Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherBRAIN

Utility of Navigator-Prospective Acquisition Correction Technique (PACE) for Reducing Motion in Brain MR Imaging Studies

J.D. Barnwell, J.K. Smith and M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2007, 28 (4) 790-791;
J.D. Barnwell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.K. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Castillo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    The navigator box is positioned midsagittal just posterior to the bregma.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A, Sagittal T1 FSE (TR, 429 ms; TE, 10 ms; acquisition time, 2 minutes) demonstrates considerable motion artifacts in our patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

    B, Sagittal T1 FSE (TR, 429 ms; TE, 10 ms) with the navigator pulse to gate the same as patient's head rocking motion. Although the acquisition time for this sequence was 3.5 minutes, it is still far superior in quality to the original FSE (A).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A, Axial T2 FSE (TR, 5890 ms; TE, 104 ms; echo train, 21; acquisition time, 2 minutes) performed without gating and resulting in a nondiagnostic image due to head rocking secondary to high-pressure ventilation.

    B, Axial T2 FSE (TR, 6635 ms; TE, 89 ms; echo train, 21; acquisition time, 5 min). This is the same sequence and patient seen in A but with the addition of the navigator pulse.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Sequences run on patient 1

    Acquisition Time (min:sec)TR (ms)TE (ms)Echo TrainResolutionIPAT Acceleration FactorComments
    T1 SAG FSE2:08429103256 × 2052Nondiagnostic due to motion
    T2 Ax FSE2:22589010421256 × 2052Nondiagnostic due to motion
    T1 GRE, 3 planes0:321024.8NA256 × 1562Nondiagnostic due to motion
    T1 FSE with navigator, 3 planes3:30–4:00429103256 × 2052Diagnostic
    T2 Ax FSE3:00589010421256 × 2052Nondiagnostic
    T2 Ax FSE navigator5:0066358921256 × 2052Diagnostic
    • Note:—IPAT indicates integrated parallel acquisition technique; SAG, sagittal; FSE, fast spin-echo; Ax, axial; GRE, gradient-echo; NA, not applicable. Both the TR and the acquisition time will be a variable of the frequency of patient motion. They should be adjusted inversely with concatenations to keep the effective TR short for T1 sequences.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Sequences run on patient 2

    Acquisition Time (min:sec)TR (ms)TE (ms)Echo TrainResolutionIPAT AccelerationFactorComments
    T1 SAG and Cor FSE2:18475163256 × 2562Nondiagnostic due to motion
    T2 Ax FSE2:22589010421256 × 2052Nondiagnostic due to motion
    T1 GRE, 3 planes0:321024.8NA256 × 1562Nondiagnostic due to motion
    T1 FSE with navigator, 3 planes4:00–6:00429103256 × 2052Diagnostic
    T2 Ax FSE4:30589010421256 × 2052Diagnostic
    • Note:—IPAT indicates integrated parallel acquisition technique; SAG, sagittal; Cor, coronal; FSE, fast spin-echo; Ax, axial; GRE, gradient-echo; NA, not applicable. Both the TR and the acquisition time will be a variable of the frequency of patient motion. They should be adjusted inversely with concatenations to keep the effective TR short for T1 sequences.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 4
April 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utility of Navigator-Prospective Acquisition Correction Technique (PACE) for Reducing Motion in Brain MR Imaging Studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J.D. Barnwell, J.K. Smith, M. Castillo
Utility of Navigator-Prospective Acquisition Correction Technique (PACE) for Reducing Motion in Brain MR Imaging Studies
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2007, 28 (4) 790-791;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Utility of Navigator-Prospective Acquisition Correction Technique (PACE) for Reducing Motion in Brain MR Imaging Studies
J.D. Barnwell, J.K. Smith, M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2007, 28 (4) 790-791;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique and Representative Cases
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Motion-Compensation Techniques in Neonatal and Fetal MR Imaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire