Arterial Spin-Labeling in Children with Brain Tumor: A Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Patel S,
   3. Bhatnagar A,
   4. Wear C, et al

   . Are pediatric brain tumors on the rise in the USA? Significant incidence and survival findings from the SEER database analysis. Childs Nerv Syst 2014;30:147–54 doi:10.1007/s00381-013-2307-1 pmid:24162619

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Spennato P,
   3. Nicosia G,
   4. Quaglietta L, et al

   . Posterior fossa tumors in infants and neonates. Childs Nerv Syst 2015;31:1751–72 doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2783-6 pmid:26351228

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Pallud J,
   3. Capelle L,
   4. Taillandier L, et al

   . Prognostic significance of imaging contrast enhancement for WHO grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2009;11:176–82 doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-066 pmid:18697954

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Hu J,
   3. Wu W,
   4. Zhu B, et al

   . Cerebral glioma grading using Bayesian network with features extracted from multiple modalities of magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153369 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153369 pmid:27077923

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Santarosa C,
   3. Castellano A,
   4. Conte GM, et al

   . Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1147–56 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.020 pmid:27161065

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Young R,
   3. Babb J,
   4. Law M, et al

   . Comparison of region-of-interest analysis with three different histogram analysis methods in the determination of perfusion metrics in patients with brain gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1053–63 doi:10.1002/jmri.21064 pmid:17896374

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Flood TF,
   3. Stence NV,
   4. Maloney JA, et al

   . Pediatric brain: repeated exposure to linear gadolinium-based contrast material is associated with increased signal intensity at unenhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2017;282:222–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160356 pmid:27467467

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. de Fatima Vasco Aragao M,
   3. Law M,
   4. Batista de Almeida D, et al

   . Comparison of perfusion, diffusion, and MR spectroscopy between low-grade enhancing pilocytic astrocytomas and high-grade astrocytomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1495–502 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3905 pmid:24699088

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Alkonyi B,
   3. Nowak J,
   4. Gnekow AK, et al

   . Differential imaging characteristics and dissemination potential of pilomyxoid astrocytomas versus pilocytic astrocytomas. Neuroradiology 2015;57:625–38 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1498-4 pmid:25666233

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Kong L,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Yang Y, et al

    . A meta-analysis of arterial spin labelling perfusion values for the prediction of glioma grade. Clin Radiol 2017;72:255–61 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.016 pmid:27932251

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Zeng Q,
    3. Jiang B,
    4. Shi F, et al

    . 3D pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling imaging in the preoperative evaluation of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1876–83 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5299 pmid:28729293

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Haller S,
    3. Zaharchuk G,
    4. Thomas DL, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling perfusion of the brain: emerging clinical applications. Radiology 2016;281:337–56 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016150789 pmid:27755938

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Warmuth C,
    3. Gunther M,
    4. Zimmer C

    . Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;228:523–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.2282020409 pmid:12819338

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Chawla S,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Wolf RL, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeling and MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1683–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0673 pmid:17893221

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Kim SY

    . A prospective study on the added value of pulsed arterial spin-labeling and apparent diffusion coefficients in the grading of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1693–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0674 pmid:17885229

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Noguchi T,
    3. Yoshiura T,
    4. Hiwatashi A, et al

    . Perfusion imaging of brain tumors using arterial spin-labeling: correlation with histopathologic vascular density. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:688–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0903 pmid:18184842

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Dangouloff-Ros V,
    3. Deroulers C,
    4. Foissac F, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling to predict brain tumor grading in children: correlations between histopathologic vascular density and perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2016;281:553–66 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152228 pmid:27257950

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Gevers S,
    3. van Osch MJ,
    4. Bokkers RP, et al

    . Intra- and multicenter reproducibility of pulsed, continuous and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling methods for measuring cerebral perfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1706–15 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.10 pmid:21304555

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Leeflang MM,
    3. Deeks JJ,
    4. Takwoingi Y, et al

    . Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews. Syst Rev 2013;2:82 doi:10.1186/2046-4053-2-82 pmid:24099098

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Moher D,
    3. Liberati A,
    4. Tetzlaff J, et al

    ; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;1;6:e1000097 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 pmid:19621072

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. McGrath TA,
    3. Alabousi M,
    4. Skidmore B, et al

    . Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017;6:194 doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0590-8 pmid:29017574

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Whiting PF,
    3. Rutjes AW,
    4. Westwood ME, et al

    ; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529–36 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 pmid:22007046

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    Review. Version RevMan 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014. http://community.cochrane.org/help/tools-and-software/revman-5/revman-5-download. Accessed 2 May 2017
24. 24.↵
    2. Doebler P,
    3. Holling H

    . Meta-Analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with mada. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mada/vignettes/mada.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2016
25. 25.↵
    R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed: 19 April 2017
26. 26.↵
    2. Robin X,
    3. Turck N,
    4. Hainard A, et al

    . pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:77 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 pmid:21414208

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Dangouloff-Ros V,
    3. Grevent D,
    4. Pagès M, et al

    . Choroid plexus neoplasms: toward a distinction between carcinoma and papilloma using arterial spin-labeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1786–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4332 pmid:26021621

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Hales PW,
    3. Phipps KP,
    4. Kaur R, et al

    . A two-stage model for in vivo assessment of brain tumor perfusion and abnormal vascular structure using arterial spin labeling. PLoS One 2013;8:e75717 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075717 pmid:24098395

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Liu HL,
    3. Chang TT,
    4. Yan FX, et al

    . Assessment of vessel permeability by combining dynamic contrast-enhanced and arterial spin labeling MRI. NMR Biomed 2015;28:642–49 doi:10.1002/nbm.3297 pmid:25880892

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Morana G,
    3. Piccardo A,
    4. Tortora D, et al

    . Grading and outcome prediction of pediatric diffuse astrocytic tumors with diffusion and arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in comparison with 18F-DOPA PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:2084–93 doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3777-2 pmid:28752225

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Vidyasagar R,
    3. Abernethy L,
    4. Pizer B, et al

    . Quantitative measurement of blood flow in paediatric brain tumours: a comparative study of dynamic susceptibility contrast and multi time-point arterial spin labelled MRI. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150624 doi:10.1259/bjr.20150624 pmid:26975495

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Yeom KW,
    3. Mitchell LA,
    4. Lober RM, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:395–401 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3670 pmid:23907239

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Kikuchi K,
    3. Hiwatashi A,
    4. Togao O, et al

    . Correlation between arterial spin-labeling perfusion and histopathological vascular density of pediatric intracranial tumors. J Neurooncol 2017;135:561–69 doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2604-8 pmid:28856499

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Louis DN,
    3. Perry A,
    4. Reifenberger G, et al

    . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Dallery F,
    3. Bouzerar R,
    4. Michel D, et al

    . Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1143–53 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1917-9 pmid:28861622

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Detre JA

    . Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1236–49 doi:10.1097/00004647-199611000-00019 pmid:8898697

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Detre JA

    . Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998;208:410–16 doi:10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680569 pmid:9680569

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Alsop DC

    . Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling: methods and clinical applications in the central nervous system. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:115–24 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00050-9 pmid:10401592

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Roberts DA, et al

    . Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed 1994;7:75–82 doi:10.1002/nbm.1940070112 pmid:8068529

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Silva AC,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Williams DS, et al

    . Multi-slice MRI of rat brain perfusion during amphetamine stimulation using arterial spin labeling. Magn Reason Med 1995;33:209–14 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330210 pmid:7707911

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Williams DS,
    3. Detre JA,
    4. Leigh JS, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:212–16 doi:10.1073/pnas.89.1.212 pmid:1729691

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Spann SM,
    3. Kazimierski KS,
    4. Aigner CS, et al

    . Spatio-temporal TGV denoising for ASL perfusion imaging. Neuroimage 2017;157:81–96 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.054 pmid:28559192

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Wang DJ,
    4. Detre JA

    . Test-retest reliability of arterial spin labeling with common labeling strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:940–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.22345 pmid:21448961

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Venkatraghavan L,
    3. Poublanc J,
    4. Bharadwaj S, et al

    . Noninvasive measurement of cerebral blood flow under anesthesia using arterial spin labeling MRI: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2016;28:331–36 doi:10.1097/ANA.0000000000000231 pmid:26397237

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Ibaraki M,
    3. Shinohara Y,
    4. Nakamura K, et al

    . Interindividual variations of cerebral blood flow, oxygen delivery, and metabolism in relation to hemoglobin concentration measured by positron emission tomography in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30:1296–305 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.13 pmid:20160738

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Henriksen OM,
    3. Kruuse C,
    4. Olesen J, et al

    . Sources of variability of resting cerebral blood flow in healthy subjects: a study using ¹³³Xe SPECT measurements. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33:787–92 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.17 pmid:23403374

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Xu F,
    3. Li W,
    4. Liu P, et al

    . Accounting for the role of hematocrit in between-subject variations of MRI-derived baseline cerebral hemodynamic parameters and functional BOLD responses. Hum Brain Mapp 2018;39:344–53 doi:10.1002/hbm.23846 pmid:29024300

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Detre JA,
    4. Golay X, et al

    . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Wu B,
    3. Lou X,
    4. Wu X, et al

    . Intra- and interscanner reliability and reproducibility of 3D whole-brain pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeling MR perfusion at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:402–09 doi:10.1002/jmri.24175 pmid:23723043

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    2. Kilroy E,
    3. Apostolova L,
    4. Liu C, et al

    . Reliability of two-dimensional and three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in elderly populations: comparison with 15O-water positron emission tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:931–39 doi:10.1002/jmri.24246 pmid:24038544

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    2. van Westen D,
    3. Petersen ET,
    4. Wirestam R, et al

    . Correlation between arterial blood volume obtained by arterial spin labelling and cerebral blood volume in intracranial tumours. MAGMA 2011;24:211–23 doi:10.1007/s10334-011-0255-x pmid:21594585

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    2. Bibic A,
    3. Knutsson L,
    4. Schmidt A, et al

    . Measurement of vascular water transport in human subjects using time-resolved pulsed arterial spin labelling. NMR Biomed 2015;28:1059–68 doi:10.1002/nbm.3344 pmid:26147641

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    2. Hales PW,
    3. Clark CA

    . Combined arterial spin labeling and diffusion-weighted imaging for noninvasive estimation of capillary volume fraction and permeability-surface product in the human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33:67–75 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.125 pmid:22990418

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Fernández-Seara MA,
    4. Wang S, et al

    . When perfusion meets diffusion: in vivo measurement of water permeability in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:839–49 doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600398 pmid:16969383

    CrossRefPubMed