Evaluation of Carotid Stenosis by Angiography: Potential Bias toward Overestimated Measurements Introduced by Prior Interpretation of Doppler Sonograms

References

1. ↵
   North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenoses. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenoses. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415-1425

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Executive committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421-1428

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Eliasziw M, Rankin RN, Fox AJ, Haynes RB, Barnett HJM. Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 1995;26(10):1747-1752

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, Barnett HJM. Carotid artery stenosis: external validity of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement method. Radiology 1997;204:229-233

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316-318

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Bluth EI, Wetzner SM, Stavros AT, Aufrichtig D, Marich KW, Baker JD. Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria. Radiographics 1998;8(3):487-506

   CrossRefPubMed