Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
Open Access

Improved Cervical Cord Lesion Detection with 3D-MP2RAGE Sequence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

S. Demortière, P. Lehmann, J. Pelletier, B. Audoin and V. Callot
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6567
S. Demortière
aFrom the Centre d’exploration métabolique par résonance magnétique (S.D., P.L., J.P., B.A., V.C.)
bDepartments of Neurology (S.D., J.P., B.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Demortière
P. Lehmann
aFrom the Centre d’exploration métabolique par résonance magnétique (S.D., P.L., J.P., B.A., V.C.)
cand Neuroradiology (P.L.), Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Universitaire Timone, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Lehmann
J. Pelletier
aFrom the Centre d’exploration métabolique par résonance magnétique (S.D., P.L., J.P., B.A., V.C.)
bDepartments of Neurology (S.D., J.P., B.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Pelletier
B. Audoin
aFrom the Centre d’exploration métabolique par résonance magnétique (S.D., P.L., J.P., B.A., V.C.)
bDepartments of Neurology (S.D., J.P., B.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Audoin
V. Callot
aFrom the Centre d’exploration métabolique par résonance magnétique (S.D., P.L., J.P., B.A., V.C.)
dCenter for Magnetic Resonance in Biology and Medicine (V.C.), Aix-Marseille University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Marseille, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. Callot
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Spinal cord lesions have a real diagnostic and prognostic role in multiple sclerosis. Thus, optimizing their detection on MR imaging has become a central issue with direct therapeutic impact. In this study, we compared the 3D-MP2RAGE sequence with the conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (MAGNIMS) set for cervical cord lesion detection in 28 patients with multiple sclerosis. 3D-MP2RAGE allowed better detection of cervical lesions (+62%) in this population, with better confidence, due to optimized contrast and high spatial resolution.

ABBREVIATION:

MAGNIMS
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis

Since the last revision of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (MAGNIMS) guidelines1 and the McDonald criteria of 2017,2 all spinal cord lesions must be counted to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the MS diagnosis.3 In this context, standardized acquisition protocols have been proposed.1 For spinal cord MR imaging, at least 2 sagittal sequences among T2WI, STIR, double inversion recovery, T1WI with gadolinium injection, and/or T2WI axial acquisitions1 are recommended. Nonetheless, different sequences are often necessary because of motion and flux artifacts,4 which is time-consuming.

The MP2RAGE sequence5 has been shown to improve the detection of cerebral lesions that are difficult to visualize on conventional sequences, such as cortical lesions.6 This T1WI MR imaging sequence, which creates a composite image, limiting field inhomogeneity bias while providing a quantitative T1 map, has recently been optimized for the spinal cord7 but has not yet been evaluated in the context of MS.

The aim of this study was to compare the MP2RAGE sequence with the conventional set of routine sequences for detecting spinal cord lesions in patients with MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

This retrospective study, approved by the local Aix-Marseille University ethics committee with written informed consent, included 28 patients with MS from January 2017 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of MS according to the revised McDonald criteria,2 older than 18 years of age, clinical symptoms suggesting spinal cord involvement, and MR imaging examination performed at least 3 months after steroid infusion.

Image Acquisition

Sequences were acquired on a 3T system (Magnetom Verio; Siemens) during the same examination. The protocol was as follows (see Table for MR imaging parameters):

  • One sagittal 3D-MP2RAGE sequence, providing 2 contrasted images, from which a uniform image free of B1 inhomogeneities and a T1 map were derived.5

  • A conventional set with sagittal 2D-T2WI, STIR-weighted, and T1WI postgadolinium sequences, with axial 2D-T2*-WI MRI for confirmation of suspicious lesions on a sagittal set.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Main sequence parameters

Lesion Detection and Scoring Confidence

The cervical spinal cord from C1 to C7 was evaluated. Two operators, a senior neuroradiologist and a neurologist who were blinded to patient data, read the results of the conventional set and the 3D-MP2RAGE sequence (T1 map and uniform image). Identification took place during a consensus session,8 on a high-resolution monitor, using syngo.via (Siemens) image-analysis software. MS lesions were detected on the basis of hyperintensity on T2WI, STIR, MP2RAGE T1 map, and T1-weighted postgadolinium images in case of inflammatory lesions or hypointensity seen on MP2RAGE uniform images compared with normal cord signals. The lesion had to be visible on at least 2 slices in a row for the millimetric MP2RAGE sequence. According to the MAGNIMS criteria, a lesion was validated if visible on at least 2 sequences of the conventional set. Lesion detection was re-evaluated (reproducibility assessment) 3 weeks later, to minimize recall bias.

Confidence in detection was defined during the consensus session by use of a qualitative scale:9 0, no lesion detected; 1, low detection confidence; 2, moderate-to-high detection confidence; and 3, very high detection confidence.

Statistical Analysis

Wilcoxon tests (JMP 9; SAS Institute) were used to compare the number of detected lesions between conventional and MP2RAGE datasets, as well as the reader’s confidence between sequences. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

We included 28 patients with MS (19 women; median age, 34.5 years; interquartile range, 28–41 years); 23 had relapsing-remitting MS, 4 had secondary-progressive MS, and 1 patient had primary-progressive MS. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 1.5 ± 1.4 (range, 0–6.5). The median disease duration was 4.8 years (interquartile range, 1.7–10.1 years).

Spinal Cord Lesions

In total, 27 patients had at least 1 identifiable spinal cord lesion, and 2 patients had an active enhancing lesion. A total of 117 lesions were detected. All lesions identified during the first image-analysis session were found during the second session (100% reproducibility). MP2RAGE significantly revealed more lesions than the conventional set (P < .001) (Fig 1). All lesions seen by the conventional sagittal set were detected on MP2RAGE.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Number of lesions detected by sequence (Wilcoxon test; triple asterisks indicate P < .0001). The MP2RAGE sequence detected significatively more lesions than using the MAGNIMS criteria (117 vs 72, P < .0001), than STIR (117 vs 83, P < .0001) and T2 (117 vs 52, P < .0001) sequences (according to the MAGNIMS criteria, a lesion was validated if visible on at least two sequences of the conventional set). This corresponds to a +62%, + 41% and +125% increase in the lesion detection using MP2RAGE as compared to MAGNIMS, STIR and T2, respectively.

Conversely, 13 lesions (7 patients) were detected only by MP2RAGE. These lesions had an average (minimum/maximum) diameter of 2.6 mm (1.9/4.1 mm). They all fulfilled the characteristics of MS lesions10 in terms of size and location (54% posterior, 31% lateral, and 15% anterior), and their presence was carefully double-checked in the axial/coronal plane. The image quality of the conventional set for the corresponding slices was carefully re-evaluated and was satisfactory. Among these 7 patients, 3 had no visible lesions at all on conventional set detection (On-line Table and Fig 2).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Illustration of MR imaging with the different investigated sequences for patient 23 (a 33-year-old man with relapsing-remitting MS) and patient 16 (a 27-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting MS). White arrows indicate good confidence in the lesion; black arrows, moderate confidence or no lesion seen; UNI, uniform image.

Detection Confidence

Mean reading confidence was significantly higher with MP2RAGE than with STIR (2.1 ± 0.7 versus 1.5 ± 1.2, P = .001) and T2 (2.1 ± 0.7 versus 0.7 ± 0.9, P < .001) sequences. Confidence did not differ between lesions detected by MP2RAGE alone and those seen jointly by MP2RAGE and the conventional set (2.0 ± 0.6 versus 2.2 ± 0.8, P = .11).

DISCUSSION

The present study reveals, for the first time in MS, that the 3D-MP2RAGE method can detect cervical cord lesions with higher confidence and higher sensitivity than the recommended conventional MAGNIMS set. Given the essential diagnostic and prognostic significance of spinal cord lesions in MS, these results could have some critical added value for clinical practice, as previously demonstrated using phase-sensitive inversion recovery or double inversion recovery contrast.9⇓-11 In this work, 3D-MP2RAGE detected significantly more lesions than STIR, T2WI, and MAGNIMS set sequences. Most important, it also allowed detection of lesions in patients classified as not having cord lesions with the conventional set (11%). Of note, the validation of these undetected lesions was achieved by consensus between 2 experienced operators, repeated once with blinding to the previous assessment. Furthermore, the detection confidence for all the lesions visualized by MP2RAGE alone (2.0 ± 0.6, n = 13 lesions) was as high as that for those visualized by both MP2RAGE and the conventional set; this finding consolidates our findings. Finally, the characteristics of these lesions were typical for MS,10 showing, for the first time in the cord, similar detection capability than previously reporter in MS brain.12⇓-14 A recent study also demonstrated good correlation between cerebral lesions detected with MP2RAGE and histologic findings;6 however, such data were not available in the present study and similar work remains to be done.

The present study has some additional limitations. First, the sample size was small and did not include patients with clinically isolated syndrome, for whom it will be necessary to assess the potential value of MP2RAGE diagnosis. Second, the respective contrast-to-noise ratios of the different sequences were not compared because of different spatial resolutions and partial volume effects. According to the present study design, we cannot exclude the possibility that the better sensitivity of MP2RAGE is mostly related to its 3D isotropic nature rather than its better ability to visualize lesions regardless of their size. Indeed, some authors reported a gain in sensitivity in 3D sequences15,16 from 28% to 65% for cervical lesion detection.9,11,17 Comparison among 3D-MP2RAGE, 3D-STIR, and 3D-T2WI is left for future specific studies. Concerning the 3 patients in whom no lesions were detected by the conventional set, missed lesions were mainly due to their small size and sequence spatial resolutions. However, 8/13 lesions detected only with the MP2RAGE sequence exceeded the spatial resolution of the conventional set; this feature suggests that the better sensitivity of MP2RAGE may be related more to its better contrast than its 3D isotropic resolution.

Finally, the MP2RAGE acquisition time (7 minutes) may seem relatively long compared with the 2D individual sequences. However, the volume acquired here covered the whole brain and the entire cervical spinal cord with isotropic submillimeter resolution. This feature offers promising opportunities for global assessment of the upper part of the central nervous system (brain and upper cervical cord). Brain evaluation was beyond the scope of this study. Finally, a compressed-sensing version of the sequence is now proposed,18 which may further improve the added clinical value of the MP2RAGE sequence.

Further assessment and multicentric studies must now be promoted to improve lesion-detection capabilities and clinical evaluation and bring additional proof of specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, an optimized 3D-MP2RAGE sequence was demonstrated to allow a significant gain in the detection of MS cervical lesions (including in patients otherwise presenting with no lesions on conventional MR imaging), with assessment with high reader confidence compared with the conventional set. This MP2RAGE protocol, allowing brain and cervical cord coverage in 7 minutes, could be promising to improve clinical practice. Future studies using larger samples are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank V. Gimenez, L. Pini, C. Costes, and M.P. Ranjeva for study logistics; A. Rico for patient recruitment; A. Massire, J.P. Ranjeva, and A. Maarouf for helpful discussions; and T. Kober (Siemens) for MP2RAGE sequence provision.

Footnotes

  • This work was performed in a laboratory member of the France Life Imaging network (grant ANR-11-INBS-0006) and was supported by the Fondation pour l’Aide à la Recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

  • Disclosures: Sarah Demortière—RELATED: Grant: France Life Imaging Network.* Jean Pelletier—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Roche, Merck, Biogen, Novartis*; Consultancy: Roche, Merck, Biogen, Novartis*; Grants/Grants Pending: Fondation pour l’Aide à la recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques Roche, Merck*; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Merck.* Virginie Callot—RELATED: Grant: Accueil–Fondation Sclérose en plaques, Comments: grant support for MRI exams. *Money paid to the institution.

  • Paper previously presented, in part, at: Annual Meeting of the European Research Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, October 18–22; 2019; Berlin, Germany (poster p1265), for which S. Demortière held a European Research Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis fellowship grant.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Filippi M,
    2. Rocca MA,
    3. Ciccarelli O, et al
    . MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple-sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:292–303 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2 pmid:26822746
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Thompson AJ,
    2. Banwell BL,
    3. Barkhof F, et al
    . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 Revisions of the McDonald Criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 pmid:29275977
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Filippi M,
    2. Preziosa P,
    3. Meani A, et al
    . Prediction of a multiple-sclerosis diagnosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome using the 2016 MAGNIMS and 2010 McDonald criteria: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:133–42 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30469-6 pmid:29275979
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vargas MI,
    2. Delavelle J,
    3. Kohler R, et al
    . Brain and spine MRI artifacts at 3 Tesla. J Neuroradiol 2009;36:74–81 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2008.08.001 pmid:18835643
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Marques JP,
    2. Kober T,
    3. Krueger G, et al
    . MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage 2010;49:1271–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 pmid:19819338
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Beck ES,
    2. Sati P,
    3. Sethi V, et al
    . Improved visualization of cortical lesions in multiple-sclerosis using 7T MP2RAGE. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:459–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5534 pmid:29439120
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rasoanandrianina H,
    2. Massire A,
    3. Taso M, et al
    . Regional T1 mapping of the whole cervical spinal cord using an optimized MP2RAGE sequence. NMR.Biomed 2019;32:e4142 doi:10.1002/nbm.4142 pmid:31393649
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Poonawalla AH,
    2. Hou P,
    3. Nelson FA, et al
    . Cervical spinal cord lesions in multiple-sclerosis: T1-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging with phase-sensitive reconstruction. Radiology 2008;246:258–64 doi:10.1148/radiol.2463061900 pmid:17991786
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fechner A,
    2. Savatovsky J,
    3. El Methni J, et al
    . A 3T phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI sequence improves detection of cervical spinal-cord lesions and shows active lesions in patients with multiple-sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:370–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5941 pmid:30679225
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Moccia M,
    2. Ruggieri S,
    3. Ianniello A, et al
    . Advances in spinal-cord imaging in multiple-sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019;12:1756286419840593 doi:10.1177/1756286419840593 pmid:31040881
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mirafzal S,
    2. Goujon A,
    3. Deschamps R, et al
    . 3D PSIR MRI at 3 Tesla improves detection of spinal-cord lesions in multiple-sclerosis. J Neurol 2020;267:406–14 doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09591-8
    CrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kober T,
    2. Granziera C,
    3. Ribes D, et al
    . MP2RAGE multiple-sclerosis magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Invest Radiol 2012;47:346–52 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31824600e9] pmid:22543966
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fartaria MJ,
    2. Bonnier G,
    3. Roche A, et al
    . Automated detection of white matter and cortical lesions in early stages of multiple-sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;43:1445–54 doi:10.1002/jmri.25095 pmid:26606758
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fartaria MJ,
    2. Sati P,
    3. Todea A, et al
    . Automated detection and segmentation of multiple–sclerosis lesions using ultra-high-field MP2RAGE. Invest Radiol 2019;54:356–64 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000551 pmid:30829941
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nayak NB,
    2. Salah R,
    3. Huang JC, et al
    . A comparison of sagittal short T1 inversion recovery and T2-weighted FSE sequences for detection of multiple-sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Acta Neurol Scand 2014;129:198–203 doi:10.1111/ane.12168 pmid:26606758
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chong AL,
    2. Chandra RV,
    3. Chuah KC, et al
    . Proton density MRI increases detection of cervical spinal-cord multiple-sclerosis lesions compared with T2-weighted fast spin-echo. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:180–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4476 pmid:26427838
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Riederer I,
    2. Karampinos DC,
    3. Settles M, et al
    . Double inversion recovery sequence of the cervical spinal-cord in multiple sclerosis and related inflammatory diseases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:219–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4093 pmid:25169924
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mussard E,
    2. Hilbert T,
    3. Forman C, et al
    . Accelerated MP2RAGE imaging using Cartesian phyllotaxis readout and compressed sensing reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2020 doi:10.1002/mrm.28244 pmid:32176826
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received October 29, 2019.
  • Accepted after revision March 23, 2020.
  • © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improved Cervical Cord Lesion Detection with 3D-MP2RAGE Sequence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Demortière, P. Lehmann, J. Pelletier, B. Audoin, V. Callot
Improved Cervical Cord Lesion Detection with 3D-MP2RAGE Sequence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6567

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Improved Cervical Cord Lesion Detection with 3D-MP2RAGE Sequence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
S. Demortière, P. Lehmann, J. Pelletier, B. Audoin, V. Callot
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6567
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Contribution of the MP2RAGE 7T Sequence in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spinal Cord
  • Crossref (12)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Advanced spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis: Current techniques and future directions
    Anna J.E. Combes, Margareta A. Clarke, Kristin P. O'Grady, Kurt G. Schilling, Seth A. Smith
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2022 36
  • Imaging of the Spinal Cord in Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, Future
    Yongsheng Chen, Ewart Mark Haacke, Evanthia Bernitsas
    Brain Sciences 2020 10 11
  • An optimized MP2RAGE sequence for studying both brain and cervical spinal cord in a single acquisition at 3T
    Arash Forodighasemabadi, Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina, Mohamed Mounir El Mendili, Maxime Guye, Virginie Callot
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2021 84
  • 3-Dimensional Fluid and White Matter Suppression Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequence Accelerated With Compressed Sensing Improves Multiple Sclerosis Cervical Spinal Cord Lesion Detection Compared With Standard 2-Dimensional Imaging
    Thibaut Emorine, Imen Megdiche, Pierre Brugières, Alain Créange, Tobias Kober, Aurélien Massire, Blanche Bapst
    Investigative Radiology 2022 57 9
  • Contribution of the MP2RAGE 7T Sequence in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spinal Cord
    B. Testud, N. Fabiani, S. Demortière, S. Mchinda, N.L. Medina, J. Pelletier, M. Guye, B. Audoin, J.P. Stellmann, V. Callot
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2023 44 9
  • Pushing MP2RAGE boundaries: Ultimate time‐efficient parameterization combined with exhaustive T1 synthetic contrasts
    Blanche Bapst, Aurélien Massire, Franck Mauconduit, Vincent Gras, Nicolas Boulant, Juliette Dufour, Benedetta Bodini, Bruno Stankoff, Alain Luciani, Alexandre Vignaud
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024 91 4
  • Ultra-High Contrast MRI: Using Divided Subtracted Inversion Recovery (dSIR) and Divided Echo Subtraction (dES) Sequences to Study the Brain and Musculoskeletal System
    Daniel Cornfeld, Paul Condron, Gil Newburn, Josh McGeown, Miriam Scadeng, Mark Bydder, Mark Griffin, Geoffrey Handsfield, Meeghage Randika Perera, Tracy Melzer, Samantha Holdsworth, Eryn Kwon, Graeme Bydder
    Bioengineering 2024 11 5
  • Microstructural Damage and Repair in the Spinal Cord of Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis and Association With Disability at 5 Years
    Malo Gaubert, Benoit Combès, Elise Bannier, Arthur Masson, Vivien Caron, Gaëlle Baudron, Jean-Christophe Ferré, Laure Michel, Emmanuelle Le Page, Bruno Stankoff, Gilles Edan, Benedetta Bodini, Anne Kerbrat
    Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation 2025 12 1
  • Spinal cord and brain tissue impairments as long-term effects of rugby practice? An exploratory study based on T1 and ihMTsat measures
    Arash Forodighasemabadi, Guillaume Baucher, Lucas Soustelle, Thomas Troalen, Olivier M. Girard, Maxime Guye, Jean-Baptiste Grisoli, Jean-Philippe Ranjeva, Guillaume Duhamel, Virginie Callot
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2022 35
  • Evaluation of a deep learning segmentation tool to help detect spinal cord lesions from combined T2 and STIR acquisitions in people with multiple sclerosis
    Baptiste Lodé, Burhan Rashid Hussein, Cédric Meurée, Ricky Walsh, Malo Gaubert, Nicolas Lassalle, Guilhem Courbon, Agathe Martin, Jeanne Le Bars, Françoise Durand-Dubief, Bertrand Bourre, Adil Maarouf, Olivier Outteryck, Clément Mehier, Alexandre Poulin, Camille Cathelineau, Jeremy Hong, Guillaume Criton, Sophie Motillon-Alonso, Augustin Lecler, Frédérique Charbonneau, Loïc Duron, Alexandre Bani-Sadr, Céline Delpierre, Jean-Christophe Ferré, Gilles Edan, François Cotton, Romain Casey, Francesca Galassi, Benoit Combès, Anne Kerbrat
    European Radiology 2025

More in this TOC Section

  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Cone Beam CT Myelography
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire