Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Matrix Coils: A Preliminary Study of Immediate Post-treatment Results

Boris Lubicz, Xavier Leclerc, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Jean-Paul Lejeune and Jean-Pierre Pruvo
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2005, 26 (2) 373-375;
Boris Lubicz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xavier Leclerc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Yves Gauvrit
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Paul Lejeune
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Pierre Pruvo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: A new, coated bioactive coil has been developed to improve the long-term results of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess the feasibility and safety of selective embolization of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix coils in 20 consecutive patients.

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms by endosaccular coil placement has become an accepted alternative to surgical clip placement (1); however, the main disadvantage of this technique compared with surgery is aneurysm recurrence (2), especially for large aneurysmal sacs or wide-necked aneurysms. To circumvent this potential limitation, many investigations are currently evaluating new coils, including biologically active coils (3), radioactive coils (4), and coated coils with a swelling hydrogel (5). The aim of these innovations is to promote intra-aneurysmal clot organization and fibrosis (3, 4) or to increase packing density (5), which is associated with a higher long-term occlusion rate (6). The complete Matrix coils (Target Therapeutics, Fremont, CA) product line has recently become available, but no study has yet evaluated the feasibility of endovascular treatment with these coils. We report our experience of selective embolization with Matrix coils in 20 consecutive patients with an intracranial aneurysm.

Technique

Matrix detachable coils are platinum coils covered with a bioabsorbable polymer (90% polyglycolide, 10% polyactide) and attached to a stainless steel delivery wire. The coil consists of 70% polymer and 30% platinum. The details of coil characteristics were described elsewhere (7), and the detachment system is the same as that used with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs). The product line is similar to that of bare GDCs and includes 3D and 2D coils. Variable degrees of stiffness are available, including standard, soft, and ultrasoft coils.

Between February and March 2004, 20 consecutive patients with 20 cerebral aneurysms were treated by selective endovascular approach in our department. Fourteen patients presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and were classified according to the Hunt and Hess scale (8): nine were grade I or II, one was grade III, and four were grade IV or V. Six patients were asymptomatic. Locations of aneurysms were as follows: posterior communicating artery in six, anterior communicating artery in five, basilar artery in three, middle cerebral artery bifurcation in three, internal carotid artery bifurcation in two, and posterior cerebral artery in one. All endovascular procedures were performed under general anesthesia and systemic heparinization. A bolus infusion of heparin (30–40 IU/kg body weight) was followed by a continuous drip (1000–1500 IU/h), with the purpose of doubling the baseline activated clotting time. No patient was placed on antiplatelet medication before treatment. All patients were treated by selective embolization with Matrix coils. Technique of endosaccular coil placement procedure has already been published in the literature (7). Aneurysm packing, by the use of an Excelsior 10 microcatheter (Target Therapeutics), was obtained by forming a basket with one or more 3D coils that were subsequently filled with smaller 2D coils. In all cases, we attempted to pack the aneurysm with Matrix coils alone. Soft, ultrasoft, or both soft and ultrasoft Matrix coils were used at the end of the procedure to complete aneurysm obliteration. To avoid friction inside the microcatheter, Matrix coils were placed in a saline solution for at least 60 seconds to hydrate the polymer completely. When packing difficulties (high frictions between coils, compartmentalization) with Matrix coils were encountered because of their stiffness, additional GDCs were used to achieve aneurysm occlusion. In three cases with unfavorable neck-to-sac ratios, the remodeling technique (9) was used to avoid coil protrusion into the parent artery. Patients were examined by angiography to document aneurysm obliteration. Angiographic results were classified into three groups: complete occlusion (no contrast medium filling of the aneurysmal sac), neck remnant (residual contrast medium filling the aneurysmal neck), and residual flow (residual contrast medium filling the aneurysmal body). A senior neurosurgeon (J.-P.L.) recorded the clinical course, including worsening of symptoms and death, at 3 months after the treatment. Clinical outcome was graded according to a modified Glasgow outcome scale (10) as follows: excellent (neurologically intact); good (mild hemiparesis, cranial nerve palsy, or other deficit that does not interfere with daily functioning or work); fair (significant hemiparesis, aphasia, confusion, or other deficit that interferes with daily activities or prevents a return to work); and poor (coma or severe neurologic deficit rendering the patient dependent on family or nursing staff).

Results

Selective embolization was successfully performed in all patients. Complete aneurysm occlusion by the use of Matrix coils alone, however, was achieved in only five patients. In these cases, cerebral aneurysms had a diameter greater than 7 mm or were treated with the remodeling technique. In the remaining 15 patients, additional GDCs were required to complete aneurysm obliteration. GDC coils—that are softer than Matrix coils—were used to fill the residual part of the aneurysm that could not be safely treated with stiffer coils because of a kickback effect on the microcatheter. A total of 68 Matrix coils were used and passed through the microcatheter without any friction. In all aneurysms, from two to 12 Matrix coils were delivered to obtain a good packing. During the delivery process, the first 3D Matrix coil was adapted smoothly to the aneurysm wall and automatically assumed its configuration upon deployment. Then, smaller 3D or 2D coils were added and packed the aneurysms. Because of the new and complete Matrix product line, soft and ultrasoft coils were used and few frictions were encountered between coils within the aneurysmal sac. When the maximal diameter of the aneurysm was less than 8 mm, however, there was a tendency of compartmentalization that required changing the position of the microcatheter to reach another part of the aneurysm. In most cases, the catheter has been repositioned only once. Detachment of coils occurred in less than 2 minutes in all cases, and no coil rupture or involuntary coil detachment was observed. No stretching of Matrix coils was encountered during their repositioning and no technical complication occurred in the present series.

Endovascular treatment resulted in 16 excellent clinical outcomes, three good outcomes, and one death. Among the four patients with a grade IV or V SAH, one died because of a severe vasospasm and three kept a mild hemiparesis or an upper limb weakness. No permanent neurologic morbidity or mortality related to the procedure was observed in the present series. Three patients, however, presented transient ischemic attacks (TIA) a few hours after the endovascular treatment. These patients had wide-neck aneurysms that were treated with Matrix coils and by the use of the remodeling technique. Systemic heparinization was prolonged for 48–72 hours and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) was administered for one month. All patients made an excellent recovery.

Angiographic results consisted of 15 complete occlusions and five neck remnants. Although the aneurysm occlusion was judged complete in 15 cases, the packing density of the aneurysmal sac appeared lower (Fig 1) than with bare coils.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

SAH in a 48-year-old man. Internal carotid artery angiogram (A) shows a 12-mm aneurysm of the posterior communicating artery. Selective embolization with Matrix coils only: 12 coils were delivered within the aneurysmal sac. Conventional non-substracted (B) and substracted (C) angiograms at the end of the procedure showed a complete aneurysm occlusion despite a moderate packing.

Discussion

This study shows that, despite their relative stiffness, Matrix coils may be used to treat intracranial aneurysms by selective embolization. Most patients showed excellent clinical and anatomic results, and there was no permanent morbidity or mortality related to the device or the procedure. However, three patients who were treated by Matrix coils with the remodeling technique experienced TIA that resolved after systemic heparinization. It is not clear whether these events were related to the use of the remodeling technique, which is known to increase thromboembolic complications (11), or to the Matrix coils that might be more thrombogenic than bare coils because of their coating.

The current limitation of Matrix coils is their stiffness that does not allow to completely treat small aneurysms with these coils alone. Indeed, these coils have a tendency to compartmentalize into the aneurysmal sac, and it requires repositioning of the catheter in order to complete aneurysm occlusion. This increases the duration and the risks of the procedure. There are, however, no formal data suggesting that aneurysms should exclusively be packed with Matrix coils to obtain a good healing of the neck. Moreover, these difficulties were observed in small aneurysms with a small neck that are known to show fewer recurrences than wide-necked or large aneurysms (12). In our department, the therapeutic strategy of selective embolization of intracranial aneurysms is to treat small aneurysms with a small neck with bare coils and to keep Matrix coils for large or wide-necked aneurysms. In these cases, we try to put one or more 3D Matrix coils to completely bridge the aneurysmal neck to put as much coated material as possible in the neck region. Then, softer 2D coils are delivered to complete aneurysm occlusion. In cases of wide-neck aneurysms, the use of a remodeling balloon is required to prevent coil protrusion into the parent artery. It also appeared helpful in the present series to completely occlude aneurysms with Matrix coils alone. Because of the inflated balloon at the neck, Matrix coils were conforming to the aneurysmal sac without any compartmentalization.

Finally, one must be aware of the final appearance of packing density of Matrix coils within the aneurysmal sac. Matrix coil consists of 70% polymer and 30% platinum and explains that packing density appears lower (Fig 1) than that with bare coils even if the treatment is complete.

Conclusion

This series shows that Matrix coils may be used for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms; however, and because of their stiffness, additional bare coils are needed to complete aneurysm occlusion in most cases of small aneurysms. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to establish the utility and potential advantages of this new coil.

References

  1. ↵
    International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. ISAT of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–1274
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–1403
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Murayama Y, Tateshima S, Gonzalez NR, Vinuela F. Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke 2003;34:2031–2037
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Raymond J, Leblanc P, desfaits AC, et al. In situ beta radiation to prevent recanalization after coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2002;33:421–427
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Aneurysm packing with Hydrocoil embolic system versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:60–62
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Tamatani S, Ito Y, Abe H, et al. Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:762–767
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Gulielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2. Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1991;75:8–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Hunt W, Hess R. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, et al. The reconstruction technique in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical results. J Neuroradiol 1997;24:30–44
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1975;1:480–484
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Soeda A, Sakai N, Sakai H, et al. Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:127–132
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Zubillaga A, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–820
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received June 15, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision August 3, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 2
1 Feb 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Matrix Coils: A Preliminary Study of Immediate Post-treatment Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Boris Lubicz, Xavier Leclerc, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Jean-Paul Lejeune, Jean-Pierre Pruvo
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Matrix Coils: A Preliminary Study of Immediate Post-treatment Results
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2005, 26 (2) 373-375;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Matrix Coils: A Preliminary Study of Immediate Post-treatment Results
Boris Lubicz, Xavier Leclerc, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Jean-Paul Lejeune, Jean-Pierre Pruvo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2005, 26 (2) 373-375;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Bioactive versus Bare Platinum Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial
  • Matrix2 Coils in Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: 1-Year Outcome and Comparison with Bare Platinum Coil Group in a Single Institution
  • Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms Using "Bioactive" or Coated-Coil Technologies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
  • Endosaccular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Matrix Coils: Early Experience and Midterm Follow-Up
  • Matrix Detachable Coils for the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Analysis of Early Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Factors Associated with Major Re-Recanalization following Second Coiling for Recanalized Aneurysms: A Multicenter Experience over 20 Years during Long-Term Follow-up
  • A Key Factor Shapes LS-DAVFs EVT Outcome
  • Optimizing Voxel Size in 3D Rotational Angiography
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire