Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging

Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Improved Tumor Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography As Compared with Fat-Suppressed MR Imaging Techniques

René van den Berg, Berit M. Verbist, Bart J. A. Mertens, Andel G. L. van der Mey and Mark A. van Buchem
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2004, 25 (5) 863-870;
René van den Berg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Berit M. Verbist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bart J. A. Mertens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andel G. L. van der Mey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. van Buchem
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Bar graph shows sensitivity (mean for both observers) for detection of carotid body tumors, vagal paragangliomas, and jugulotympanic paragangliomas for each MR imaging technique. T2W-FSE, T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging; T2W-FS-FSE, T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo imaging; CE-T1W-FS-SE, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo imaging; CE-3DTOF, contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight imaging.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Images of a 51-year-old woman with a small right-sided carotid body tumor (confirmed angiographically) and a large left-sided vagal paraganglioma (not shown).

    A and B, Axial view dual T2-weighted fast spin-echo image (3750/28/120 [TR/TE1/TE2]) shows only slight splaying of the carotid bifurcation (double arrow).

    C, On the axial view T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo image (5500/100 [TR/TE]), neither the carotid bifurcation nor a carotid body tumor is visible. High signal intensity in the carotid region is reflecting slow venous flow (arrow).

    D, On the axial view contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo image (625/17 [TR/TE]), enhancement of veins surrounding the normal left-sided carotid bifurcation (arrow) constrains detection of the small carotid body tumor (arrow).

    E, Splaying of the carotid bifurcation (double arrow) can be noticed on the axial view unenhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiogram (25/6.9/20 [TR/TE/flip angle]).

    F, Enhancement of a small carotid body tumor (arrow) is depicted on the axial view contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiogram (25/6.9/20).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Images of a 35-year-old man after surgical resection of a left-sided jugulotympanic paraganglioma with a small residual lesion in the left cerebellopontine angle.

    A, Residual paraganglioma in the left cerebellopontine angle is not clearly depicted with the T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo sequence (5500/100 [TR/TE]).

    B, Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo image (625/17 [TR/TE) clearly shows a small residual paraganglioma (arrow).

    C, Contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiogram (25/6.9/20 [TR/TE/flip angle]) clearly shows a small residual paraganglioma (arrow).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Unenhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiogram (25/6.9/20 [TR/TE/flip angle]) of a 39-year-old woman with a left-sided jugulotympanic paraganglioma clearly shows the highly vascular nature of the lesion (arrow).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    Imaging parameters of the sequences used

    TRTENSAFlip Angle (degrees)Section Thickness (mm)FOVRFOVMatrixImaging Time
    T1W-SE600202905 (gap, 1)25070205 × 2565:49
    T2W-FSE375028/1203905 (gap, 1)24091177 × 2564:56
    T2W-FS-FSE55001002905 (gap, 1)25091177 × 2563:45
    CE-T1W-FS-SE625172905 (gap, 1)25070179 × 2565:19
    3D TOF MRA256.91201.521070196 × 2565:52
    • Note.—NSA indicates number of signal averages; FOV, field of view; RFOV, rectangular field of view; T1W-SE, T1-weighted spin-echo; T2W-FSE, dual T2-weighted fast spin-echo; T2W-FS-FSE, T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo; CE-T1W-FS-SE, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo; 3D TOF MRA, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    Data regarding sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value [mean (observer 1 − observer 2)]

    SensitivityFitted Probability*Odds*SpecificityNPV
    T2W-FSE0.74 (0.64 − 0.83).7352.7830.99 (1.00 − 0.97)0.86
    T2W-FS-FSE0.70 (0.64 − 0.76).6992.3331.00 (1.00 − 1.00)0.85
    CE-T1 W-FS-SE0.73 (0.67 − 0.79).7382.6831.00 (1.00 − 1.00)0.86
    3D TOF MRA0.89 (0.87 − 0.90).9177.7490.99 (0.99 − 0.99)0.93
    • * Fitted probability and odds determined with logistic regression model.

    • Note.—NPV indicates negative predictive value; T2W-FSE, dual T2-weighted fast spin-echo; T2W-FS-FSE, T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo; CE-T1W-FS-SE, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo; 3D TOF MRA, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3:

    Number of detected tumors (mean for observers 1 and 2) in relation to tumor size for each MR imaging technique as compared with criterion standard DSA

    0–10 mm11–20 mm21–30 mm31–50 mm≥51 mm
    T2W-FSE1 (0)11 (3)10 (2)22 (17)8 (8)
    T2W-FS-FSE1 (0)9 (2)11 (3)21 (17)8 (7)
    CE-T1 W-FS-SE1 (0)11 (2)10 (0)22 (16)8 (8)
    CE-3D TOF3 (1)17 (11)12 (10)22 (20)8 (8)
    DSA91912228
    • Note.—T2W-FSE indicates dual T2-weighted fast spin-echo; T2W-FS-FSE, T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo; CE-T1 W-FS-SE, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo; 3D TOF MRA, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography; DSA, digital subtraction angiography. Data in parenthesis represent presence of intra-tumoral flow for each subgroup and technique.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 5
1 May 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Improved Tumor Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography As Compared with Fat-Suppressed MR Imaging Techniques
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
René van den Berg, Berit M. Verbist, Bart J. A. Mertens, Andel G. L. van der Mey, Mark A. van Buchem
Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Improved Tumor Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography As Compared with Fat-Suppressed MR Imaging Techniques
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2004, 25 (5) 863-870;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Improved Tumor Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography As Compared with Fat-Suppressed MR Imaging Techniques
René van den Berg, Berit M. Verbist, Bart J. A. Mertens, Andel G. L. van der Mey, Mark A. van Buchem
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2004, 25 (5) 863-870;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Clinical management of paragangliomas
  • 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for Baseline Evaluation of Patients with Head and Neck Paraganglioma
  • Evaluation of Brain and Head and Neck Tumors with 4D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Performance of US in Neck Node NIRADS 2
  • Hydrops Herniation into the Semicircular Canals
  • DIVr of NPC Predicted Outcome
Show more HEAD AND NECK IMAGING

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire