Fusion Image Guidance for Supra-Aortic Vessel Catheterization in Neurointerventions: A Feasibility Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Faggioli GL,
   2. Ferri M,
   3. Freyrie A, et al

   . Aortic arch anomalies are associated with increased risk of neurological events in carotid stent procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:436–41 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.026 pmid:17240174

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Werner M,
   2. Bausback Y,
   3. Bräunlich S, et al

   . Anatomic variables contributing to a higher periprocedural incidence of stroke and TIA in carotid artery stenting: single center experience of 833 consecutive cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:321–28 doi:10.1002/ccd.23483 pmid:22422560

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Riga CV,
   2. Bicknell CD,
   3. Hamady MS, et al

   . Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:799–809 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.218 pmid:21620623

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Demertzis S,
   2. Hurni S,
   3. Stalder M, et al

   . Aortic arch morphometry in living humans. J Anat 2010;217:588–96 doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01297.x pmid:20979589

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.
   1. Yu SC,
   2. Leung TW,
   3. Hung EH, et al

   . Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with nitinol stent. Operative Neurosurg 2012;70(1 Suppl Operative):104–13 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182320bb0 pmid:21849921

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Madhwal S,
   2. Rajagopal V,
   3. Bhatt DL, et al

   . Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2008;20:200–04 pmid:18460700

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Goudeketting SR,
   2. Heinen SG,
   3. van den Heuvel DA, et al

   . The use of 3D image fusion for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of iliac artery obstructions: validation of the technique and systematic review of literature. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2018;59:26–36 doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10224-7 pmid:28933523

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kaladji A,
   2. Daoudal A,
   3. Clochard E, et al

   . Interest of fusion imaging and modern navigation tools with hybrid rooms in endovascular aortic procedures. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2017;58:458–66 doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09046-7 pmid:26583928

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.
   1. Kaladji A,
   2. Duménil A,
   3. Mahé G, et al

   . Safety and accuracy of endovascular aneurysm repair without pre-operative and intra-operative contrast agent. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015;49:255–61 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.003 pmid:25617257

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Sailer AM,
    2. de Haan MW,
    3. Peppelenbosch AG, et al

    . CTA with fluoroscopy image fusion guidance in endovascular complex aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;47:349–56 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.022 pmid:24485850

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Blanc R,
    2. Seiler A,
    3. Robert T, et al

    . Multimodal angiographic assessment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a pilot study. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:841–47 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011402 pmid:25280569

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Kocer N,
    2. Kizilkilic O,
    3. Babic D, et al

    . Fused magnetic resonance angiography and 2D fluoroscopic visualization for endovascular intracranial neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 2013;118:1000–02 doi:10.3171/2012.11.JNS111355 pmid:23240695

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Perhac J,
    2. Spaltenstein J,
    3. Pereira VM, et al

    . Improving workflows of neuro-interventional procedures with autostereoscopic 3D visualization of multi-modality imaging in hybrid interventional suites. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016;11:189–96 doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1268-0 pmid:26233622

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Blanc R,
    2. Fahed R,
    3. Roux P, et al

    . Augmented 3D venous navigation for neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:649–52 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013365 pmid:29021314

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Lin CJ,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Clarençon F, et al

    . Overlying fluoroscopy and preacquired CT angiography for road-mapping in cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:494–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1757 pmid:19833792

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. McNally MM,
    2. Scali ST,
    3. Feezor RJ, et al

    . Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2015;61:309–16 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.097 pmid:25175634

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.
    1. Tacher V,
    2. Lin M,
    3. Desgranges P, et al

    . Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24:1698–1706 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.07.016 pmid:24035418

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.
    1. Kaladji A,
    2. Giovannetti M,
    3. Pascot R, et al

    . Preoperative CT-scan-based sizing and in-stent restenosis in peripheral endovascular revascularizations. Vascular 2017;25:504–13 doi:10.1177/1708538117700764 pmid:28330432

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.
    1. Klein AJ,
    2. Tomkowiak MT,
    3. Vigen KK, et al

    . Multimodality image fusion to guide peripheral artery chronic total arterial occlusion recanalization in a swine carotid artery occlusion model: unblinding the interventionalist. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:1090–98 doi:10.1002/ccd.24391 pmid:23097307

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.
    1. Kobeiter H,
    2. Nahum J,
    3. Becquemin JP

    . Zero-contrast thoracic endovascular aortic repair using image fusion. Circulation 2011;124:e280–82 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014118 pmid:21911788

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Schulz CJ,
    2. Schmitt M,
    3. Böckler D, et al

    . Feasibility and accuracy of fusion imaging during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2016;63:314–22 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.089 pmid:26527424

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Uneri A,
    2. Otake Y,
    3. Wang AS, et al

    . 3D–2D registration for surgical guidance: Effect of projection view angles on registration accuracy. Phys Med Biol 2013;59:271–87 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/2/271 pmid:24351769

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. van den Berg JC

    . Update on new tools for three-dimensional navigation in endovascular procedures. Aorta (Stamford) 2014;2:279–85 doi:10.12945/j.aorta.2014.14-054 pmid:26798746

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ruijters D,
    2. Homan R,
    3. Mielekamp P, et al

    . Validation of 3D multimodality roadmapping in interventional neuroradiology. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:5335–54 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/017 pmid:21799235

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Soderman M,
    2. Babic D,
    3. Homan R, et al

    . 3D roadmap in neuroangiography: technique and clinical interest. Neuroradiology 2005;47:735–34 doi:10.1007/s00234-005-1417-1 pmid:16001241

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Xu R,
    2. Leng LZ,
    3. Rubin DG, et al

    . Fusion of intraoperative three-dimensional rotational angiography and flat-panel detector computed tomography for cerebrovascular neuronavigation. World Neurosurg 2013;79:504–09 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.008 pmid:2120274

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Sun Q,
    3. Zhang Y, et al

    . Three-dimensional image fusion of CTA and angiography for real-time guidance during neurointerventional procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:302–06 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012216 pmid:27048959

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Tritt S,
    2. Ommer B,
    3. Gehrisch S, et al

    . Optimization of the surgical approach in AVMs using MRI and 4D DSA fusion technique: a technical note. Clin Neuroradiol 2017;27:443–50 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0571-2 pmid:28289757

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Ide S,
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Morioka M, et al

    . Usefulness of 3D DSA-MR fusion imaging in the pretreatment evaluation of brain arteriovenous malformations. Acad Radiol 2012;19:1345–52 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.001 pmid:22951112

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Crossley R,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Holtmannspoetter M, et al

    . Validation studies of virtual reality simulation performance metrics for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:775–80 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014510 pmid:30655360

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Rudarakanchana N,
    2. Van Herzeele I,
    3. Bicknell CD, et al

    . Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: technical and team training in an immersive virtual reality environment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:920–27 doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0765-1 pmid:24196270

    CrossRefPubMed