Considering Psychological and Cognitive Factors in Interventional Neuroradiology: A Systematic Literature Review

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Rodesch G,
   2. Picard L,
   3. Berenstein A, et al

   . “Editorial Interventional Neuroradiology: A Neuroscience Sub-Specialty?” Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:263–70 doi:10.1177/159101991301900301 pmid:24355160

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Dai RQ,
   2. Bai WX,
   3. Gao BL, et al

   . Internal carotid artery occlusion may affect long-term quality of life in patients with high-flow carotid cavernous fistulas. Interv Neuroradiol 2020;26:83–89 doi:10.1177/1591019919864668 pmid:31333051

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Chan A,
   2. Ho S,
   3. Poon WS

   . Neuropsychological sequelae of patients treated with microsurgical clipping or endovascular embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Eur Neurol 2002;47:37–44 doi:10.1159/000047945 pmid:11803191

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Lattanzi S,
   2. Coccia M,
   3. Pulcini A, et al

   . Endovascular treatment and cognitive outcome after anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Sci Rep 2020;10:18524 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75609-1 pmid:33116220

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Clarke RE,
   2. Jelen MB,
   3. Jones B, et al

   . Letter: “How to Defuse a Ticking Time Bomb?” Considering psychosocial factors in patients with small unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2022;90:e45–46 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001764 pmid:34995243

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Fontana J,
   2. Wenz R,
   3. Groden C, et al

   . The preinterventional psychiatric history as a major predictor for a reduced quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1215–22 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.047 pmid:26142812

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Schneider N,
   2. Schedlowski M,
   3. Schürmeyer TH, et al

   . Stress reduction through music in patients undergoing cerebral angiography. Neuroradiology 2001;43:472–76 doi:10.1007/s002340000522 pmid:11465759

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Buffum MD,
   2. Sasso C,
   3. Sands LP, et al

   . A music intervention to reduce anxiety before vascular angiography procedures. J Vasc Nurs 2006;24:68–73; quiz 74 doi:10.1016/j.jvn.2006.04.001 pmid:16952777

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Wostrack M,
   2. Friedrich B,
   3. Hammer K, et al

   . Hippocampal damage and affective disorders after treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurol 2014;261:2128–35 doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7464-y pmid:25119842

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Van Der Schaaf IC,
    2. Wermer MJH,
    3. Velthuis BK, et al

    . Psychosocial impact of finding small aneurysms that are left untreated in patients previously operated on for ruptured aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:748–52 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.079194 pmid:16705198

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Wenz H,
    2. Wenz R,
    3. Maros ME, et al

    . The neglected need for psychological intervention in patients suffering from incidentally discovered intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;143:65–70 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.018 pmid:26896784

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Grunwald IQ,
    2. Supprian T,
    3. Politi M, et al

    . Cognitive changes after carotid artery stenting. Neuroradiology 2006;48:319–23 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0064-5 pmid:16703361

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Zabyhian S,
    2. Mousavi-Bayegi SJ,
    3. Baharvahdat H, et al

    . Cognitive function, depression, and quality of life in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Curr J Neurol 2019 Jan 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.18502/ijnl.v17i3.368

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Dammann P,
    2. Wittek P,
    3. Darkwah Oppong M, et al

    . Relative health-related quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: long-term outcomes and influencing factors. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019;12:1756286419833492 doi:10.1177/1756286419833492 pmid:30886649

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Zaki Ghali MG,
    2. Srinivasan VM,
    3. Wagner K, et al

    . Cognitive sequelae of unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms and their treatment: modalities for neuropsychological assessment. World Neurosurg 2018;120:537–49 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.178 pmid:29966787

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Bonares MJ,
    2. Egeto P,
    3. De Oliveira Manoel AL, et al

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment effects on cognitive function: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2016;124:784–90 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS141625 pmid:26381251

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Korno NV,
    2. Ivanova NE,
    3. Ivanov AY, et al

    . Clinical value of functional MRI in the diagnosis of cognitive disorders in patients with arteriovenous malformations. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2020, February 24–26, 2020. Valletta, Malta doi:10.5220/0008973003790386

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Berra LV,
    2. Armocida D,
    3. D’Angelo L, et al

    . Vascular intracranial malformations and dementia: an under-estimated cause and clinical correlation: clinical note. Cereb Circ Cogn Behav 2022;3:100146 doi:10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100146 pmid:36324411

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. de Souza Coelho D,
    2. de Oliveira Santos BF,
    3. da Costa MD, et al

    . Cognitive performance in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation. J Neurosurg 2019;132:1548–55 doi:10.3171/2018.12.JNS181883 pmid:31465157

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Page MJ,
    2. Moher D,
    3. Bossuyt PM, et al

    . PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n160 doi:10.1136/bmj.n160 pmid:33781993

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Lombardo L,
    2. Shaw R,
    3. Sayles K, et al

    . Anxiety and depression in patients who undergo a cerebrovascular procedure. BMC Neurol 2020;20:124 doi:10.1186/s12883-020-01674-8 pmid:32264847

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Buijs JE,
    2. Greebe P,
    3. Rinkel GJ

    . Quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm with or without aneurysm occlusion. Neurosurgery 2012;70:868–72 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182367295 pmid:21937934

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Choi H,
    2. Kim J

    . Effects of multimedia-based information on anxiety, discomfort and satisfaction with care among patients undergoing cerebral angiography: a quasi-experimental study. J Clin Nurs 2022;31:949–57 doi:10.1111/jocn.15949 pmid:34231279

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Sayadi L,
    2. Varaei S,
    3. Faghihzadeh E, et al

    . The effects of multimedia education on anxiety and physiological status among patients with cerebral angiography: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Nurs Pract Today 2018;5:375–84 doi:10.18502/npt.v5i4.116

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Vanderboom TL,
    2. Arcari PM,
    3. Duffy ME, et al

    . Effects of a music intervention on patients undergoing cerebral angiography: a pilot study. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:229–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010052 pmid:21990511

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Kolahi Z,
    2. Zandi M,
    3. Esmaeili R, et al

    . Effect of angiography room orientation tour on anxiety of patients awaiting cerebrovascular angiography. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery 2020;29:7–11
27. 27.↵
    1. Polding LC,
    2. Tate WJ,
    3. Mlynash M, et al

    ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Quality of life in physical, social, and cognitive domains improves with endovascular therapy in the DEFUSE 3 Trial. Stroke 2021;52:1185–91 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031490 pmid:33596675

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Ma N,
    2. Feng X,
    3. Wu Z, et al

    . Cognitive impairments and risk factors after ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment in low-grade patients without severe complications: a multicenter retrospective study. Front Neurol 2021;12:613785 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.613785 pmid:33643199

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Brundl E,
    2. Schodel P,
    3. Bele S, et al

    . Treatment of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and self-reported neuropsychological performance at 6 months: results of a prospective clinical pilot study on good-grade patients. Turk Neurosurg 2018;28:369–88 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.21825-17.0 pmid:29204979

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Koivisto T,
    2. Vanninen R,
    3. Hurskainen H, et al

    . Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000;31:2369–77 doi:10.1161/01.str.31.10.2369 pmid:11022066

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Mukerji N,
    2. Holliman D,
    3. Baisch S, et al

    . Neuropsychologic impact of treatment modalities in subarachnoid hemorrhage: clipping is no different from coiling. World Neurosurg 2010;74:129–38 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2010.05.009 pmid:21300002

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Preiss M,
    2. Koblihova J,
    3. Netuka D, et al

    . Ruptured cerebral aneurysm patients treated by clipping or coiling: comparison of long-term neuropsychological and personality outcomes. Zentralbl Neurochir 2007;68:169–75 doi:10.1055/s-2007-985855 pmid:17966076

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Proust F,
    2. Martinaud O,
    3. Gérardin E, et al

    . Quality of life and brain damage after microsurgical clip occlusion or endovascular coil embolization for ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: neuropsychological assessment: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2009;110:19–29 doi:10.3171/2008.3.17432 pmid:18928356

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Proust F,
    2. Bracard S,
    3. Lejeune JP, et al

    ; FASHE Investigators. A randomized controlled study assessing outcome, cognition, autonomy and quality of life in over 70-year-old patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurochirurgie 2018;64:395–400 doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2018.08.004 pmid:30340777

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Preiss M,
    2. Netuka D,
    3. Koblihová J, et al

    . Cognitive functions before and 1 year after surgical and endovascular treatment in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 2012;26:514–16 doi:10.3109/02688697.2011.645915 pmid:22260815

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Latimer SF,
    2. Wilson FC,
    3. McCusker CG, et al

    . Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH): long-term cognitive outcome in patients treated with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:845–50 doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.709909 pmid:22909316

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Beeckmans K,
    2. Crunelle CL,
    3. Van den Bossche J, et al

    . Cognitive outcome after surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Acta Neurol Belg 2020;120:123–32 doi:10.1007/s13760-019-01245-w pmid:31745846

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Fontanella M,
    2. Perozzo P,
    3. Ursone R, et al

    . Neuropsychological assessment after microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:867–72; discussion 872 doi:10.1007/s00701-003-0111-5 pmid:14577008

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Frazer D,
    2. Ahuja A,
    3. Watkins L, et al

    . Coiling versus clipping for the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a longitudinal investigation into cognitive outcome. Neurosurgery 2007;60:434–42 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000255335.72662.25 pmid:17327787

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Vieira AC,
    2. Azevedo-Filho HR,
    3. Andrade G, et al

    . Cognitive changes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage before and early posttreatment: differences between surgical and endovascular. World Neurosurg 2012;78:95–100 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.021 pmid:22120261

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Bendel P,
    2. Koivisto T,
    3. Niskanen E, et al

    . Brain atrophy and neuropsychological outcome after treatment of ruptured anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: a voxel-based morphometric study. Neuroradiology 2009;51:711–22 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0552-5 pmid:19568738

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Gao P,
    2. Jin Z,
    3. Wang P, et al

    . Effects of intracranial interventional embolization and intracranial clipping on the cognitive and neurologic function of patients with intracranial aneurysms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2022;37:1688–98 doi:10.1093/arclin/acac030 pmid:35596958

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Scott RB,
    2. Eccles F,
    3. Molyneux AJ, et al

    . Improved cognitive outcomes with endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: neuropsychological outcomes from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2010;41:1743–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585240 pmid:20616321

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Bründl E,
    2. Böhm C,
    3. Lürding R, et al

    . Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms and cognitive performance: preliminary results of a prospective clinical trial. World Neurosurg 2016;94:145–56 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.112 pmid:27392894

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Caveney AF,
    2. Langenecker SA,
    3. Pandey AS, et al

    . Neuropsychological changes in patients undergoing treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neurosurg 2019;84:581–87 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy077 pmid:29608704

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Bründl E,
    2. Proescholdt M,
    3. Schödel P, et al

    . Excessive release of endogenous neuropeptide Y into cerebrospinal fluid after treatment of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage and its possible impact on self-reported neuropsychological performance: results of a prospective clinical pilot study on good-grade patients. Neurol Res 2018;40:1001–13 doi:10.1080/01616412.2018.1508547 pmid:30213237

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Manning L,
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Dufour A

    . Anterior and non-anterior ruptured aneurysms: Memory and frontal lobe function performance following coiling. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:466–74 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01012.x pmid:15885052

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Shen Y,
    2. Dong Z,
    3. Pan P, et al

    . Risk factors for mild cognitive impairment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with endovascular coiling. World Neurosurg 2018;119:e527–33 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.196 pmid:30075259

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Sousa L,
    2. Antunes A,
    3. Mendes T, et al

    . Long-term neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological sequelae of endovascularly treated aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Med Port 2019;32:706–13 doi:10.20344/amp.10894 pmid:31703183

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Kang DH,
    2. Hwang YH,
    3. Kim YS, et al

    . Cognitive outcome and clinically silent thromboembolic events after coiling of asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013;72:638–45; discussion 645 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846f74 pmid:23277379

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Srivatsan A,
    2. Mohanty A,
    3. Saleem Y, et al

    . Cognitive outcomes after unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment with endovascular coiling. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:430–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016362 pmid:32699175

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. Pang J,
    2. Zhao C,
    3. Zhang A, et al

    . Impact of different surgical methods for endovascular embolization of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms on patient prognosis and cognitive function. Int J Clin Exp Med 2020;13:3630–36
53. 53.↵
    1. Ishii D,
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Roa JA, et al

    . Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after endovascular treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a pilot study. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:439–43 doi:10.1177/15910199211039917 pmid:34516320

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Wagner K,
    2. Srivatsan A,
    3. Mohanty A, et al

    . Cognitive outcomes after unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment with flow diversion. J Neurosurg 2019;134:1–6 doi:10.3171/2019.9.JNS191910

    CrossRef
55. 55.↵
    1. López-Cancio E,
    2. Millán M,
    3. Muñoz L, et al

    . Endovascular treatment improves cognition after stroke: a secondary analysis of REVASCAT trial. Neurology 2017;88:245–51 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003517 pmid:27940648

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Strambo D,
    2. Bartolini B,
    3. Beaud V, et al

    . Thrombectomy and thrombolysis of isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: cognitive, visual, and disability outcomes. Stroke 2020;51:254–61 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026907 pmid:31718503

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Xu G,
    2. Dong X,
    3. Niu X, et al

    . Cognitive function and prognosis of multimodal neuroimage-guided thrombectomy on mild to moderate anterior circulation infarction patients with broadened therapeutic window: a prospective study. Eur Neurol 2017;78:257–63 doi:10.1159/000479735 pmid:28942450

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    1. Sekar S,
    2. Kannath SK,
    3. Ramachandran S, et al

    . Alterations in resting-state functional MRI connectivity related to cognitive changes in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas before and after embolization treatment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;55:1183–99 doi:10.1002/jmri.27936 pmid:34592019

    CrossRefPubMed
59. 59.↵
    1. Moftakhar R,
    2. Turk AS,
    3. Niemann DB, et al

    . Effects of carotid or vertebrobasilar stent placement on cerebral perfusion and cognition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1772–80 pmid:16091529

    PubMedWeb of Science
60. 60.↵
    1. Corriere MA,
    2. Edwards MS,
    3. Geer CP, et al

    . Longitudinal evaluation of neurobehavioral outcomes after carotid revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:874–81 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2013.06.032 pmid:24184497

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    1. Fan YL,
    2. Wan JQ,
    3. Zhou ZW, et al

    . Neurocognitive improvement after carotid artery stenting in patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion: a prospective, controlled, single-center study. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2014;48:305–10 doi:10.1177/1538574414525863 pmid:24643000

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Gupta AN,
    2. Bhatti AA,
    3. Shah MM, et al

    . Carotid artery stenting and its impact on cognitive function: a prospective observational study. Neurointervention 2020;15:74–78 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2020.00038 pmid:32268720

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    1. Hitchner E,
    2. Baughman BD,
    3. Soman S, et al

    . Microembolization is associated with transient cognitive decline in patients undergoing carotid interventions. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:1719–25 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.06.104 pmid:27633169

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    1. Kim JJ,
    2. Schwartz S,
    3. Wen J, et al

    . Comparison of neurocognitive outcomes after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Am Surg 2015;81:1010–14
65. 65.↵
    1. Lin MS,
    2. Chiu MJ,
    3. Wu YW, et al

    . Neurocognitive improvement after carotid artery stenting in patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion and cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2011;42:2850–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613133 pmid:21836094

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
66. 66.↵
    1. Piegza M,
    2. Jaworska I,
    3. Piegza J, et al

    . Cognitive functions after carotid artery stenting: 1-year follow-up study. J Clin Med 2022;11:3019 doi:10.3390/jcm11113019 pmid:35683407

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    1. Raabe RD,
    2. Burr RB,
    3. Short R

    . One-year cognitive outcomes associated with carotid artery stent placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:983–88; quiz 989 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.03.011 pmid:20537561

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    1. Song LP,
    2. Zhang WW,
    3. Gu YQ, et al

    . Cognitive improvement after carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery near-occlusion. J Neurol Sci 2019;404:86–90 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2019.07.023 pmid:31352294

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    1. Tanashyan MM,
    2. Medvedev RB,
    3. Lagoda OV, et al

    . The state of cognitive functions after angioreconstructive operations on the carotid arteries. Immuno-Oncology 2019;5:65–71 doi:10.24075/brsmu.2019.059

    CrossRef
70. 70.↵
    1. Turowicz A,
    2. Czapiga A,
    3. Malinowski M, et al

    . Carotid revascularization improves cognition in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and cognitive decline. Greater improvement in younger patients with more disordered neuropsychological performance. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105608 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105608 pmid:33461024

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    1. Varetto G,
    2. Gibello L,
    3. Faletti R, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict the risk of microembolization during carotid artery stenting. Radiol Med 2015;120:1050–55 doi:10.1007/s11547-015-0530-4 pmid:25805183

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    1. Whooley JL,
    2. David BC,
    3. Woo HH, et al

    . Carotid revascularization and its effect on cognitive function: a prospective nonrandomized multicenter clinical study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020;29:104702 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104702 pmid:32107155

    CrossRefPubMed
73. 73.↵
    1. Witt K,
    2. Börsch K,
    3. Daniels C, et al

    . Neuropsychological consequences of endarterectomy and endovascular angioplasty with stent placement for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a prospective randomised study. J Neurol 2007;254:1524–32 doi:10.1007/s00415-007-0576-x pmid:17657403

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
74. 74.↵
    1. Xu G,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Meyer JS, et al

    . Cognitive performance after carotid angioplasty and stenting with brain protection devices. Neurol Res 2007;29:251–55 doi:10.1179/016164107X159216 pmid:17178010

    CrossRefPubMed
75. 75.↵
    1. Eastwood JA,
    2. Doering LV,
    3. Dracup K, et al

    . Health-related quality of life: the impact of diagnostic angiography. Heart Lung 2011;40:147–55 doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.05.056 pmid:20691477

    CrossRefPubMed
76. 76.↵
    1. King JT Jr.,
    2. Kassam AB,
    3. Yonas H, et al

    . Mental health, anxiety, and depression in patients with cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;103:636–41 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.103.4.0636 pmid:6266045

    CrossRefPubMed
77. 77.↵
    1. Lemos M,
    2. Román-Calderón JP,
    3. Calle G, et al

    . Personality and anxiety are related to health-related quality of life in unruptured intracranial aneurysm patients selected for non-intervention: a cross sectional study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229795 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229795 pmid:32163437

    CrossRefPubMed
78. 78.↵
    1. Beattie DK,
    2. Golledge J,
    3. Greenhalgh RM, et al

    . Quality of life assessment in vascular disease: towards a consensus. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:9–13 doi:10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80044-5 pmid:9046908

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
79. 79.↵
    1. Schiavolin S,
    2. Mariniello A,
    3. Broggi M, et al

    . Patient-reported outcome and cognitive measures to be used in vascular and brain tumor surgery: proposal for a minimum set. Neurol Sci 2022;43:5143–51 doi:10.1007/s10072-022-06162-0 pmid:35654996

    CrossRefPubMed