Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Occlusion Length Is a Crucial Determinant of Efficiency and Complication Rate in Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

J. Gralla, M. Burkhardt, G. Schroth, M. El-Koussy, M. Reinert, K. Nedeltchev, J. Slotboom and C. Brekenfeld
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2008, 29 (2) 247-252; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0790
J. Gralla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Burkhardt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Schroth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. El-Koussy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Reinert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Nedeltchev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Slotboom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Brekenfeld
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Comparison of distal devices. The Merci device (A) has a coil-like shape; the Catch device (B) has significantly more filaments forming its basketlike shape than the BCR Roadsaver device (C) with its complex snarelike shape. D, The device is delivered using a microcatheter and is unsheathed behind the clot, where force is applied to the distal base of the thrombus.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Magnified image of initial 10-mm thrombus; the microcatheter (*) is positioned proximal to the thrombus (]) with the device unsheathed (upper and lower markers >) distal to the thrombus (A). B–D, During initial retrieval, the device partially catches the thrombus without significant elongation of the vessel. C and F, Minor dislocation of thrombus and device is visible at the junction of the lingual and maxillary arteries. E, Elongation of the thrombus in proximity to the balloon catheter (open arrow) illustrates the effect of the additional proximal aspiration. Total retrieval was achieved.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Retrieval of the 10-mm thrombus. A, The distal device (upper and lower markers <) enters the thrombus. B and C, Approximately half of the thrombotic material is carried within the device; the other half is either pushed sideways to the microcatheter (*) or proximal to the device and is prone to collateral flow (D). E, The supplementary proximal aspiration sucks the entire thrombus from the device into the balloon catheter (open arrow) to achieve total recanalization.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A, During the retrieval attempt of the 40-mm thrombus, the device is unsheathed distal to the thrombus. B, The device (upper and lower markers <) enters the thrombus. C–E, The thrombotic material is progressively compressed between the device and the microcatheter (*).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    The 40-mm thrombus (]) is initially mobilized within the carrying vessel (A) and partially compressed sideways to the microcatheter (B). C, The thrombus enters the balloon catheter (open arrow); compression of the thrombus causes the distal part to stick at the tip of the balloon catheter. The thrombus is elongated (D) and finally fractures with consequent thromboembolization (→) into other major vessels (E). A major potion of the thrombus is retrieved to the balloon catheter.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    A, The device (upper and lower markers <) is unsheathed distal to the 40-mm thrombus. B and C, During the retrieval attempt, the device enters the compressed thrombus, and the pulling force causes marked elongation of the carrying vessel. The device finally slips through the thrombus catching only a minor fragment (D), which is retrieved together with the microcatheter (*) to the balloon catheter (open arrow; E).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Results for mechanical thrombectomy as related to thrombus length

    VariableOcclusion Length, mmLevel of Significance
    102040
    Total number of attempts92527NA
    Mean time per attempt (±SD), min10.6 (± 2.7)11.5 (± 4.3)11.8 (± 3.1)P = .67*
    Total recanalization rate, TIMI 3, %10071.442.9
    Success rate for partial clot removal, %77.868.055.6P = .43*
        10 vs 20 mmOR, 1.6 (95% CI, 0.3–9.8)
        10 vs 40 mmOR, 2.8 (95% CI, 0.5–16.0)
        20 vs 40 mmOR, 1.7 (95% CI, 0.5–5.3)
    No. of attempts per successful recanalization1.359P < .005*
    No. of attempts achieving TIMI 3, %77.820.011.1
        10 vs 20 mmOR, 14.0 (95% CI, 2.2–89.2)
        10 vs 40 mmOR, 28.0 (95% CI, 3.9–202.2)
        20 vs 40 mmOR, 2.0 (95% CI, 0.4–9.4)
    Thromboembolism rate during passing procedure, %04.07.4P = 0.67*
    Thromboembolism in other vessels, %04.014.8P = 0.24*
        10 vs 20 mm
        10 vs 40 mm
        20 vs 40 mmOR, 4.2 (95% CI, 0.4–40.2)
    • Note:—OR indicates odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NA, not applicable.

    • * ANOVA.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 2
February 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Occlusion Length Is a Crucial Determinant of Efficiency and Complication Rate in Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Gralla, M. Burkhardt, G. Schroth, M. El-Koussy, M. Reinert, K. Nedeltchev, J. Slotboom, C. Brekenfeld
Occlusion Length Is a Crucial Determinant of Efficiency and Complication Rate in Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 247-252; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0790

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Occlusion Length Is a Crucial Determinant of Efficiency and Complication Rate in Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
J. Gralla, M. Burkhardt, G. Schroth, M. El-Koussy, M. Reinert, K. Nedeltchev, J. Slotboom, C. Brekenfeld
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 247-252; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0790
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Characterization of strut indentation during mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke clot analogs
  • Stent retriever placement in embolectomy: the choice of the post-bifurcational trunk influences the first-pass reperfusion result in M1 occlusions
  • Importance of truncal-type occlusion in stentriever-based thrombectomy for acute stroke
  • Prediction of Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy Outcomes by Dynamic Multidetector CT Angiography in Patients with Acute Carotid T or MCA Occlusions
  • The Curved MCA: Influence of Vessel Anatomy on Recanalization Results of Mechanical Thrombectomy after Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • 4D CT Angiography More Closely Defines Intracranial Thrombus Burden Than Single-Phase CT Angiography
  • Experimental Evaluation of Immediate Recanalization Effect and Recanalization Efficacy of a New Thrombus Retriever for Acute Stroke Treatment In Vivo
  • Location of the Clot and Outcome of Perfusion Defects in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis
  • Infarct Volume Is a Pivotal Biomarker After Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy
  • The Impact of Thromboemboli Histology on the Performance of a Mechanical Thrombectomy Device
  • Impact of intracranial self-expanding stents in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: efficacy and limitations
  • In Vivo Evaluation of the First Dedicated Combined Flow-Restoration and Mechanical Thrombectomy Device in a Swine Model of Acute Vessel Occlusion
  • In Vivo Evaluation of the Phenox CRC Mechanical Thrombectomy Device in a Swine Model of Acute Vessel Occlusion
  • Response to Letter by Dai et al
  • CT Angiography Clot Burden Score and Collateral Score: Correlation with Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Cavernous dural AVF treated by transfacial route
  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire