Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging Measurements of Timing Parameters in Patients with a Carotid Artery Occlusion

R.P.H. Bokkers, P.J. van Laar, K.C.C. van de Ven, L.J. Kapelle, C.J.M. Klijn and J. Hendrikse
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2008, 29 (9) 1698-1703; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1232
R.P.H. Bokkers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.J. van Laar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.C.C. van de Ven
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.J. Kapelle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.J.M. Klijn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Hendrikse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial spin-labeling (ASL) with image acquisition at multiple delay times can be exploited in perfusion MR imaging to visualize and quantify the temporal dynamics of arterial blood inflow. In this study, we investigated the consequences of an internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion and collateral blood flow on regional timing parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen functionally independent patients with a symptomatic ICA occlusion (15 men, 2 women; mean age, 57 years) and 29 sex- and age-matched control subjects were investigated. ASL at multiple delay times was used to quantify regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the transit and trailing edge times (arterial timing parameters) reflecting, respectively, the beginning and end of the labeled bolus. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and MR angiography were used to grade collaterals.

RESULTS: In the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion, the CBF was lower in the anterior frontal (31 ± 4 versus 47 ± 3 mL/min/100 g, P < .01), posterior frontal (39 ± 4 versus 55 ± 2 mL/min/100 g, P < .01), and frontal parietal region (49 ± 3 versus 61 ± 3 mL/min/100 g, P = .04) than that in control subjects. The trailing edge of the frontal-parietal region was longer in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion compared with that in control subjects (2225 ± 167 versus 1593 ± 35 ms, P < .01). In patients with leptomeningeal collateral flow, the trailing edge was longer in the anterior frontal region (2436 ± 275 versus 1648 ± 201 ms, P = .03) and shorter in the occipital region (1815 ± 128 versus 2388 ± 203 ms, P = .04), compared with patients without leptomeningeal collaterals.

CONCLUSION: Regional assessment of timing parameters with ASL may provide valuable information on the cerebral hemodynamic status. In patients with leptomeningeal collaterals, the most impaired territory was found in the frontal lobe.

An obstructive lesion in the internal carotid artery (ICA) causes a reduction of the perfusion pressure in the cerebral circulation. As the cerebral perfusion pressure decreases, pressure is initially maintained by a compensatory vasodilation of the arterioles, followed by an increase in the oxygen extraction fraction.1 Regionally, the cerebral hemodynamic status depends not only on the degree of carotid obstruction but also on other factors, such as the contribution of collateral pathways.2,3

The collateral circulation can provide alternative routes for oxygenated blood to reach the brain tissue, either through the primary pathways via the circle of Willis or the secondary pathways via leptomeningeal and ophthalmic collaterals.4 The combination of a decreased cerebral perfusion pressure and an insufficient primary collateral blood supply may lead to hemodynamic impairment, which eventually can result in a limited clearance of emboli and ischemia.5,6 Recruitment of the secondary collaterals is associated with further impairment, and its presence may be considered a marker of inadequacy of the primary collateral pathways.7,8 Because the recruitment of collateral perfusion in patients with an ICA occlusion will lead to longer blood flow routes and a delayed arrival time of the blood, regional knowledge of the arrival times of arterial blood may provide additional information to characterize the collateral flow and may potentially be used to identify hemodynamically impaired regions. The most widely used methods to measure arrival times of blood use dynamic sampling of an injected bolus of contrast agent. However, due to the current concerns regarding contrast use in patients with poor renal function9 and ionizing radiation, an alternative without detrimental effects would be of great benefit.

Recently, arterial spin-labeling (ASL) was introduced as a noninvasive method capable of assessing cerebral perfusion and the temporal dynamics of arterial blood inflow.10 The purpose of our study was, first, to investigate hemodynamic parameters in different areas of the brain in patients with an occlusion of the ICA and, second, to evaluate the effect of collateral flow on regional hemodynamics. We used an ASL MR imaging technique with image acquisition at multiple delay times to quantify regionally cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial timing parameters (transit and trailing edge times).

Materials and Methods

Patients

The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Seventeen functionally independent patients (15 men and 2 women; mean age, 57 ± 8 years) with an ICA occlusion were included in the study. All patients had transient or minor-disabling neurologic deficits (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) on the side of the occlusion11 and were referred to the department of radiology by vascular surgeons or neurologists for diagnosis and grading of the ICA obstruction. Patients who had experienced a severe stroke causing major disability (modified Rankin Scale score of 3–5) in the past were not included. Diagnosis of the ICA obstruction was performed with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and the presence of a contralateral obstruction was graded in accordance to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria.12 In 11 patients, the ICA occlusion was located on the right side, and in 6 patients, on the left side.

The presence of collateral flow was assessed with intra-arterial DSA and MR angiography (MRA). The direction of blood flow in the circle of Willis was assessed according to a previously published imaging protocol,13 with 2 consecutive 2D phase-contrast MR imaging measurements, of which 1 was phase-encoded in the left-right direction and 1, in the anteroposterior direction. Anterior collateral flow was defined as flow across the anterior communicating artery with retrograde flow in the precommunicating part (A1 segment) of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA). Posterior-to-anterior flow in the posterior communicating artery was considered to represent posterior collateral flow. Leptomeningeal collaterals were judged as present if intra-arterial DSA showed cortical branches extending from the posterior cerebral artery that supplied the flow territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) or ACA.

The control group consisted of 29 volunteers (25 men and 4 women; mean age, 57 ± 9 years) without a history of neurologic disease, vascular pathology on T1- or T2-weighted MR imaging or MRA scans, or an ICA stenosis of >30%. The control subjects were matched to the patient group for sex and age. All control subjects were recruited from a vascular screening MR imaging study involving subjects with symptomatic atherosclerosis or risk factors for atherosclerosis.14

MR Imaging

MR imaging investigations were performed on a 1.5T system (Gyroscan ACS-NT; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). For all MR imaging acquisitions, a quadrature head coil was used for radio-frequency transmission and signal-intensity reception. For perfusion MR imaging, a pulsed ASL transfer insensitive labeling technique was used.15 A single-perfusion imaging section was planned just above the ventricles through the centrum semiovale and aligned parallel to the orbitomeatal angle (Fig 1). Labeling was achieved by applying 2 consecutive section-selective 90° radio-frequency pulses in a 140-mm-thick labeling slab 10 mm proximal to the imaging section. For image acquisition, a series of thirteen 35° excitation pulses was applied, with increasing delay times from 200 to 2600 ms with a constant interval of 200 ms, followed by single-shot gradient echo-planar imaging readout. The ASL signal was corrected for imperfections in section profiles.16 Other MR imaging parameters for perfusion imaging were the following: TR, 3000 ms; TE, 5.6 ms; 62% partial Fourier acquisition; averages, 50; FOV, 240 × 240 mm; 64 × 64 matrix; scanning time, 5 minutes.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, sagittal orientation image illustrating the planning of the imaging section (1) and the arterial spin-labeling slab (2) parallel to the orbitomeatal angle. B, regions of interest used for quantification of the hemodynamic parameters. In each hemisphere, 2 regions of interests were drawn in the frontal lobe, and 1, in the frontal parietal, parietal occipital, and occipital regions.

Cerebral Blood Flow, Transit, and Trailing Edge Quantification

Perfusion-weighed images were obtained by subtracting the labeled images from the control images. In addition to quantifying CBF, ASL can also be used for the measurement of arterial timing parameters. By acquiring a series of perfusion images, it is possible to follow the inflow of labeled blood into the vascular exchange site. The obtained kinetic data of blood inflow can be used to calculate the transit time and trailing edge times. These are physiologic parameters that reflect the time needed for the labeled arterial blood to reach the brain tissue. Transit time is the duration between labeling and the first arrival of the magnetized blood into the imaging voxel. The trailing edge time is the duration needed for the end of the labeled bolus to reach the imaging voxel.

To quantify CBF, transit, and trailing edge time, we fitted the perfusion signal intensity (ΔM) at varying delay times (t) to the kinetic perfusion model of Buxton et al,17 with the adaptations as proposed by Gunther et al18: Math(1) where f is the perfusion value CBF in milliliters/minute/100 g, τa is the transit time, τd is the trailing edge time, δR = R1a − R1app, eff and R1app, eff = R1 + f/λ− ln(cosα/ΔTI), λ is the brain/blood partition coefficient, α is the flip angle, ΔTI is the time between consecutive readouts, R1a is the longitudinal relaxation rate of arterial blood, R1 is the longitudinal relaxation rate of tissue, and Ma,0 is the equilibrium magnetization in a blood-filled voxel, estimated by fitting the unlabeled signal intensity in the sagittal sinus to a saturation-recovery curve. The following physical constants were obtained from the literature: R1 = 1000 ms; R1a = 1400 ms; λ (brain/blood partition coefficient of water) = 0.9 mL/g.19,20

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed with mathematic software (Matlab; MathWorks, Natick, Mass). On the basis of the ASL control images, regions of interest were drawn according to a standardized template symmetrically in both hemispheres, in distinct areas of gray matter (Fig. 1). For statistical analysis, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows, Version 12.0.1 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) was used. Mean CBF, transit, and trailing edge times were calculated over all regions of interest in the hemisphere on the side of the symptomatic and contralateral asymptomatic hemispheres. Because no differences were found in CBF, transit, and trailing edge times between the left and right hemisphere in control subjects, values for both hemispheres were averaged for analysis. Differences in CBF, transit, and trailing edge region-of-interest measurements between the hemispheres ipsi- and contralateral to the ICA occlusion and the control group were evaluated by using a 1-way analysis of variance with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. To examine the influence of collateral flow patterns, we evaluated differences between CBF, transit, and trailing edge times in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion by using the Student t test. A P value < .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Results

The baseline characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1. An example of an ASL MR imaging investigation of a patient with a symptomatic left-sided ICA occlusion is shown in Fig 2. Decreased CBF and increased timing parameters, resulting from a delayed arrival of the magnetically labeled bolus, can be appreciated in the left hemisphere.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Measured perfusion images of a 53-year-old man with a unilateral left-sided ICA occlusion. The images show the absolute cerebral blood flow (A), transit time (B), and trailing edge (C) maps. Decreased cerebral blood flow, increased transit time, and increased trailing edge can be appreciated in the left hemisphere.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patient characteristics

Regional Quantification of CBF, Transit, and Trailing Edge Time

In the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion, the CBF was significantly lower than that in the control subjects in the anterior frontal region (31 ± 4 versus 47 ± 3 mL/min/100 g, P < .01), posterior frontal region (39 ± 4 versus 55 ± 2 mL/min/100 g, P < .01), and in the frontal parietal region (49 ± 3 versus 61 ± 3 mL/min/100 g, P = .04) (Fig 3). In the hemisphere contralateral to the ICA occlusion, CBF in patients was significantly lower in the anterior frontal region than that in control subjects (34 ± 3 versus 47 ± 3 mL/min/100 g, P = .02).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Cerebral blood flow (mean ± SEM) in the regions of the hemisphere ipsi- and contralateral to the occlusion and of the control group. Asterisk indicates P < .05; double asterisks, P < .01, a significant difference between the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion and the control subjects; number sign, a significant (P < .05) difference between the hemisphere contralateral to the ICA occlusion and the control subjects.

The transit time in the posterior frontal region ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion was prolonged (138 ± 52 ms, P = .03) compared with that in the control group (41 ± 11 ms) (Fig 4). In the frontal parietal region ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion, the transit time (158 ± 49, P < .01) and the trailing edge time (2225 ± 167, P < .01) were prolonged compared with the control subjects (respectively, 7 ± 4 ms and 1593 ± 35 ms) (Fig 4). In the hemisphere contralateral to the ICA occlusion, the trailing edge time of the occipital region was significantly shorter in patients than in control subjects (1859 ± 122 ms versus 2289 ± 89 ms, P = .02).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Transit time and trailing edge time (mean ± SEM) in the regions of the hemisphere ipsi- and contralateral to the occlusion and of the control group. Asterisk indicates P < .05; double asterisks, P < .01, a significant difference between the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion and the control subjects; number sign, a significant (P < .05) asymmetry between the hemisphere contralateral to the ICA occlusion and the control subjects; dagger, a significant (P < .01) difference between the hemisphere ipsi- and contralateral to the ICA occlusion.

Patients with leptomeningeal collateral flow (53%, n = 9) had a lower CBF in the posterior frontal region (29 ± 5 mL/min/100 g) than patients without leptomeningeal collaterals (47 ± 6 mL/min/100 g, P = .04) in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion (Table 2). Furthermore, the trailing edge was longer in the anterior frontal region (2436 ± 275 versus 1648 ± 201 ms, P = .03) and shorter in the occipital region (1815 ± 128 versus 2388 ± 203 ms, P = .04) than that in patients without leptomeningeal collateral flow. No differences in hemodynamic parameters were found for the presence or absence of collateral flow via the anterior (71%, n = 12) or posterior (65%, n = 11) collateral pathways.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Hemodynamic values for the hemisphere ipsilateral to the occlusion in patients with (n = 9) and with leptomeningeal collateral vessels

Discussion

The most important findings of our study were twofold. First, we found significant heterogeneity of regional cerebral hemodynamics in patients with a symptomatic ICA occlusion, with decreased CBF and increased timing parameters in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the occlusion. Second, in patients with leptomeningeal collateral flow, there was a prolonged trailing edge in the anterior and a decreased CBF in the posterior frontal region ipsilateral to the occlusion in comparison with patients without leptomeningeal collateral flow.

Most of the techniques that can assess CBF in patients are invasive and require the injection of a radioactive tracer or contrast agent.21 ASL MR imaging has been developed to measure cerebral perfusion noninvasively by using magnetically labeled blood as an endogenous contrast agent.10 Most current ASL approaches acquire the imaging at a single inversion time point, which, in healthy volunteers, is sufficient for an adequate exchange of the label with the brain tissue water. However, in patients with an occlusion of the ICA, collateral blood flow recruitment may result in increased transit times of the labeled blood to the brain tissue,22 resulting in an underestimation of CBF.23,24 If one performs multiple ASL experiments at various delay times, all labeled spin contributes to the perfusion signal intensity and no prior knowledge of individual transit times is needed. An additional advantage of this acquisition method is that it can be used to visualize and quantify the temporal dynamics of blood inflow and tissue perfusion.18,25 Although previous studies have demonstrated the ability of ASL at multiple delay times to measure timing parameters and the effect of brain activation on timing parameters,15,26–28 this is the first study to investigate the consequences of an occlusion of the ICA and collateral blood flow patterns on regional ASL timing parameters and CBF.

In this study, we found a significant decreased CBF in both frontal and the frontal parietal regions in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion, which is in agreement with previous positron-emission tomography (PET), 133Xe inhalation, and MR imaging–based studies.29–33 Furthermore, we demonstrated that the time needed for the labeled bolus to travel to the affected hemisphere was increased in patients with a symptomatic ICA occlusion, in regions corresponding to the anterior borderzone and the flow territory of the MCA. In previous studies, researchers found similar regional heterogeneity in hemodynamic parameters with ASL.25 Roughly, measures comparable with the ASL timing parameters are the arrival time and time-to-peak in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR and CT perfusion imaging. In contrast-enhanced perfusion studies of patients with an ICA occlusion, researchers have demonstrated increased time-to-peak times and reduced CBF in the gray and white matter of the affected hemisphere,34–36 which was thought to be caused by decreased flow in the arteries and increased dispersion in the microvasculature. This finding corresponds with our finding of a delayed arrival of arterial blood in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion.

With the 10-mm gap between the imaging and labeling section, the time needed for the blood from the upper site of the labeled volume to travel to the brain tissue will depend on the vascular pathways distal to the circle of Willis. In contrast, the lower edge of the labeling volume is below the level of the circle of Willis. Therefore the trailing edge time will depend on the vascular pathways both proximal and distal to the circle of Willis. In the evaluation of the impact of collateral flow on the delay of arterial blood, the trailing edge will consequently be the most informative parameter of the 2. Furthermore, the transit and trailing edge times do not necessarily have to show a combined increase in patients with a vascular obstruction because the increase of timing parameters may, for instance, mainly depend on the rerouting of the labeled arterial blood proximal from the circle of Willis.

In our analysis of the role of collateral blood flow, we found that neither flow via the anterior or posterior collateral pathways had an effect on regional hemodynamic parameters in patients with ICA occlusion. Previous studies have indicated that hemodynamic and metabolic changes are more severe in patients without primary collaterals than in patients with primary collaterals,3,37 and that the presence of secondary collateral flow is associated with an impaired hemodynamic status.38,39 In this study, we found that patients with leptomeningeal collaterals and an occlusion of the ICA had a lower CBF and a prolonged trailing edge in the frontal lobe. No differences were found in symptoms between patients with and without leptomeningeal flow. Although the CBF measured in the frontal regions was low, it is above the value of 20 mL/min/100 g, which is considered to indicate tissue at risk.40 We hypothesize that the increased trailing edge time reflects the elongated path that the bolus of magnetically labeled blood has to travel through the leptomeningeal collaterals from the posterior circulation to the frontal lobe.

A disadvantage of using ASL at multiple delay times is the longer scanning duration compared with single-delay experiments. In this study, we used a Look-Locker-like sampling strategy to acquire the series of perfusion images at increasing delay times to decrease scanning time. Although this makes it more practical for clinical use in patients, the train of small flip angle gradient echoes decreases the perfusion signal. Due to this loss and additionally the decrease of signal due to the natural T1 decay of the magnetized blood, we were not able to use crusher gradients. Therefore, a limitation of this study is that due to the presence of magnetic label within the vasculature, there may possibly be a regional overestimation of CBF. Although this is a well-recognized problem of ASL, the CBF values found in both the patient group and the control subjects were within the reported range of previous PET studies.1,30 In the present study, 2 of the 17 patients with an occlusion of the ICA had a contralateral stenosis of ≥70%, which could have affected the hemodynamic measurements in the contralateral hemisphere. Furthermore, the DSA examinations, which were used to judge the presence of leptomeningeal collaterals, were not specifically performed to visualize these collaterals. Therefore, an underestimation of the prevalence of leptomeningeal collaterals is possible. In our study, 9 of the 17 patients (53%) had collateral flow through leptomeningeal vessels. Although there is a large interindividual variability in the number and size of leptomeningeal anastomoses, this is in accordance with previous reported prevalences.41

Conclusion

ASL with image acquisition at multiple delay times can be used to quantify the temporal dynamics of arterial blood inflow and identify brain regions with impaired hemodynamics. In this study, we found significant heterogeneity of regional cerebral hemodynamics in patients with a symptomatic ICA occlusion. In patients with leptomeningeal collaterals, the most impaired region was found in the frontal lobe.

Footnotes

  • J. Hendrikse was supported by a grant 916-76-035 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Videen TO, Yundt KD, et al. Variability of cerebral blood volume and oxygen extraction: stages of cerebral haemodynamic impairment revisited. Brain 2002;125:595–607
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Powers WJ, Press GA, Grubb RL Jr. The effect of hemodynamically significant carotid artery disease on the hemodynamic status of the cerebral circulation. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:27–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Vernieri F, Pasqualetti P, Matteis M, et al. Effect of collateral blood flow and cerebral vasomotor reactivity on the outcome of carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2001;32:1552–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Powers WJ. Cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Ann Neurol 1991;29:231–40
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Caplan LR, Hennerici M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol 1998;55:1475–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Schomer DF, Marks MP, Steinberg GK, et al. The anatomy of the posterior communicating artery as a risk factor for ischemic cerebral infarction. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1565–70
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Liebeskind DS. Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Hofmeijer J, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. Collateral circulation via the ophthalmic artery or leptomeningeal vessels is associated with impaired cerebral vasoreactivity in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;14:22–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Penfield JG, Reilly RF Jr. What nephrologists need to know about gadolinium. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2007;3:654–68
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:10–27
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Warlow CP, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1989;20:828
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316–18
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Rutgers DR, Klijn CJM, Kappelle LJ, et al. A longitudinal study of collateral flow patterns in the circle of Willis and the ophthalmic artery in patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2000;31:1913–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Simons PC, Algra A, van de Laak MF, et al. Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study: rationale and design. Eur J Epidemiol 1999;15:773–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Hendrikse J, Lu H, van der Grond J, et al. Measurements of cerebral perfusion and arterial hemodynamics during visual stimulation using TURBO-TILT. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:429–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Keilholz-George SD, Knight-Scott J, Berr SS. Theoretical analysis of the effect of imperfect slice profiles on tagging schemes for pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:141–48
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, et al. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:383–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Gunther M, Bock M, Schad LR. Arterial spin labeling in combination with a look-locker sampling strategy: inflow turbo-sampling EPI-FAIR (ITS-FAIR). Magn Reson Med 2001;46:974–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Barth M, Moser E. Proton NMR relaxation times of human blood samples at 1.5 T and implications for functional MRI. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1997;43:783–91
    PubMed
  20. ↵
    Herscovitch P, Raichle ME. What is the correct value for the brain–blood partition coefficient for water? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:65–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Wintermark M, Sesay M, Barbier E, et al. Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke 2005;36:e83–e99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Gibbs JM, Wise RJ, Leenders KL, et al. Evaluation of cerebral perfusion reserve in patients with carotid-artery occlusion. Lancet 1984;1:310–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Calamante F, Williams SR, van Bruggen N, et al. A model for quantification of perfusion in pulsed labelling techniques. NMR Biomed 1996;9:79–83
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Alsop DC, Detre JA. Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1236–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Hendrikse J, Petersen ET, van Laar PJ, et al. Cerebral border zones between distal end branches of intracranial arteries: MR imaging. Radiology 2008;246:572–80
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Rao H, Wang J, Tang K, et al. Imaging brain activity during natural vision using CASL perfusion fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2007;28:593–601
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Gonzalez-At JB, Alsop DC, Detre JA. Cerebral perfusion and arterial transit time changes during task activation determined with continuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:739–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Yang Y, Engelien W, Xu S, et al. Transit time, trailing time, and cerebral blood flow during brain activation: measurement using multislice, pulsed spin-labeling perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:680–85
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Norrving B, Nilsson B, Risberg Jr. CBF in patients with carotid occlusion: resting and hypercapnic flow related to collateral pattern. Stroke 1982;13:155–62
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Kimura J, et al. Hemodynamics in internal carotid artery occlusion examined by positron emission tomography. Stroke 1990;21:1400–06
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. Leblanc R, Yamamoto YL, Tyler JL, et al. Borderzone ischemia. Ann Neurol 1987;22:707–13
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. Roc AC, Wang J, Ances BM, et al. Altered hemodynamics and regional cerebral blood flow in patients with hemodynamically significant stenoses. Stroke 2006;37:382–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Hendrikse J, van Osch MJ, Rutgers DR, et al. Internal carotid artery occlusion assessed at pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging at multiple delay times. Radiology 2004;233:899–904
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Apruzzese A, Silvestrini M, Floris R, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in asymptomatic patients with internal carotid artery occlusion: a dynamic susceptibility contrast MR and transcranial Doppler study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1062–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. van Osch MJ, Rutgers DR, Vonken EP, et al. Quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI and CO2 reactivity measurements in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Neuroimage 2002;17:469–78
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Kluytmans M, van der Grond J, Viergever MA. Gray matter and white matter perfusion imaging in patients with severe carotid artery lesions. Radiology 1998;209:675–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Kluytmans M, van der Grond J, van Everdingen KJ, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in relation to patterns of collateral flow. Stroke 1999;30:1432–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Muller M, Schimrigk K. Vasomotor reactivity and pattern of collateral blood flow in severe occlusive carotid artery disease. Stroke 1996;27:296–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Tatemichi TK, Chamorro A, Petty GW, et al. Hemodynamic role of ophthalmic artery collateral in internal carotid artery occlusion. Neurology 1990;40:461–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Muir KW, Buchan A, von KR, et al. Imaging of acute stroke. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:755–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Brozici M, van der Zwan A, Hillen B. Anatomy and functionality of leptomeningeal anastomoses: a review. Stroke 2003;34:2750–62
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received January 31, 2008.
  • Accepted after revision June 2, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 9
October 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging Measurements of Timing Parameters in Patients with a Carotid Artery Occlusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.P.H. Bokkers, P.J. van Laar, K.C.C. van de Ven, L.J. Kapelle, C.J.M. Klijn, J. Hendrikse
Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging Measurements of Timing Parameters in Patients with a Carotid Artery Occlusion
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2008, 29 (9) 1698-1703; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging Measurements of Timing Parameters in Patients with a Carotid Artery Occlusion
R.P.H. Bokkers, P.J. van Laar, K.C.C. van de Ven, L.J. Kapelle, C.J.M. Klijn, J. Hendrikse
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2008, 29 (9) 1698-1703; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1232
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cerebral Perfusion After Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion After ECMO Therapy
  • Noninvasive Evaluation of CBF and Perfusion Delay of Moyamoya Disease Using Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI with Multiple Postlabeling Delays: Comparison with 15O-Gas PET and DSC-MRI
  • Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging Estimation of Antegrade and Collateral Flow in Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis
  • Regional Cerebral Arterial Transit Time Hemodynamics Correlate with Vascular Risk Factors and Cognitive Function in Men with Coronary Artery Disease
  • Cerebrovascular Collaterals Correlate with Disease Severity in Adult North American Patients with Moyamoya Disease
  • Assessment of Cortical Hemodynamics by Multichannel Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Steno-Occlusive Disease of the Middle Cerebral Artery
  • Hemodynamic Alterations in Vertebrobasilar Large Artery Disease Assessed by Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging
  • Systematic Review of Methods for Assessing Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow
  • Cerebral Perfusion Long Term after Therapeutic Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery in Patients Who Tolerated Angiographic Balloon Test Occlusion
  • Multiple Inflow Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling Reveals Delays in the Arterial Arrival Time in Minor Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack
  • Noninvasive MR imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with a carotid artery stenosis
  • Simultaneous Measurement of Arterial Transit Time, Arterial Blood Volume, and Cerebral Blood Flow Using Arterial Spin-Labeling in Patients with Alzheimer Disease
  • Crossref (49)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Applications of arterial spin labeled MRI in the brain
    John A. Detre, Hengyi Rao, Danny J.J. Wang, Yu Fen Chen, Ze Wang
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2012 35 5
  • Systematic Review of Methods for Assessing Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow
    F. McVerry, D.S. Liebeskind, K.W. Muir
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012 33 3
  • Arterial spin labeling in neuroimaging
    Sasitorn Petcharunpaisan
    World Journal of Radiology 2010 2 10
  • Assessment of arterial arrival times derived from multiple inversion time pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI
    Bradley J. MacIntosh, Nicola Filippini, Michael A. Chappell, Mark W. Woolrich, Clare E. Mackay, Peter Jezzard
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010 63 3
  • Separation of macrovascular signal in multi‐inversion time arterial spin labelling MRI
    Michael A. Chappell, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Manus J. Donahue, Matthias Günther, Peter Jezzard, Mark W. Woolrich
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010 63 5
  • Multiple Inflow Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling Reveals Delays in the Arterial Arrival Time in Minor Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack
    B.J. MacIntosh, A.C. Lindsay, I. Kylintireas, W. Kuker, M. Günther, M.D. Robson, J. Kennedy, R.P. Choudhury, P. Jezzard
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010 31 10
  • Simultaneous Measurement of Arterial Transit Time, Arterial Blood Volume, and Cerebral Blood Flow Using Arterial Spin-Labeling in Patients with Alzheimer Disease
    T. Yoshiura, A. Hiwatashi, K. Yamashita, Y. Ohyagi, A. Monji, Y. Takayama, E. Nagao, H. Kamano, T. Noguchi, H. Honda
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009 30 7
  • State-of-the-art MRI techniques in neuroradiology: principles, pitfalls, and clinical applications
    Magalie Viallon, Victor Cuvinciuc, Benedicte Delattre, Laura Merlini, Isabelle Barnaure-Nachbar, Seema Toso-Patel, Minerva Becker, Karl-Olof Lovblad, Sven Haller
    Neuroradiology 2015 57 5
  • Noninvasive MR imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with a carotid artery stenosis
    R.P.H. Bokkers, H. B. van der Worp, W. P.T.M. Mali, J. Hendrikse
    Neurology 2009 73 11
  • Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging in acute stroke: initial clinical experience
    C. Federau, S. Sumer, F. Becce, P. Maeder, K. O’Brien, R. Meuli, M. Wintermark
    Neuroradiology 2014 56 8

More in this TOC Section

  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire