Revisiting the Pathophysiology of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Fetuses with Chiari II Malformation: Novel Imaging Biomarkers of Disease Severity?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Sarnat HB

   . Disorders of segmentation of the neural tube: Chiari malformations. Handb Clin Neurol 2008;87:89–103 doi:10.1016/S0072-9752(07)87006-0 pmid:18809020

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Woitek R,
   2. Dvorak A,
   3. Weber M, et al

   . MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine. PLoS One 2014;9:e112585 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112585 pmid:25393279

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Tamburrini G,
   2. Frassanito P,
   3. Iakovaki K, et al

   . Myelomeningocele: the management of the associated hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 2013;29:1569–79 doi:10.1007/s00381-013-2179-4 pmid:24013327

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. McLone DG,
   2. Dias MS

   . The Chiari II malformation: cause and impact. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19:540–50 doi:10.1007/s00381-003-0792-3 pmid:12920543

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Fukuoka T,
   2. Nishimura Y,
   3. Hara M, et al

   . Chiari Type 1 malformation-induced intracranial hypertension with diffuse brain edema treated with foramen magnum decompression: a case report. NMC Case Rep J 2017;4:115–20 doi:10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2016-0278 pmid:29018653

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Didier RA,
   2. Martin-Saavedra JS,
   3. Oliver ER, et al

   . Fetal intraventricular hemorrhage in open neural tube defects: prenatal imaging evaluation and perinatal outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1923–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6745

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Zamlynski J,
   2. Olejek A,
   3. Koszutski T, et al

   . Comparison of prenatal and postnatal treatments of spina bifida in Poland–a non-randomized, single-center study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1409–17 doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.858689

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Cinalli G,
   2. Russo C,
   3. Vitulli F, et al

   . Changes in venous drainage after posterior cranial vault distraction and foramen magnum decompression in syndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2022;30:330–41 doi:10.3171/2022.6.PEDS22171 pmid:35901679

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Lauzier DC,
   2. Chiang SN,
   3. Chatterjee AR, et al

   . Idiopathic intracranial hypertension and vascular anomalies in Chiari I malformation. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023;34:175–83 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2022.09.008

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Putbrese B,
    2. Kennedy A

    . Findings and differential diagnosis of fetal intracranial haemorrhage and fetal ischaemic brain injury: what is the role of fetal MRI? Br J Radiology 2017;90:20160253 doi:10.1259/bjr.20160253 pmid:27734711

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Heaphy-Henault KJ,
    2. Guimaraes CV,
    3. Mehollin-Ray AR, et al

    . Congenital aqueductal stenosis: findings at fetal MRI that accurately predict a postnatal diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:942–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5590 pmid:29519789

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Barkovich AJ,
    2. Newton TH

    . MR of aqueductal stenosis: evidence of a broad spectrum of tectal distortion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:471–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Prayer D,
    2. Malinger G,
    3. De Catte L, et al

    . ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;61:278–87 doi:10.1002/uog.26129

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Garel C

    . MRI of the Fetal Brain: Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies. Stuttgart, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
15. 15.↵
    1. Stuempflen M,
    2. Taymourtash A,
    3. Kienast P, et al

    . Ganglionic eminence: volumetric assessment of transient brain structure utilizing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;62:405–13 doi:10.1002/uog.26232 pmid:37099530

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Shi H,
    2. Prayer F,
    3. Kienast P, et al

    . Multiparametric prenatal imaging characterization of fetal brain edema in Chiari II malformation might help to select candidates for fetal surgery. Eur Radiology Published online April 24, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00330-024-10729-0

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Avesani G,
    2. Perazzolo A,
    3. Elia L, et al

    . Fetal MRI prior to intrauterine surgery of open neural tube defects: what does the radiologist need to know. Radiology Med 2022;128:113–24 doi:10.1007/s11547-022-01579-1 pmid:36525177

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Fu SJ,
    2. Xu JB,
    3. Liu X, et al

    . Quantitative evaluation of a cross-sectional area of the fetal straight sinus by magnetic resonance imaging and its clinical value. Front Neurol 2022;13:875402 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.875402 pmid:35937066

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Bateman GA,
    2. Lechner-Scott J,
    3. Bateman AR

    . Modelling of the dilated sagittal sinuses found in multiple sclerosis suggests increased wall stiffness may be a contributing factor. Sci Rep 2022;12:17575 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21810-3 pmid:36266424

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Barabasi AL,
    2. Gulbahce N,
    3. Loscalzo J

    . Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:56–68 doi:10.1038/nrg2918 pmid:21164525

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Sarnat HB

    . Regional differentiation of the human fetal ependyma: immunocytochemical markers. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1992;51:58–75 doi:10.1097/00005072-199201000-00008 pmid:1371311

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Sarnat HB

    . Histochemistry and immunocytochemistry of the developing ependyma and choroid plexus. Microsc Res Tech 1998;41:14–28 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19980401)41:1<14::AID-JEMT3>3.0.CO;2-U

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Sarnat HB

    . Ependymal reactions to injury. A review. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1995;54:1–15 doi:10.1097/00005072-199501000-00001 pmid:7815072

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Del Bigio MR

    . Ependymal cells: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119:55–73 doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0624-y pmid:20024659

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Lublinsky S,
    2. Friedman A,
    3. Kesler A, et al

    . Automated cross-sectional measurement method of intracranial dural venous sinuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:468–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4583 pmid:26564431

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Markey KA,
    2. Mollan SP,
    3. Jensen RH, et al

    . Understanding idiopathic intracranial hypertension: mechanisms, management, and future directions. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:78–91 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00298-7

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Zhao K,
    2. Gu W,
    3. Liu C, et al

    . Advances in the understanding of the complex role of venous sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;56:645–54 doi:10.1002/jmri.28177

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Conner ES,
    2. Foley L,
    3. Black PM

    . Experimental normal-pressure hydrocephalus is accompanied by increased transmantle pressure. J Neurosurg 1984;61:322–27 doi:10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0322 pmid:6737056

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Okudera T,
    2. Huang YP,
    3. Fukusumi A, et al

    . Micro-angiographical studies of the medullary venous system of the cerebral hemisphere. Neuropathology 1999;19:93–111 doi:10.1046/j.1440-1789.1999.00215.x pmid:19519653

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Mufti N,
    2. Aertsen M,
    3. Ebner M, et al

    . Cortical spectral matching and shape and volume analysis of the fetal brain pre- and post-fetal surgery for spina bifida: a retrospective study. Neuroradiology 2021;63:1721–34 doi:10.1007/s00234-021-02725-8 pmid:33934181

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Jakab A,
    2. Payette K,
    3. Mazzone L, et al

    . Emerging magnetic resonance imaging techniques in open spina bifida in utero. Eur Radiology Exp 2021;5:23 doi:10.1186/s41747-021-00219-z pmid:34136989

    CrossRefPubMed