A Proposed Grading Scale Based on Radiographic Imaging for Wall Apposition to Estimate Neurological Complications after Flow Diverter Treatment

Qianqian Zhang, Qiuji Shao, Kaitao Chang, Zhiyuan Sheng, Hongyun Zhang, Yi Chen, Ying-Kun He, Tianxiao Li and Li Li

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The evaluation of wall apposition following flow diverter (FD) treatment remains poorly defined. This study aims to establish a radiographic grading scale for wall apposition after FD deployment and to investigate its association with FD-related neurological complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). A wall apposition grading scale (Grades I–IV) was developed based on radiographic imaging, incorporating anatomical location and the degree of malapposition: Grade I, perfect wall apposition; Grade II, mild malapposition; Grade III, moderate malapposition; and Grade IV, severe malapposition. Cases were categorized into two groups: complete wall apposition (Grade I) and malapposition (Grades II–IV). The association between malapposition and neurological complications was further analyzed.

RESULTS: A total of 197 PED cases were included. Incomplete wall apposition was observed in 29 cases (14.7%), while 168 cases (85.3%) demonstrated complete wall apposition (Grade I). In the malapposition group, 13 cases (6.6%) were classified as Grade II, 11 cases (5.6%) as Grade III, and 5 cases (2.5%) as Grade IV. FD-related perioperative and follow-up neurological complications occurred in 10.3% and 13.8% of the malapposition group, respectively, compared to 1.8% and 1.2% in the complete wall apposition group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified malapposition as an independent risk factor for FD-related neurological complications (P<0.05). The Cochran-Armitage test revealed a significant trend of increasing neurological complications with worsening malapposition from Grade II to IV (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The proposed grading scale is a feasible and practical tool for assessing wall apposition following FD treatment. Neurological complications are significantly more likely in cases with moderate to severe malapposition (Grades III and IV).

ABBREVIATIONS: FD = flow diverter; PED = Pipeline Embolization Device; 2D DSA = two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography; OCT = optical coherence tomography; TIA = transient ischemic attack; IQR = interquartile range.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.

Log in through your institution

Advertisement