Quantification of Collateral Supply with Local-AIF Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Predicts Infarct Growth

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS,
   2. Saber H,
   3. Xiang B

   ; DAWN Investigators, et al. Collateral circulation in thrombectomy for stroke after 6 to 24 hours in the DAWN trial. Stroke 2022;53:742–48 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034471 pmid:34727737

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Winship IR

   . Cerebral collaterals and collateral therapeutics for acute ischemic stroke. Microcirculation 2015;22:228–36 doi:10.1111/micc.12177 pmid:25351102

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Marks MP,
   2. Heit JJ,
   3. Lansberg MG

   ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators, et al. Endovascular treatment in the DEFUSE 3 study. Stroke 2018;49:2000–03 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022147 pmid:29986935

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Shazeeb MS,
   2. King RM,
   3. Anagnostakou V, et al

   . Novel oxygen carrier slows infarct growth in large vessel occlusion dog model based on magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Stroke 2022;53:1363–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036896 pmid:35306836

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Christoforidis GA,
   2. Saadat N,
   3. Liu M, et al

   . Effect of early sanguinate (PEGylated carboxyhemoglobin bovine) infusion on cerebral blood flow to the ischemic core in experimental middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:1253–57 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018239 pmid:34907008

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Saadat N,
   2. Christoforidis GA,
   3. Jeong YI, et al

   . Influence of simultaneous pressor and vasodilatory agents on the evolution of infarct growth in experimental acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;13:741–45 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016539 pmid:32900906

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Liu M,
   2. Saadat N,
   3. Jeong YI, et al

   . Augmentation of perfusion with simultaneous vasodilator and inotropic agents in experimental acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: a pilot study. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:e69–75 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-018990 pmid:35803730

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Lee MJ,
   2. Son JP,
   3. Kim SJ, et al

   . Predicting collateral status with magnetic resonance perfusion parameters: probabilistic approach with a Tmax-derived prediction model. Stroke 2015;46:2800–07 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009828 pmid:26306754

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Jeong YI,
   2. Christoforidis GA,
   3. Saadat N, et al

   . Absolute quantitative MR perfusion and comparison against stable‐isotope microspheres. Magn Reson Med 2019;81:3567–77

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Mouannes-Srour JJ,
    2. Shin W,
    3. Ansari SA, et al

    . Correction for arterial-tissue delay and dispersion in absolute quantitative cerebral perfusion DSC MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:495–506 doi:10.1002/mrm.23257 pmid:22162092

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Calamante F,
    2. Willats L,
    3. Gadian DG, et al

    . Bolus delay and dispersion in perfusion MRI: implications for tissue predictor models in stroke. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1180–85 doi:10.1002/mrm.20873 pmid:16598717

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Rink C,
    2. Christoforidis G,
    3. Abduljalil A, et al

    . Minimally invasive neuroradiologic model of preclinical transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in canines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:14100–05 doi:10.1073/pnas.0806678105 pmid:18779582

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Christoforidis GA,
    2. Rink C,
    3. Kontzialis MS, et al

    . An endovascular canine middle cerebral artery occlusion model for the study of leptomeningeal collateral recruitment. Invest Radiol 2011;46:34–40 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f0cbc7 pmid:20856126

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Christoforidis GA,
    2. Vakil P,
    3. Ansari SA, et al

    . Impact of pial collaterals on infarct growth rate in experimental acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:270–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5003 pmid:27856435

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Christoforidis GA,
    2. Mohammad Y,
    3. Kehagias D, et al

    . Angiographic assessment of pial collaterals as a prognostic indicator following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1789–97 pmid:16091531

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Carroll TJ,
    2. Rowley HA,
    3. Haughton VM

    . Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:593–600 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272020092 pmid:12663823

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Carroll TJ,
    2. Horowitz S,
    3. Shin W, et al

    . Quantification of cerebral perfusion using the “bookend technique”: an evaluation in CNS tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:1352–59 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2008.04.010 pmid:18538523

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Sakaie KE,
    2. Shin W,
    3. Curtin KR, et al

    . Method for improving the accuracy of quantitative cerebral perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:512–19 doi:10.1002/jmri.20305 pmid:15834910

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Shin W,
    2. Cashen TA,
    3. Horowitz SW, et al

    . Quantitative CBV measurement from static T1 changes in tissue and correction for intravascular water exchange. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:138–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.20937 pmid:16767742

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Shin W,
    2. Horowitz S,
    3. Ragin A, et al

    . Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: evaluation of reproducibility and age- and gender-dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1232–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.21420 pmid:17969025

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Vakil P,
    2. Lee JJ,
    3. Mouannes-Srour JJ, et al

    . Cerebrovascular occlusive disease: quantitative cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging correlates with quantitative H2[15O] PET. Radiology 2013;266:879–86 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120756 pmid:23297337

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Systems SM

    . Absolute quantitative DSC cerebral perfusion imaging with SCALE-PWI. N4_VD13D_1049_Z00387MF_QIAN_SCALEPWI. 2015;WIP #1049.
23. 23.↵
    T1Bookend DSC Perfusion with Global and Local AIF Open Source Code [computer program]. Version 1.2.0. Github 2024
24. 24.↵
    1. Shah MK,
    2. Shin W,
    3. Parikh VS, et al

    . Quantitative cerebral MR perfusion imaging: preliminary results in stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:796–802 doi:10.1002/jmri.22302 pmid:20882609

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Yaghi S,
    2. Khatri P,
    3. Prabhakaran S, et al

    . What threshold defines penumbral brain tissue in patients with symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis: an exploratory analysis. J Neuroimaging 2019;29:203–05 doi:10.1111/jon.12577 pmid:30398302

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Calamante F,
    2. Christensen S,
    3. Desmond PM, et al

    . The physiological significance of the time-to-maximum (Tmax) parameter in perfusion MRI. Stroke 2010;41:1169–74 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580670 pmid:20413735

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Jones TH,
    2. Morawetz RB,
    3. Crowell RM, et al

    . Thresholds of focal cerebral ischemia in awake monkeys. J Neurosurg 1981;54:773–82 doi:10.3171/jns.1981.54.6.0773 pmid:7241187

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Nael K,
    2. Doshi A,
    3. De Leacy R, et al

    . MR perfusion to determine the status of collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a look beyond time maps. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:219–225 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5454 pmid:29217747

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Federau C,
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Christensen S, et al

    . Collateral blood flow measurement with intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging in hyperacute brain stroke. Neurology 2019;92:e2462–71 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007538 pmid:31019105

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Liu M,
    2. Saadat N,
    3. Jeong Y, et al

    . Quantitative perfusion and water transport time model from multi b-value diffusion magnetic resonance imaging validated against neutron capture microspheres. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2023;10:063501doi:10.1117/1.JMI.10.6.063501

    CrossRefPubMed