A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Recanalization First-Pass Effect following Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Albers GW,
   2. Marks MP,
   3. Kemp S, et al

   ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators, Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Benjamin EJ,
   2. Muntner P,
   3. Alonso A, et al

   ; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019;139:e56–528 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659 pmid:30700139

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Leibeskind DS,
   2. Jovin TG,
   3. Majoie CB, et al

   . TICI reperfusion in HERMES: Success in endovascular stroke therapy. In: Proceedings of the International Stroke Conference, Feb 21–24, 2017. Houston, Texas. doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.128Stroke

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   1. Dargazanli C,
   2. Consoli A,
   3. Barral M, et al

   . Impact of modified TICI 3 versus modified TICI 2b reperfusion score to predict good outcome following endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:90–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4968 pmid:27811134

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Fugate JE,
   2. Klunder AM,
   3. Kallmes DF

   . What is meant by “TICI”? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1792–97 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3496 pmid:23578670

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Leischner H,
   2. Flottmann F,
   3. Hanning U, et al

   . Reasons for failed endovascular recanalization attempts in patients with stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:439–42 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014060 pmid:30472671

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Blanc R,
   2. Redjem H,
   3. Ciccio G, et al

   . Predictors of the aspiration component success of a Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) for the endovascular treatment of stroke reperfusion strategy in anterior circulation acute stroke. Stroke 2017;48:1588–93 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016149 pmid:28428348

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Ducroux C,
   2. Piotin M,
   3. Gory B, et al

   ; ASTER Trial Investigators. First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:386–91 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215 pmid:31471527

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Flottmann F,
   2. Brekenfeld C,
   3. Broocks G, et al

   ; GSR Investigators. Good clinical outcome decreases with number of retrieval attempts in stroke thrombectomy: beyond the first-pass effect. Stroke 2021;52:482–90 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029830 pmid:33467875

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Shahid AH,
    2. Abbasi M,
    3. Larco JLA, et al

    . Risk factors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment in patients with large‐vessel occlusion: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Stroke Vascular Interventional Radiology 2022;2:e000257. Accessed January 4, 2023
11. 11.↵
    1. Goda T,
    2. Oyama N,
    3. Kitano T, et al

    . Factors associated with unsuccessful recanalization in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2019;9:107–13 doi:10.1159/000503001 pmid:31563915

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Heider DM,
    2. Simgen A,
    3. Wagenpfeil G, et al

    . Why we fail: mechanisms and co-factors of unsuccessful thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Neurol Sci 2020;41:1547–55 doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04244-5 pmid:31974796

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bang OY,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Kim SJ, et al

    . Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693–99 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595256 pmid:21233472

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Mulder ML,
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Goldhoorn RJ, et al

    ; MR CLEAN Registry Investigators. Time to endovascular treatment and outcome in acute ischemic stroke: MR CLEAN registry results. Circulation 2018;138:232–40 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032600 pmid:29581124

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Piedade GS,
    2. Schirmer CM,
    3. Goren O, et al

    . Cerebral collateral circulation: a review in the context of ischemic stroke and mechanical thrombectomy. World Neurosurg 2019;122:33–42 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.066 pmid:30342266

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Shuaib A,
    2. Butcher K,
    3. Mohammad AA, et al

    . Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:909–21 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70195-8 pmid:21939900

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Ackerson T, et al

    . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Assoiation. Stroke 2019;50:E344–418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Velagapudi L,
    2. Mouchtouris N,
    3. Schmidt RF, et al

    . A machine learning approach to first pass reperfusion in mechanical thrombectomy: prediction and feature analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105796 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105796 pmid:33887664

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Srivatsa S,
    2. Duan Y,
    3. Sheppard JP, et al

    . Cerebral vessel anatomy as a predictor of first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large-vessel occlusion. J Neurosurg 2020;134:576–84 doi:10.3171/2019.11.JNS192673 pmid:31978878

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Velasco Gonzalez A,
    2. Görlich D,
    3. Buerke B, et al

    . Predictors of successful first-pass thrombectomy with a balloon guide catheter: results of a decision tree analysis. Transl Stroke Res 2020;11:900–09 doi:10.1007/s12975-020-00784-2 pmid:32447614

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Polson JS,
    3. Nael K, et al

    . A machine learning approach to predict acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy reperfusion using discriminative MR image features, BHI 2021. In: Proeedings of the 2021 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, Sept 21–24, 2021. Athens, Greece doi:10.1109/BHI50953.2021.9508597

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. van Os HJA,
    2. Ramos LA,
    3. Hilbert A, et al

    ; MR CLEAN Registry Investigators. Predicting outcome of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: potential value of machine learning algorithms. Front Neurol 2018;9:784 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00784 pmid:30319525

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Waqas M,
    2. Li W,
    3. Patel TR, et al

    . Clot imaging characteristics predict first-pass effect of aspiration-first approach to thrombectomy. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:152–59 doi:10.1177/15910199211019174 pmid:34000868

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bala F,
    2. Qiu W,
    3. Zhu K, et al

    ; ESCAPE‐NA1 Investigators. Ability of radiomics versus humans in predicting first‐pass effect after endovascular treatment in the ESCAPE‐NA1 trial. Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology 2023;3:e000525 doi:10.1161/SVIN.122.000525

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Hofmeister J,
    2. Bernava G,
    3. Rosi A, et al

    . Clot-based radiomics predict a mechanical thrombectomy strategy for successful recanalization in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2020;51:2488–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030334 pmid:32684141

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.
    1. Qiu W,
    2. Kuang H,
    3. Nair J, et al

    . Radiomics-based intracranial thrombus features on CT and CTA predict recanalization with intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:39–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5918 pmid:30573458

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Hilbert A,
    2. Ramos LA,
    3. van Os HJ, et al

    . Data-efficient deep learning of radiological image data for outcome prediction after endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Comput Biol Med 2019;115:103516 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103516 pmid:31707199

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Xian Y,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Smith EE, et al

    . Achieving more rapid door-to-needle times and improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke in a nationwide quality improvement intervention. Stroke 2022;53:1328–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035853 pmid:34802250

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Fonarow GC,
    2. Smith EE,
    3. Saver JL, et al

    . Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s Target–Stroke initiative. Stroke 2011;42:2983–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621342 pmid:21885841

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Polson JS,
    3. Nael K, et al

    . Intra-domain task-adaptive transfer learning to determine acute ischemic onset time. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2021;90:101926 doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101926 pmid:33934065

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Tustison N,
    3. Song G

    . Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J 2009;2:1–35
32. 32.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. He K

    . Exploring simple Siamese representation learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 20-25, 2021; Nashville, Tennessee
33. 33.↵
    1. Loshchilov I,
    2. Hutter F

    . Decoupled weight decay regularization 1711.05101. arXiv 2017 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101. Accessed December 10, 2022
34. 34.↵
    1. Youden WJ

    . Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32–35 doi:10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3 pmid:15405679

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Goyal N,
    2. Tsivgoulis G,
    3. Frei D, et al

    . Comparative safety and efficacy of modified TICI 2b and TICI 3 reperfusion in acute ischemic strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Clin Neurosurg 2019;84:680–86 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy097 pmid:29618102

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Alexandre AM,
    2. Valente I,
    3. Consoli A, et al

    . Posterior circulation endovascular thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion: predictors of favorable clinical outcome and analysis of first-pass effect. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:896–903 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7023 pmid:33664106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Di Maria F,
    2. Kyheng M,
    3. Consoli A, et al

    ; ETIS Investigators. Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: results from a multicentric prospective registry. Int J Stroke 2021;16:20–28 doi:10.1177/1747493020923051 pmid:32380902

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Nikoubashman O,
    2. Dekeyzer S,
    3. Riabikin A, et al

    . True first-pass effect: first-pass complete reperfusion improves clinical outcome in thrombectomy patients with stroke. Stroke 2019;50:2140–46 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025148 pmid:31216965

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Jang KM,
    2. Choi HH,
    3. Nam TK, et al

    . Clinical outcomes of first-pass effect after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021;211:107030 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107030 pmid:34823155

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Jadhav AP,
    2. Desai SM,
    3. Zaidat OO, et al

    . First pass effect with neurothrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: analysis of the systematic evaluation of patients treated with stroke devices for acute ischemic stroke registry. Stroke 2022;53:e30–32 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035457 pmid:34784741

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Bai X,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Wang J, et al

    . Factors influencing recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy with first-pass effect for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2021;12:628523 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.628523 pmid:33897591

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Rohan V,
    2. Baxa J,
    3. Tupy R, et al

    . Length of occlusion predicts recanalization and outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 2014;45:2010–17 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005731 pmid:24916912

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Polson J,
    3. Yang EJ, et al

    . Predicting thrombectomy recanalization from CT imaging using deep learning models, arXiv Feb 8, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04143. Accessed March 15, 2023
44. 44.↵
    1. Volny O,
    2. Cimflova P,
    3. Szeder V

    . Inter-rater reliability for thrombolysis in cerebral infarction with TICI 2c category. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26:992–94 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.008 pmid:27919793

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Bracard S,
    3. Guillemin F, et al

    ; HERMES Collaborators. eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:433–38 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127 pmid:30194109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Behme D,
    2. Tsogkas I,
    3. Colla R, et al

    . Validation of the extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score in a real-world cohort. PLoS One 2019;14:e0210334 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210334 pmid:30629664

    CrossRefPubMed