Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain

Acute Ischemic Stroke Infarct Topology: Association with Lesion Volume and Severity of Symptoms at Admission and Discharge

S. Payabvash, S. Taleb, J.C. Benson and A.M. McKinney
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2017, 38 (1) 58-63; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4970
S. Payabvash
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Payabvash
S. Taleb
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Taleb
J.C. Benson
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.C. Benson
A.M. McKinney
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.M. McKinney
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute stroke presentation and outcome depend on both ischemic infarct volume and location. We aimed to determine the association between acute ischemic infarct topology and lesion volume and stroke severity at presentation and discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent MR imaging within 24 hours of symptom onset or last seen well were included. Infarcts were segmented and coregistered on the Montreal Neurological Institute-152 brain map. Voxel-based analyses were performed to determine the distribution of infarct lesions associated with larger volumes, higher NIHSS scores at admission and discharge, and greater NIHSS/volume ratios.

RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were included. Ischemic infarcts involving the bilateral lentiform nuclei, insular ribbons, middle corona radiata, and right precentral gyrus were associated with larger infarct volumes (average, 76.7 ± 125.6 mL versus 16.4 ± 24.0 mL, P < .001) and higher admission NIHSS scores. Meanwhile, brain stem and thalami infarctions were associated with higher admission NIHSS/volume ratios. The discharge NIHSS scores were available in 218 patients, in whom voxel-based analysis demonstrated that ischemic infarcts of the bilateral posterior insular ribbons, middle corona radiata, and right precentral gyrus were associated with more severe symptoms at discharge, whereas ischemic lesions of the brain stem, bilateral thalami, and, to a lesser extent, the middle corona radiata were associated with higher ratios of discharge NIHSS score/infarct volume.

CONCLUSIONS: Acute ischemic infarcts of the insulae, lentiform nuclei, and middle corona radiata tend to have larger volumes, more severe presentations, and worse outcomes, whereas brain stem and thalamic infarcts have greater symptom severity relative to smaller lesion volumes.

ABBREVIATION:

VLSM
voxel-based lesion symptom mapping

The primary goal of acute-phase stroke imaging is to exclude intracranial hemorrhage and to estimate the volume of irreversible ischemic infarct, to identify candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Currently, NCCT is the most widely used imaging technique for this purpose, given its availability, speed, and reliability for ruling out intracranial hemorrhage. However, acute stroke imaging could also have the potential to provide additional prognostic information. For example, the DWI infarct volume, ASPECTS, and malignant CTA collateral profile are imaging markers that have shown prognostic value in patients with acute ischemic stroke.1⇓–3

Patients with acute ischemic stroke with larger infarct volumes have a higher risk of developing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and worse clinical outcome following intravenous thrombolysis.4,5 The presence of ischemic changes of greater than one-third of the MCA territory on noncontrast CT may exclude patients from reperfusion therapy. Certain studies have suggested that a DWI infarct volume of >70–100 mL represents a malignant profile that has a higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation and poor outcome.4,5 Consequently, the ASPECTS, which has been correlated with outcome, was developed as a means of quantifying ischemic changes on NCCT to identify candidates for thrombolysis.6,7

In addition to volume, the location of an infarct is fundamentally linked to neurologic deficits. There is a limited correlation between the infarct volume and the severity of stroke symptoms; while the infarct volume accounts for 38% of the variation in stroke severity, the combination of both infarct volume and location can account for 62% of the variation in NIHSS scores.8 Thus, there has been recent effort to assess the relationship between the infarct topology and outcome in patients with stroke.9⇓⇓–12 Specifically, some studies reported that ischemic infarcts in the insular ribbon, lentiform nucleus, and corona radiata are associated with poor prognosis in patients with stroke.10,13,14 However, there are limited prior studies on voxel-based evaluation of the relationship between acute infarct location and volume in these patients.

The primary goal of our study was to determine the location of acute ischemic infarcts with larger volumes on admission MR imaging by using a voxel-based analysis. It is likely that the distribution of infarct lesions with larger volumes could, at least in part, explain some of the recent findings on the topographic correlation of admission infarct distribution and clinical presentation, as well as outcome. Also, the present study investigated the interconnection of infarct topology, lesion volume, and severity of symptoms at admission and discharge. Additionally, we evaluated the distribution of infarct lesions with higher ratios of NIHSS-to-infarct volume, which represent worse clinical deficits relative to smaller lesion size. The voxel-based analysis of lesion-location volume or location-symptom relation can search for significant associations between infarct topology and outcome variables without a priori cerebral parcellation, compared with an atlas-based image analysis methodology.11,12 Such findings can potentially be the basis for development of a “hazard atlas” of the brain to predict clinical outcome and, perhaps, response to treatment on the basis of infarct distribution and size at the time of admission.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This study was approved by the institutional review boards at the University of Minnesota Medical Center, Hennepin County Medical Center. The medical and imaging records of all patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of stroke to those 2 hospitals were reviewed between January 2011 and December 2014. Patients were included in this study if all of the following criteria were present: 1) They underwent MR imaging within 24 hours of symptom onset or, alternatively, at the time last seen well; 2) the patient had a “unilateral” acute ischemic infarct based on DWI; and 3) the patient had no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on the admission CT or MR imaging examinations. As per the stroke registry protocol of the 2 institutions, the NIHSS score is recorded for all patients presenting with stroke symptoms, as a measure of symptom severity.11,12 The demographic data, time to scan, stroke risk factors, and reperfusion therapy data were all extracted from the electronic medical record.

Infarct Lesion Segmentation and Coregistration

Infarct lesions were manually segmented on the admission DWI via the MRIcron software (http://www.mccauslandcenter.sc.edu/crnl/).15 An intensity filter was used to augment selection and segmentation of the DWI-hyperintense lesions. The lesion volumes were also calculated by using the above-mentioned software. Thereafter, the infarct lesion volumes, along with the corresponding DWI scan, were coregistered to the Montreal Neurological Institute-152 brain space by using the FMRIB Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT; http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/).16 To illustrate the distribution of infarct lesions across this cohort of patients, we created a summation color-coded overlay map with each voxel showing the number of patients with an infarct at that voxel coordinate (On-line Fig 1A).

Voxel-Based Lesion Symptom Mapping

For voxel-based analysis, the nonparametric mapping toolbox included in the MRIcron software package was used.10,15 Five series of group comparisons were performed for each voxel (infarcted versus noninfarcted) with the following: 1) the admission infarct volume, 2–3) the NIHSS scores at the admission and discharge (if available), and 4–5) the ratio of NIHSS/volume at the admission and discharge. Separate Voxel-Based Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM) analyses were also performed for voxel-based topographic association of admission infarct location with component scores of upper extremity motor (question 5), lower extremity motor (question 6), and language functions (sum scores of questions 9 and 10) on the admission NIHSS test. The software uses the Brunner-Munzel rank order test, and the results provide a corresponding z score map, in which higher values indicate the association of an infarct at that specific voxel with either larger lesion volume, more severe symptoms, or a higher NIHSS/volume ratio, respectively (Fig 1). To correct for multiple comparisons, we performed a family-wise error Bonferroni correction with 2000 permutations to compensate for the small sample size. To achieve optimal statistical power, we included only voxels affected in at least 10 patients in the voxel-based analysis (On-line Fig 1B), as suggested by prior studies.17 For each series of analyses, the family-wise error Bonferroni-corrected z scores corresponding to .05 and .01 P value thresholds are listed with the depiction window narrowed to approximate corresponding levels (Fig 1 and On-line Fig 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Voxel-based analysis of the association of admission infarct location with infarct volume, admission and discharge NIHSS scores, and NIHSS/volume ratios. The color range shows z scores, and corresponding P value thresholds are calculated after family-wise error Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons and applying 2000 permutations. A, Ischemic infarcts are associated with larger admission DWI-lesion volumes. Higher family-wise error scores are associated with larger lesion volumes: z score = 4.27 → P value = .05; z score = 4.96 → P value = .01. B and C, Infarct lesions in voxels with higher z scores are associated with higher admission NIHSS scores (z score = 4.35 → P value = .05; z score = 4.93 → P value = .01) and discharge NIHSS scores (z score = 4.23 → P value = .05; z score = 5.01 → P value = .01). D and E, Voxel-based analysis of NIHSS/volume ratio highlights those regions where infarction is associated with a higher ratio of admission (D) and discharge (E) NIHSS scores per infarct volume, so infarction is associated with worse clinical symptoms despite a smaller volume (for admission ratios: z score = 4.30 → P value = .05; z score = 4.98 → P value = .01; for discharge ratios: z score = 4.30 → P value = .05; z score = 5.15 → P value = .01).

Statistical Analysis

The data are expressed as mean ± SD, frequency (percentage) or median (interquartile range) when appropriate. The z score maps from the VLSM analysis were used to develop brain masks and dichotomize patients into 2 groups on the basis of whether their infarct lesions overlapped with the brain mask. An independent samples Student t test was performed to compare the average lesion volumes between the dichotomized groups; and a Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of the NIHSS scores. All statistical analyses were performed by using the SPSS for Mac, Version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient Characteristics

A total of 238 patients were included in this series. The patient characteristics are summarized in the Table. MR imaging was performed at a mean of 13.6 ± 7.1 hours after symptom onset or time last seen well. On-line Fig 1 illustrates the distribution of infarcts among patients. Most infarcts were centered at the insular ribbon and lentiform nuclei, with less frequency at the periphery of the MCA territory and posterior circulation. Overall, 70 (29.4%) patients had ischemic infarct lesions within the posterior circulation territory; and 120 (50.4%) had a right-sided stroke.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Patient characteristics (N = 238)a

Topology of Acute Ischemic Infarct Lesions with Larger Volume

The average infarct volume on admission DWI was 39.5 ± 84.9 mL. Fig 1A depicts the VLSM analysis results of lesion volume-location correlation. Infarctions of the bilateral lentiform nuclei, insular ribbons, central corona radiata, and the right precentral gyrus were associated with larger infarct volumes. A brain mask was developed by using the z score map corresponding to a family-wise error–corrected P value of .05, to dichotomize infarcts into high-versus-low volume (Fig 1A). On average, the volume of ischemic infarcts that involved the highlighted regions in Fig 1A (76.7 ± 125.6 mL) was higher than those that spared these regions (16.4 ± 24.0 mL, P < .001).

Topology of Infarcts with Higher NIHSS Scores at Admission and Discharge

Fig 1B highlights the cerebral regions where infarction is associated with higher admission NIHSS scores based on the VLSM analysis. Infarct lesions localized to the insula bilaterally and corona radiata and, to a lesser extent, the right precentral gyrus were associated with higher NIHSS scores at admission. On-line Fig 2 shows the distribution of infarct lesions associated with higher component NIHSS scores for the upper and lower extremity motor deficit and aphasia/dysarthria at the time of admission. Overall, ischemic infarct lesions of the bilateral periventricular white matter and middle corona radiata and the bilateral precentral gyri were associated with higher scores of upper and lower extremity motor deficits—questions 5 and 6, respectively—on the admission NIHSS test (On-line Fig 2A, -B). Higher sum scores on questions 9 (best language) and 10 (dysarthria) were associated with infarct lesions in the left inferior frontal lobe, insular ribbon, and high left precentral gyrus (On-line Fig 2C).

Patients were discharged between 1 and 33 days after stroke onset with 215 (90.3%) discharged within 10 days of admission (Table). The discharge NIHSS scores were available in 218 (91.6%) patients. Ischemic infarct lesions in the bilateral middle corona radiata, posterior insular ribbons, and right precentral gyrus were associated with more severe symptoms at discharge (Fig 1C). Notably, there was no significant difference in admission or discharge NIHSS scores between patients with right-versus-left hemisphere ischemic stroke in univariate analysis (P values = 0.569 and 1.000, respectively).

Topology of Infarcts with Higher NIHSS/Volume Ratio

The infarct lesions in the brain stem and, to a lesser extent, the bilateral thalami were associated with higher admission NIHSS/volume ratios (Fig 1D). The patients were then dichotomized into 2 groups: those with infarction within the brain stem (ie, midbrain, pons, or medulla) and/or thalami versus those with an infarct that spared these regions. The average volume of ischemic infarcts involving the brain stem and/or thalami (21.5 ± 35.1 mL) was less than that of infarcts sparing these regions (43.6 ± 92.1 mL, P = .010), whereas, patients with brain stem/thalami infarcts had higher admission NIHSS scores (median, 6; interquartile range, 3–11) compared with the remainder of patients (median, 4; interquartile range, 2–7, P = .006). Similar results were found for the topographic distribution of discharge NIHSS score/admission infarct volume ratio (Fig 1E); higher ratios were found in the brain stem, bilateral thalami, and, to an extent, the bilateral middle corona radiata. Among 218 patients with available discharge NIHSS scores, the average volume of ischemic infarcts involving the brain stem and/or thalami (22.6 ± 33.1 mL) was smaller compared with infarcts sparing these regions (39.3 ± 72.6 mL, P = .048), with no significant difference in discharge NIHSS scores between these 2 subgroups (P = .336).

Discussion

The present study found a topographic overlap in the distribution of acute ischemic infarcts associated with larger lesion volumes, more severe admission symptoms, and worse clinical deficits at discharge. It seems that infarct lesions affecting the insular ribbon, lentiform nuclei, and middle corona radiata in the acute phase represent an ominous sign in terms of clinical presentation and outcome, which could be, at least in part, due to their larger size. On the other hand, those patients with acute ischemic infarcts in the brain stem and thalami had more severe neurologic deficits relative to smaller infarct volumes at presentation and discharge. These findings are in accordance with and can partially explain the mechanism of the recent reports linking acute infarcts of the insula, lentiform nuclei, and periventricular white matter with poor prognosis in anterior circulation stroke.9,10,13,14,18 The results suggest that admission infarct topology, possibly along with the integration of clinical findings and lesion volume, can be applied to develop a quantitative population-based probability map for prediction of long-term outcome or assessment of treatment risk versus benefit.

The association between larger infarct volume and involvement of the insular ribbon, lentiform nuclei, and central corona radiata could be due to the spatial location of these regions because extensive ischemic infarcts in the MCA territory would inevitably involve the central portion. However, the topographic distribution of larger infarct lesions may also be secondary to the higher ischemic vulnerability of the insular ribbon and adjacent lentiform nuclei.16 In addition, proximal MCA occlusion infarcts that involve the insula are more likely to grow into areas of initial perfusion-DWI mismatch.19 On the other hand, a proximal MCA occlusion stroke sparing the insula may indicate adequate MCA collaterals, given that the insular ribbon arterial supply is almost exclusively from the superior and inferior M2 branches, with a small contribution from the M1 insular branches.20

Regarding outcome prediction, various imaging and clinical variables at stroke presentation have been shown to help predict the clinical outcome. Such predictors described within the literature include the severity of symptoms at presentation (ie, NIHSS score), prestroke mRS score, patient age, and blood glucose level at baseline.4,5 As for imaging-based scoring systems proposed for prediction of stroke outcome, ASPECTS is the most widely used tool.1 However, each DWI-ASPECTS score may represent a wide range of infarct volumes,21 which could be, in part, due to unequal weighing of different MCA regions in ASPECTS, favoring the basal ganglia.22 The results of this study demonstrate that larger infarcts and those associated with more severe symptoms at admission and discharge tend to involve the lentiform nuclei and adjacent insular ribbon, which may explain the prognostic power of the ASPECTS scoring tool despite volumetrically unequal region components.

Recently, there have been growing attempts at prediction of stroke outcome based on the infarct topology.9⇓⇓⇓⇓–14 A penalized logistic analysis of ASPECTS component scores on pretreatment CT in the National Institute for Neurological Disorders Tissue Plasminogen Activator trial found that infarction of the lentiform nucleus and parieto-occipital junction (M6 region) predicts poor outcome in older patients.13 A voxel-based analysis reported an association between infarction of the central corona radiata, internal capsule, and insular ribbon with higher mRS scores on 1-month follow-up.10 The current study suggests that admission ischemic infarcts within the insular ribbon, lentiform nuclei, and middle corona radiata are predictors of poor neurologic function at discharge, in part, due to larger lesion volume of infarcts involving these areas and their association with more severe symptoms at presentation. On the other hand, special attention should be paid to the less frequent posterior circulation ischemic infarcts involving the brain stem and thalami, given that such lesions tend to have relatively prominent neurologic deficits at admission and discharge despite their smaller volume.

Although the findings in the current study suggest that infarct topology affects stroke outcome, in part due to lesion volume, the infarct location–outcome correlation persists even after adjustment for infarct volume.18 Rangaraju et al18 showed that right parieto-occipital (M6) and left superior frontal (M4) infarctions are associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with stroke with anterior large arterial occlusion over and above the corresponding infarct lesion volume. Timpone et al14 showed that the percentage of insular ribbon infarction of >50% is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome despite small admission DWI lesion volumes (<70 mL). Nevertheless, the combination of lesion volume and infarct location results in a stronger correlation with the severity of symptoms at presentation.8

Posterior circulation infarcts compose 20%–25% of ischemic strokes.23 Many prior studies on lesion-function correlation have focused on patients with anterior circulation stroke,9,10,18 presumably due to the lower rate of posterior circulation stroke. In the current study, posterior circulation infarcts were not associated with higher NIHSS values on overall VLSM analysis; however, infarctions of the brain stem and thalami were associated with higher ratios of admission and discharge NIHSS scores relative to acute infarct volume. In addition, those patients with ischemic lesions of the brain stem or thalami had higher admission NIHSS scores compared with the remainder of patients. Given the lower rate of posterior circulation infarcts and their smaller volume, it seems pertinent to run a separate analysis for patients with anterior-versus-posterior circulation territory stroke for the development of an inclusive imaging-based prognostic model. Another consideration would be to investigate the relationship of infarct volume in each vascular territory to the territory volume to demonstrate the relative impact of different infarct lesion volumes in a given arterial territory. However, there is no consensus regarding the precise boundaries of different vascular territories, given the great interpatient variability, which can introduce limitations and bias in calculations.

On separate voxel-based analyses of location-function, this study found a strong association between infarcts of the left inferior frontal gyrus, insular ribbon, and, to a lesser extent, the lower precentral gyrus with aphasia and dysarthria (On-line Fig 2). In addition, infarcts of the precentral primary motor cortex and middle corona radiata along the cerebrospinal tracts were associated with higher degrees of arm and leg paresis at the time of admission. These findings are consistent with prior topographic studies in patients with stroke with CT perfusion and MR imaging.11,12,24 Thus, a location-weighted assessment of admission MR imaging can potentially help with the clinical evaluation of stroke patients who have altered mental status by predicting neurologic deficits on the basis of the topology of the infarct lesion.24

One of the limitations of our study is the variability of the onset-to-MR imaging interval gap duration. We tried to minimize such an effect by restricting our inclusion criteria to those patients who underwent MR imaging within 24 hours of stroke. However, the inclusion of patients who had MR imaging within the first 24 hours of stroke might introduce a selection bias because some of the sickest patients with large infarct volumes have only undergone CT. The relatively mild stroke symptoms in our patient cohort were reflected in the median NIHSS scores of 4 at presentation and 2 at 24 hours and discharge, which may limit the extrapolation of these findings to other cohorts. Moreover, some of the vertebrobasilar distribution infarct lesions might be false-negative on early DWI within the first 24 hours of stroke, which might introduce some limitations in our study.25 Also, as an inherent limitation of the current study, the VLSM is affected by the variability in the regional frequency of infarct lesions throughout the brain, so those regions that are scarcely infarcted may not be well-evaluated (eg, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior circulation territory).

In addition, limiting the inclusion criteria to those patients with unilateral infarct lesions might introduce a selection bias by excluding patients with brain stem infarcts that crossed the midline. Thus, the slight asymmetry in lateralization of a higher NIHSS/volume ratio in the right brain stem is most likely secondary to the limited number of patients rather than a true physiologic right-versus-left difference. Additionally, a multivariate voxel-based analysis for correction of findings based on different risk factors or stroke subtypes can further promote our knowledge of the correlation between infarct location and lesion volume and stroke severity. Finally, the follow-up evaluations (namely, the 3-month mRS score) were not available in all patients, and discharge NIHSS scores obtained at variable time points after stroke onset may not provide an accurate and homogeneous measure for early outcome. Nonetheless, the purpose of the current study was not to derive a predictive model for outcome but rather to explore the association between lesion volume and anatomic distribution of infarcts with attention to the severity of symptoms at presentation.

Conclusions

There has been growing interest in the assessment of infarct location for the prediction of clinical outcome, and some have suggested that the location of cerebral ischemia rather than volume can predict clinical outcome. This study found a topographic overlap between the distribution of infarct lesions with larger volumes and more severe neurologic deficits at admission and discharge. These findings may, in part, explain the underlying mechanism of recent imaging-based predictive models that have noted a poor prognosis of ischemic infarcts involving the insular ribbon, lentiform nuclei, and middle corona radiata, suggesting that such lesions not only affect the eloquent cerebral regions and major white matter neural pathways but also reflect larger infarct sizes. On the other hand, among the less frequent posterior circulation strokes, brain stem and thalamic infarcts were associated with worse symptoms relative to their smaller lesion volumes. Such findings may potentially be the basis of designing a hazard atlas of the brain for prognostication and treatment triage of acute ischemic stroke.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Alexander M. McKinney—UNRELATED: Other Relationships: medicolegal consultation <$5000 per annum.

  • The data were partially presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 21–26, 2016; Washington, DC.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Zhang J, et al
    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy: ASPECTS Study Group—Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02237-6 pmid:10905241
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Souza LC,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Chaudhry ZA, et al
    . Malignant CTA collateral profile is highly specific for large admission DWI infarct core and poor outcome in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1331–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2985 pmid:22383238
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Benson J,
    2. Payabvash S,
    3. Salazar P, et al
    . Comparison of CT perfusion summary maps to early diffusion-weighted images in suspected acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:682–89 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.026 pmid:25623829
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lansberg MG,
    2. Straka M,
    3. Kemp S, et al
    ; DEFUSE 2 Study Investigators. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70203-X pmid:22954705
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mlynash M,
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. De Silva DA, et al
    ; DEFUSE-EPITHET Investigators. Refining the definition of the malignant profile: insights from the DEFUSE-EPITHET pooled data set. Stroke 2011;42:1270–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601609 pmid:21474799
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Demchuk AM,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Barber PA, et al
    ; NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group, NIH. Importance of early ischemic computed tomography changes using ASPECTS in NINDS rtPA Stroke Study. Stroke 2005;36:2110–15 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000181116.15426.58 pmid:16166579
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pexman JH,
    2. Barber PA,
    3. Hill MD, et al
    . Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1534–42 pmid:11559501
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Menezes NM,
    2. Ay H,
    3. Wang Zhu M, et al
    . The real estate factor: quantifying the impact of infarct location on stroke severity. Stroke 2007;38:194–97 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000251792.76080.45 pmid:17122428
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Beare R,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Phan TG, et al
    ; VISTA-Acute Collaboration. Googling stroke ASPECTS to determine disability: exploratory analysis from VISTA-Acute Collaboration. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125687 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125687 pmid:25961856
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cheng B,
    2. Forkert ND,
    3. Zavaglia M, et al
    . Influence of stroke infarct location on functional outcome measured by the modified Rankin scale. Stroke 2014;45:1695–702 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005152 pmid:24781084
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Payabvash S,
    2. Kamalian S,
    3. Fung S, et al
    . Predicting language improvement in acute stroke patients presenting with aphasia: a multivariate logistic model using location-weighted atlas-based analysis of admission CT perfusion scans. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1661–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2125 pmid:20488905
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Payabvash S,
    2. Souza LC,
    3. Kamalian S, et al
    . Location-weighted CTP analysis predicts early motor improvement in stroke: a preliminary study. Neurology 2012;78:1853–59 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f799 pmid:22573641
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Phan TG,
    2. Demchuk A,
    3. Srikanth V, et al
    . Proof of concept study: relating infarct location to stroke disability in the NINDS rt-PA trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;35:560–65 doi:10.1159/000351147 pmid:23838753
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Timpone VM,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Kamalian S, et al
    . Percentage insula ribbon infarction of >50% identifies patients likely to have poor clinical outcome despite small DWI infarct volume. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:40–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4091 pmid:25190204
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rorden C,
    2. Karnath HO,
    3. Bonilha L
    . Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 2007;19:1081–88 doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1081 pmid:17583985
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Payabvash S,
    2. Souza LC,
    3. Wang Y, et al
    . Regional ischemic vulnerability of the brain to hypoperfusion: the need for location specific computed tomography perfusion thresholds in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2011;42:1255–60 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600940 pmid:21493917
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Reynolds AM,
    2. Peters DM,
    3. Vendemia JM, et al
    . Neuronal injury in the motor cortex after chronic stroke and lower limb motor impairment: a voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study. Neural Regen Res 2014;9:766–72 doi:10.4103/1673-5374.131589 pmid:25206888
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rangaraju S,
    2. Streib C,
    3. Aghaebrahim A, et al
    . Relationship between lesion topology and clinical outcome in anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Stroke 2015;46:1787–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009908 pmid:26060248
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kamalian S,
    2. Kemmling A,
    3. Borgie RC, et al
    . Admission insular infarction >25% is the strongest predictor of large mismatch loss in proximal middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 2013;44:3084–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002260 pmid:23988643
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Türe U,
    2. Yasargil MG,
    3. Al-Mefty O, et al
    . Arteries of the insula. J Neurosurg 2000;92:676–87 doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.4.0676 pmid:10761659
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. de Margerie-Mellon C,
    2. Turc G,
    3. Tisserand M, et al
    . Can DWI-ASPECTS substitute for lesion volume in acute stroke? Stroke 2013;44:3565–67 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003047 pmid:24092549
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Phan TG,
    2. Donnan GA,
    3. Koga M, et al
    . The ASPECTS template is weighted in favor of the striatocapsular region. Neuroimage 2006;31:477–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.059 pmid:16504541
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Merwick Á,
    2. Werring D
    . Posterior circulation ischaemic stroke. BMJ 2014;348:g3175 doi:10.1136/bmj.g3175 pmid:24842277
    FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Phan TG,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Donnan G, et al
    . Development of a new tool to correlate stroke outcome with infarct topography: a proof-of-concept study. Neuroimage 2010;49:127–33 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.067 pmid:19660556
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Oppenheim C,
    2. Stanescu R,
    3. Dormont D, et al
    . False-negative diffusion-weighted MR findings in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1434–40 pmid:11003275
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received May 31, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision August 22, 2016.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 1
1 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acute Ischemic Stroke Infarct Topology: Association with Lesion Volume and Severity of Symptoms at Admission and Discharge
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Payabvash, S. Taleb, J.C. Benson, A.M. McKinney
Acute Ischemic Stroke Infarct Topology: Association with Lesion Volume and Severity of Symptoms at Admission and Discharge
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2017, 38 (1) 58-63; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4970

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Acute Ischemic Stroke Infarct Topology: Association with Lesion Volume and Severity of Symptoms at Admission and Discharge
S. Payabvash, S. Taleb, J.C. Benson, A.M. McKinney
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2017, 38 (1) 58-63; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4970
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Prognostic ability of the haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio in predicting in-hospital mortality: a retrospective, longitudinal, observational study among elderly patients with acute ischaemic stroke
  • Similar admission NIHSS may represent larger tissue-at-risk in patients with right-sided versus left-sided large vessel occlusion
  • Fast and slow progressors of infarct growth in basilar artery occlusion strokes
  • Association of Computed Tomography Ischemic Lesion Location With Functional Outcome in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
  • Crossref (42)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Prognostic Significance of Infarct Size and Location: The Case of Insular Stroke
    Carlos Laredo, Yashu Zhao, Salvatore Rudilosso, Arturo Renú, José Carlos Pariente, Ángel Chamorro, Xabier Urra
    Scientific Reports 2018 8 1
  • Association of Computed Tomography Ischemic Lesion Location With Functional Outcome in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
    Marielle Ernst, Anna M.M. Boers, Annette Aigner, Olvert A. Berkhemer, Albert J. Yoo, Yvo B. Roos, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Aad van der Lugt, Robert J. van Oostenbrugge, Wim H. van Zwam, Jens Fiehler, Henk A. Marquering, Charles B.L.M. Majoie
    Stroke 2017 48 9
  • Effects of Collateral Status on Infarct Distribution Following Endovascular Therapy in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke
    Khalid Al-Dasuqi, Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Gerardo A. Torres-Flores, Sumita M. Strander, Cindy Khanh Nguyen, Krithika U. Peshwe, Sreeja Kodali, Andrew Silverman, Ajay Malhotra, Michele H. Johnson, Charles C. Matouk, Joseph L. Schindler, Lauren H. Sansing, Guido J. Falcone, Kevin N. Sheth, Nils H. Petersen
    Stroke 2020 51 9
  • Neural Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles Disrupt Midline Shift Predictive Outcomes in Porcine Ischemic Stroke Model
    Samantha E. Spellicy, Erin E. Kaiser, Michael M. Bowler, Brian J. Jurgielewicz, Robin L. Webb, Franklin D. West, Steven L. Stice
    Translational Stroke Research 2020 11 4
  • Multi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography with machine learning for human stroke diagnosis
    Barry McDermott, Adnan Elahi, Adam Santorelli, Martin O’Halloran, James Avery, Emily Porter
    Physiological Measurement 2020 41 7
  • Multivariate Prognostic Model of Acute Stroke Combining Admission Infarct Location and Symptom Severity: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    Seyedmehdi Payabvash, John C. Benson, Andrew E. Tyan, Shayandokht Taleb, Alexander M. McKinney
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2018 27 4
  • A CT perfusion based model predicts outcome in wake-up stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
    Miloš Ajčević, Giovanni Furlanis, Alex Buoite Stella, Tommaso Cillotto, Paola Caruso, Mariana Ridolfi, Carlo Lugnan, Aleksandar Miladinović, Maja Ukmar, Maria Assunta Cova, Agostino Accardo, Paolo Manganotti, Marcello Naccarato
    Physiological Measurement 2020 41 7
  • Stroke atlas of the brain: Voxel-wise density-based clustering of infarct lesions topographic distribution
    Yanlu Wang, Julia M. Juliano, Sook-Lei Liew, Alexander M. McKinney, Seyedmehdi Payabvash
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2019 24
  • Differential Impact of Acute Lesions Versus White Matter Hyperintensities on Stroke Recovery
    Rachel L. Hawe, Sonja E. Findlater, Jeffrey M. Kenzie, Michael D. Hill, Stephen H. Scott, Sean P. Dukelow
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2018 7 18
  • Interpretable deep learning for the prognosis of long-term functional outcome post-stroke using acute diffusion weighted imaging
    Eric Moulton, Romain Valabregue, Michel Piotin, Gaultier Marnat, Suzana Saleme, Bertrand Lapergue, Stephane Lehericy, Frederic Clarencon, Charlotte Rosso
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2023 43 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire