Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Choroid Plexus Changes after Temporal Lobectomy

Sanjay Saluja, Noriko Sato, Yasutaka Kawamura, William Coughlin, Christopher M. Putman, Dennis D. Spencer, Gordon Sze and Richard A. Bronen
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2000, 21 (9) 1650-1653;
Sanjay Saluja
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noriko Sato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasutaka Kawamura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Coughlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M. Putman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis D. Spencer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordon Sze
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Bronen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the brain is routinely used when evaluating for residual or recurrent brain tumor. It is imperative to be aware of morphologic changes and imaging features that typically occur in response to surgical manipulation at the postoperative site to avoid misinterpretation of imaging findings. Our purpose was to determine normal postoperative changes and alterations in the choroid plexus among patients who had undergone temporal lobectomy in order to distinguish this appearance from pathologic changes that may be seen in the presence of infection or recurrent tumors.

METHODS: We reviewed 159 MR scans from 95 patients with hippocampal sclerosis or gliosis who underwent temporal lobectomy for treatment of intractable epilepsy. Choroid plexus location and size were assessed on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.

RESULTS: After temporal lobectomy, the choroid plexus enlarged and sagged into the resection site. Increase in the size of the choroid plexus occurred in 58% of cases overall. The degree of enhancement also increased after surgery, sometimes resulting in a nodular pattern of enhancement. The changes were most marked during the 1st week after temporal lobectomy, and showed an enlarged, markedly enhancing choroid plexus on 86% of the scans.

CONCLUSION: Postoperative changes of the choroid plexus after temporal lobectomy include sagging into the resection site, an increased size, and an increased degree of enhancement. Normal postoperative morphologic characteristics may mimic neoplastic enhancement pattern. Familiarity with this appearance is important to avoid a pitfall in diagnosis of recurrent postoperative temporal lobe neoplasms.

Postoperative contrast enhanced MR imaging of the brain is routinely used when evaluating for residual or recurrent brain tumor (1, 2). It is imperative to be aware of the morphologic alterations and imaging features that typically occur in response to surgical manipulation at the postoperative site in order to avoid a misinterpretation of imaging findings. Several studies have demonstrated that contrast enhancement of the surgical margin occurs “normally” during the 1st month after surgery and may be seen as early as the first postoperative day (1, 3–5). These observations have important implications for patients undergoing surgery for neoplastic lesions. A nodular pattern of enhancement that mimics tumor enhancement can occur at the surgical margins 5 days after surgery and last for a variable period of time. Therefore, the optimal window for imaging such a patient is in the first 4 days after surgery.

Although the normal postoperative enhancement pattern has been reported for the parenchymal surgical margins by several authors, choroid plexus changes occurring sequentially after temporal lobectomy have not been described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the normal changes occurring postoperatively after temporal lobectomy. These findings are useful for patients with neoplasm or infections in order to distinguish normal postoperative changes from those attributable to pathologic processes. The study population consisted of patients undergoing surgery for seizure control not related to neoplastic, inflammatory, or vascular lesions.

Methods

All patients underwent temporal lobectomy between 1987 and 1995. In order to detect contrast enhancement changes attributable solely to surgery, patients with neoplasms or enhancing lesions on preoperative MR scans were excluded from the study. All patients had a histologic diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis, hippocampal gliosis, or normal tissue. Patients with infectious complications at the surgical site were also excluded. Ninety-five subjects from whom 159 postoperative contrast-enhanced MR scans were performed comprised the study group. Their ages ranged from 9 to 68 years, with a mean age of 32 years. Of these, 54 patients underwent only one postoperative MR examination, whereas the remaining 41 had serial postoperative MR examinations. The interval between surgery and imaging ranged from 9 hours to 5.6 years.

All MR examinations were performed on a 1.5-T unit (Signa; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). Both T1-weighted coronal and T2-weighted axial images were obtained before administration of contrast material. T1-weighted coronal images were obtained after IV administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex, Wayne, NJ). In addition, studies were supplemented with axial or sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in most cases. The parameters for the T1-weighted coronal spin-echo series were 400–750/10–30 (TR/TE); one to four signals; section thickness, 5 mm; field of view, 20 to 25 cm; and matrix size, 192 × 256 or 128 × 256. Spin-echo T2-weighted axial image parameters were 2000–2500/80–100; one to two signals; section thickness, 5 mm; field of view, 20 to 25 cm; matrix, 192 × 256 or 256 × 256.

The size, morphologic characteristics, and degree of enhancement of the choroid plexus on the postoperative coronal images were evaluated. The postoperative choroid plexus was classified as either normal or abnormally prominent (with respect to size enlargement and an increased degree of enhancement) as compared with the contralateral side that was not resected.

Results

The pathologic diagnosis was hippocampal sclerosis in 83 patients. Nonspecific gliosis was found in the hippocampus in 11 patients, and no histologic abnormality was discovered in a single patient.

After temporal lobectomy, the size and degree of enhancement of the choroid plexus on contrast-enhanced images was increased compared with the contralateral, uninvolved side (Figs 1 and 2). Ipsilateral choroid plexus prominence was noted in 58% (92/159) postoperative MR scans. In the 1st week after surgery, choroid plexus prominence occurred in 86% (38/44) MR scans. Between 2 weeks and 6 years after surgery, such prominence was seen on about half the MR scans (Fig 3). The enhancement pattern was sometimes nodular, which could potentially mimic the nodular appearance of recurrent or residual neoplasm occurring at the surgical margin (Figs 1, 2, and 4). A finding associated with choroids plexus prominence was the sagging of the choroid plexus into the surgical bed (Fig 5).

fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 1.

Typical postoperative changes of the choroid plexus after temporal lobectomy. Coronal postcontrast T1-weighted MR image, obtained in the immediate postoperative period (1 day) after right temporal lobectomy, shows enlargement and intense nodular enhancement of the choroid plexus on the right (arrow) compared with the normal side

fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 2.

Postoperative changes of choroid plexus with time, on enhanced T1-weighted coronal images. A, Intense, nodular enhancement of the choroid plexus (arrow) on the right side in the immediate (1 day) postoperative period. B, Persistent nodular changes 9 months after surgery, although the enlargement and the degree of enhancement have markedly diminished in the interval

fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 3.

This graph illustrates the frequency of the choroid plexus changes as a function of time. Thirty-eight (86%) of the 44 MR scans performed within the 1st week after surgery revealed an enlarged, intensely enhancing choroid plexus. These choroid plexus changes persist in about half the cases after the 1st postoperative week

fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 4.

Recurrent neoplastic disease with similar appearance to postoperative choroid plexus enhancement revealed on coronal enhanced T1-weighted images. A, The preoperative image shows a large, heterogeneously enhancing tumor involving the medial temporal lobe. B, MR scan 1 month after resective surgery shows a prolapsed choroid plexus adherent to the surgical margins (arrow). C, At 3 months after surgery, several enhancing foci are present. Recurrent enhancing oligodendroglioma was found medially (arrow), as confirmed on sequential images (not seen). The choroid plexus enhancement (arrowhead) adjacent to the tumor as well as the dural enhancement (open arrows) could be misinterpreted as neoplastic enhancement.

fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 5.

Postsurgical choroid plexus herniation on coronal, enhanced, T1-weighted images. A, Preoperative scan shows the normal-appearing choroid plexus in the lateral ventricles. B, Immediate postoperative scan depicts herniation of the choroid plexus inferiorly into the surgical site (arrow). C, Persistent sagging of the choroid plexus 6 months (arrow) after surgery. This should be distinguished from adjacent postoperative dural enhancement (arrowhead).

Discussion

Several reports note the importance of observing nodular enhancement at the postoperative site with MR imaging. Albert et al (1) evaluated MR images from 60 patients after resection for malignant glioma. Approximately 80% of tumor recurrences were seen to arise from prior enhancing “nodular” or “masslike” lesions, which were retrospectively recognizable on MR examinations performed 1 to 4 days after surgery. However, a nodular pattern of enhancement along the surgical margins was also observed by Sato et al (3) among patients who underwent epilepsy surgery for benign disease. This occurred during the period of peak enhancement, ie, 1 week to 1 month postoperatively. Therefore, it appears that a nodular enhancement represents part of the spectrum of the “normal” postoperative appearance. Such a pattern of enhancement, if seen postoperatively in a patient having undergone surgery for malignant disease, could be mistaken for residual or recurrent tumor.

In this study, enlargement of the choroid plexus was seen in 86% of the cases in the 1st postoperative week. A nodular pattern of enhancement early in the postoperative period was also commonly seen. This could potentially mimic residual/recurrent tumor. Familiarity with the altered postoperative anatomy will help to avoid this pitfall in diagnosis—the enhancing nodule is always contiguous with the choroid plexus on the side of the surgery.

In order to understand the etiology of these postoperative changes, it is helpful to review the surgical technique for temporal lobectomy. At our institution, an anteromedial temporal lobectomy involves an en bloc surgical resection of the amygdala, hippocampus, uncus, and parahippocampal and fusiform gyri (6). The temporal horn is opened, and an incision is made inferiorly through the horn to the floor of the middle cranial fossa, just lateral to the fusiform gyrus. This incision is then extended posteriorly into the atrium of the lateral ventricle. This deficiency in the floor of the temporal horn and atrium allows varying degrees of herniation of the choroid plexus through it, resulting in the sagging observed in our cases. The profuse enhancement of the choroid plexus is because of its highly vascular structure and lack of a blood-brain barrier. Inflammatory changes postoperatively cause further hyperemia and pronounced enhancement. It may also be related to retraction injury during the surgical procedure, particularly with radical hippocampectomy. During this procedure, more forceful retraction is needed in order to resect the distal end of the hippocampus at the posterior edge of the brain stem. The free edge of the sagging choroid plexus may be clumped together, resulting in the nodularity observed in some cases. If this sagging choroid plexus becomes adherent to the margin of the resection site, a markedly enhancing nodular appearance may result. The choroid plexus changes are most prominent in the 1st week, probably because of tissue injury associated with surgical resection (3).

In conclusion, it is important to be familiar with normal postoperative imaging findings. The use of a surrogate population, ie, those who have undergone epilepsy surgery, allows us to study enhancement of the human brain without the confounding problem of discriminating tumor from nontumor enhancement (3, 5, 7). The findings of the current study have important implications with respect to MR imaging findings in a patient with a neoplastic condition.

Footnotes

  • 1 Address reprint requests to Richard A. Bronen, M.D., Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042.

References

  1. ↵
    Albert FK, Forsting M, Sartor K, et al. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery 1994;34:45-60
    PubMed
  2. Runge VM, Clanton JA, Price AC, et al. Evaluation of contrast enhanced MR imaging in a brain-abscess model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;6:139-147
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Sato N, Bronen RA, Sze G, et al. Postoperative changes in the brain: MR imaging findings in patients without neoplasms. Radiology 1997;204:839-846
    PubMed
  4. Meyers SP, Wildenhain S, Chess MA, et al. Postoperative evaluation for intracranial recurrence of medulloblastoma: MR findings with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1425-1434
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. Henegar MM, Moran CJ, Silbergeld DL. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following non-neoplastic cortical resection. J Neurosurg 1996;84:174-179
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Spencer DD, Spencer SS, Mattson RH, et al. Access to the posterior medial temporal structures in the surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosurgery 1984;15:667-671
    PubMed
  7. Lohaprasit V, Silbergeld , Ojemann GA, et al. Postoperative CT contrast enhancement following lobectomy for epilepsy. J Neurosurg 1990;73:392-395
    PubMed
  • Received November 18, 1999.
  • Accepted after revision April 19, 2000.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 9
1 Oct 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Choroid Plexus Changes after Temporal Lobectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Sanjay Saluja, Noriko Sato, Yasutaka Kawamura, William Coughlin, Christopher M. Putman, Dennis D. Spencer, Gordon Sze, Richard A. Bronen
Choroid Plexus Changes after Temporal Lobectomy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2000, 21 (9) 1650-1653;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Choroid Plexus Changes after Temporal Lobectomy
Sanjay Saluja, Noriko Sato, Yasutaka Kawamura, William Coughlin, Christopher M. Putman, Dennis D. Spencer, Gordon Sze, Richard A. Bronen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2000, 21 (9) 1650-1653;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Imaging of Neuromodulation and Surgical Interventions for Epilepsy
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire