Residual Flow Inside the Woven EndoBridge Device at Follow-Up: Potential Predictors of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon

References

1. 1.↵
   1. van Rooij S,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. Peluso JP, et al

   . A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2020 Feb 6. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/1591019920904421 pmid:32028824

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Kaya HE,
   2. Bakdik S,
   3. Keskin F, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device: retrospective analysis of a single center experience. Clin Imaging 2020;59:25-29 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.09.001 pmid:31715514

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Zhang SM,
   2. Liu LX,
   3. Ren PW, et al

   . Effectiveness, safety and risk factors of Woven EndoBridge device in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2020;136:e1-23 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.023 pmid:31419591

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Ozpeynirci Y,
   2. Braun M,
   3. Schmitz B

   . CT angiography in occlusion assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. J Neuroimaging 2019;29:481-86 doi:10.1111/jon.12622 pmid:31037787

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Mine B,
   2. Tancredi I,
   3. Aljishi A, et al

   . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by a WEB flow disrupter: a comparative study of DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:615-20 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011644 pmid:25999378

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Caroff J,
   2. Mihalea C,
   3. Tuilier T, et al

   . Occlusion assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Neuroradiology 2016;58:887-85 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1715-9 pmid:27312475

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. van Rooij S,
   2. Peluso JP,
   3. Sluzewski M, et al

   . Mid-term 3T MRA follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge. Interv Neuroradiol 2018;24:601-07 doi:10.1177/1591019918788346 pmid:30001648

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Januel AC

   . Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:522-30 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000669 pmid:25710103

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Lubicz B,
   2. Klisch J,
   3. Gauvrit JY, et al

   . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432-38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3869

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Duan Z,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Guan S, et al

    . Morphological parameters and anatomical locations associated with rupture status of small intracranial aneurysms. Sci Rep 2018;8:6440 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24732-1 pmid:29691446

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Ikka L, et al

    . Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolisation system. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:e11-12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011862 pmid:26080827

    FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Arthur A,
    3. Byrne J, et al

    . Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolization system. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:591-95 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011251 pmid:24984707

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Neki H, et al

    . Role of C-arm VasoCT in the use of endovascular WEB flow disruption in intracranial aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1353-57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3860 pmid:24524918

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Asif KS,
    2. Sattar A,
    3. Lazzaro MA, et al

    . Consecutive endovascular treatment of 20 ruptured very small (<3 mm) anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Interv Neurol 2016;5:57-64 doi:10.1159/000444662 pmid:27610122

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Sluzewski M,
    2. Bosch JA,
    3. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. J Neurosurg 2001;94:238-40 doi:10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0238 pmid:11213960

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Wang CC,
    2. Lv N,
    3. Feng ZZ, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal microcatheter looping technique for stent-assisted embolization of complex intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:580-84 doi:10.1177/1591019915594330 pmid:26179063

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Luo B,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Wang S, et al

    . High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke 2011;42:745-53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593517 pmid:21233477

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Huang DZ,
    2. Jiang B,
    3. He W, et al

    . Risk factors for the recurrence of an intracranial saccular aneurysm following endovascular treatment. Oncotarget 2017;8:33676–82 doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16897 pmid:28430600

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Castro MA,
    2. Putman CM,
    3. Sheridan MJ, et al

    . Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a possible association with rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:297-302 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1323 pmid:19131411

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Tateshima S,
    2. Chien A,
    3. Sayre J, et al

    . The effect of aneurysm geometry on the intra-aneurysmal flow condition. Neuroradiology 2010;52:1135-41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0687-4 pmid:20373097

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Risk factors of procedural complications related to Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol 2019 Feb 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00762-8 pmid:30734053

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. Ahmed R,
    3. Zannoni R, et al

    . Predicting factors of angiographic aneurysm occlusion after treatment with the Woven EndoBridge device: a single-center experience with midterm follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1773-78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6221 pmid:31537514

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Nawka MT,
    2. Sedlacik J,
    3. Frölich A, et al

    . Multiparametric MRI of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB): a case of Faraday’s cage? J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:988-94 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013625 pmid:29440326

    Abstract/FREE Full Text