Comparing Morphology and Hemodynamics of Stable-versus-Growing and Grown Intracranial Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Gabriel RA,
   3. Kim H,
   4. Sidney S, et al

   . Ten-year detection rate of brain arteriovenous malformations in a large, multiethnic, defined population. Stroke 2010;41:21–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566018 pmid:19926839

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Lecler A,
   3. Raymond J,
   4. Rodriguez-Régent C, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment: a prospective cohort study. Radiology 2015;277:173–80 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142496 pmid:26057784

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Birks J,
   4. Clarke A, et al

   . The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18-year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015;385:691–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14]60975-2 pmid:25465111

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Greving JP,
   3. Wermer MJH,
   4. Brown RD, et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13]70263-1 pmid:24290159

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Weir B,
   3. Disney L,
   4. Karrison T

   . Sizes of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in relation to their sites and the ages of patients. J Neurosurg 2002;96:64–70 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0064 pmid:11794606

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Korja M,
   3. Kaprio J

   . Controversies in epidemiology of intracranial aneurysms and SAH. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:50–55 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.228 pmid:26670298

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Xiang J,
   3. Natarajan SK,
   4. Tremmel M, et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–152 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Mut F,
   4. Weir J, et al

   . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2419 pmid:21127144

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Dhar S,
   3. Tremmel M,
   4. Mocco J, et al

   . Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008;63:185–97 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81 pmid:18797347

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Etminan N,
    3. Rinkel GJ

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:699 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.150 pmid:27808265

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Villablanca JP,
    3. Duckwiler GR,
    4. Jahan R, et al

    . Natural history of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms evaluated at CT angiography: growth and rupture incidence and correlation with epidemiologic risk factors. Radiology 2013;269:258–65 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121188 pmid:23821755

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Backes D,
    3. Rinkel GJE,
    4. Greving JP, et al

    . ELAPSS score for prediction of risk of growth of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurology 2017;88:1600–06 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003450 pmid:28363976

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Chien A,
    3. Xu M,
    4. Yokota H, et al

    . Nonsphericity index and size ratio identify morphologic differences between growing and stable aneurysms in a longitudinal study of 93 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:500–06 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5531 pmid:29371255

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Ramachandran M,
    3. Raghavan ML

    . On the Role of Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology in Stable versus Unstable Lesions. Iowa City: University of Iowa; 2012
15. 15.↵
    2. Backes D,
    3. Rinkel GJ,
    4. Laban KG, et al

    . Patient- and aneurysm-specific risk factors for intracranial aneurysm growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2016;47:951–57 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012162 pmid:26906920

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Chung BJ,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Identification of hostile hemodynamics and geometries of cerebral aneurysms: a case-control study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1860–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5764 pmid:30166431

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Sforza DM,
    3. Kono K,
    4. Tateshima S, et al

    . Hemodynamics in growing and stable cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:407–12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011339 pmid:25653228

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Meng H,
    3. Tutino VM,
    4. Xiang J, et al

    . High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1254–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3558 pmid:23598838

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Fan J,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Liu J, et al

    . Morphological-hemodynamic characteristics of intracranial bifurcation mirror aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2015;84:114–120.e2 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.038 pmid:25753233

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Doddasomayajula R,
    3. Chung BJ,
    4. Mut F, et al

    . Hemodynamic characteristics of ruptured and unruptured multiple aneurysms at mirror and ipsilateral locations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2301–07 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5397 pmid:28982787

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/5/005 pmid:18460763

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Murray CD

    . The physiological principle of minimum work, I: the vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1926;12:207–14 doi:10.1073/pnas.12.3.207 pmid:16576980

    FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro M,
    4. Burgess JE, et al

    . Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59 pmid:16286400

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Sforza D, et al

    . Clinical application of image-based CFD for cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2011;27:977–92 doi:10.1002/cnm.1373 pmid:21822465

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Raghavan ML,
    3. Ma B,
    4. Harbaugh RE

    . Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 pmid:15739566

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Ma B,
    3. Harbaugh RE,
    4. Raghavan ML

    . Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:264–73 doi:10.1023/B:ABME.0000012746.31343.92 pmid:15008374

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. Chien A, et al

    . Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2011;27:822–39 doi:10.1002/cnm.1424 pmid:21643491

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Jou LD,
    3. Mawad ME

    . Growth rate and rupture rate of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a population approach. Biomed Eng Online 2009;8:1–9 doi:10.1186/1475-925X-8-11 pmid:19534830

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Koffijberg H,
    3. Buskens E,
    4. Algra A, et al

    . Growth rates of intracranial aneurysms: exploring constancy. J Neurosurg 2008;109:176–85 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/109/8/0176 pmid:18671627

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Tremmel M,
    3. Dhar S,
    4. Levy EI, et al

    . Influence of intracranial aneurysm-to-parent vessel size ratio on hemodynamics and implication for rupture: results from a virtual experimental study. Neurosurgery 2009;64:622–30; discussion 630–31 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000341529.11231.69 pmid:19349824

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Tabachnick BG,
    3. Fidell LS

    . Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New York: Pearson; 2013
32. 32.↵
    2. Varble N,
    3. Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H,
    4. Wang J, et al

    . Differences in morphologic and hemodynamic characteristics for “PHASES-based” intracranial aneurysm locations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2105–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5341 pmid:28912279

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Xu J,
    3. Yu Y,
    4. Wu X, et al

    . Morphological and hemodynamic analysis of mirror posterior communicating artery aneurysms. PLoS One 2013;8:e55413 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055413 pmid:23383184

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Boussel L,
    3. Rayz V,
    4. McCulloch C, et al

    . Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997–3002 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521617 pmid:18688012

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Backes D,
    3. Vergouwen MD,
    4. Groenestege AT, et al

    . PHASES score for prediction of intracranial aneurysm growth. Stroke 2015;46:1221–27 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008198 pmid:25757900

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Marquering HA,
    4. Antiga L, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: the impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:121–28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3179 pmid:22899789

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Behme D,
    3. Amelung N,
    4. Khakzad T, et al

    . How to size intracranial aneurysms: a phantom study of invasive and noninvasive methods. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018: 39:2291–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5866 pmid:30409851

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Lauric A,
    3. Hippelheuser JE,
    4. Malek AM

    . Critical role of angiographic acquisition modality and reconstruction on morphometric and haemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:911–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013677 pmid:29352062

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Millán RD,
    3. Dempere-Marco L,
    4. Pozo JM, et al

    . Morphological characterization of intracranial aneurysms using 3-D moment invariants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:1270–82 doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.901008 pmid:17896598

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Cornelissen BMW,
    3. Schneiders JJ,
    4. Sprengers ME, et al

    . Aneurysmal parent artery-specific inflow conditions for complete and incomplete circle of Willis configurations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:910–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5602 pmid:29599169

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Schneiders JJ,
    4. Potters WV, et al

    . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3901 pmid:24651816

    Abstract/FREE Full Text