Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Relationship of MR-Derived Lactate, Mobile Lipids, and Relative Blood Volume for Gliomas in Vivo

Xiaojuan Li, Daniel B. Vigneron, Soonmee Cha, Edward E. Graves, Forrest Crawford, Susan M. Chang and Sarah J. Nelson
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2005, 26 (4) 760-769;
Xiaojuan Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel B. Vigneron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soonmee Cha
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward E. Graves
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Forrest Crawford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan M. Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah J. Nelson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Spatial distribution of elevated Lac and Lip presented as contours overlaid on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in presurgical patients with the following tumors: grade II glioma with Lac within the T2 hyperintensity but out of the contrast enhancement (A), nonenhancing grade III glioma with only elevated Lac (B), enhancing grade III glioma with elevated Lac and Lip (C), grade IV glioma with only elevated Lac (D), grade IV glioma with only elevated Lip (E), grade IV glioma without macronecrosis but with elevated Lac and Lip (F), and grade IV glioma with ring enhancement and a necrotic core with elevated Lac and Lip (G). Blue = Lac contours, red = Lip contours, yellow = PRESS box.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Spatial distribution of elevated Lac and Lip presented as contours overlaid on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in postsurgical patients with the following tumors: grade II glioma with Lip within the resection cavity and Lac within the contrast enhancement (A), grade II glioma with Lac and Lip within the nonenhancing region (B), grade IV glioma with Lip within the resection cavity and contrast enhancement and Lac in the enhancement and extended to the nonenhancing region (C), and grade IV glioma with Lac within the resection cavity and Lip partly in the resection cavity and mainly in the contrast enhancement (D). Blue = Lac contours, red = Lip contours, yellow = PRESS box.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Images in a 59-year-old woman with nonenhancing infiltrative grade III glioma in the right frontal lobe with a highly elevated Lac level and increased rCBV before surgery: post-contrast T1-weighted image with an overlying PRESS box and voxel grid (A); difference spectra showing huge, elevated Lac peaks (B); Lac image overlaid on the post-contrast T1-weighted image (C), and rCBV (color) overlaid on the post-contrast T1-weighted image (D). White = PRESS box, blue = Lac contour.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Mean, SD, and maximal (Max) rCBV in regions of elevated Lac but no Lip (within Lac) and in regions with elevated Lip but no Lac (within Lip) for six presurgical grade IV tumors with both elevated Lac and Lip. Both mean and maximal rCBV within Lac were significantly lower than those within Lip.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Images in a 49-year-old man with grade IV glioma in the left frontal lobe. Presurgical data show increased mean and maximal rCBV within regions having elevated Lac but no Lip and within regions having elevated Lip but no Lac: contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images with PRESS box (yellow) and part of the voxel grid (white) (A); spectra showing the summed spectra for Cho, Cr, NAA, and elevated Lip (left) and difference spectra showing elevated Lac (right) (B); resampled metabolic images show Lac (upper left), Lip (lower left), and the color overlays (right) for elevated Lac only (green), Lip only (red), and both (yellow) (C); Lac and Lip overlaid on T1-weighted images (D); and rCBV overlaid on T2-weighted images with contours for significantly elevated Lac (blue) and Lip (red) (E).

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Images in a 45-year-old man with enhancing grade III glioma involving the splenium of the corpus callosum. Presurgical data show elevated Lip in the center of the region with elevated Lac: T1-weighted image showing contrast enhancement but no macronecrosis (A); resampled Lac (upper) and Lip (lower) images (B); Lac (green), Lip (red), and both (yellow) overlaid on a T1-weighted image (C); rCBV overlaid on a T2-weighted image with contours for elevated Lac (blue) and Lip (red) (D); and rCBV curves for voxels in the contrast enhancement (E). Dynamic signal intensity curves for voxels (red square) suggest necrosis, which is consistent with elevated Lip peaks.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    Acquisition times and SNRs in phantoms and volunteers

    AcquisitionTime (min:sec)SNR
    Phantom
        Cubic38:2453.85
        Ellipsoidal17:1265.53
    Volunteer
        Cubic38:2413.77
        Ellipsoidal17:1215.69
    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    Presence and volumes of significantly elevated Lac and Lip values by tumor grade

    ValuePresurgical Tumor GradePostsurgical Tumor Grade
    II (n = 7)III (n = 5)IV (n = 11)II (n = 11)III (n = 2)GBM (n = 14)
    Lac
        Present*1 (14.3)3 (60.0)9 (81.8)4 (36.4)011 (78.6)
        Volume (mL)†6.6912.32 (1.01–29.85)3.74 (1.93–39.15)7.48 (1.39–11.75)NA3.24 (1.31–18.17)
    Lip
        Present*01 (20.0)9 (81.8)5 (45.5)07 (50.0)
        Volume (mL)†NA2.4512.48 (1.41–48.52)4.87 (1.42–16.89)NA5.01 (1.17–17.31)
    • Note.—NA indicates not applicable.

    • * No. of gliomas with elevated Lac or Lip/total no. gliomas in each grade. Data in parentheses are percentages.

    • † Median (minimum − maximum) for gliomas with elevated Lac or Lip values. Data in parentheses are ranges.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3:

    Spatial localization of elevated Lac and Lip levels compared with morphologic abnormalities before surgery

    PatientPathologyElevated LacElevated Lip
    MacronecrosisCET2-CEMacronecrosisCET2-CE
    1A2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    2OD2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    3OA2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    4OD2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    5OD2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    6OD2NoNoYesNoNoNo
    7*OD2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    18AA3NoYesNoNoYesNo
    19AA3NoYesNoNoNoNo
    20OD3NoNoNoNoNoNo
    21*AA3NoNoNoNoNoNo
    22*OD3NoNoYesNoNoNo
    23GBMYesYesNoYesYesNo
    24GBMNoYesNoNoNoNo
    25GBMYesYesYesYesYesNo
    26*GBMNoNoNoYesYesNo
    27*GBMNoYesNoNoYesNo
    28*GBMNoYesNoNoNoNo
    29*GBMYesYesNoYesNoNo
    30*GBMYesNoNoYesYesNo
    31*GBMYesYesYesYesYesNo
    32*GBMNoNoNoYesYesNo
    33*GBMYesYesNoYesYesNo
    • Note.—Data before surgical resection or biopsy. CE indicates contrast enhancement; T2-CE, regions within T2 hyperintensity but outside contrast enhancement.

    • * Patients with both presurgical and postsurgical data.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4:

    Spatial localization of elevated Lac and Lip levels compared with morphologic abnormalities after surgery

    PatientPathologyElevated LacElevated Lip
    Resection CavityCET2-CEResection CavityCET2-CE
    7*OD2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    8A2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    9A2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    10OD2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    11OD2NoNoNoNoNoYes
    12OD2NoNoNoYesNoNo
    13OA2NoNoYesNoNoNo
    14OA2NoNoNoNoNoNo
    15A2YesNoNoYesYesNo
    16A2YesYesYesYesNoNo
    17A2NoNoYesNoNoYes
    21*AA3NoNoNoNoNoNo
    22*OD3NoNoNoNoNoNo
    26*GBMYesNoNoYesNoNo
    27*GBMYesNoNoNoNoNo
    28*GBMYesYesYesYesYesNo
    29*GBMNoNoNoYesNoNo
    30*GBMNoNoNoNoNoNo
    31*GBMYesNoNoNoNoNo
    32*GBMYesNoNoNoNoNo
    33*GBMYesNoNoNoNoNo
    34GBMNoYesNoNoYesNo
    35GBMYesYesYesYesYesNo
    36GBMNoNoNoNoNoNo
    37GBMYesNoNoYesYesNo
    38GBMYesNoNoNoYesNo
    39GBMYesYesNoNoNoNo
    • Note.—Data after surgical resection or biopsy but before radiation treatment or chemotherapy. CE indicates contrast enhancement; T2-CE, regions within T2 hyperintensity but outside contrast enhancement; A2, grade-II astrocytomas; OA2, grade-II oligoastrocytomas; OD2, grade-II oligodendrogliomas; AA3, grade-III anaplastic astrocytomas; OA3, grade-III oligoastrocytomas; OD3, grade-III oligodendrogliomas.

    • * Patients with both presurgical and postsurgical data.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 4
1 Apr 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Relationship of MR-Derived Lactate, Mobile Lipids, and Relative Blood Volume for Gliomas in Vivo
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Xiaojuan Li, Daniel B. Vigneron, Soonmee Cha, Edward E. Graves, Forrest Crawford, Susan M. Chang, Sarah J. Nelson
Relationship of MR-Derived Lactate, Mobile Lipids, and Relative Blood Volume for Gliomas in Vivo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2005, 26 (4) 760-769;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Relationship of MR-Derived Lactate, Mobile Lipids, and Relative Blood Volume for Gliomas in Vivo
Xiaojuan Li, Daniel B. Vigneron, Soonmee Cha, Edward E. Graves, Forrest Crawford, Susan M. Chang, Sarah J. Nelson
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2005, 26 (4) 760-769;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Imaging hypoxia in gliomas
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire