Diagnostic Confidence of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted MRI for the Detection of Brain Metastases: 3D FSE versus 3D GRE–Based Sequences

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Tabouret E,
   2. Chinot O,
   3. Metellus P, et al

   . Recent trends in epidemiology of brain metastases: an overview. Anticancer Res 2012;32:4655–62 pmid:23155227

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. DeVita V,
   2. Hellman S,
   3. Rosenberg SA

   1. Wen PY,
   2. Black PM,
   3. Loeffler JS

   . Metastatic brain cancer. In: DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 6th ed. Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins; 2001: 2655–70
3. 3.↵
   1. Ene CI,
   2. Abi Faraj C,
   3. Beckham TH, et al

   . Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery. Nat Commun 2024;15:3728 doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47998-8 pmid:38697991

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Chappell PM,
   2. Pelc NJ,
   3. Foo TK, et al

   . Comparison of lesion enhancement on spin-echo and gradient-echo images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:37–44 pmid:8141064

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Mugler JP 3rd.,
   2. Bao S,
   3. Mulkern RV, et al

   . Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;216:891–99 doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au46891 pmid:10966728

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Kato Y,
   2. Higano S,
   3. Tamura H, et al

   . Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3T MR imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:923–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1506 pmid:19213825

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Reichert M,
   2. Morelli JN,
   3. Runge VM, et al

   . Contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional SPACE versus MP-RAGE for the detection of brain metastases: considerations with a 32-channel head coil. Invest Radiol 2013;48:55–60 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318277b1aa pmid:23192164

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kwak HS,
   2. Hwang S,
   3. Chung GH, et al

   . Detection of small brain metastases at 3 T: comparing the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted SPACE, MPRAGE, and 2D FLASH imaging. Clin Imaging 2015;39:571–75 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.02.010 pmid:25770904

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Danieli L,
   2. Riccitelli GC,
   3. Distefano D, et al

   . Brain tumor-enhancement visualization and morphometric assessment: a comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1140–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6096 pmid:31221635

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Smits M,
    3. Boxerman J, et al

    . Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2020;22:757–72 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa030 pmid:32048719

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Mugler JP 3rd.,
    2. Brookeman JR

    . Theoretical analysis of gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement in T1-weighted imaging of the brain: comparison of two-dimensional spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:761–69 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880030512 pmid:8400563

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Krippendorff K

    . Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 4th ed. SAGE publications, Inc: 2019
13. 13.↵
    1. Komada T,
    2. Naganawa S,
    3. Ogawa H, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 Tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7:13–21 doi:10.2463/mrms.7.13 pmid:18460844

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Suh CH,
    2. Jung SC,
    3. Kim KW, et al

    . The detectability of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced spin-echo or gradient-echo images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2016;129:363–71 doi:10.1007/s11060-016-2185-y pmid:27324495

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Nagao E,
    2. Yoshiura T,
    3. Hiwatashi A, et al

    . 3D turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation for detection of brain metastases on 3T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:664–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2343 pmid:21292797

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Park J,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Yoo E, et al

    . Detection of small metastatic brain tumors: comparison of 3D contrast-enhanced whole-brain black-blood imaging and MP-RAGE imaging. Invest Radiol 2012;47:136–41 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182319704 pmid:22104961

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Blüml S,
    2. Schad LR,
    3. Scharf J, et al

    . A comparison of magnetization prepared 3D gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) sequences for imaging of intracranial lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:329–35 doi:10.1016/0730-725x(95)02095-b pmid:8725198

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Wetzel SG,
    2. Johnson G,
    3. Tan AG, et al

    . Three-dimensional, T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the brain with a volumetric interpolated examination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:995–1002 pmid:12063232

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Majigsuren M,
    2. Abe T,
    3. Kageji T, et al

    . Comparison of brain tumor contrast-enhancement on T-1-CUBE and 3D-SPGR images. Magn Reson Med Sci 2016;15:34–40 doi:10.2463/mrms.2014-0129 pmid:26104076

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Rofsky NM,
    2. Lee VS,
    3. Laub G, et al

    . Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212:876–84 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se34876 pmid:10478260

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Kim D,
    2. Heo YJ,
    3. Jeong HW, et al

    . Usefulness of the delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation pulse with T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution in the detection of cerebral metastases: comparison with MPRAGE imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1469–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6158 pmid:31371358

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Chkili S,
    2. Lefebvre Y,
    3. Chao SL, et al

    . Optimization of workflow for detection of brain metastases at 3T: is a black-blood MTC prepared 3D T1 used alone robust enough to replace the combination of conventional 3D T1 and the black-blood 3D T1 MTC? Neuroradiology 2023;65:1133–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-023-03143-8 pmid:36995375

    CrossRefPubMed