This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The novel MR imaging technique of vascular architecture mapping allows in vivo characterization of local changes in cerebral microvasculature, but reference ranges for vascular architecture mapping parameters in healthy brain tissue are lacking, limiting its potential applicability as an MR imaging biomarker in clinical practice. We conducted whole-brain vascular architecture mapping in a large cohort to establish vascular architecture mapping parameter references ranges and identify region-specific cortical and subcortical microvascular profiles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center examination of adult patients with unifocal, stable low-grade gliomas with multiband spin- and gradient-echo EPI sequence at 3T using parallel imaging. Voxelwise plotting of resulting values for gradient-echo (R2*) versus spin-echo (R2) relaxation rates during contrast agent bolus administration generates vessel vortex curves that allow the extraction of vascular architecture mapping parameters representative of, eg, vessel type, vessel radius, or CBV in the underlying voxel. Averaged whole-brain parametric maps were calculated for 9 parameters, and VOI analysis was conducted on the basis of a standardized brain atlas and individual cortical GM and WM segmentation.
RESULTS: Prevalence of vascular risk factors among subjects (n = 106; mean age, 39.2 [SD, 12.5] years; 56 women) was similar to those in the German population. Compared with WM, we found cortical GM to have larger mean vascular calibers (5.80 [SD, 0.59] versus 4.25 [SD, 0.62] P < .001), increased blood volume fraction (20.40 [SD, 4.49] s−1 versus 11.05 [SD, 2.44] s−1; P < .001), and a dominance of venous vessels. Distinct microvascular profiles emerged for cortical GM, where vascular architecture mapping vessel type indicator differed, eg, between the thalamus and cortical GM (mean, −2.47 [SD, 4.02] s−2 versus −5.41 [SD, 2.84] s−2; P < .001). Intraclass correlation coefficient values indicated overall high test-retest reliability for vascular architecture mapping parameter mean values when comparing multiple scans per subject.
CONCLUSIONS: Whole-brain vascular architecture mapping in the adult brain reveals region-specific microvascular profiles. The obtained parameter reference ranges for distinct anatomic and functional brain areas may be used for future vascular architecture mapping studies on cerebrovascular pathologies and might facilitate early discovery of microvascular changes, in, eg, neurodegeneration and neuro-oncology.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- BMI
- body mass index
- BVF
- blood volume fraction
- CA
- contrast agent
- CBI
- capillary bed identifier
- CGI
- caliber gradient indicator
- cGM
- cortical gray matter
- CN
- caudate nucleus
- GE
- gradient-echo
- GP
- globus pallidus
- I
- maximum distance between the ascending and descending branches of the vascular hysteresis loop
- ICC
- intraclass correlation coefficient
- KPS
- Karnofsky Performance Status
- MNI
- Montreal Neurological Institute
- Q
- microvessel density parameter
- R2
- T2 relaxation rate
- rCBV
- relative CBV
- SAGE
- spin-and gradient-echo
- SE
- spin echo
- VAM
- vascular architecture mapping
- VHL
- vascular hysteresis loop
- VIPS
- vascular-induced bolus peak-time shift
- VSI
- vessel size index
- VTI
- vessel type indicator
Footnotes
K.Z, and F.T.K. received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (contract grant Nos. 507778602 and 317283311). A.H. was supported by the medical faculty of Heidelberg University (Rahel-Straus-Program). F.T.K. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the medical faculty of Heidelberg University and the Hoffmann-Klose Foundation of Heidelberg University. J.M.E.J. received grants from the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (P179) and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung Foundation (2021_EKES29).
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.
- © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology