Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Carotid Plaque Composition and Cerebral Infarction: MR Imaging Study

Mohamed Ouhlous, H. Zwenneke Flach, Thomas T. de Weert, Johanna M. Hendriks, Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Peter M. T. Pattynama and Aad van der Lugt
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 1044-1049;
Mohamed Ouhlous
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Zwenneke Flach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas T. de Weert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna M. Hendriks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diederik W. J. Dippel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter M. T. Pattynama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aad van der Lugt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Besides the severity of carotid artery stenosis, atherosclerotic plaque composition is an important determinant of cerebral symptoms. We analyzed the relationship between the composition of the atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid artery bifurcation and ipsilateral ischemic cerebral lesions on MR imaging.

METHODS: Forty-one patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70%) underwent black-blood, fast spin-echo imaging of the carotid artery and turbo fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (t-FLAIR) imaging of the brain. Plaque regions with a relative decrease in signal intensity in the plaque from proton density-weighted (TE = 14 ms) to T2-weighted (TE = 50 ms) imaging were considered to be lipid cores. We assessed the number and location of infarcts in the ipsilateral cortex, basal ganglia, and centrum semiovale, and hyperintense white matter lesions on t-FLAIR images.

RESULTS: Lipid in the atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid bifurcation was seen in 25 patients. Ipsilateral infarctions were seen in 22 (54%); most often, it involved the centrum semiovale. Patients with a lipid core had an ipsilateral infarct more often than patients without a lipid core (68% vs. 31%; P = .03). Centrum semiovale infarcts were more frequent (56% vs. 25%, P = .06) and the median number of centrum semiovale infarcts was higher P = .04) in patients with a lipid core than in patients without a lipid core.

CONCLUSION: Ischemic cerebral lesions were common in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Plaque composition, as assessed with MR imaging, is related to the presence and extent of ischemic cerebral lesions.

The severity of carotid stenosis is strongly related to ipsilateral cerebral infarction, and it is used as parameter in deciding which patients may benefit from treatment of the carotid lesion (1, 2). However, a large proportion of cerebral infarcts may be caused by thromboembolism. This observation suggests that the degree of carotid stenosis is only indirectly related to the occurrence of cerebral infarction and that it does not capture the essence of the process. Besides the severity of stenosis, plaque composition is considered an important determinant of symptoms. The concept of unstable or vulnerable plaque that may rupture and release thromboembolic material has been postulated for the coronary arteries (3–5), and it may also be applicable to the carotid arteries. This vulnerable plaque contains a large necrotic lipid core covered by a thin or disrupted fibrous cap (6–8). Information concerning the composition of the plaque may enhance predictions of the infarct risk that are based on the degree of carotid stenosis.

Imaging of carotid plaque components in vivo has been performed with ultrasonography (US) (9, 10). However, histologic evaluation demonstrates no clear relationship with different plaque components, and interobserver variability is high (11, 12). Therefore, a more quantitative method with less interobserver variability, the gray-scale median (GSM), was introduced to characterize the plaque (12, 13). GSM is positively related to both clinical symptoms of cerebral ischemia and ischemic lesions demonstrated on CT (13–15).

High-resolution MR imaging has emerged as a potential technique for atherosclerotic plaque imaging (16, 17). In addition, MR imaging has proved its superiority over CT in the analysis of ischemic cerebral lesions (18). To test the concept of a vulnerable plaque leading to an increased risk for cerebrovascular events, we analyzed the relationship between the composition of the carotid atherosclerotic plaque and ipsilateral ischemic cerebral lesions in symptomatic patients on MR imaging.

Methods

Patients

Between November 2000 and July 2003, 64 patients (13 women, 51 men; median age, 68 years; age range, 44–86 years) with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70%) scheduled for endarterectomy or carotid stent placement underwent MR imaging of both the carotid artery and the brain.

This study was approved by the local institutional review board, and patients gave written informed consent. The patients were screened for cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. The severity of carotid artery stenosis as defined by using the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators criteria (1) was based on selective digital subtraction angiography. A division was made between 70–89% and 90–99% stenosis.

Imaging Protocol

MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T system with a gradient amplitude of 40 mTm−1 and a maximum slew rate of 150Tm−1s−1 (Signa CV/i; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). To obtain high-resolution images of the symptomatic carotid artery, a dedicated phased-array coil (19) was used. The brain was imaged with a quadrature head coil (GE Medical Systems).

Patients were imaged within 3 days before carotid intervention. Table 1 shows the imaging protocol for the carotid artery. First, a two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence of the carotid bifurcation was performed. The caudal coordinates of the bifurcation on the images were used to plan eight consecutive axial 3-mm proton density-weighted (TE = 14 ms) and T2-weighted (TE = 50 ms) black-blood, fast spin-echo sections with the carotid artery in the center of the image (Table 1). The first section was planned for just below the bifurcation; the next sections were cranial, without intersection spacing. To reduce the imaging time, T2-weighted images were acquired only at the levels at which atherosclerotic disease was seen on the proton density-weighted images (19). MR imaging of the brain was subsequently performed. The MR imaging protocol consisted of a t-FLAIR sequence (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Imaging protocol

Definitions and Analyses

Previous studies with 1.5–3T units demonstrated that lipid core has a shorter T2 than that of fibrous tissue, both in vitro (20–23) and in vivo (24, 25). Therefore, lipid has a relative signal intensity drop on proton density-weighted images versus T2-weighted images in comparison to fibrous tissue. Shinnar et al (26) confirmed these findings in an ex vivo study with a 9.4-T a machine and reported that lipid had high intensity on proton density-weighted images and lower intensity on T2-weighted images. Therefore, a distinct region in the atherosclerotic plaque, which showed a relative decrease in signal intensity to fibrous tissue from proton density- to T2-weighted images (from hyperintense to intermediate or hypointense or from intermediate to hypointense) was considered to represent lipid core (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial lack-blood fast spin-echo images of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and external carotid artery (ECA). Comparison of images reveals no changes in relative signal intensity of the plaque. Hyperintense region is fibrous tissue, and hypointense spots are calcifications.

A, Proton density-weighted image. L = lumen.

B, Corresponding T2-weighted image. Plaque in the ICA is mainly hyperintense, with hypointense spots.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Axial lack-blood fast spin-echo images of the ICA (arrow). Plaque in the ICA is hyperintense. L = lumen.

A and B, Proton density-weighted (A) and corresponding T2-weighted (B) images. Large region of the plaque has intermediate signal intensity, with hyperintense edges.

C and D, Another patient. Proton density-weighted (C) and corresponding T2-weighted (D) images. Plaque in the ICA has a large region of intermediate signal intensity, which is relatively decreased in D, while the rest of the plaque remains hyperintense.

Two observers (M.O., A.v.d.L.) analyzed the MR images independently, blinded to the results of the brain MR imaging. Differences were solved by consensus and these results were correlated with the cerebral lesions. The two observers assessed the quality of the MR images of the carotid artery and classified them by consensus as good, moderate, or poor. Only studies with good image quality were analyzed further. The signal intensity of plaque components at the most stenotic region was assessed relative to the signal intensity of surrounding muscles on proton density- and T2-weighted images. The signal intensity was classified as hyperintense, intermediate, or hypointense.

FLAIR images of the brain were analyzed for the presence and number of cortical infarcts, subcortical infarcts, and hyperintense white matter lesions in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Cortical infarctions were defined as focal atrophy of the cortex and underlying white matter, characterized by signal intensity similar to CSF. The atrophy was surrounded by a hyperintense region (Fig 3A). Subcortical infarcts were defined as hypointense lesions with the signal intensity of CSF. This hypointense lesion may have been surrounded by a hyperintense ring (Fig 3B). A division was made on the basis of the location of infarcts in basal ganglia and centrum semiovale. Hyperintense white matter lesions were defined as hyperintense regions ≥3 mm (Fig 3C). Two experienced neuroradiologists (ZF, A.v.d.L.) analyzed the images, and differences were solved by consensus. The neuroradiologists were blinded to the results of the carotid plaque analysis. Carotid plaque and brain were analyzed with a time interval of 4 weeks. The presence and number of cerebral lesions in patients with and without lipid core were compared.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

t-FLAIR images of the brain.

A, Cortical infarct in the territory of the left middle cerebral artery.

B, Centrum semiovale infarct (arrow) in the left hemisphere.

C, White matter lesion (arrow) in the right hemisphere.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed with software (SPSS version 11.0.1; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Differences between categorical data were analyzed with the Fisher exact test, and continuous data, with the Mann-Whitney test. Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test was used to assess the influence of potential confounders, such as severity of stenosis, on the relationship between lipid core and cerebral lesions. A P value <.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made.

Results

MR images of the carotid artery were of good quality in 41 patients (10 women, 31 men; median age, 67 years; age range, 44–86 years). Images of the carotid artery of 22 patients showed motion blur or a low signal-to-noise ratio and were therefore rated as moderate (n = 15) or poor (n = 7) quality; these patients were excluded from analysis. One patient was excluded because of severe cerebral leukoaraiosis of the brain, which hampered analyses of hyperintense cerebral lesions. Clinically, 19 patients presented with an infarct, and 25 presented with a transient ischemic attack.

We found no statistically significant relationships between ipsilateral cerebral lesions (cortical and subcortical infarcts and white matter lesions) and patient characteristics (i.e., age, sex, smoking habits, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, or severity of stenosis).

Plaque Composition

All plaques revealed hyperintense (fibrous) plaque components in all proton density- and T2-weighted images. A lipid core, as indicated by a relative drop in signal intensity in the plaque, was seen in 25 patients.

Ipsilateral Cerebral Lesions

Nine patients had a cortical infarct. Three basal ganglia infarcts in two patients and 45 centrum semiovale infarcts in 18 patients were seen. The number of centrum semiovale infarcts in these 18 patients ranged from one to six. All patients with a basal ganglia infarct had also one or more centrum semiovale infarcts. In 34 patients, 124 hyperintense white matter lesions were revealed (range, one to 12).

Relationship between Plaque Composition and Cerebral Lesions

Table 2 summarizes results from the analysis of lipid core in the atherosclerotic plaque versus cerebral lesions. The number of cortical infarcts was not different in patients with and in those without a lipid core. Centrum semiovale infarcts were more frequent (56% vs. 25%, P = .06) and the number of centrum semiovale infarcts was significantly higher (P = .04) in patients with a lipid core than in the patients without a lipid core. Combining all infarcts, we found that infarcts were more frequent in patients with a lipid core in the atherosclerotic plaque than in patients without a lipid core (P = .03). The presence of a lipid core was significantly associated with any cerebral infarction on MR imaging (crude odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 22.9). After an adjustment for severity of carotid stenosis, the association was unaffected (Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.94, 22.7). The presence and number of hyperintense white matter lesions was not different in patients with and in those without a lipid core.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

Relationship between plaque composition and cerebral lesions

Discussion

The composition of the atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid artery is considered an important determinant of cerebrovascular events. Histologic studies have revealed that lesions associated with the development of ischemic symptoms contain a large lipid core and a thin fibrous cap (6). Therefore, in vivo assessment of plaque composition is a step forward in the prevention of cerebral ischemia. A cross-sectional study in which clinical symptoms were related to atherosclerotic plaque composition, as assessed with MR imaging, showed that patients with ruptured fibrous caps were 23 times more likely to have a transient ischemic attack or stroke compared with patients with thick fibrous caps (17). To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze the relationship between MR imaging-assessed plaque composition and MR imaging-assessed brain lesions: Lipid in the atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid artery was related to the presence of cerebral infarcts.

Evaluation of cerebral damage by means of imaging-based analysis differs from clinical analysis. On the one hand, symptomatic patients do not necessarily have structural brain damage; on the other hand, asymptomatic patients may have ischemic lesions on imaging studies. MR imaging is superior to CT in the assessment of these ischemic lesions (27).

The relationship between plaque characteristics and cerebral lesions has been studied with US (plaque) and CT (brain) (15). Geroulakos et al (14) examined patients with >70% stenosis who were mainly symptomatic and found that focal cerebral infarctions visible with CT were more frequent in patients with echolucent plaques, which were assumed to be lipid. This finding was confirmed in subsequent studies in which the GSM was assessed as a measure of echogenicity. Investigators found that a low GSM was related to more ipsilateral focal cerebral infarctions on CT (28, 29). Another study in asymptomatic patients with stenosis <60% revealed that patients with heterogeneous, mainly echolucent, plaques had an increased incidence of new CT- and MR imaging-detected lesions during follow-up (30). The number of lesions on MR imaging was greater than the number of lesions on CT (30). Overall, echolucent plaques (low GSM), which probably contain lipid or thrombus, are related to CT-detected focal cerebral ischemia. Our finding of a relationship between a relative decrease in signal intensity (an indicator of lipid) and cerebral infarcts is in accordance with previous results.

MR imaging can be used to differentiate types of cerebral lesions that are thought to be caused by different pathophysiologic mechanisms. Infarcts involving the cortex are caused by thromboembolic occlusion of the main cerebral arteries or cortical branches. Basal ganglia infarcts or so-called lacunar infarcts are caused by diseased small vessels, which result in occlusion of the deep perforating arteries. The underlying cause of centrum semiovale infarcts is still a matter of debate (31–33), but evidence suggests that large-vessel disease with thromboembolic release of material plays a role in their pathogenesis. The clinical characteristics of patients with centrum semiovale infarcts differ from those of patients with basal ganglia infarcts, with higher frequencies of carotid artery disease in the former (32, 34). For this reason, basal ganglia, centrum semiovale, and cortical infarcts were analyzed separately and then combined. The relationship between centrum semiovale infarcts and a lipid core in the atherosclerotic plaque points in the direction of large-vessel disease instead of small-vessel disease as the underlying cause of these infarcts. Centrum semiovale infarcts are less devastating than cortical infarcts. However, when centrum semiovale infarcts are indicators of end-branch infarctions like cortical infarctions, detection of vulnerable plaque with MR imaging may help in preventing serious neurologic complications. A large population-based study atherosclerotic disease in the carotid artery showed relative risks of 3.2 for nonlacunar infarcts and 10.8 for lacunar infarcts (35). Therefore, one may argue that our findings should not be explained by using a different pathophysiologic mechanism between basal ganglia infarcts and centrum semiovale infarcts, but rather, by using the small number of basal ganglia infarct, which prevented the demonstration of a significant difference in patients with and in those without a lipid core.

Hyperintense white matter lesions were frequently seen, and no relationship was found with plaque composition. These lesions have been related to cerebrovascular risk factors, but direct demonstration for an ischemic origin of these lesions is lacking (36).

This study had several limitations. First, decreased signal intensity on T2-weighted images is considered to represent lipid core. However, hemorrhage and thrombosis may also cause this decrease in signal intensity on T2-weighted images compared with proton density-weighted images because of stronger susceptibility effect with the longer TE. Nevertheless, besides the lipid core, hemorrhage and thrombus are also constituents of the vulnerable plaque (37, 38). Second, we examined only symptomatic patients with severe (>70%) stenosis. Asymptomatic patients, patients with restenosis, and patients with carotid occlusion were not included. Investigating whether plaque composition is related to brain infarcts in patients without symptoms or in those with less stenosis would be important. Third, despite the applicability of high-resolution MR imaging in the assessment of plaque composition, this method has some practical limitations. MR imaging is vulnerable to motion artifacts because of the (generally) long acquisition time. Therefore, in this study, 23 patients with inadequate image quality were excluded from the analysis. Contraindications to MR imaging, particularly claustrophobia, can exclude also a considerable number of patients. Fourth, the relationship between lipid and cerebral lesions may have been confounded by severity of the ipsilateral carotid stenosis. Patients with a lipid core may have had more severe carotid stenosis resulting in hemodynamic limitations and causing internal watershed infarctions (39). However, the observed relationship remained present after an adjustment for the severity of carotid stenosis. Last, this study had a cross-sectional design and provided evidence that plaque composition (lipid core) was related to chronic ischemic cerebral lesions. Prospective follow-up studies should be conducted to determine the predictive value of plaque composition in terms of the risk of new cerebral lesions.

Conclusion

Results of this cross-sectional study demonstrated a correlation between the presence of lipid in the plaque in the carotid artery and the incidence of ipsilateral cerebral infarcts. Follow-up studies are warranted to assess the prognostic value of MR imaging-assessed plaque composition with regard to occurrence of new cerebral infarcts.

References

  1. ↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1243
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Sitzer M, Muller W, Siebler M, et al. Plaque ulceration and lumen thrombus are the main sources of cerebral microemboli in high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1995;26:1231–1233
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Mann JM, Davies MJ. Vulnerable plaque. Relation of characteristics to degree of stenosis in human coronary arteries. Circulation 1996;94:928–931
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Beach KW, et al. Carotid plaque morphology and clinical events. Stroke 1997;28:95–100
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995;92:657–671
    FREE Full Text
  7. Schroeder AP, Falk E. Vulnerable and dangerous coronary plaques [Suppl]. Atherosclerosis 1995;118:S141–S149
  8. ↵
    Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:1512–1531
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Reilly LM, Lusby RJ, Hughes L, Ferrell LD, Stoney RJ, Ehrenfeld WK. Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography. Clinical and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg 1983;146:188–193
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Geroulakos G, Ramaswami G, Nicolaides A, et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1993;80:1274–1277
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Arnold JA, Modaresi KB, Thomas N, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS. Carotid plaque characterization by duplex scanning: observer error may undermine current clinical trials. Stroke 1999;30:61–65
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Sabetai MM, Tegos TJ, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Pare GJ, Stevens JM. Reproducibility of computer-quantified carotid plaque echogenicity: can we overcome the subjectivity? Stroke 2000;31:2189–2196
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    el-Barghouty N, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides A, Androulakis A, Bahal V. Computer-assisted carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;9:389–393
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Geroulakos G, Domjan J, Nicolaides A, et al. Ultrasonic carotid artery plaque structure and the risk of cerebral infarction on computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:263–266
    PubMed
  15. ↵
    Tegos TJ, Sabetai MM, Nicolaides AN, Elatrozy TS, Dhanjil S, Stevens JM. Patterns of brain computed tomography infarction and carotid plaque echogenicity. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:334–339
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001;104:2051–2056
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Yuan C, Zhang Sx SX, Polissar NL, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation 2002;105:181–185
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Bryan RN, Levy LM, Whitlow WD, Killian JM, Preziosi TJ, Rosario JA. Diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of CT and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:611–620
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Ouhlous M, Lethimonnier F, Dippel DW, et al. Evaluation of a dedicated dual phased-array surface coil using a black- blood FSE sequence for high resolution MRI of the carotid vessel wall. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:344–351
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Martin AJ, Ryan LK, Gotlieb AI, Henkelman RM, Foster FS. Arterial imaging: comparison of high-resolution US and MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiographics 1997;17:189–202
    PubMed
  21. Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:1533–1542
  22. Raynaud JS, Bridal SL, Toussaint JF, et al. Characterization of atherosclerotic plaque components by high resolution quantitative MR and US imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:622–629
    PubMed
  23. ↵
    Serfaty JM, Chaabane L, Tabib A, Chevallier JM, Briguet A, Douek PC. Atherosclerotic plaques: classification and characterization with T2- weighted high-spatial-resolution MR imaging–an in vitro study. Radiology 2001;219:403–410
    PubMed
  24. ↵
    Toussaint JF, LaMuraglia GM, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation 1996;94:932–938
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Ouhlous M, Hoek BA, van Sambeek MRHM, Dippel DW, Pattynama PMT, van der lugt A. Validation of in vivo MRI of the atherosclerotic plaque of the carotid artery with histologic sections: preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2002;(suppl 1, 12S):186
  26. ↵
    Shinnar M, Fallon JT, Wehrli S, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo MRI for human atherosclerotic plaque characterization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:2756–2761
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J, Lodder J, et al. Transient ischemic attacks with and without a relevant infarct on computed tomographic scans cannot be distinguished clinically. Dutch Transient Ischemic Attack Study Group. Arch Neurol 1991;48:916–920
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    el-Barghouty N, Nicolaides A, Bahal V, Geroulakos G, Androulakis A. The identification of the high risk carotid plaque. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;11:470–478
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Matsagas MI, Vasdekis SN, Gugulakis AG, Lazaris A, Foteinou M, Sechas MN. Computer-assisted ultrasonographic analysis of carotid plaques in relation to cerebrovascular symptoms, cerebral infarction, and histology. Ann Vasc Surg 2000;14:130–137
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Belcaro G, Laurora G, Cesarone MR, et al. Ultrasonic classification of carotid plaques causing less than 60% stenosis according to ultrasound morphology and events. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1993;34:287–294
    PubMed
  31. ↵
    Ghika J, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Infarcts in the territory of the deep perforators from the carotid system. Neurology 1989;39:507–512
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Boiten J, Lodder J. Lacunar infarcts: pathogenesis and validity of the clinical syndromes. Stroke 1991;22:1374–1378
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Lodder J, Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Jones LN, Warlow CP. Are hypertension or cardiac embolism likely causes of lacunar infarction? Stroke 1990;21:375–381
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Yonemura K, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Uchino M, Yamaguchi T. Small centrum ovale infarcts on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2002;33:1541–1544
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Hollander M, Bots ML, Del Sol AI, et al. Carotid plaques increase the risk of stroke and subtypes of cerebral infarction in asymptomatic elderly: the Rotterdam study. Circulation 2002;105:2872–2877
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Pantoni L, Garcia JH. Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: a review. Stroke 1997;28:652–659
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Virmani R, Narula J, Farb A. When neoangiogenesis ricochets. Am Heart J 1998;136:937–939
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Milei J, Parodi JC, Alonso GF, Barone A, Grana D, Matturri L. Carotid rupture and intraplaque hemorrhage: immunophenotype and role of cells involved. Am Heart J 1998;136:1096–1105
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Bladin CF, Chambers BR. Clinical features, pathogenesis, and computed tomographic characteristics of internal watershed infarction. Stroke 1993;24:1925–1932
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received July 9, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision September 15, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 5
1 May 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Carotid Plaque Composition and Cerebral Infarction: MR Imaging Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Mohamed Ouhlous, H. Zwenneke Flach, Thomas T. de Weert, Johanna M. Hendriks, Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Peter M. T. Pattynama, Aad van der Lugt
Carotid Plaque Composition and Cerebral Infarction: MR Imaging Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 1044-1049;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Carotid Plaque Composition and Cerebral Infarction: MR Imaging Study
Mohamed Ouhlous, H. Zwenneke Flach, Thomas T. de Weert, Johanna M. Hendriks, Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Peter M. T. Pattynama, Aad van der Lugt
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 1044-1049;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Plaque Components in Symptomatic Moderately Stenosed Carotid Arteries Related to Cerebral Infarcts: The Plaque At RISK Study
  • Contrast-Enhanced 3T High-Resolution MR Imaging in Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Basilar Artery Stenosis
  • Carotid Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition With Gradient-Echo Signal Is Associated With Acute Territorial Cerebral Ischemic Events Detected by Diffusion-Weighted MRI
  • Carotid Artery Wall Thickness and Leukoaraiosis: Preliminary Results Using Multidetector Row CT Angiography
  • 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
  • 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Window Settings for the Study of Calcified Carotid Plaques with Multidetector CT Angiography
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire