Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherBRAIN

Gadolinium-Enhanced CT Angiography of the Circle of Willis and Neck

John W. Henson, Raul G. Nogueira, Diego J. Covarrubias, R. Gilberto Gonzalez and Michael H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2004, 25 (6) 969-972;
John W. Henson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raul G. Nogueira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego J. Covarrubias
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Gilberto Gonzalez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael H. Lev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: CT angiography (CTA) of the cervical and intracranial vessels is a rapid, noninvasive, and relatively inexpensive technique for the evaluation of vascular abnormalities. Contraindications to the use of contrast media, however, can preclude use of iodinated agents for CTA. We report the use of gadolinium as contrast agent for CTA of the head and neck in three patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents.

CT angiography (CTA) allows reliable pretreatment planning and diminishes evaluation time for most cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (1). Indeed, the accuracy of CTA for aneurysm detection has been shown to exceed that of conventional digital subtraction arteriography and, by extension, MR angiography (MRA; 2). CTA is also highly accurate for evaluation of large-vessel intracranial occlusions and is a valuable tool in the rapid triage of stroke patients to intra-arterial thrombolytic treatment (3). Furthermore, CTA of cervical vessels is useful in the evaluation of cervical arterial stenosis (4). Thus, the availability of an alternative to standard CT contrast agents would be of significant value in patients with contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast media.

Description of Technique and Report of Cases

CTA was performed on a 16-detector multisection helical scanner (LightSpeed, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) in the head-first, supine orientation. The standard technique for iodinated CTA was employed. For detection of an aneurysm in patient 1, the study was performed by using a 25-second delay after contrast medium administration, 140 kVp, 170 mA, 0.8-second rotation time, 1.25-mm section thickness reconstructed at 0.6-mm intervals, 3.75 mm/rotation table speed, pitch 0.75:1, and soft-tissue algorithm reconstruction. Images were obtained from the C2 vertebral body through the vertex. For CTA of the cervical and intracranial vessels in patients 2 and 3, images were obtained by using a 25-second delay after contrast medium administration, 140 kVp, 250 mA, 1.0-second rotation time, 2.5-mm section thickness reconstructed at 1.25-mm intervals, 3.75 mm/rotation table speed, and pitch 0.75:1. A set of images was obtained from the C6 vertebral body level through the circle of Willis followed immediately by a second set of images from the aortic arch through the C6 level. Instead of iodinated contrast material, a power infusion of 60 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex, Wayne, NJ) was followed by a 20-mL normal saline chase, both injected at 4 mL/s through an 18-gauge cannula placed into an antecubital vein. Sixty milliliters of gadolinium (≈0.4 mmol/kg) are used at our institution for venous-enhanced peripheral MR angiography and, thus, were not considered to be investigational.

Case 1

A 63-year-old man on warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation entered the emergency department after 30 minutes of severe right retro-orbital headache, blurred vision, and dizziness. An unenhanced CT scan of the head showed no evidence of intracranial or orbital hemorrhage. The emergency department physician requested an angiographic study of the circle of Willis to exclude an unruptured aneurysm. Because the patient had a permanent cardiac pacemaker and a history of anaphylaxis following the administration of iodinated CT contrast medium, gadolinium-enhanced CTA was performed. The patient had no adverse symptoms. Later that day, lumbar puncture showed one red blood cell per cubic millimeter of CSF, and no evidence of xanthochromia. Axial and 3D reconstructed images demonstrated no evidence of an intracranial aneurysm (Fig 1). Average attenuation within the gadolinium-enhanced intracranial internal carotid arteries was 94 H.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Gadolinium-enhanced CTA images obtained in a 63-year-old man with sudden-onset, severe headache.

A, Axial 1.25-mm gadolinium-enhanced CTA image shows the right posterior communicating artery (arrow).

B-F, Reconstructed images show the middle and anterior cerebral arteries (B), anterior communicating artery region (C), left posterior communicating artery (D), vertebrobasilar junction and basilar artery (E), and right posterior inferior cerebellar artery origin (F).

Case 2

MRA performed in a 52-year-old woman with severe complications from diabetes, including renal failure treated with renal transplant, suggested severe stenosis of both cervical internal carotid arteries, in a pattern typical of arterial dissections. Fat-saturated images through the neck were inconclusive. Iodinated contrast material was contraindicated because of moderate chronic renal insufficiency in the setting a renal transplant. A gadolinium-enhanced CTA image of the cervical vessels and circle of Willis was obtained (Fig 2). The study suggested complete occlusion of the left internal carotid artery and severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery with tapered narrowing, which indicated the presence of carotid dissections. Average attenuation within the supraclinoid internal carotid artery was 124 H and 150 H at the carotid bifurcation.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Gadolinium-enhanced CTA images of the cervical vessels obtained in a 52-year-old woman with severe carotid stenosis disclosed by MRA.

A, Axial image shows absence of contrast material in the left internal carotid artery (arrow) and stenosis of the right internal carotid artery.

B, Reconstructed image shows absence of contrast in the left internal carotid artery and smooth tapered narrowing of the proximal vessel.

C, Smooth tapered narrowing of the right internal carotid artery.

Case 3

A 71-year-old man with history of automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator placement, diabetes, and chronic renal insufficiency developed acute onset of expressive aphasia without other symptoms (NIH Stroke Scale, 1). Thrombolytic therapy was not deemed appropriate. The patient did, however, reported a history of a carotid plaque and concerns were raised about the possible need for urgent carotid endarterectomy. Iodinated contrast medium was contraindicated because of chronic renal insufficiency with prior exacerbation after use of iodinated contrast material. Gadolinium-enhanced CTA of the cervical vessels was performed and revealed only mild stenosis of the left carotid bifurcation with scattered atherosclerotic calcification and a hypoattenuated plaque (Fig 3). Immediately following the study, the patient developed mild nausea and flushing and was treated with ranitidine and diphenhydramine without further complications. His creatinine remained stable. Average attenuation within the origin of the common carotid arteries was 150 H and 130 H at the carotid bifurcation.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Gadolinium-enhanced CTA images obtained in a 71-year-old man with acute-onset, expressive aphasia and history of “carotid plaque.”

A, Reconstructed gadolinium-enhanced CTA image shows mild stenosis of the left carotid bifurcation with scattered atherosclerotic calcification and hypoattenuated plaque.

B, Reconstructed image of the left common carotid artery origin shows mild atherosclerotic calcification without any significant stenosis.

Discussion

Gadolinium-enhanced CTA has been used to image major vessels in the chest and abdomen (5), and gadolinium has an established role in conventional angiography in patients with contraindications to iodine (6). Quinn et al (7) reported visualization of gadolinium enhancement on a routine head CT scan, but to our knowledge the use of gadolinium-enhanced CTA of the intracranial and cervical vessels has not been reported.

Subjective image quality, although inferior to that of conventional CTA, was considered diagnostically adequate in each case. Contrast attenuation within the cervical and intracranial arteries was between 94 and 150 H. The K-edge of gadolinium (50 keV) is better matched to the energy profile of a filtered 140-kVp CT beam compared with that of iodine (33 keV), but the lower number of gadolinium atoms per milliliter of contrast agent produces a maximum attenuation that was one-third to one-half the typical values for iodinated contrast–enhanced CTA (5, 8). It is likely, therefore, that the value of gadolinium as a CTA contrast agent would be lessened in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, because the attenuation of blood would be similar to that of the intravascular gadolinium.

The risks of gadolinium administration at the doses used here are not well understood, as pointed out in a pair of recent commentaries (9, 10). The potential risks revolve around nephrotoxicity and hyperosmolality; however, administration of gadolinium at similar doses has been without significant risk in most published series. Exacerbation of chronic renal failure in a subset of patients undergoing conventional angiography has been reported, and a 5% incidence of worsened renal failure after conventional angiography in patients with baseline renal insufficiency has been noted (9, 11–13). One of our patients developed mild, transient nausea and flushing immediately following injection of gadolinium. This reaction could have been related to the osmolality of gadopentetate dimeglumine (6.9 times higher than plasma osmolality) and, if so, might be avoided by using contrast agents, such as gadodiamide or gadoteridol, that are one-third less hyperosmolar. Extravasation of gadolinium can lead to local pain and serious injury, including skin necrosis. As with intravenous injection of iodinated contrast agent for CTA, infusions should be performed only in the presence of excellent venous access by using a large-bore catheter. Distal upper extremity veins should be avoided. Although many centers advocate the use of a test-bolus, or the “Smartscan” function, to time the preparation delay between the start of contrast material administration and scanning, we have found that a fixed 25-second delay is not only simpler for our CT technologists, but also provides consistently reproducible good image quality. In patients with atrial fibrillation or very low ejection fraction, we employ a 35–40-second delay.

We compared the costs for gadolinium and iodinated agents. At our institution, the cost of Magnevist (Berlex, Montville, NJ) required for CTA was six times higher, or about $150 more, than that of nonionic iodinated contrast material. There was minimal cost difference between Magnevist and iodixanol (Visipaque, Amersham Health, Princeton, NJ). In relative terms, however, the difference is likely to be small compared with the potential delay and costs incurred when CTA cannot be performed.

Gadolinium-enhanced CTA for vessels of the head and neck is technically feasible and is valuable in patients with contraindications to use of iodinated contrast material. Limitations of this approach include lower vascular contrast attenuation than is achieved with conventional CTA and requirement of high doses of gadolinium.

References

  1. ↵
    Dehdashti AR, Rufenacht DA, Delavelle J, et al. Therapeutic decision and management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage based on computed tomographic angiography. Br J Neurosurg 2003;17:46–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Villablanca JP, Jahan R, Hooshi P, et al. Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1187–1198
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR, et al. CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:520–528
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Hollingworth W, Nathens AB, Kanne JP, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2003;48:88–102
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Chryssidis S, Davies RP, Tie ML. Gadolinium-enhanced computed tomographic aortography. Australas Radiol 2002;46:97–100
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Wagner HJ, Kalinowski M, Klose KJ, Alfke H. The use of gadolinium chelates for X-ray digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 2001;36:257–265
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Quinn AD, O’Hare NJ, Wallis FJ, Wilson GF. Gd-DTPA: an alternative contrast medium for CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:634–636
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Gierada DS, Bae KT. Gadolinium as a CT contrast agent: assessment in a porcine model. Radiology 1999;210:829–834
    PubMed
  9. ↵
    Spinosa DJ, Kaufmann JA, Hartwell GD. Gadolinium chelates in angiography and interventional radiology: a useful alternative to iodinated contrast media for angiography. Radiology 2002;223:319–325
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Nyman U, Elmstahl B, Leander P, et al. Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia? Radiology 2002;223:311–318
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Bazari H, Waltman AC. Gadolinium-based contrast agents as an alternative at vena cavography in patients with renal insufficiency: early experience. Radiology 1999;212:280–284
    PubMed
  12. Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Renal insufficiency: gadopentetate dimeglumine as a radiographic contrast agent during peripheral vascular interventional procedures. Radiology 1996;198:579–581
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    Sam AD 2nd, Morasch MD, Collins J, et al. Safety of gadolinium contrast angiography in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:313–318
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received November 30, 2003.
  • Accepted after revision January 18, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 6
1 Jun 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gadolinium-Enhanced CT Angiography of the Circle of Willis and Neck
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
John W. Henson, Raul G. Nogueira, Diego J. Covarrubias, R. Gilberto Gonzalez, Michael H. Lev
Gadolinium-Enhanced CT Angiography of the Circle of Willis and Neck
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2004, 25 (6) 969-972;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Gadolinium-Enhanced CT Angiography of the Circle of Willis and Neck
John W. Henson, Raul G. Nogueira, Diego J. Covarrubias, R. Gilberto Gonzalez, Michael H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2004, 25 (6) 969-972;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Accumulation and Toxicity: An Update
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire