Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticlePediatric Neuroimaging

Quantitative Differentiation Between Healthy and Disordered Brain Matter in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type I Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging

S.J.P.M. van Engelen, L.C. Krab, H.A. Moll, A. de Goede-Bolder, S.M.F. Pluijm, C.E. Catsman-Berrevoets, Y. Elgersma and M.H. Lequin
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2008, 29 (4) 816-822; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0921
S.J.P.M. van Engelen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.C. Krab
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.A. Moll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. de Goede-Bolder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.M.F. Pluijm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.E. Catsman-Berrevoets
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Elgersma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.H. Lequin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Region-of-interest placement. Transverse b = 0 s/mm2 images of a healthy control (multi-repetition single-shot echo-planar sequence; section thickness of 3 mm with no gap; 25 gradient directions; b = 1000 s/mm2; TR/TE = 15,000/82.1 ms; 1 average; FOV of 240 × 240 mm2; matrix of 128 × 128; voxel size of 1.8 × 1.8 × 3.0 mm3). Circular regions of interest are placed in the CWM (A), the CP and HI (B), the TH (C), the GP (D), and FWM and POWM (E).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    DTIs of the globus pallidus. Transverse DTIs (multi-repetition single-shot echo-planar sequence; section thickness of 3 mm with no gap; 25 gradient directions; b = 1000 s/mm2; TR/TE = 15,000/82.1 ms; 1 average; FOV of 240 × 240 mm2; matrix of 128 × 128; voxel size of 1.8 × 1.8 × 3.0 mm3). Girl with NF-1 (13 years of age) with a unilateral UBO in the GP. Arrow indicates an area of high intensity on the b = 0 s/mm2 image and high values on the ADC, λ2 (lambda 2), and λ3 (lambda 3) maps.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Mean ADC values. The cohort is divided in 3 groups: NF-1 regions with UBOs (UBO), NF-1 regions with normal-appearing brain matter (NAS), and controls. Mean ADC values for UBOs are higher than those for NAS in all regions (except POWM and FWM where no UBOs were found). Mean ADC values for NAS are significantly higher than those of controls in all regions, except CP. For convenience, the results of the HI area are presented in the same figure as the results of the other regions of interest. HI hyperintensities are presented as UBOs and normal-appearing HI areas as NAS. Significant differences between UBO and NAS are indicated by ★ and between NAS and controls by ⧫.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    FA values. Mean FA values ± SD for UBO, normal-appearing sites (NAS), and controls are plotted for the 7 regions of interest. Few significant differences are found between UBO and NAS, indicated by ★.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Am values. Mean Am values ± SD for UBO, normal-appearing sites (NAS), and controls per regions of interest. Significant differences between UBO and NAS are indicated by ★ and between NAS and controls by ⧫.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Eigenvalues per region. For UBO, normal-appearing sites (NAS), and controls, mean values for the 3 eigenvalues are plotted for each region. In all regions where UBOs are found, λ1, λ2, and λ3 are higher for UBOs than for NAS and higher for NAS compared with controls. Significant differences between UBO and NAS are indicated by ★ and between NAS and controls by ⧫.

Tables

  • Figures
  • DTI values per ROI*

    ROIGroupNo.Mean Value
    ADC × 10−3 mm2/sFAλ1 × 10−3 mm2/sλ2 × 10−3 mm2/sλ3 × 10−3 mm2/sAm
    POWMNAS500.79 ± 0.050.31 ± 0.061.09 ± 0.060.74 ± 0.060.52 ± 0.070.20 ± 0.04
    Controls80.75 ± 0.020.36 ± 0.061.06 ± 0.040.70 ± 0.050.48 ± 0.030.19 ± 0.06
    FWMNAS500.80 ± 0.040.31 ± 0.041.04 ± 0.050.76 ± 0.040.56 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.02
    Controls80.75 ± 0.030.30 ± 0.020.98 ± 0.040.71 ± 0.040.53 ± 0.040.16 ± 0.02
    GP†UBO230.83 ± 0.070.25 ± 0.061.02 ± 0.120.79 ± 0.070.64 ± 0.060.13 ± 0.04
    NAS270.72 ± 0.040.17 ± 0.040.83 ± 0.050.70 ± 0.040.60 ± 0.040.09 ± 0.01
    Controls80.70 ± 0.020.16 ± 0.020.81 ± 0.030.68 ± 0.030.58 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.02
    THUBO70.81 ± 0.040.29 ± 0.101.04 ± 0.050.75 ± 0.060.61 ± 0.080.15 ± 0.04
    NAS430.76 ± 0.030.31 ± 0.051.02 ± 0.050.70 ± 0.040.55 ± 0.040.17 ± 0.03
    Controls80.70 ± 0.020.36 ± 0.060.98 ± 0.070.63 ± 0.030.47 ± 0.020.21 ± 0.04
    HIUBO230.90 ± 0.050.20 ± 0.041.07 ± 0.510.87 ± 0.420.72 ± 0.510.10 ± 0.03
    NAS250.84 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.041.04 ± 0.070.82 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.040.12 ± 0.03
    Controls80.80 ± 0.020.21 ± 0.020.97 ± 0.020.78 ± 0.030.63 ± 0.030.11 ± 0.02
    CWM†UBO250.85 ± 0.140.32 ± 0.111.11 ± 0.080.85 ± 0.350.61 ± 0.130.20 ± 0.18
    NAS250.72 ± 0.060.43 ± 0.111.05 ± 0.130.65 ± 0.070.47 ± 0.090.23 ± 0.07
    Controls80.68 ± 0.020.45 ± 0.081.00 ± 0.060.62 ± 0.050.43 ± 0.040.23 ± 0.05
    CPUBO160.89 ± 0.050.44 ± 0.061.31 ± 0.090.77 ± 0.090.54 ± 0.090.25 ± 0.04
    NAS330.81 ± 0.050.47 ± 0.051.32 ± 0.110.69 ± 0.090.47 ± 0.050.30 ± 0.05
    Controls80.80 ± 0.050.51 ± 0.041.32 ± 0.120.63 ± 0.050.43 ± 0.040.33 ± 0.03
    • Note:—ROI indicates region of interest; NAS, normal-appearing sites; POWM, parieto-occipital white matter; FWM, frontal white matter; GP, globus pallidus; TH, thalamus; HI, hippocampus; CWM, cerebellar white matter; CP, cerebral peduncle; UBO, unidentified bright object; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; FA, fractional anisotropy; Am, axial anisotropy.

    • * Values are averaged for left and right hemispheres. For all indices, mean values ± SD are given for regions with UBOs, regions without UBOs (NAS), and healthy controls.

    • † Nonparametric data.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 4
April 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative Differentiation Between Healthy and Disordered Brain Matter in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type I Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.J.P.M. van Engelen, L.C. Krab, H.A. Moll, A. de Goede-Bolder, S.M.F. Pluijm, C.E. Catsman-Berrevoets, Y. Elgersma, M.H. Lequin
Quantitative Differentiation Between Healthy and Disordered Brain Matter in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type I Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2008, 29 (4) 816-822; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0921

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Quantitative Differentiation Between Healthy and Disordered Brain Matter in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type I Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging
S.J.P.M. van Engelen, L.C. Krab, H.A. Moll, A. de Goede-Bolder, S.M.F. Pluijm, C.E. Catsman-Berrevoets, Y. Elgersma, M.H. Lequin
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2008, 29 (4) 816-822; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0921
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Understanding autism spectrum disorder and social functioning in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: protocol for a cross-sectional multimodal study
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography in Children with Craniosynostosis Syndromes
  • Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Modeling CNS Dysfunction
  • Corpus Callosum Morphology and Microstructure Assessed Using Structural MR Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Initial Findings in Adults with Neurofibromatosis Type 1
  • Brain structure and function in neurofibromatosis type 1: current concepts and future directions
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Subpial Hemorrhage & Motor Outcomes in Neonates
  • Norrie Disease Intracranial Signal Abnormalities
  • Frontal Paraventricular Cysts
Show more Pediatric Neuroimaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire