Jr, Sundt TM Jr, Fode NC, et al. Superficial temporal-middle cerebral artery bypass: clinical pre- and postoperative angiographic correlation. J Neurosurg 1988;69:46–51
    PubMed
  21. ↵
    Baron JC, Bousser MG, Rey A, et al. Reversal of focal “misery-perfusion syndrome” by extra-intracranial arterial bypass in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. A case study with 15O positron emission tomography. Stroke 1981;12:454–59
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Kanno I, Uemura K, Higano S, et al. Oxygen extraction fraction at maximally vasodilated tissue in the ischemic brain estimated from the regional CO2 responsiveness measured by positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1988;8:227–35
    PubMed
  23. ↵
    Powers WJ, Grubb RL Jr, Raichle ME. Clinical results of extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in patients with hemodynamic cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 1989;70:61–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Kuroda S, Kamiyama H, Abe H, et al. Acetazolamide test in detecting reduced cerebral perfusion reserve and predicting long-term prognosis in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion. Neurosurgery 1993;32:912–18
    PubMed
  25. ↵
    Iwata Y, Hayakawa T, Shimizu K, et al. STA-MCA anastomosis and collateral circulation. Neurol Med Chir 1980;20:701–11
  26. ↵
    Murata Y, Katayama Y, Sakatani K, et al. Evaluation of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass function by using near-infrared spectroscopy. J Neurosurg 2003;99:304–10
    PubMed
  27. ↵
    Hirai Y, Fujimoto S, Toyoda K, et al. Superficial temporal artery duplex ultrasonography for improved cerebral hemodynamics after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. Cerebrovac Dis 2005;20:463–69
    CrossRef
  28. ↵
    Inoue T, Fujimoto S. Prediction of cerebral blood flow restoration after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery using superficial temporal artery duplex ultrasonography (STDU). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;94:159–63
    CrossRef
  29. ↵
    Iida H, Itoh H, Nakazawa M, et al. Quantitative mapping of regional cerebral blood flow using iodine-123-IMP and SPECT. J Nucl Med 1994;35:2019–30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Schick U, Zimmermann M, Stolke D. Long-term evaluation of EC-IC bypass patency. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138:938–42; discussion 942–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Amin-Hanjani S, Shin JH, Zhao M, et al. Evaluation of extracranial-intracranial bypass using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography. J Neurosurg 2007;106:291–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Arakawa S, Kamouchi M, Okada Y, et al. Ultrasonographically predicting the extent of collateral flow through superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery anastomosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:886–91
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 20, 2008.
  • Accepted after revision November 20, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Postoperative Evaluation of Changes in Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Graft Using Superficial Temporal Artery Duplex Ultrasonography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Nakamizo, T. Inoue, Y. Kikkawa, K. Uda, Y. Hirata, K. Okamura, M. Yasaka, Y. Okada
Postoperative Evaluation of Changes in Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Graft Using Superficial Temporal Artery Duplex Ultrasonography
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 900-905; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1468

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Postoperative Evaluation of Changes in Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Graft Using Superficial Temporal Artery Duplex Ultrasonography
A. Nakamizo, T. Inoue, Y. Kikkawa, K. Uda, Y. Hirata, K. Okamura, M. Yasaka, Y. Okada
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 900-905; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1468
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (7)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Moyamoya Disease
    Tsukasa Saida, Tomohiko Masumoto, Yasunobu Nakai, Masanari Shiigai, Akira Matsumura, Manabu Minami
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2012 36 1
  • Obstructive carotid and/or intracranial artery disease rarely affects the incidence of haemodynamic ischaemic stroke during cardiac surgery: a study on brain perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography with acetazolamide
    Ken-ichi Imasaka, Masahiro Yasaka, Eiki Tayama, Yukihiro Tomita
    European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2015 48 5
  • Factors related to improvement of cerebrovascular reserve after superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery anastomosis for patients with atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease
    Munehiro Otsuka, Yuichiro Kikkawa, Tomoya Kamide, Kaima Suzuki, Aoto Shibata, Toshiki Ikeda, Hiroki Kurita
    Acta Neurochirurgica 2019 161 4
  • Trends in Neurovascular Surgery
    Sven O. Eicker, Kerim Beseoglu, Nima Etminan, Bernd Turowski, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Daniel Hänggi
    2011 112
  • Time-of-flight MRA signal intensity predicts the cerebral hemodynamic status after superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery anastomosis
    Satoshi Matsuo, Akira Nakamizo, Yutaka Fujioka, Toshiyuki Amano, Masahiro Yasaka, Yasushi Okada, Shinji Nagata
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2019 59
  • Cortical Venous Reddening Predicts Remote Cerebral Infarction Post Superficial Temporal Artery–Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass in Atherosclerotic Occlusive Cerebrovascular Disease
    Kenyu Hayashi, Ken Uekawa, Takayuki Kawano, Yuki Ohmori, Toshihiro Amadatsu, Yushin Takemoto, Akitake Mukasa
    World Neurosurgery 2019 127
  • Long-term outcomes and quantitative radiologic analysis of extracranial–intracranial bypass for hemodynamically compromised chronic large artery occlusive disease
    Hyunjun Jo, Si Un Lee, Han-Gil Jeong, Young-Deok Kim, Tackeun Kim, Leonard Sunwoo, Seung Pil Ban, Jae Seung Bang, Oki Kwon, Chang Wan Oh
    Scientific Reports 2023 13 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire