Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measurement of Cervical Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis

R. Zivadinov, A.C. Banas, V. Yella, N. Abdelrahman, B. Weinstock-Guttman and M.G. Dwyer
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2008, 29 (2) 319-325; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0813
R. Zivadinov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.C. Banas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Yella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Abdelrahman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Weinstock-Guttman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.G. Dwyer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Cervical cord identification and quantification. Left, Original cervical 3D SPGR-T1WI. Center, Edge-detection image. Right, Cord edges identified by operator.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Cervical canal identification and quantification. Left, Original cervical T2WI. Center, Edge-detection image. Right, Spinal canal edge identified by operator.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Correlation of cervical cord absolute volume and brain parenchyma fraction with disability, as measured by EDSS.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Demographic and clinical characteristics of normal control subjects and multiple sclerosis patients, according to disease type

    VariableNC (n= 19)MS (n = 65)CIS (n = 11)RR (n = 34)SP (n = 14)PP (n = 7)
    Female, n (%)10 (52.6)48 (72.7)9 (81.8)26 (76.5)9 (64.3)4 (57.1)
    Age in years, mean (SD)30.4 (12)41.2 (12.4)36.9 (9.1)42.4 (8.6)47.2 (11.4)59.9 (12)
    Disease duration in years, mean (SD)NA11.8 (10.7)1.1 (1.4)11.1 (8.2)17.1 (9.9)19.6 (18.6)
    EDSS, mean (SD)NA3.1 (2.1)1.6 (0.3)2.1 (1.3)5.0 (1.8)5.8 (1.3)
    • Note:—NC indicates normal control subjects; MS, multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing-remitting; SP, secondary-progressive; PP, primary-progressive; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; NA, not applicable.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Coefficient of variation of different cervical spinal cord atrophy measures

    Cervical Atrophy MeasureScan-Rescan COV, Mean % (95% CI)Intrarater COV, Mean % (95% CI)Interrater COV, Mean % (95% CI)
    CCAV1.29 (0.62–2.37)0.25 (0.12–0.46)1.26 (0.60–2.30)
    CCF1.4 (0.67–2.60)0.6 (0.29–1.10)1.1 (0.53–2.00)
    CCAV/ICV1.6 (0.77–2.90)0.7 (0.34–1.30)1.6 (0.77–2.90)
    BPF0.1 (0.048–0.184)00
    MPD0.84 (0.40–1.55)00
    • Note:—COV indicates coefficient of variation; CCAV, cervical cord absolute volume in cubic millimeters; CCF, cervical cord fraction; CCAV/ICV, cervical cord absolute volume to intracranial volume; CI, confidence interval; BPF, brain parenchyma fraction; MPD, mean parenchyma diffusivity.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Cervical cord atrophy and lesion MR imaging measures in normal control subjects and multiple sclerosis patients, according to disease type

    VariableNC (n= 19), Mean (SD)MS (n= 66), Mean (SD)CIS (n= 11), Mean (SD)RR (n= 34), Mean (SD)SP (n= 14), Mean (SD)PP (n= 7), Mean (SD)
    CCAV, mm37691.7 (1136.2)7063.2 (1206.8)**7461.1 (599.5)7281.6 (758.9)5990.7 (1060.9)***6907.3 (1796.2)*
    CCF0.343 (0.29)0.318 (0.23)**0.344 (0.04)0.307 (0.06)0.307 (0.06)*0.294 (0.04)*
    CCAV/ICV0.012 (0.002)0.016 (0.02)0.012 (0.002)0.015 (0.005)0.015 (0.016)0.01 (0.005)
    Cervical T2-LV, mLNA4.6 (5.8)0.7 (0.02)4.2 (3.8)9.7 (8)2.6 (3.2)
    • Note:—NC indicates normal control subject; MS, multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing-remitting; SP, secondary-progressive; PP, primary-progressive; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; CCAV, cervical cord absolute volume; CCF, cervical cord fraction; CCAV/ICV, cervical cord absolute volume to intracranial volume; LV, lesion volume; NA, nonapplicable. A general linear model analysis was performed to test significant differences between normal control subjects and multiple sclerosis patients in which the age was entered as a covariate and, due to the multiple comparisons, a post hoc Bonferroni correction was applied directly in the SPSS analysis model.

    • P values are provided between normal control subject and multiple sclerosis patients

    • * P < .05;

    • ** P < .01;

    • *** P < .001.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Brain MR imaging measures in normal control subjects and multiple sclerosis patients, according to disease type

    VariableNC (n= 19), Mean (SD)MS (n= 66), Mean (SD)CIS (n= 11), Mean (SD)RR (n= 34), Mean (SD)SP (n= 14), Mean (SD)PP (n= 7), Mean (SD)
    BPF0.845 (0.006)0.827 (0.02)0.834 (0.01)0.832 (0.01)0.815 (0.02)0.815 (0.009)
    MPD, × 10−6 mm2/s1130.1 (65.8)1204.3 (89.2)1143.4 (59.1)1222.8 (100.4)1196.3 (71)1222.9 (61)
    T2-LV, mLNA11 (12.6)5.1 (6.5)12.1 (14.4)18.3 (13.5)6.9 (7.7)
    T1-LV, mLNA1.7 (3.2)0.5 (0.7)1.2 (1.7)3.2 (5.4)1.2 (1.5)
    • Note:—NC indicates normal control subjects; MS, multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing-remitting; SP, secondary-progressive; PP, primary-progressive; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; BPF, brain parenchyma fraction; MPD, mean parenchyma diffusivity; LV, lesion volume; NA, nonapplicable.

    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Correlation analysis between cervical and brain MR imaging measures and clinical variables

    VariableEDSSDisease Duration
    rPrP
    CCAV, mm3−0.51*<0.0001*−0.150.246
    CCF−0.31*0.018*−0.140.260
    CCAV/ICV−0.120.459−0.120.438
    Cervical T2-LV, mL0.38*0.027*0.33*0.04*
    BPF−0.43*0.001*−0.36*0.004*
    MPD0.31*0.04*0.250.069
    Brain T2-LV, mL0.160.2320.25*0.047*
    Brain T1-LV, mL0.36*0.009*0.260.055
    • Note:—CCAV indicates cervical cord absolute volume; CCF, cervical cord fraction; CCAV/ICV, cervical cord absolute volume to intracranial volume; BPF, brain parenchyma fraction; MPD, mean parenchyma diffusivity; LV, lesion volume.

    • * Values are significant (P < .05).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 2
February 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measurement of Cervical Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis
R. Zivadinov, A.C. Banas, V. Yella, N. Abdelrahman, B. Weinstock-Guttman, M.G. Dwyer
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 319-325; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0813
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Aged hind-limb clasping experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models aspects of the neurodegenerative process seen in multiple sclerosis
  • Cervical Cord Atrophy and Long-Term Disease Progression in Patients with Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
  • Cervical spinal cord atrophy: An early marker of progressive MS onset
  • Multicenter Validation of Mean Upper Cervical Cord Area Measurements from Head 3D T1-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Differential patterns of spinal cord and brain atrophy in NMO and MS
  • Cervical spinal cord volume loss is related to clinical disability progression in multiple sclerosis
  • Spinal cord tract diffusion tensor imaging reveals disability substrate in demyelinating disease
  • Voxel-wise mapping of cervical cord damage in multiple sclerosis patients with different clinical phenotypes
  • A multicenter assessment of cervical cord atrophy among MS clinical phenotypes
  • A 3T MR Imaging Investigation of the Topography of Whole Spinal Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Dynamic CT Myelography: Patient Positioning
  • Evaluation of SIH MR Scoring Systems in Normals
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measurement of Cervical Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R. Zivadinov, A.C. Banas, V. Yella, N. Abdelrahman, B. Weinstock-Guttman, M.G. Dwyer
Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measurement of Cervical Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 319-325; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0813

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.