Safety of Consecutive Bilateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension and Occult CSF Leak

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Davidson B,
   2. Nassiri F,
   3. Mansouri A, et al

   . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a review and introduction of an algorithm for management. World Neurosurg 2017;101:343–49 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.123 pmid:28192268

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Mokri B

   . Spontaneous low pressure, low CSF volume headaches: spontaneous CSF leaks. Headache 2013;53:1034–53 doi:10.1111/head.12149 pmid:23808630

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Akbar JJ,
   2. Luetmer PH,
   3. Schwartz KM, et al

   . The role of MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium in localization of spinal CSF leaks in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:535–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2815 pmid:22173753

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Wang YF,
   2. Lirng JF,
   3. Fuh JL, et al

   . Heavily T2-weighted MR myelography vs CT myelography in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology 2009;73:1892–98 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3fd99 pmid:19949036

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Farb RI,
   2. Nicholson PJ,
   3. Peng PW, et al

   . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a systematic imaging approach for CSF leak localization and management based on MRI and digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:745–53 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6016 pmid:30923083

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Clark MS,
   2. Diehn FE,
   3. Verdoorn JT, et al

   . Prevalence of hyperdense paraspinal vein sign in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension without dural CSF leak on standard CT myelography. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018;24:54–59 doi:10.5152/dir.2017.17220 pmid:29217497

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Schievink WI,
   2. Maya MM,
   3. Jean-Pierre S, et al

   . A classification system of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. Neurology 2016;87:673–79 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002986 pmid:27440149

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Schievink WI

   . Novel neuroimaging modalities in the evaluation of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2013;13:358 doi:10.1007/s11910-013-0358-z pmid:23703239

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Hoxworth JM,
   2. Trentman TL,
   3. Kotsenas AL, et al

   . The role of digital subtraction myelography in the diagnosis and localization of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:649–53 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.8238 pmid:22915407

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Hoxworth JM,
    2. Patel AC,
    3. Bosch EP, et al

    . Localization of a rapid CSF leak with digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:516–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1294 pmid:18842766

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Luetmer PH,
    2. Mokri B

    . Dynamic CT myelography: a technique for localizing high-flow spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1711–14 pmid:13679297

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Moser FG,
    3. Maya MM, et al

    . Digital subtraction myelography for the identification of spontaneous spinal CSF-venous fistulas. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:960–64 doi:10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15855 pmid:26849709

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya MM,
    3. Moser FG, et al

    . Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography to identify spinal CSF-venous fistulas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. J Neurosurg Spine 2019 Sept 13. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2019.9.SPINE181362 pmid:31518974

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Matsumoto T,
    2. Imagama S,
    3. Inoue H, et al

    . Outpatient myelography: a prospective trial comparing complications after myelography between outpatients and inpatients in Japan. Asian Spine J 2015;9:928–34 doi:10.4184/asj.2015.9.6.928 pmid:26713127

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Albrecht A,
    2. Golebiowski M,
    3. Kornienko VN, et al

    . A double-blind, prospective, randomized, multicenter group comparison study of iopromide 240 vs iohexol 240 in myelography. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1901–08 doi:10.1007/s003300050945 pmid:10602973

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Binet EF,
    3. Gabrielsen TO, et al

    . Lumbar myelography with iohexol in outpatients: prospective multicenter evaluation of safety. Radiology 1989;173:239–42 doi:10.1148/radiology.173.1.2675186 pmid:2675186

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Sand T,
    2. Myhr G,
    3. Stovner LJ, et al

    . Side effects after ambulatory lumbar iohexol myelography. Neuroradiology 1989;31:49–54 doi:10.1007/BF00342030 pmid:2717004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Kieffer SA,
    2. Binet EF,
    3. Davis DO, et al

    . Lumbar myelography with iohexol and metrizamide: a comparative multicenter prospective study. Radiology 1984;151:665–70 doi:10.1148/radiology.151.3.6371890 pmid:6371890

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Eldevik OP,
    2. Nakstad P,
    3. Kendall BE, et al

    . Iohexol in lumbar myelography: preliminary results from an open, noncomparative multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1983;4:299–301 pmid:6410725

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Kim DK,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Morris PP, et al

    . Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography: tips, tricks, and pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:21–28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6368 pmid:31857327

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Gatica-Moris SR,
    2. Welch TL,
    3. Abcejo AS, et al

    . Anesthesia during positive-pressure myelogram: a new role for cerebral oximetry. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2019 Oct 23. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1097/ANA.0000000000000651 pmid:31651546

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Griauzde J,
    2. Gemmete JJ,
    3. Pandey AS, et al

    . Intrathecal preservative-free normal saline challenge magnetic resonance myelography for the identification of cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. J Neurosurg 2015;123:732–36 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS142057 pmid:26140486

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Junck L,
    2. Marshall WH

    . Neurotoxicity of radiological contrast agents. Ann Neurol 1983;13:469–84 doi:10.1002/ana.410130502 pmid:6347033

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Skalpe IO,
    2. Nakstad P

    . Myelography with iohexol (Omnipaque); a clinical report with special reference to the adverse effects. Neuroradiology 1988;30:169–74 doi:10.1007/BF00395620 pmid:3386812

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Laasonen EM

    . Iohexol and metrizamide in lumbar myelography: comparison of side effects. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1985;26:761–65 doi:10.1177/028418518502600623 pmid:3909755

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    Omnipaque [package insert]. GE Healthcare, Marlborough, MA; 2018
27. 27.↵
    1. Shah LM,
    2. Kranz PG,
    3. Anzai Y, et al

    . Critical assessment of myelography practices: a call for rational guideline revision. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:2378–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5867 pmid:30385469

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Mahesh M

    . Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics 2001;21:1033–45 doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl271033 pmid:11452079

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Strupp M,
    2. Brandt T,
    3. Müller A

    . Incidence of post-lumbar puncture syndrome reduced by reinserting the stylet: a randomized prospective study of 600 patients. J Neurol 1998;245:589–92 doi:10.1007/s004150050250 pmid:9758296

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Halpern S,
    2. Preston R

    . Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design: meta-analyses. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1376–83 doi:10.1097/00000542-199412000-00012 pmid:7992906

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Norris MC,
    2. Leighton BL,
    3. DeSimone CA

    . Needle bevel direction and headache after inadvertent dural puncture. Anesthesiology 1989;70:729–31 doi:10.1097/00000542-198905000-00002 pmid:2655500

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science