Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Evaluation of Cortical Atrophy between Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration by Hemispheric Surface Display of MR Images

Masato Taki, Kazunari Ishii, Tetsuya Fukuda, Yoshio Kojima and Etsuro Mori
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2004, 25 (10) 1709-1714;
Masato Taki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazunari Ishii
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuya Fukuda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshio Kojima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etsuro Mori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional imaging and hemispheric volumetry are useful for the assessment of degenerative cortical atrophy. Our purpose was to determine the features of cortical atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) by means of a hemispheric surface display generated with MR images.

METHODS: The extent of cortical atrophy was evaluated with automated MR hemispheric surface display and volumetry in 19 patients with PSP and 19 with CBD.

RESULTS: Most cortical regions were less atrophic in PSP than in CBD. The parietal lobe, paracentral regions, anterior middle frontal lobe, and posterior inferior frontal lobe were significantly more atrophic in CBD than in PSP, whereas the brainstem was significantly more atrophic in PSP. The mean hemisphere-to-intracranial volume ratio was significantly greater in patients with PSP (74.5%) than in those with CBD (71.4%), whereas the mean brainstem-to-intracranial volume ratio was significantly smaller in PSP (1.4%) than in CBD (1.6%). Asymmetry of hemispheric volume was significantly larger in the CBD group than in the PSP group.

CONCLUSION: Hemispheric surface display and volumetry are generally helpful and especially useful for the differentiation of PSP and CBD.

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) are neurodegenerative disorders that manifest with dementia and parkinsonism in middle-aged and elderly patients. The neurologic features of PSP are impaired ocular motility, pseudobulbar palsy, and axial dystonias, whereas CBD includes asymmetric rigidity of the limbs, myoclonus, the alien-limb sign, and localized cortical signs such as apraxia or cortical sensory loss. Because the clinical syndromes of typical PSP and CBD cases are distinct, it is usually not difficult to distinguish these two diseases if the subjects have typical symptoms. However, atypical cases with overlapping clinical and pathologic features are often seen. Several pathologic features, such as astrocytic lesions and ballooned neurons, differentiate PSP from CBD, although both diseases share several neuropathologic features including filamentous tau inclusions in neurons and glia and biochemical alterations in the tau protein (1, 2).

The patterns of brain atrophy and dysfunction of these two diseases can be visualized by means of neuroimaging. Radionuclear studies, which provide information about cortical dysfunction, are reportedly useful for differentiating these neurodegenerative disorders. MR imaging, which demonstrates structural changes, is useful for evaluating clinicopathologic correlations and establishing the diagnosis (3).

Several studies of single cases or case series have demonstrated the presence of high-grade cerebral atrophy in CBD; this may be bilateral and asymmetrical, involving the frontoparietal region contralateral to the side first and most severely affected (4, 5). Many groups have analyzed MR imaging of PSP (3, 6–10). Cordato et al (8) reported frontal atrophy in patients with PSP and found that frontal atrophy is correlated with behavioral changes. However, only a few groups have directly compared MR images of PSP with those of CBD. Soliveri et al (11, 12) demonstrated that MR findings of asymmetric frontoparietal atrophy in CBD and midbrain atrophy in PSP were the most consistent and useful aids in the clinical differentiation of the two diseases by visually rating atrophy of the midbrain and cortex. Yekhlef et al (13) also used visual inspection to evaluate cortical and midbrain atrophy and reported its diagnostic value. For visual inspection and additional quantitative measurement for evaluation of brain atrophy, Kitagaki et al (14–18) developed software that automatically extracts the brain matter from thin-sliced coronal MR images and generates 3D volume-rendered images of the cerebral hemisphere, brainstem, cerebellum, and calvaria. In previous studies, the precise anatomic location of cortical atrophy in frontotemporal dementia, CBD, and Alzheimer’s disease was determined by using these 3D reconstructed MR images (14–18), and the utility of this software was confirmed.

3D imaging and hemispheric volumetry are useful for the assessment of degenerative cortical atrophy. In this study, we used the 3D reconstruction of MR images to compare PSP with CBD to determine the extent of cortical atrophy in PSP.

Methods

Subjects

Nineteen patients with probable PSP diagnosed according to the clinical criteria established by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Society for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy International Workshop (19) were selected from among patients who were admitted to our hospital for examination of cognitive impairment. Another 19 patients with probable CBD who met the criteria of the CBD Multicenter Case-Control Study (CBDMCCS) (20) were sampled from the same cohort as those with PSP. All patients were matched on the basis of age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score and Alzheimer’s disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) score. Patients with PSP consisted of 11 men and eight women with a mean age ± SD of 63.8 ± 6.3 years. Their respective MMSE and ADAS scores were 22.3 ± 5.3 and 20.8 ± 10.7. Patients with CBD consisted of 11 men and eight women with a mean age of 63.8 ± 6.7 years and respective MMSE and ADAS scores of 19.1 ± 6.0 and 26.1 ± 12.6. All subjects were right-handed.

Probable PSP requires the presence of a gradually progressive disorder with an onset at age 40 years or later, both vertical supranuclear gaze palsy and prominent postural instability occurring in the first year of onset, and no evidence of other diseases that could explain these features (20). Although clinical diagnostic criteria for CBD have not been established, Litvan et al (21) reported that their clinical diagnosis of CBD based on characteristic clinical features had good specificity. The CBDMCCS criteria require the presence of rigidity plus apraxia, cortical sensory loss, or alien-limb phenomena at some time during the course of the disease. Alternatively, the presence of moderate-to-marked limb rigidity accompanied by a fixed dystonic posture and spontaneous and reflex asymmetrical myoclonus can serve as inclusion criteria. The clinical features of the patients with PSP and those with CBD are summarized in Table 1. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients or their relatives. The study protocol was approved by our institutional ethical committee.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Clinical features of patients with PSP and those with CBD

MR Acquisition, Image Processing, and Surface Display

All studies were performed on a 1.5-T MR imaging unit (Signa Horizon 5; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) with a circularly polarized head coil functioning as both transmitter and receiver. Coronal 3D spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) images (field of view, 220 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; 124 × 1.5-mm contiguous sections; TR/TE/NEX, 14/3/2; flip angle, 20°) covering the whole calvaria were the source data. Voxel size was (220 mm/256)2 × 1.5 mm = 1.1 mm3.

Datasets of the SPGR images were directly transmitted from the MR imaging unit to a UNIX graphic workstation (Indigo 2, SGI; Mountain View, CA) and analyzed with 3D MR image-processing software (22). This software generated a 3D volume-rendered image of each structure; a two-dimensional reconstruction with arbitrary angles; and volumetric measurements of the bilateral cerebral hemisphere, brainstem, cerebellum, and CSF space (including ventricular systems). The posterior end of the whole brain and calvaria was manually set at the plane intersecting the occipitoatlantal junction. By using a mouse cursor to rotate the image, the rendered images of individual brain hemispheres could be seen at arbitrary angles.

Assessment of Cortical Atrophy

A 3D volume-rendered image of each cerebral hemisphere was displayed on a high-resolution color monitor. One neuroradiologist (K.I.) blinded to the clinical data and diagnosis rated regional cortical atrophy for each of the 66 cortical regions of the lateral and medial hemispheric surfaces into five categories: normal (nadir of the sulcus invisible with stacked gyri), minimal (nadir of the sulcus visible), mild (bottom of the sulcus widened), moderate (gyrus thinner than sulcus), and severe (very shrunken). The regions consisted of the orbitofrontal cortex, superior frontal gyrus (anterior and posterior, lateral and medial), middle frontal gyrus (anterior and posterior), inferior frontal gyrus (anterior and posterior), cingulate gyrus (anterior and posterior), precentral gyrus (medial and lateral), postcentral gyrus (medial and lateral), superior parietal lobule (anterior and posterior, lateral and medial), inferior parietal lobule (anterior and posterior), superior temporal gyrus (anterior and posterior), middle temporal gyrus (anterior and posterior), inferior temporal gyrus (anterior and posterior), parahippocampal gyrus (anterior and posterior), occipital gyri (anterior and posterior, lateral and medial), midbrain, and pons on either side. The score of the more affected side was considered representative for a given region, so that altogether 33 regions were evaluated.

In addition, the volumes of the right and left cerebral hemispheres, total cerebral volume, total intracranial volume, cerebellar volume, and the volume of the brainstem were determined. We also calculated total intracranial volume, hemispheric volume, cerebellar volume, brainstem volume, hemispheric volume-to-total intracranial volume ratio, cerebellar volume-to-total intracranial volume ratio, brainstem volume-to-total intracranial volume ratio, and asymmetry index. This index was calculated as the absolute value of (left hemispheric volume − right hemispheric volume)/(left hemispheric volume + right hemispheric volume).

We then assessed the relationship between clinical symptoms and cortical ratings. The cortical ratings for the positive and negative symptoms of apraxia, cortical sensory loss, alien limb, and myoclonus in the CBD group were compared.

