Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleORIGINAL RESEARCH

Diagnostic performance of fast brain MRI compared to routine clinical MRI in patients with glioma grade 3 and 4 -a pilot study

Francesca De Luca, Annika Suneson, Annika Kits, Emilia Palmér, Stefan Skare and Anna Falk Delgado
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2024, ajnr.A8558; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8558
Francesca De Luca
From the Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL); Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (AS, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (EP); Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (EP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Suneson
From the Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL); Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (AS, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (EP); Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (EP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Kits
From the Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL); Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (AS, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (EP); Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (EP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilia Palmér
From the Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL); Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (AS, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (EP); Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (EP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Skare
From the Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL); Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (AS, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (EP); Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (EP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Falk Delgado
From the Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL); Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (AS, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (EP); Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (FDL, AK, SS, AFD); Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (EP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: EPIMix is a fast brain MRI technique not previously investigated in patients with glioma grades 3 and 4. This pilot study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of EPIMix in the radiological treatment evaluation of adult patients with glioma grades 3 and 4 compared to routine clinical MRI (rcMRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with glioma grades 3 and 4 investigated with rcMRI and EPIMix were retrospectively included in the study. Three readers (R1–3) participated in the radiological assessment applying Response Assessment for Neuro-oncology Criteria (RANO 2.0), of which two (R1–2) independently evaluated EPIMix and later rcMRI by measuring contrast-enhancing and non-contrastenhancing tumor regions at each follow-up. For cases with discrepant evaluations, an unblinded side-by-side (EPIMix and rcMRI) reading was performed together with a third reader (R3). Comparisons between methods (EPIMix vs. rcMRI) were performed using Weighted Cohen’s kappa. The sensitivity and specificity to detect tumor progression (PD) on a follow-up scan were calculated for EPIMix compared to rcMRI with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS: In 35 patients (mean age 53, 31% females), a total of 93 MRIs encompassing 58 follow-up investigations showed PD at blinded reading in 33% of EPIMix (19/58, R1–2), while in 31% (18/58 exams, R1), and 34% (20/58 exams, R2) of rcMRI. An almost perfect agreement for tumor category assessment was found between EPIMix and rcMRI (EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1 ϰ= 0.96; EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2 ϰ= 0.89). The sensitivity for EPIMix to detect PD was 1.00 (0.81–1.00) for R1 and 0.90 (0.68–0.99) for R2, while the specificity was 0.97 (0.86–1.00) for R1–2. The AUC for PD was 0.99 for R1 (EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1) and 0.94 for R2 (EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2), DeLong’s test AUCR1 vs. AUCR2 p=0.20 (R1–2).

CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, EPIMix was used as a fast MRI alternative for treatment evaluation of patients with glioma grades 3 and 4, with high, but slightly lower diagnostic performance than rcMRI.

ABBREVIATIONS: CR = complete response; EPIMix = multi-contrast echo-planar imaging-based technique; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; RANO = response assessment in neuro-oncology; R1 = reader 1; R2 = reader 2; R3 = reader 3; rcMRI = routine clinical MRI; SD = stable disease.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.

  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic performance of fast brain MRI compared to routine clinical MRI in patients with glioma grade 3 and 4 -a pilot study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Accepted Manuscript
Francesca De Luca, Annika Suneson, Annika Kits, Emilia Palmér, Stefan Skare, Anna Falk Delgado
Diagnostic performance of fast brain MRI compared to routine clinical MRI in patients with glioma grade 3 and 4 -a pilot study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2024, ajnr.A8558; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8558

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Accepted Manuscript
Diagnostic performance of fast brain MRI compared to routine clinical MRI in patients with glioma grade 3 and 4 -a pilot study
Francesca De Luca, Annika Suneson, Annika Kits, Emilia Palmér, Stefan Skare, Anna Falk Delgado
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2024, ajnr.A8558; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8558
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Direct Localization of the VIM/DRTT Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Essential Tremor: A Pilot MRI Study
  • Digital FDG-PET detects MYD88 mutation-driven glycolysis in primary central nervous system lymphoma
  • Postnatal Development of the Vestibular Aqueduct Trajectory on CT: Establishing Age-Specific Norms to Distinguish Normal from Arrested (Hypoplastic) Development
Show more ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire