Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Differentiate Parotid Neoplasms Using Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Imaging

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Lechner Goyault J,
   3. Riehm S,
   4. Neuville A, et al

   . Interest of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR sequences for the diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. J Neuroradiol 2011;38:77–89 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2009.10.005 pmid:20542568

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Yabuuchi H,
   3. Fukuya T,
   4. Tajima T, et al

   . Salivary gland tumors: diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;226:345–54 doi:10.1148/radiol.2262011486 pmid:12563124

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Valentini V,
   3. Fabiani F,
   4. Perugini M, et al

   . Surgical techniques in the treatment of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: our experience and review of literature. J Craniofac Surg 2001;12:565–68 doi:10.1097/00001665-200111000-00013 pmid:11711824

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Abdel Razek AA,
   3. Samir S,
   4. Ashmalla GA

   . Characterization of parotid tumors with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017;41:131–36 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000486 pmid:27636248

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Yousem DM,
   3. Kraut MA,
   4. Chalian AA

   . Major salivary gland imaging. Radiology 2000;216:19–29 doi:10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl4519 pmid:10887223

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Lam PD,
   3. Kuribayashi A,
   4. Imaizumi A, et al

   . Differentiating benign and malignant salivary gland tumours: diagnostic criteria and the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with high temporal resolution. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140685 doi:10.1259/bjr.20140685 pmid:25791568

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Zaghi S,
   3. Hendizadeh L,
   4. Hung T, et al

   . MRI criteria for the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma: a validation study. Am J Otolaryngol 2014;35:713–18 doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.07.013 pmid:25128908

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Hisatomi M,
   3. Asaumi J,
   4. Yanagi Y, et al

   . Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the salivary gland tumors. Oral Oncol 2007;43:940–47 doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.11.009 pmid:17257881

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Haldar S,
   3. Sinnott JD,
   4. Tekeli KM, et al

   . Biopsy of parotid masses: review of current techniques. World J Radiol 2016;8:501–05 doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.501 pmid:27247715

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Feng L,
    3. Grimm R,
    4. Block KT, et al

    . Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:707–17 doi:10.1002/mrm.24980 pmid:24142845

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Chandarana H,
    3. Feng L,
    4. Block TK, et al

    . Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol 2013;48:10–16 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318271869c pmid:23192165

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Rosenkrantz AB,
    3. Geppert C,
    4. Grimm R, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1365–73 doi:10.1002/jmri.24661 pmid:24833417

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wu X,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Block TK, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:883–89 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11729 pmid:25247956

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bangiyev L,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Block TK, et al

    . Evaluation of the orbit using contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1 weighted gradient echo (Radial-VIBE) sequence. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140863 doi:10.1259/bjr.20140863 pmid:26194589

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Heacock L,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. Heller SL, et al

    . Comparison of conventional DCE-MRI and a novel golden-angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;45:1746–52 doi:10.1002/jmri.25530 pmid:27859874

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Rossi Espagnet MC,
    3. Bangiyev L,
    4. Haber M, et al

    . High-resolution DCE-MRI of the pituitary gland using radial k-space acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1444–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4324 pmid:25953760

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Sen R,
    3. Sen C,
    4. Pack J, et al

    . Role of high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with golden-angle radial sparse parallel reconstruction to identify the normal pituitary gland in patients with macroadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1117–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5244 pmid:28495945

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Clopper CJ,
    3. Pearson ES

    . The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 1934;26:404 doi:10.1093/biomet/26.4.404

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    2. Alibek S,
    3. Zenk J,
    4. Bozzato A, et al

    . The value of dynamic MRI studies in parotid tumors. Acad Radiol 2007;14:701–10 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.03.004 pmid:17502260

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Yabuuchi H,
    3. Matsuo Y,
    4. Kamitani T, et al

    . Parotid gland tumors: can addition of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging improve diagnostic accuracy in characterization? Radiology 2008;249:909–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.2493072045 pmid:18941162

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Barrett T,
    3. Brechbiel M,
    4. Bernardo M, et al

    . MRI of tumor angiogenesis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:235–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.20991 pmid:17623889

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Tao X,
    3. Yang G,
    4. Wang P, et al

    . The value of combining conventional, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the diagnosis of parotid gland tumours. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017:20160434 doi:10.1259/dmfr.20160434 doi:28299943

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    2. Furukawa M,
    3. Parvathaneni U,
    4. Maravilla K, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion imaging of head and neck tumors at 3 Tesla. Head Neck 2013;35:923–29 doi:10.1002/hed.23051 pmid:22887003

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Thomas AA,
    3. Arevalo-Perez J,
    4. Kaley T, et al

    . Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2015;125:183–90 doi:10.1007/s11060-015-1893-z pmid:26275367

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Yuan Y,
    3. Tang W,
    4. Tao X

    . Parotid gland lesions: separate and combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150912 doi:10.1259/bjr.20150912 pmid:26892378

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Gaddikeri S,
    3. Gaddikeri RS,
    4. Tailor T, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in head and neck cancer: techniques and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:588–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4458 pmid:26427839

    Abstract/FREE Full Text