Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention
Open Access

Generalized versus Patient-Specific Inflow Boundary Conditions in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Cerebral Aneurysmal Hemodynamics

I.G.H. Jansen, J.J. Schneiders, W.V. Potters, P. van Ooij, R. van den Berg, E. van Bavel, H.A. Marquering and C.B.L.M. Majoie
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3901
I.G.H. Jansen
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.J. Schneiders
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.V. Potters
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. van Ooij
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. van den Berg
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. van Bavel
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.A. Marquering
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.B.L.M. Majoie
From the Departments of Radiology (I.G.H.J., J.J.S., W.V.P., R.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.) and Biomedical Engineering and Physics (E.T.B., H.A.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (P.O.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Attempts have been made to associate intracranial aneurysmal hemodynamics with aneurysm growth and rupture status. Hemodynamics in aneurysms is traditionally determined with computational fluid dynamics by using generalized inflow boundary conditions in a parent artery. Recently, patient-specific inflow boundary conditions are being implemented more frequently. Our purpose was to compare intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics based on generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 36 patients, geometric models of aneurysms were determined by using 3D rotational angiography. 2D phase-contrast MR imaging velocity measurements of the parent artery were performed. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed twice: once by using patient-specific phase-contrast MR imaging velocity profiles and once by using generalized Womersley profiles as inflow boundary conditions. Resulting mean and maximum wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index values were analyzed, and hemodynamic characteristics were qualitatively compared.

RESULTS: Quantitative analysis showed statistically significant differences for mean and maximum wall shear stress values between both inflow boundary conditions (P < .001). Qualitative assessment of hemodynamic characteristics showed differences in 21 cases: high wall shear stress location (n = 8), deflection location (n = 3), lobulation wall shear stress (n = 12), and/or vortex and inflow jet stability (n = 9). The latter showed more instability for the generalized inflow boundary conditions in 7 of 9 patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Using generalized and patient-specific inflow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics results in different wall shear stress magnitudes and hemodynamic characteristics. Generalized inflow boundary conditions result in more vortices and inflow jet instabilities. This study emphasizes the necessity of patient-specific inflow boundary conditions for calculation of hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms by using computational fluid dynamics techniques.

Abbreviations

CFD
computational fluid dynamics
PC-MR imaging
2D phase-contrast MR imaging
WSS
wall shear stress

Footnotes

  • H.A. Marquering and C.B.L.M. Majoie shared senior authorship of this article.

  • © 2014 American Society of Neuroradiology

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

Next
Back to top
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Generalized versus Patient-Specific Inflow Boundary Conditions in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Cerebral Aneurysmal Hemodynamics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
I.G.H. Jansen, J.J. Schneiders, W.V. Potters, P. van Ooij, R. van den Berg, E. van Bavel, H.A. Marquering, C.B.L.M. Majoie
Generalized versus Patient-Specific Inflow Boundary Conditions in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Cerebral Aneurysmal Hemodynamics
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2014, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3901