Statistical Analysis

Differences between the PSP and CBD groups were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric ordinal data (atrophy rating). One-way analysis of variance was used for numerical data (volume). The level of statistical significance was set at P < .05 with Bonferroni correction. A stepwise discriminant-function analysis was used to identify the volumetry data most likely to help in distinguishing PSP from CBD.

Results

Patients in the PSP group had moderate atrophy in the midbrain. Mild atrophy was also observed in the frontal cortices but not in the parietal or occipital cortices (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

3D volume-rendered images reconstructed from thin-section coronal 3D SPGR MR images (TR/TE, 14/3; field of view, 220 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; 124 × 1.5-mm contiguous sections; flip angle, 20°) show mild diffuse atrophy of cerebral cortex and moderate atrophy of brainstem in a 67-year-old woman with PSP (MMSE score of 21).

Focal atrophy affecting the frontal and parietal lobes was apparent on the hemispheric surface images of patients with CBD (Fig 2). The central area, especially the postcentral gyrus, was highly atrophic. In the frontal lobe, atrophy was concentrated in the lateral and medial surface of the superior frontal gyrus. The superior parietal lobule of the parietal lobe was especially severely affected. In contrast, atrophy of the temporal and occipital lobes was moderate.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

3D volume-rendered images reconstructed from thin-section coronal 3D SPGR MR images (TR/TE, 14/3; field of view, 220 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; 124 × 1.5-mm contiguous section; flip angle, 20°) show severe frontoparietal atrophy in a 63-year-old woman with CBD (MMSE score of 19).

Table 2 shows the regions where cortical atrophy was significantly different for the two groups. Comparison of the PSP and CBD groups showed that 10 regions in the central areas, the frontal lobe, and the parietal lobe of patients with CBD were significantly atrophic, whereas the midbrain of patients with PSP was significantly atrophic. Figure 3 shows the significantly atrophic regions schematically. When an atrophy score of 3 was used as the cutoff point (CBD parietal atrophic rating >3, PSP midbrain atrophy rating >3), correct prediction occurred in 89% of the PSP cases and in 85% of the CBD cases.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Light gray and dark gray areas are regions where atrophy was rated significantly more severe in the CBD and PSP groups, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

Mean visual regional atrophy ratings of the PSP and CBD groups

Table 3 shows the values for volumes and asymmetry index. The mean hemispheric volume and the mean hemispheric-to-total intracranial volume ratio were significantly smaller for CBD than for PSP. On the other hand, the mean brainstem volume-to-total intracranial volume ratio (relative volume) was significantly smaller for PSP than for CBD. The CBD and PSP group did not significantly differ in mean total intracranial volume, mean cerebellar volume, mean brainstem volume, or mean cerebellar-to-total intracranial volume ratio. The mean asymmetry index was significantly larger for the CBD group than for the PSP group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3:

Volumetric data for patients with PSP and those with CBD

Discriminant analysis used the following formulas: Classification score for PSP = (asymmetry index × 1.92) + (relative brainstem volume × 3908.6) + (relative right hemisphere volume × 837.3) − 168.7; Classification score for CBD = (asymmetry index × 2.147) + (relative brainstem volume × 4318.7) + (relative right hemisphere volume × 808.1) − 166.7. With this model, 79% of PSP and 74% of CBD cases were correctly predicted.

The exploratory comparison of atrophy ratings for the positive- and negative-symptom groups indicated that the anterior inferior frontal gyrus was significantly more atrophied in the alien-hand positive group than in the negative group. The positive and negative groups had no significant regional differences for other clinical symptoms.

Discussion

To identify the anatomic location of cortical atrophy in CBD, emphasis of pathologic examinations has been on the frontal, parietal, and central regions (23–26), whereas in PSP, the midbrain and pons are considered to be the pathologically affected regions (3). Although previous MR imaging studies of CBD have demonstrated asymmetric parietal and frontal cortical atrophy and asymmetric dilatation of the lateral ventricles (3, 4), the reports failed to specify the exact location of cortical atrophy. Making use of the advantages of MR imaging and computer technology, Kitagaki et al (18) were the first to document the extent of cortical atrophy in CBD with precise identification of its anatomic location in vivo. Test-retest reliability of the atrophy rating with this method was verified as good. Reliability was assessed by calculating the interclass correlation coefficients of two separate experimental ratings for 15 subjects who were randomly selected from the subject groups. Interclass coefficients ranged from 0.49 to 1.00, with a mean of 0.75 ± 0.14 (14). Relying on data from prior studies (14–18), we used the method of Kitagaki et al for our study of patients with PSP and those with CBD. Our rating results showed that atrophy was concentrated in the inferior frontal, paracentral, and parietal regions in patients with CBD and in the brainstem of patients with PSP.

Our study clearly demonstrated that parasagittal frontoparietal and paracentral cortical atrophy in CBD, which has often been emphasized in pathologic studies (23–26), was a useful MR sign for distinguishing CBD from PSP. Because asymmetry of atrophy in CBD was stressed in previous studies and also demonstrated in our volumetric study, it was found to be another useful sign for discriminating between CBD and PSP. A comparison of Parkinson disease and PSP showed that asymmetric hemispheric atrophy is a hallmark of CBD (4). Our findings verified the validity of this sign with surface-rendered images, while the volumetric asymmetry index also confirmed the prevalence of asymmetry of atrophy in CBD compared with PSP. Studies of functional neuroimaging approaches, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission CT (SPECT), have demonstrated metabolic and perfusional impairment in both CBD and PSP (27–30). In CBD, metabolic and perfusional asymmetry and substantial reduction in the parietal, paracentral, and frontal lobes and in the basal ganglia and thalamus have been identified. In PSP, metabolism and perfusion is considerably reduced in the medial frontal lobe, basal ganglia and midbrain. Comparison of our two groups showed that CBD featured parietal and frontal atrophy, and PSP, only brainstem atrophy. This finding was noted because the frontal lobe in the PSP group was also atrophic, and the frontal lobes in the CBD group did not significantly differ except in the inferior frontal gyri.

As shown in our study, visual atrophy rating resulted in more accurate discrimination of the two diseases than did volumetric results. This may be due to the limitation of volumetry, which cannot be used to measure small cortical regions, while visual atrophy rating can be used to assess smaller regions. 3D reconstruction of the MR images is the first step in gross pathologic examination (i.e., inspection of the brain specimen before dissection). Detection of cortical atrophy with precise anatomic localization by the present system makes it possible to determine correlations between clinical symptoms and affected regions and to obtain useful additional evidence to support clinical diagnoses of the disease. In CBD, the basal ganglia is another affected locus, while the pallidus globes are a locus affected in PSP. However, our system is currently not capable of evaluating the internal structures, including the basal ganglia. However, in clinical situations, there is no need to evaluate basal ganglia atrophy for discriminating between these two diseases. Nevertheless, 3D reconstruction of MR images is a useful complementary tool for evaluating focal cortical atrophy in degenerative dementias and may facilitate the study of brain-behavior relationships and the differential diagnosis of dementia.

Our study demonstrated that only anterior inferior frontal cortical atrophy was correlated with the alien-hand symptom in CBD. Apraxia and cortical sensory loss in CBD may well be related to regional cortical atrophy, but we did not find any significantly atrophied regions related to those symptoms. This result may represent a limitation of morphologic MR imaging studies for the assessment of atrophy. Additional, more detailed regional volumetric measurements are needed to reach any definite conclusions.

Conclusion

Hemispheric surface display allows for external inspection of diseased brain and is useful for differentiating PSP and CBD. Asymmetry of hemispheric brain atrophy is a distinguishing feature of CBD and brainstem atrophy of PSP.

References

  1. ↵
    Dickson DW. Neuropathologic differentiation of progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol 1999;246:II6–II15
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Di Maria E, Tabaton M, Vigo T, et al. Corticobasal degeneration shares a common genetic background with progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol 2000;47:374–377
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Yagishita A, Oda M. Progressive supranuclear palsy: MRI and pathological findings [Suppl]. Neuroradiology 1996;1:S60–S66
  4. ↵
    Grisoli M, Fetoni V, Savoiardo M, Girotti F, Bruzzone MG. MRI in corticobasal degeneration. Eur J Neurol 1995;2:547–552
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hauser RA, Murtaugh FR, Akhter K, Gold M, Olanow CW. Magnetic resonance imaging of corticobasal degeneration. J Neuroimaging 1996;6:222–226
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Nagahama Y, et al. Comparison of the pattern of atrophy of the corpus callosum in frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:623–639
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. Asato R, Akiguchi I, Masunaga S, Hashimoto N. Magnetic resonance imaging distinguishes progressive supranuclear palsy from multiple system atrophy. J Neural Transm 2000;107:1427–1436
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Cordato NJ, Pantelis C, Halliday GM, et al. Frontal atrophy correlates with behavioural changes in progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 2002;125:789–800
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Kato N, Arai K, Hattori T. Study of the anterior midbrain atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci 2003;210:57–60
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Savoiardo M. Differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonian disorders by magnetic resonance imaging [Suppl]. Neurol Sci 24 2003;1:S35–S37
  11. ↵
    Soliveri P, Monza D, Paridi D, et al. Cognitive and magnetic resonance imaging aspects of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 1999;53:502–507
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Soliveri P, Monza D, Paridi D, et al. Cognitive and magnetic resonance imaging aspects of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy [comment]. Neurology 2000;54:1878
    FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Yekhlef F, Ballan G, Macia F, Delmer O, Sourgen C, Tison F. Routine MRI for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, MSA, PSP, and CBD. J Neural Transm 2003;110:151–169
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Kitagaki H, Mori E, Yamaji S, et al. Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease: evaluation of cortical atrophy with automated hemispheric surface display generated with MR images. Radiology 1998;208:431–439
    PubMed
  15. Yasuda M, Mori E, Kitagaki H, et al. Apolipoprotein E e4 allele and whole brain atrophy in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:779–784
    PubMed
  16. Hashimoto M, Kitagaki H, Imamura T, et al. Medial temporal and whole-brain atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies: a volumetric MRI study. Neurology 1998;51:357–362
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. Mori E, Ikeda M, Hirono N, Kitagaki H, Imamura T, Shimomura T. Amygdalar volume and emotional memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:216–222
    PubMed
  18. ↵
    Kitagaki H, Hirono N, Ishii K, Mori E. Corticobasal degeneration: evaluation of cortical atrophy by means of hemispheric surface display generated with MR images. Radiology 2000;216:31–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop. Neurology 1996;47:1–9
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Lang AE, Riley DE, Bergeron C. Cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. In: Calne DB, ed. Neurodegenerative Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders;1994 :877–894
  21. ↵
    Litvan I, Agid Y, Goetz C, et al. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 1997;48:119–125
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Kobashi S, Kamiura N, Hata Y, Yamato K. 3D Automatic Extraction Method of the Brain Regions Aided by Fuzzy Matching Techniques: Asian Fuzzy Systems Symposium. Soft Computing in Intelligent Systems and Information Processing. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE;1996 :164–175
  23. ↵
    Gibb WRG, Luthert PJ, Marsden CD. Corticobasal degeneration. Brain 1989;112:1171–1192
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. Riley DE, Lang AE, Lewis A, et al. Cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. Neurology 1990;40:1203–1212
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. Tsuchiya K, Ikeda K, Uchihara T, Oda T, Shimada H. Distribution of cerebral cortical lesions in corticobasal degeneration: a clinicopathological study of five autopsy cases in Japan. Acta Neuropatholol 1997;94:416–424
    CrossRef
  26. ↵
    Wakabayashi K, Oyanagi K, Makifuchi T, et. al. Corticobasal degeneration: etiopathological significance of the cytoskeletal alterations. Acta Neuropathol 1994;87:545–553
    PubMed
  27. ↵
    Blin J, Vidailhet MJ, Pillon B, Dubois B, Feve JR, Agid Y. Corticobasal degeneration: decreased and asymmetrical glucose consumption as studied with PET. Mov Disord 1992;7:348–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Nagahama Y, Fukuyama H, Turjanski N, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in corticobasal degeneration: comparison with progressive supranuclear palsy and normal controls. Mov Disord 1997;12:691–696
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. Okuda B, Tachibana H, Kawabata K, Takeda M, Sugita M. Cerebral blood flow in corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2000;14:46–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Hosaka K, Ishii K, Sakamoto S, et al. Voxel-based comparison of regional cerebral glucose metabolism between PSP and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Sci 2002;199:67–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received November 19, 2003.
  • Accepted after revision April 5, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 10
1 Nov 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Cortical Atrophy between Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration by Hemispheric Surface Display of MR Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Masato Taki, Kazunari Ishii, Tetsuya Fukuda, Yoshio Kojima, Etsuro Mori
Evaluation of Cortical Atrophy between Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration by Hemispheric Surface Display of MR Images
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2004, 25 (10) 1709-1714;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Evaluation of Cortical Atrophy between Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration by Hemispheric Surface Display of MR Images
Masato Taki, Kazunari Ishii, Tetsuya Fukuda, Yoshio Kojima, Etsuro Mori
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2004, 25 (10) 1709-1714;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Progressive supra-nuclear palsy: frequency of cardinal extrapyramidal features at first presentation
  • Neuroimaging of Rapidly Progressive Dementias, Part 1: Neurodegenerative Etiologies
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire