Effective Dose Measurements of the Latest-Generation Angiographic System in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Comparison with the Newest Multidetector CT Generation

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Psychogios MN,
   2. Maier IL,
   3. Tsogkas I, et al

   . One-stop management of 230 consecutive acute stroke patients: report of procedural times and clinical outcome. J Clin Med 2019;8:2185 doi:10.3390/jcm8122185 pmid:31835763

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Brehm A,
   2. Tsogkas I,
   3. Ospel JM, et al

   . Direct to angiography suite approaches for the triage of suspected acute stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022;15:17562864221078177 doi:10.1177/17562864221078177 pmid:35251309

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Requena M,
   2. Olivé-Gadea M,
   3. Muchada M, et al

   . Direct to angiography suite without stopping for computed tomography imaging for patients with acute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1099–1107 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2385 pmid:34338742

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Quispe-Orozco D,
   2. Farooqui M,
   3. Zevallos C, et al

   . Angiography suite cone-beam computed tomography perfusion imaging in large-vessel occlusion patients using RAPID software: a pilot study. Stroke 2021;52:e542–44 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035992 pmid:34315250

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Roser P,
   2. Birkhold A,
   3. Zhong X, et al

   . Pitfalls in interventional x-ray organ dose assessment-combined experimental and computational phantom study: application to prostatic artery embolization. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2019;14:1859–69 doi:10.1007/s11548-019-02037-6 pmid:31377964

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Brehm A,
   2. Stamm G,
   3. Lüpke M, et al

   . Effective dose to patient measurements for flat-detector computed tomography protocols in acute stroke care. Eur Radiol 2020;30:5082–88 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06891-w pmid:32346793

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Moore R,
   2. Waheed A,
   3. Burns B

   . Rule of Nines. StatPearls Publishing; 2021
8. 8.↵
   Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values: a report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals—ICRP publication 89. Ann ICRP 2002;32:5–265 pmid:14506981

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–332 doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003] pmid:18082557

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Kloska S, et al

    . Dynamic angiography and perfusion imaging using flat detector CT in the angiography suite: a pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1964–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4383 pmid:26066625

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Nogueira RG,
    2. Jadhav AP,
    3. Haussen DC, et al

    . Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Kemp S, et al

    . Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Hauer M,
    3. Banckwitz R, et al

    . Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1257–65 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3136-7 pmid:24691631

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chen SH,
    2. Snelling BM,
    3. Sur S, et al

    . Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:874–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014485 pmid:30670623

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. McTaggart RA,
    2. Ospel JM,
    3. Psychogios MN, et al

    . Optimization of endovascular therapy in the neuroangiography suite to achieve fast and complete (Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia 2c-3) reperfusion. Stroke 2020;51:1961–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026736 pmid:32568643

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Psychogios MN,
    2. Behme D,
    3. Schregel K, et al

    . One-stop management of acute stroke patients: minimizing door-to-reperfusion times. Stroke 2017;48:3152–55 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018077 pmid:29018132

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Amukotuwa SA,
    2. Wu A,
    3. Zhou K, et al

    . Time-to-maximum of the tissue residue function improves diagnostic performance for detecting distal vessel occlusions on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:65–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6891 pmid:33431503

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Amukotuwa SA,
    2. Wu A,
    3. Zhou K, et al

    . Distal medium vessel occlusions can be accurately and rapidly detected using Tmax maps. Stroke 2021;52:3308–17 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032941 pmid:34233460

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Chapot R,
    3. Agid R, et al

    ; Distal Thrombectomy Summit Group. Thrombectomy for distal, medium vessel occlusions: a consensus statement on present knowledge and promising directions. Stroke 2020;51:2872–84 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028956 pmid:32757757

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Lin HC,
    2. Lai TJ,
    3. Tseng HC, et al

    . Radiation doses with various body weights of phantoms in brain 128-slice MDCT examination. J Radiat Res 2019;60:466–75 doi:10.1093/jrr/rrz029 pmid:31197311

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Petroulia VD,
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Piechowiak EI, et al

    . Evaluation of Sine Spin flat detector CT imaging compared with multidetector CT. J Neurointerv Surg 2022 Mar 22 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018312 pmid:35318960

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Kalender WA,
    2. Kyriakou Y

    . Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007;17:2767–79 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9 pmid:17587058

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Nikupaavo U,
    2. Kaasalainen T,
    3. Reijonen V, et al

    . Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:117–23 doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12763 pmid:25539246

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Fahrig R,
    2. Dixon R,
    3. Payne T, et al

    . Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 2006;33:4541–50 doi:10.1118/1.2370508 pmid:17278805

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Roser P,
    2. Birkhold A,
    3. Preuhs A, et al

    . XDose: toward online cross-validation of experimental and computational X-ray dose estimation. Int J Comput Assist Radiology Surg 2021;16:1–10 doi:10.1007/s11548-020-02298-6 pmid:33274400

    CrossRefPubMed