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Generalized versus Patient-Specific Inflow Boundary Conditions in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Cerebral Aneurysmal Hemodynamics
I.G.H. Jansen, J.J. Schneiders, W.V. Potters, P. van Ooij, R. van den Berg, E. van Bavel, H.A. Marquering, C.B.L.M. Majoie
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2014, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3901
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A practical strategy for data assimilation of cerebral intra-aneurysmal flows using a variational method with boundary control of velocity
  • Evaluation of aneurysm rupture risk based upon flowrate-independent hemodynamic parameters: a multi-center pilot study
  • Evaluation of aneurysm rupture risk based upon flowrate-independent hemodynamic parameters: a multi-center pilot study
  • How patient-specific do internal carotid artery inflow rates need to be for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms?
  • A Hemodynamic Mechanism Correlating with the Initiation of MCA Bifurcation Aneurysms
  • Comparing Morphology and Hemodynamics of Stable-versus-Growing and Grown Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery
  • Quantification of hemodynamic irregularity using oscillatory velocity index in the associations with the rupture status of cerebral aneurysms
  • Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment
  • Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD
  • Towards the Clinical utility of CFD for assessment of intracranial aneurysm rupture - a systematic review and novel parameter-ranking tool
  • Aneurysmal Parent Artery-Specific Inflow Conditions for Complete and Incomplete Circle of Willis Configurations
  • Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations
  • Regarding "Differences in Hemodynamics and Rupture Rate of Aneurysms at the Bifurcation of the Basilar and Internal Carotid Arteries"
  • Inflow Jet Patterns of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Based on the Flow Velocity in the Parent Artery: Evaluation Using 4D Flow MRI
  • Additional Value of Intra-Aneurysmal Hemodynamics in Discriminating Ruptured versus Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Hemodynamic Differences in Intracranial Aneurysms before and after Rupture
  • The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase I: Prediction of Rupture Status in Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Toward Improving Fidelity of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations: Boundary Conditions Matter
  • Crossref (71)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging
    Krishna S. Nayak, Jon-Fredrik Nielsen, Matt A. Bernstein, Michael Markl, Peter D. Gatehouse, Rene M. Botnar, David Saloner, Christine Lorenz, Han Wen, Bob S. Hu, Frederick H. Epstein, John N. Oshinski, Subha V. Raman
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2015 17 1
  • The biophysical role of hemodynamics in the pathogenesis of cerebral aneurysm formation and rupture
    Sauson Soldozy, Pedro Norat, Mazin Elsarrag, Ajay Chatrath, John S. Costello, Jennifer D. Sokolowski, Petr Tvrdik, M. Yashar S. Kalani, Min S. Park
    Neurosurgical Focus 2019 47 1
  • Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge
    Kristian Valen-Sendstad, Aslak W. Bergersen, Yuji Shimogonya, Leonid Goubergrits, Jan Bruening, Jordi Pallares, Salvatore Cito, Senol Piskin, Kerem Pekkan, Arjan J. Geers, Ignacio Larrabide, Saikiran Rapaka, Viorel Mihalef, Wenyu Fu, Aike Qiao, Kartik Jain, Sabine Roller, Kent-Andre Mardal, Ramji Kamakoti, Thomas Spirka, Neil Ashton, Alistair Revell, Nicolas Aristokleous, J. Graeme Houston, Masanori Tsuji, Fujimaro Ishida, Prahlad G. Menon, Leonard D. Browne, Stephen Broderick, Masaaki Shojima, Satoshi Koizumi, Michael Barbour, Alberto Aliseda, Hernán G. Morales, Thierry Lefèvre, Simona Hodis, Yahia M. Al-Smadi, Justin S. Tran, Alison L. Marsden, Sreeja Vaippummadhom, G. Albert Einstein, Alistair G. Brown, Kristian Debus, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Sherif Rashad, Shin-ichiro Sugiyama, M. Owais Khan, Adam R. Updegrove, Shawn C. Shadden, Bart M. W. Cornelissen, Charles B. L. M. Majoie, Philipp Berg, Sylvia Saalfield, Kenichi Kono, David A. Steinman
    Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology 2018 9 4
  • Reproducibility and interobserver variability of systolic blood flow velocity and 3D wall shear stress derived from 4D flow MRI in the healthy aorta
    Pim van Ooij, Alexander L. Powell, Wouter V. Potters, James C. Carr, Michael Markl, and Alex J. Barker
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2016 43 1
  • Super-resolution and denoising of 4D-Flow MRI using physics-Informed deep neural nets
    Mojtaba F. Fathi, Isaac Perez-Raya, Ahmadreza Baghaie, Philipp Berg, Gabor Janiga, Amirhossein Arzani, Roshan M. D’Souza
    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2020 197
  • Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations
    C. Chnafa, O. Brina, V.M. Pereira, D.A. Steinman
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 2
  • Towards the Clinical utility of CFD for assessment of intracranial aneurysm rupture – a systematic review and novel parameter-ranking tool
    Li Liang, David A Steinman, Olivier Brina, Christophe Chnafa, Nicole M Cancelliere, Vitor M Pereira
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2019 11 2
  • The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013—Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms
    Philipp Berg, Christoph Roloff, Oliver Beuing, Samuel Voss, Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama, Nicolas Aristokleous, Andreas S. Anayiotos, Neil Ashton, Alistair Revell, Neil W. Bressloff, Alistair G. Brown, Bong Jae Chung, Juan R. Cebral, Gabriele Copelli, Wenyu Fu, Aike Qiao, Arjan J. Geers, Simona Hodis, Dan Dragomir-Daescu, Emily Nordahl, Yildirim Bora Suzen, Muhammad Owais Khan, Kristian Valen-Sendstad, Kenichi Kono, Prahlad G. Menon, Priti G. Albal, Otto Mierka, Raphael Münster, Hernán G. Morales, Odile Bonnefous, Jan Osman, Leonid Goubergrits, Jordi Pallares, Salvatore Cito, Alberto Passalacqua, Senol Piskin, Kerem Pekkan, Susana Ramalho, Nelson Marques, Stéphane Sanchi, Kristopher R. Schumacher, Jess Sturgeon, Helena Švihlová, Jaroslav Hron, Gabriel Usera, Mariana Mendina, Jianping Xiang, Hui Meng, David A. Steinman, Gábor Janiga
    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2015 137 12
  • Prediction of rupture risk in anterior communicating artery aneurysms with a feed-forward artificial neural network
    Jinjin Liu, Yongchun Chen, Li Lan, Boli Lin, Weijian Chen, Meihao Wang, Rui Li, Yunjun Yang, Bing Zhao, Zilong Hu, Yuxia Duan
    European Radiology 2018 28 8
  • The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013—Phase I: Prediction of Rupture Status in Intracranial Aneurysms
    G. Janiga, P. Berg, S. Sugiyama, K. Kono, D.A. Steinman
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015 36 3

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Guided vs Conventional Angiography Systems
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire