Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 1

References

1. ↵
   Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Schillinger DJ, et al. Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology 1997;204:272–77

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. Baudendistel KT, Reichenbach JR, Metzner R, et al. Comparison of functional MR-venography and EPI-BOLD fMRI at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:989–91

   CrossRefPubMed
3. Reichenbach JR, Essig M, Haacke EM, et al. High-resolution venography of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA 1998;6:62–69

   CrossRefPubMed
4. Essig M, Reichenbach JR, Schad LR, et al. High-resolution MR venography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1417–25

   CrossRefPubMed
5. Lee BC, Kuppusamy K, Grueneich R, et al. Hemispheric language dominance in children demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Child Neurol 1999;14:78–82

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. Lin W, Mukherjee P, An H, et al. Improving high-resolution MR bold venographic imaging using a T1 reducing contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:118–23

   CrossRefPubMed
7. Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ, et al. MR venography of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1039–42

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. Reichenbach JR, Barth M, Haacke EM, et al. High-resolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:949–57

   CrossRefPubMed
9. Cheng YC, Haacke EM. Predicting BOLD signal changes as a function of blood volume fraction and resolution. NMR Biomed 2001;14:468–77

   CrossRefPubMed
10. Cheng YC, Haacke EM, Yu YJ. An exact form for the magnetic field density of states for a dipole. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:1017–23

    CrossRefPubMed
11. Schad LR. Improved target volume characterization in stereotactic treatment planning of brain lesions by using high-resolution BOLD MR-venography. NMR Biomed 2001;14:478–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. Reichenbach JR, Haacke EM. High-resolution BOLD venographic imaging; a window into brain function. NMR Biomed 2001;14:453–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. Reichenbach JR, Jonetz-Mentzel L, Fitzek C, et al. High-resolution blood oxygen-level dependent MR venography (HRBV): a new technique. Neuroradiology 2001;43:364–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. Essig M, Reichenbach JR, Schad L, et al. High resolution MR-venography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations [in German]. Radiologe 2001;41:288–95

    CrossRefPubMed
15. Haacke EM, Herigault G, Yu Y, et al. Observing tumor vascularity noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging. Image Analysis and Stereology 2002;21:107–13
16. Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, et al. Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results. Radiology 2003;227:332–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. Essig M, Waschkies M, Wenz F, et al. Assessment of brain metastases with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial results. Radiology 2003;228:193–99

    PubMed
18. Abduljalil AM, Schmalbrock P, Novak V, et al. Enhanced gray and white matter contrast of phase susceptibility-weighted images in ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:284–90

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. Hermier M, Nighoghossian N. Contribution of susceptibility-weighted imaging to acute stroke assessment. Stroke 2004;35:1989–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. Wycliffe ND, Choe J, Holshouser B, et al. Reliability in detection of hemorrhage in acute stroke by a new three-dimensional gradient recalled echo susceptibility-weighted imaging technique compared to computed tomography: a retrospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:372–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Ann Neurol 2004;56:36–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. Haddar D, Haacke E, Sehgal V, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging: theory and applications. J Radiol 2004;85:1901–08

    PubMed
24. Rauscher A, Sedlacik J, Barth M, et al. Noninvasive assessment of vascular architecture and function during modulated blood oxygenation using susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:87–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haacke EM, et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:439–50

    CrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    Haacke EM, Cheng NY, House MJ, et al. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:1–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Mentzel HJ, Dieckmann A, Fitzek C, et al. Early diagnosis of cerebral involvement in Sturge-Weber syndrome using high-resolution BOLD MR venography. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:85–90

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. Babikian T, Freier MC, Tong KA, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging: neuropsychologic outcome and pediatric head injury. Pediatr Neurol 2005;33:184–94

    CrossRefPubMed
29. Rauscher A, Sedlacik J, Barth M, et al. Magnetic susceptibility-weighted MR phase imaging of the human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:736–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    Xu Y, Haacke EM. The role of voxel aspect ratio in determining apparent vascular phase behavior in susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:155–60

    CrossRefPubMed
31. Hamans BC, Barth M, Leenders WP, et al. Contrast enhanced susceptibility weighted imaging (CE-SWI) of the mouse brain using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO). Z Med Phys 2006;16:269–74

    PubMed
32. Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haddar D, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:41–51

    CrossRefPubMed
33. Haacke EM. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Z Med Phys 2006;16:237

    PubMed
34. Ashwal S, Babikian T, Gardner-Nichols J, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in assessment of outcome after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:S50–58

    PubMedWeb of Science
35. Yoshida Y, Terae S, Kudo K, et al. Capillary telangiectasia of the brain stem diagnosed by susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:980–82

    CrossRefPubMed
36. Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Pinker K, Barth M, et al. Contrast-enhanced, high-resolution, susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: dose-dependent optimization at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla in healthy volunteers. Invest Radiol 2006;41:249–55

    CrossRefPubMed
37. Haacke EM, DelProposto ZS, Chaturvedi S, et al. Imaging cerebral amyloid angiopathy with susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:316–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. Vinod Desai S, Bindu PS, Ravishankar S, et al. Relaxation and susceptibility MRI characteristics in Hallervorden-Spatz syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:715–20

    CrossRefPubMed
39. Akter M, Hirai T, Hiai Y, et al. Detection of hemorrhagic hypointense foci in the brain on susceptibility-weighted imaging clinical and phantom studies. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1011–19

    CrossRefPubMed
40. Larsen JP, Britt WI, Kido D, et al. Susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of dementia. Radiology Case Reports 2007;2:102
41. Sedlacik J, Rauscher A, Reichenbach JR. Obtaining blood oxygenation levels from MR signal behavior in the presence of single venous vessels. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1035–44

    CrossRefPubMed
42. Pinker K, Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Stavrou I, et al. High-resolution contrast-enhanced, susceptibility-weighted MR imaging at 3T in patients with brain tumors: correlation with positron-emission tomography and histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1280–86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. Shen Y, Kou Z, Kreipke CW, et al. In vivo measurement of tissue damage, oxygen saturation changes and blood flow changes after experimental traumatic brain injury in rats using susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:219–27

    CrossRefPubMed
44. Ohta A, Naito K, Ohkubo M, et al. Study of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) using a simple MR phantom [in Japanese]. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2007;63:1093–98

    PubMed
45. Thomas B, Somasundaram S, Thamburaj K, et al. Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain: a pictorial review. Neuroradiology 2008;50:105–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. de Souza JM, Domingues RC, Cruz LC, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging for the evaluation of patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations; a comparison with T2-weighted fast spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:154–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. Harder SL, Hopp KM, Ward H, et al. Mineralization of the deep gray matter with age: a retrospective review with susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:176–83

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. Sedlacik J, Helm K, Rauscher A, et al. Investigations on the effect of caffeine on cerebral venous vessel contrast by using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5, 3 and 7 T. Neuroimage 2008;40:11–18

    CrossRefPubMed
49. Somasundaram S, Kesavadas C, Thomas B. Susceptibility weighted imaging in holohemispheric venous angioma with cerebral hemiatrophy. Neurol India 2008;56:104–05

    PubMed
50. Liu HL, Wai YY, Chen WS, et al. Hemorrhage detection during focused-ultrasound induced blood-brain-barrier opening by using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34:598–606

    CrossRefPubMed
51. Koopmans PJ, Manniesing R, Niessen WJ, et al. MR venography of the human brain using susceptibility weighted imaging at very high field strength. MAGMA 2008;21:149–58. Epub 2008 Jan 11

    CrossRefPubMed
52. Fushimi Y, Miki Y, Togashi K, et al. A developmental venous anomaly presenting atypical findings on susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:E56

    CrossRefPubMed
53. ↵
    Du YP, Jin Z. Simultaneous acquisition of MR angiography and venography (MRAV). Magn Reson Med 2008;59:954–58

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. Hammond KE, Lupo JM, Xu D, et al. Development of a robust method for generating 7.0 T multichannel phase images of the brain with application to normal volunteers and patients with neurological diseases. Neuroimage 2008;39:1682–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. Zhong K, Leupold J, von Elverfeldt D, et al. The molecular basis for gray and white matter contrast in phase imaging. Neuroimage 2008;40:1561–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. ↵
    Hu J, Yu Y, Juhasz C, et al. MR susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) complements conventional contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI in characterizing brain abnormalities of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:300–07

    CrossRefPubMed
57. ↵
    Haacke EM, Lai S, Yablonskiy DA, et al. In-vivo validation of the BOLD mechanism: a review of signal changes in gradient-echo functional MRI in the presence of flow. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 1995;6:153–63

    CrossRef
58. Haacke EM, Lai S, Reichenbach JR, et al. In vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional brain imaging. Human Brain Mapp 1997;5:341–46

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. Akbudak E, Norberg RE, Conturo TE. Contrast-agent phase effects: an experimental system for analysis of susceptibility, concentration, and bolus input function kinetics. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:990–1002

    CrossRefPubMed
60. ↵
    Wang Y, Yu Y, Li D, et al. Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:661–70

    CrossRefPubMed
61. Fernandez-Seara MA, Techawiboonwong A, Detre JA, et al. MR susceptometry for measuring global brain oxygen extraction. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:967–73

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
62. ↵
    Haacke EM, Ayaz M, Khan A, et al. Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:256–64

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
63. ↵
    Duyn JH, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, et al. High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:11796–801

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. ↵
    Young IR, Bailes DR, Burl M, et al. Initial clinical evaluation of a whole body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomograph. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982;6:1–18

    PubMedWeb of Science
65. ↵
    Bydder GM, Steiner RE. NMR imaging of the brain. Neuroradiology 1982;23:231–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
66. ↵
    Bailes DR, Young IR, Thomas DJ, et al. NMR imaging of the brain using spin-echo sequences. Clin Radiol 1982;33:395–414

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
67. ↵
    Edelstein WA, Hutchison JM, Johnson G, et al. Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. Phys Med Biol 1980;25:751–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, et al. Flash imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. J Magn Reson 1986;67:258–66

    CrossRefWeb of Science
69. ↵
    Frahm J, Haase A, Matthaei D. Rapid 3-dimensional MR imaging using the flash technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:363–68

    PubMedWeb of Science
70. ↵
    Mugler JP 3rd, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med 1990;15:152–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
71. ↵
    Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Yablonskiy DA, et al. Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:266–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
72. ↵
    Haacke EM, Brown R, Thompson M, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York: Wiley;1999 :5
73. ↵
    Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
74. ↵
    Saini S, Frankel RB, Stark DD, et al. Magnetism: a primer and review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:735–43

    PubMedWeb of Science
75. ↵
    Chu SC, Xu Y, Balschi JA, et al. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn Reson Med 1990;13:239–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
76. ↵
    Weisskoff RM, Kiihne S. MRI susceptometry: image-based measurement of absolute susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood. Magn Reson Med 1992;24:375–83

    PubMed
77. ↵
    Spees WM, Yablonskiy DA, Oswood MC, et al. Water proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5 Tesla: magnetic susceptibility, T(1), T(2), T*(2), and non-Lorentzian signal behavior. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:533–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
78. ↵
    Neelavalli J, Cheng YC, Haacke EM. Removal of Air/Tissue Interface Field Effects in Susceptibility Weighted Imaging. Proceedings of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3–9 May2008 . Abstract 3499
79. ↵
    Rauscher A, Barth M, Reichenbach JR, et al. Automated unwrapping of MR phase images applied to BOLD MR-venography at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:175–80

    CrossRefPubMed
80. ↵
    Haacke EM, Makki M, Ge Y, et al. Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009 (In press).
81. ↵
    Tong KA, Ashwal S, Obenaus A, et al. Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging: a review of clinical applications in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:9–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
82. ↵
    de Rochefort L, Brown R, Prince MR, Wang Y. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1003–09

    CrossRefPubMed