Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherNeurointervention

A Rare Complication of Carotid Artery Stenting: Displacement of Marker Ring Causing Locking of Stent and Incomplete Stent Expansion

E. Akgul, E.H. Aksungur, K. Korur, K. Aikimbaev and H. Yaliniz
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2007, 28 (7) 1403-1404; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0562
E. Akgul
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.H. Aksungur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Korur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Aikimbaev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Yaliniz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: We present a rare case of a complication of placement of a carotid artery stent represented by partial opening of a carotid Wallstent caused by displacement of its metal ring marker, which thus hindered complete expansion of the stent. An intraluminally locked carotid stent necessitated referral of the patient for urgent carotid endarterectomy. A possible reason of this unusual complication can be a manufacturing defect, which, to our knowledge, was not documented previously in open public data bases or on the Internet.

Carotid artery stent (CAS) placement is a well-established method for revascularization of the obstructed lumen in patients with carotid artery disease. Complications may occur during the procedure and generally are presented by neurologic symptoms as a result of microembolism or thrombosis, which can be prevented by the use of a protective filter. Less common complications during CAS placement are hemodynamic conditions such as bradycardia and hypotension, which are easily treatable.1–3 Mechanical complications such as spasm or dissection are seen less and less frequently with personal experience and innovations in equipment. Complications caused by unlucky mechanical accidents during stent implantation such as incomplete opening are unusual and therefore can be a reason for unpredictable outcomes of CAS placement. We present a rare case of a CAS complication with incomplete opening of a carotid Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) caused by displacement of its metal ring marker, which hindered the complete expansion of the stent and required urgent surgical intervention.

Case Report

A 71-year-old woman with a history of transient ischemic attack and right internal carotid artery stenosis of more than 70% in the proximal portion previously diagnosed on CT and MR angiography was referred to our hospital for implantation of a carotid stent. CAS with a carotid Wallstent Monorail4 with a cerebral protection filter (EPI Filter Wire; Boston Scientific) was planned.

The patient had received therapy with antiaggregant medications: aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day for 1 week before stent implantation. A 6F shuttle introducer was placed into the right common carotid artery by the femoral approach, and preprocedure control angiograms were obtained. A cerebral protection filter was placed distally to the obstructed internal carotid artery, and then self-expandable Wallstent (7 × 50 mm) deployment was performed. During deployment, unexpected slipping of the distal ring of the metal marker over the shaft of the stent was observed. The slipped ring at one fourth of the proximal end of the stent hindered the complete expansion of the stent. The shaft of the stent and the protection filter could not be pulled back because the metal ring locked over the stent (Fig 1). Attempts to rescue the fixed stent and slipped metal ring were unsuccessful, and the patient was rushed to the operating room. During endarterectomy, the stent, stent shaft, and protection filter were removed without any surgical complication (Fig 2). Four days after the operation, the patient was discharged from the hospital without any neurologic deficit.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

After deployment of the Wallstent, a distal metallic ring marker, causing incomplete expansion, is seen on the stent (A). Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid artery with the Wallstent is shown (B).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

The stent, shaft, and filter are seen after surgical removal of the devices. The distal metallic marker (white arrow), which must be on the distal end of the shaft (black arrow), is on the stent and prevents the complete expansion of the stent. Arrowhead shows the proximal metallic marker on the shaft.

Discussion

Periprocedural complications of CAS placement generally are hemodynamic, thromboembolic, or mechanical. Hemodynamic changes such as bradycardia, hypotension, and asystole are often seen but are easily treatable complications. Wholey et al1 reported bradycardia in 10% of patients during prestent dilation. In our unpublished series, we observed bradycardia in almost 50% of patients during in-stent dilation and asystole in about 2% of patients. Park et al5 revealed development of periprocedural hypotension in 23% of patients. The most important complications of CAS are related to distal embolization from a crushing of atheromatous plaque that occurs before or after dilation. Although cerebral protection devices reduce this kind of embolism, they can cause some mechanical or iatrogenic complications such as vasospasm and dissection of the vessel.2, 6–8 In cases of serious vasospasm, minor stroke can be seen.9 However “mechanical” complications such as incomplete expansion of the stent caused by displacement of a marker ring with intraluminal locking of the stent are unusual.

The low-profile and self-expandable carotid Wallstent Monorail (6–10 mm in diameter and 30–50 mm in length), which has been used extensively by our interventional team for the last 3 years, is composed of a biomedical alloy. The constructive feature of such products is that during deployment, it foreshortens according to the diameter of the target vessel, and a constant radial force allows embedding of the stent into the lumen and adapting to the variable diameter of the vessel across the bifurcation. The main disadvantage is that the Wallstent straightens the vessel more than the expanded open-cell nitinol stent. Two metallic rings on the stent, which are squeezed over a plastic shaft, indicate the proximal and distal ends of the Wallstent. After deployment, the stent carrier shaft must be pulled back to release the stent.4, 10, 11 In our case, the distal metallic ring marker of the stent carrier shaft slipped over the stent before deployment was accomplished. During deployment, although we pulled back the sheath of the shaft fully, we realized that the stent did not open and the distal metallic marker, which was squeezed around the distal end of the plastic shaft, was over the proximal one fourth of the stent, hindering the complete expansion of the stent. To our knowledge, this unusual complication has not been documented previously in an open public data base or on the Internet. The distal metallic marker slipped, possibly because it was not squeezed sufficiently during production.

In conclusion, the distal metallic ring marker of the carotid Wallstent displacement hindered the complete expansion of the stent during CAS placement. This complication can occur and can necessitate referral of the patient for an urgent endarterectomy. Informing the surgical team before CAS for possible complications requiring urgent endarterectomy may decrease mortality.

References

  1. ↵
    Wholey MH, Wholey MH, Jarmolowski CR, et al. Endovascular stents for carotid artery occlusive disease. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:326–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Sztriha LK, Voros E, Sas K, et al. Favorable early outcome of carotid artery stenting without protection devices. Stroke 2004;35:2862–66
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Mathew B, Bhatia V, Francis L. Nonsurgical carotid revascularization. Cardiol Rev 2005;13:197–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Carotid Wallstent Monorail, Boston Scientific Corporation. Available at: http://www.bostonscientific.ie/medspecialty/deviceDetail.jsp?task=tskBasicDevice.jsp&sectionId=4&relId=3,126,127,128&deviceId=12017&uniqueId=MPDB2219. Accessed October 30, 2006.
  5. ↵
    Park B, Shapiro D, Dahn M, et al. Carotid artery angioplasty with stenting and postprocedure hypotension. Am J Surg 2005;190:691–95
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R, et al. Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:786–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. Liistro F, Di Mario C. Carotid artery stenting. Heart 2003;89:944–48
    FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Kovacic JC, Roy PR, Baron DW, et al. Percutaneous carotid artery stenting: a strategy in evolution. Intern Med J 2005;35:143–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Cardaioli P, Giordan M, Panfili M, et al. Complication with an embolic protection device during carotid angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:234–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Rabe K, Sievert H. Carotid artery stenting: state of the art. J Interv Cardiol 2004;17:417–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Incidence of hypotension reduced with Boston Scientific's carotid WALLSTENT Monorail endoprosthesis as compared with slotted-tube nitinol stents. Medical News Today 11 October 2006. Available at: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=53807. Accessed October 30, 2006.
  • Received November 13, 2006.
  • Accepted after revision December 12, 2006.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 7
August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Rare Complication of Carotid Artery Stenting: Displacement of Marker Ring Causing Locking of Stent and Incomplete Stent Expansion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E. Akgul, E.H. Aksungur, K. Korur, K. Aikimbaev, H. Yaliniz
A Rare Complication of Carotid Artery Stenting: Displacement of Marker Ring Causing Locking of Stent and Incomplete Stent Expansion
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2007, 28 (7) 1403-1404; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0562

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
A Rare Complication of Carotid Artery Stenting: Displacement of Marker Ring Causing Locking of Stent and Incomplete Stent Expansion
E. Akgul, E.H. Aksungur, K. Korur, K. Aikimbaev, H. Yaliniz
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2007, 28 (7) 1403-1404; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0562
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Cavernous dural AVF treated by transfacial route
  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire