Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHEAD AND NECK

Pediatric Head and Neck Lesions: Assessment of Vascularity by MR Digital Subtraction Angiography

Weng Kong Chooi, Neil Woodhouse, Stuart C. Coley and Paul D. Griffiths
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2004, 25 (7) 1251-1255;
Weng Kong Chooi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Woodhouse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart C. Coley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul D. Griffiths
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pediatric head and neck lesions can be difficult to characterize on clinical grounds alone. We investigated the use of dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography as a noninvasive adjunct for the assessment of the vascularity of these abnormalities.

METHODS: Twelve patients (age range, 2 days to 16 years) with known or suspected vascular abnormalities were studied. Routine MR imaging, time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR digital subtraction angiography were performed in all patients. The dynamic sequence was acquired in two planes at one frame per second by using a thick section (6–10 cm) selective radio-frequency spoiled fast gradient-echo sequence and an IV administered bolus of contrast material. The images were subtracted from a preliminary mask sequence and viewed as a video-inverted cine loop.

RESULTS: In all cases, MR digital subtraction angiography was successfully performed. The technique showed the following: 1) slow flow lesions (two choroidal angiomas, eyelid hemangioma, and scalp venous malformation); 2) high flow lesions that were not always suspected by clinical examination alone (parotid hemangioma, scalp, occipital, and eyelid arteriovenous malformations plus a palatal teratoma); 3) a hypovascular tumor for which a biopsy could be safely performed (Burkitt lymphoma); and 4) a hypervascular tumor of the palate (cystic teratoma).

CONCLUSION: Our early experience suggests that MR digital subtraction angiography can be reliably performed in children of all ages without complication. The technique provided a noninvasive assessment of the vascularity of each lesion that could not always have been predicted on the basis of clinical examination or routine MR imaging alone.

Pediatric head and neck abnormalities are relatively common and frequently are brought to medical attention because of their conspicuity and associated disfigurement. The nature of many of these lesions can be adequately assessed by clinical examination alone, but the vascularity of certain abnormalities is more difficult to evaluate and requires further investigation. MR imaging often is performed as the first imaging method to characterize the lesion and document the extent of the abnormality, sometimes as a prelude to treatment. One of the most important features that must be established is the vascularity of the lesion.

Vascular imaging can help to differentiate between high and low flow lesions in terms of structural changes, such as enlarged vessels and capillary staining, and can help to delineate hemodynamic parameters that are most simply assessed by the speed of arteriovenous shunting. Traditionally, this has been performed by transfemoral angiography, a technique that has a small but finite complication rate and can be difficult to perform in small children.

Recent advances in MR imaging have enabled the acquisition of dynamic (or time-resolved) angiographic data sets with high spatial and temporal resolution (1–3). These techniques have already been described for the assessment of brain arteriovenous malformations (4–9), dural fistulae (8–11), and cerebrovascular disease (12, 13). We herein present our preliminary work with MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of the vascularity of pediatric head and neck lesions.

Methods

Twelve patients were studied (five male, seven female) with an age range of 2 days to 16 years. All examinations were performed on a 1.5-T system (Infinon; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH). Routine multiplanar imaging and time-of-flight MR angiography were performed before the dynamic acquisitions were obtained. MR digital subtraction angiography was performed in the frontal and lateral projections by using half of the total allowable dose of 1.0 mol/L gadolinium chelate (Gadovist; Schering AG, Berlin) for each projection. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo images were obtained after dynamic angiography was performed.

Our MR digital subtraction angiography protocol has previously been described in detail (4) and is summarized herein. The sequence uses a section-selective radio-frequency spoiled fast gradient-echo sequence (7/2 [TR/TE]; flip angle, 40°; matrix, 150 × 256; field of view, 230 mm; section thickness, 6–10 cm). Images were acquired as thick 2D sections every second for a total of 1 minute. After a preliminary unenhanced acquisition, a second run was performed during the IV administration of a bolus of contrast material (at 3 mL/s) and then a 10-mL saline flush at the same rate. The dataset was rapidly processed and viewed as a subtracted video-inverted cine loop with a temporal resolution of one frame per second.

Lesions were classified as high flow lesions if any of the following was shown: 1) rapid enhancement during the arterial phase of angiography, 2) arteriovenous shunting, or 3) enlarged vessels. Lesions that became conspicuous during the venous phase or did not show increased contrast enhancement were defined as low flow lesions.

Results

MR digital subtraction angiography was performed without clinical complication in all 12 patients. In each case, the images were considered to be of high quality, equal or better to the results we routinely achieve in the adult population. The salient clinical details and radiologic findings are summarized in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Clinical details and MR imaging findings

In some instances, the initial clinical diagnosis was revised on the basis of MR imaging results. Figure 1 shows images obtained in a child with a suspected low flow vascular lesion of the scalp. Standard MR imaging showed an extra-calvarial mass with serpiginous flow voids indicative of enlarged vessels. MR digital subtraction angiography confirmed the high flow nature of this lesion. A 14-month-old child (Fig 2) presented with a large neck mass that could not be characterized by clinical examination. Conventional MR imaging showed appearances consistent with a large parotid hemangioma. MR digital subtraction angiography revealed high flow within this lesion by virtue of early arterial phase enhancement and also arteriovenous shunting. This was thought to be consistent with a hemangioma in the highly vascular (proliferative) phase. A 1-week-old neonate (Fig 3) presented with a huge occipital mass that was initially thought to be an encephalocele. MR digital subtraction angiography revealed a highly vascular amorphous mass, the vascularity of which was confirmed by histologic analysis. MR digital subtraction angiography was also able to show the absence of significant blood flow within a suspected tumor. Figure 4 shows images obtained in a 5-year-old male patient with a nasopharyngeal mass that was initially thought to be a juvenile angiofibroma on the basis of clinical findings. MR imaging and MR digital subtraction angiography revealed a large but relatively avascular mass. Biopsy was safely performed, and the lesion was shown to be a Burkitt lymphoma.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Images from the case of a 3-year-old female patient with a suspected vascular abnormality of the scalp.

A, Unenhanced sagittal T1-weighted MR image shows an extra-calvarial soft tissue mass.

B, Marked uniform enhancement can be seen after the administration of contrast material. Serpiginous flow void represents an enlarged feeding vessel.

C, Selected MR digital subtraction angiograms show prominent filling of contrast material in the arterial phase and prominent enhancement of the lesion. This was considered to represent a high-flow lesion.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Images from the case of a 14-month-old female patient with left-sided neck swelling.

A, Unenhanced axial T1-weighted MR image shows an encapsulated mass in the left parotid gland.

B, After the administration of contrast material, marked contrast enhancement is seen. Note the vascular flow voids within the lesion.

C, Selected MR digital subtraction angiograms show early arterial filling of the hypervascular lesion and arteriovenous shunting into an early draining vein. This is consistent with a parotid hemangioma in the proliferative phase.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Images from the case of a 5-day-old female patient with a large occipital mass thought to be an encephalocele.

A, Sagittal T1-weighted MR image shows a large occipital mass with intermediate signal intensity.

B, More heterogeneous appearance can be seen on the T2-weighted image. No intracranial communication is shown.

C, Selected MR digital subtraction angiograms show rapid opacification of the lesion during the early arterial phase. Flow in this lesion was so high that the intracranial vessels are poorly shown. Pathologic examination revealed an undifferentiated highly vascular tumor.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Images from the case of a 5-year-old male patient with a nasopharyngeal mass.

A, Lobulated nasopharyngeal mass is seen on the sagittal T2-weighted MR image.

B, T1-weighted coronal MR image also shows the lobulated nasopharyngeal mass.

C, Coronal contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted MR image shows minor eccentric contrast enhancement.

D, No significant contrast material flow was seen within the lesion on MR digital subtraction angiograms. This lesion was diagnosed as Burkitt lymphoma on the basis of biopsy findings.

In other cases, MR digital subtraction angiography provided complementary evidence of a low flow lesion. These included a suspected scalp venous malformation, a lid hemangioma, and choroidal angiomas in two patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. One example of a shunting arteriovenous malformation did not show enlarged flow voids on the spin-echo sequences.

Discussion

Characterizing the vascularity of certain pediatric head and neck lesions may be difficult on the basis of clinical examination alone. It is, however, important to differentiate such abnormalities, because the differentiation will often influence the further management of these lesions (14, 15). High flow arteriovenous malformations are often treated by a combination of intra-arterial embolization and surgery (16). Percutaneous sclerotherapy is the preferred method of treatment for venous malformations (17). Hemangiomas usually do not warrant intervention, because many will spontaneously involute.

Most head and neck tumors and vascular malformations show increased enhancement on standard MR images after administration of contrast material. Although certain appearances of high and low flow lesions, such as visible flow voids (18), have been depicted on standard MR images, these are static images that do not allow assessment of the hemodynamics of the lesion. Furthermore, flow voids may be absent or inconspicuous in certain lesions (19). The unique value of MR digital subtraction angiography is its ability to show the passage of a bolus of contrast material through the abnormality in a manner identical to that of conventional angiography.

High flow lesions show rapid contrast enhancement during the early arterial phase and may show enlarged vessels and pathologic arteriovenous shunting with early venous filling. Low flow lesions, such as venous malformations and certain hemangiomas, may show less dramatic contrast enhancement on routine MR images; however, most importantly, the lesion does not show early opacification on MR digital subtraction angiograms. Such lesions show either no vascularity on MR digital subtraction angiograms or appear during the venous phase (20).

Ziyeh et al (20) recently reported their experience with time-resolved MR projection angiography in the assessment of head and neck vascular malformations. Using view-sharing and temporal interpolation, the authors were able to achieve a temporal resolution approaching four frames per second. Five patients with venous malformations showed no pathologic vasculature on dynamic images, whereas contrast enhancement was observed on T1-weighted spin-echo MR images. Two high flow arteriovenous malformations were readily identified and were classified as such by determining the time delay between the arrival of the contrast material bolus in the extracranial carotid circulation and the vascular malformation. Rapid arrival of contrast material was associated with intense enhancement on the dynamic sequences. Furthermore, our own early experience suggests that MR digital subtraction angiography may also allow assessment of the vascularity of neoplastic lesions without the risks and expense associated with conventional angiography.

At present, MR digital subtraction angiography is inferior to conventional angiography in terms of spatial and temporal resolution and therefore has some limitation in the assessment of those arteriovenous malformations associated with rapid arteriovenous shunting. Although rapid sub-second MR imaging can be performed with frame rates similar to those of conventional angiography (21), such techniques remain experimental at this time and require further work to produce satisfactory spatial resolution. Furthermore, by using an IV injection of contrast material, there is simultaneous opacification of the internal carotid, external carotid, and vertebral circulations. This feature can create diagnostic difficulties with vessel superimposition and dural shunts. Current MR digital subtraction angiography techniques for use in the head and neck region also are limited to a small number of 2D projections that cannot be manipulated in the third plane and therefore cannot generate 3D models or be shown in an infinite number of oblique projections. A specific limitation of this study is lack of correlation with conventional angiography. Because the high flow arteriovenous malformations and parotid hemangioma were not considered for surgical intervention at this time, we could not justify subjecting these patients to further investigation.

Conclusion

Despite the limitations of this study and the technique it used, we think MR digital subtraction angiography has a potentially important role in the assessment of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic pediatric head and neck lesions.

Footnotes

  • Presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, April 26–May 2, 2003; Washington, DC.

References

  1. ↵
    Strecker R, Scheffler K, Klisch J, et al. Fast functional MRA using time-resolved projection MR angiography with correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:303–309
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, Strecker R. Time-resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:341–345
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:551–556
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892–1899
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:707–711
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 2001;48:973–982
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27–33
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M. Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 2000;42:104–107
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451–453
    PubMed
  10. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293–1295
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, Griffiths PD. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404–407
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1858–1864
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Wetzel SG, Haselhorst R, Bilecen D, et al. Preliminary experience with dynamic MR projection angiography in the evaluation of cervicocranial steno-occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 2001;11:295–302
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Werner JA, Dunne AA, Folz BJ, et al. Current concepts in the classification, diagnosis and treatment of hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001;258:141–149
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Kohout MP, Hansen M, Pribaz JJ, Mulliken JB. Arteriovenous malformations of the head and neck: natural history and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:643–654
    PubMed
  16. ↵
    Seccia A, Salgarello M, Farallo E, Falappa PG. Combined radiological and surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations of the head and neck. Ann Plast Surg 1999;43:359–366
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Berenguer B, Burrows PE, Zurakowski D, Mulliken JB. Sclerotherapy of craniofacial venous malformations: complications and results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1–11
    PubMed
  18. ↵
    Baker LL, Dillon WP, Hieshima GB, Dowd CF, Frieden IJ. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck: MR characterization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:307–314
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    van Rijswijk CS, van der Linden E, van der Woude HJ, van Baalen JM, Bloem JL. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in diagnosing and classifying peripheral vascular malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1181–1187
    PubMed
  20. ↵
    Ziyeh S, Schumacher M, Strecker R, Rossler J, Hochmuth, Klisch J. Head and neck vascular malformations: time-resolved MR projection angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:681–686
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Wild JM, Coley SC, Kasuboski L, et al. Time-resolved 2D MRA of arteriovenous malformations with a radial projection sliding window sequence. Presented at the 11th Scientific Meeting of the Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine, July 10–16,2003; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Received July 16, 2003.
  • Accepted after revision December 22, 2003.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 7
1 Aug 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pediatric Head and Neck Lesions: Assessment of Vascularity by MR Digital Subtraction Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Weng Kong Chooi, Neil Woodhouse, Stuart C. Coley, Paul D. Griffiths
Pediatric Head and Neck Lesions: Assessment of Vascularity by MR Digital Subtraction Angiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2004, 25 (7) 1251-1255;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Pediatric Head and Neck Lesions: Assessment of Vascularity by MR Digital Subtraction Angiography
Weng Kong Chooi, Neil Woodhouse, Stuart C. Coley, Paul D. Griffiths
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2004, 25 (7) 1251-1255;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • MR Diagnosis of Facial Neuritis: Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced 3D-FLAIR Technique Compared with Contrast-Enhanced 3D-T1-Fast-Field Echo with Fat Suppression
Show more HEAD AND NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire