Diagnostic Performance of Fast Brain MRI Compared with Routine Clinical MRI in Patients with Glioma Grades 3 and 4: A Pilot Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Louis DN,
   2. Perry A,
   3. Wesseling P, et al

   . The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1231–51 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab106 pmid:34185076

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Miller KD,
   2. Ostrom QT,
   3. Kruchko C, et al

   . Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:381–406 doi:10.3322/caac.21693 pmid:34427324

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Weller M,
   2. van den Bent M,
   3. Preusser M, et al

   . EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021;18:170–86 doi:10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z pmid:33293629

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Ellingson BM,
   2. Wen PY,
   3. Cloughesy TF

   . Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics 2017;14:307–20 doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6 pmid:28108885

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Ellingson BM,
   2. Bendszus M,
   3. Boxerman J, et al

   ; Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition Imaging Standardization Steering Committee. Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:1188–98 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov095 pmid:26250565

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Thust SC,
   2. Heiland S,
   3. Falini A, et al

   . Glioma imaging in Europe: a survey of 220 centres and recommendations for best clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2018;28:3306–17 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5314-5 pmid:29536240

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Skare S,
   2. Sprenger T,
   3. Norbeck O, et al

   . A 1-minute full brain MR exam using a multicontrast EPI sequence. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:3045–54 doi:10.1002/mrm.26974 pmid:29090483

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. McGivney DF,
   2. Boyacıoğlu R,
   3. Jiang Y, et al

   . Magnetic resonance fingerprinting review part 2: technique and directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;51:993–1007 doi:10.1002/jmri.26877

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Tanenbaum LN,
   2. Tsiouris AJ,
   3. Johnson AN, et al

   . Synthetic MRI for clinical neuroimaging: results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1103–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5227 pmid:28450439

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Delgado AF,
    2. Kits A,
    3. Bystam J, et al

    . Diagnostic performance of a new multicontrast one-minute full brain exam (EPIMix) in neuroradiology: a prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:1824–33 doi:10.1002/jmri.26742

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kits A,
    2. De Luca F,
    3. Kolloch J, et al

    . One-minute multi-contrast echo planar brain MRI in ischemic stroke: a retrospective observational study of diagnostic performance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;54:1088–95 doi:10.1002/jmri.27641

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Af Burén S,
    2. Kits A,
    3. Lönn L, et al

    . A 78 second complete brain MRI examination in ischemic stroke: a prospective cohort study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;56:884–92 doi:10.1002/jmri.28107 pmid:35170134

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. De Luca F,
    2. Kits A,
    3. Martin Muñoz D, et al

    . Elective one-minute full brain multi-contrast MRI versus brain CT in pediatric patients: a prospective feasibility study. BMC Med Imaging 2024;24:23 doi:10.1186/s12880-024-01196-6 pmid:38267889

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Bossuyt PM,
    2. Reitsma JB,
    3. Bruns DE

    ; STARD Group, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2015;277:826–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151516 pmid:26509226

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wen PY,
    2. van den Bent M,
    3. Youssef G, et al

    . RANO 2.0: update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas in adults. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:5187–99 doi:10.1200/JCO.23.01059 pmid:37774317

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Magnotta VA,
    2. Friedman L

    , FIRST BIRN. Measurement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise in the FBIRN multicenter imaging study. J Digit Imaging 2006;19:140–47 doi:10.1007/s10278-006-0264-x pmid:16598643

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. McNemar Q

    . Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947;12:153–57 doi:10.1007/BF02295996] pmid:20254758

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Maxwell AE

    . Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges. Br J Psychiatry 1970;116:651–55 doi:10.1192/bjp.116.535.651 pmid:5452368

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Hanley JA,
    2. McNeil BJ

    . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36 doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 pmid:7063747

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. DeLong ER,
    2. DeLong DM,
    3. Clarke-Pearson DL

    . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 pmid:3203132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Rosner B,
    2. Glynn RJ,
    3. Lee ML

    . The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics 2006;62:185–92 doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00389.x pmid:16542245

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Reifenberger G, et al

    . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Prakkamakul S,
    2. Witzel T,
    3. Huang S, et al

    . Ultrafast brain MRI: clinical deployment and comparison to conventional brain MRI at 3T. J Neuroimaging 2016;26:503–10 doi:10.1111/jon.12365 pmid:27273370

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Dhunnoo G,
    2. Mukhopadhyay D

    . Evaluation of the impact of limited-sequence MRI brain protocol (fast brain MRI) on diagnostic accuracy and length of hospital stay for patients with stroke-like symptoms. Clin Med (Lond) 2020;20:s78–79 doi:10.7861/clinmed.20-2-s78 pmid:32409392

    FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Jaimes C,
    2. Yang E,
    3. Connaughton P, et al

    . Diagnostic equivalency of fast T2 and FLAIR sequences for pediatric brain MRI: a pilot study. Pediatr Radiol 2020;50:550–59 doi:10.1007/s00247-019-04584-1 pmid:31863192

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Lindberg DM,
    2. Stence NV,
    3. Grubenhoff JA, et al

    . Feasibility and accuracy of fast MRI versus CT for traumatic brain injury in young children. Pediatrics 2019;144:e20190419 doi:10.1542/peds.2019-0419 pmid:31533974

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Loução R,
    2. Oros-Peusquens AM,
    3. Langen KJ, et al

    . A fast protocol for multiparametric characterisation of diffusion in the brain and brain tumours. Front Oncol 2021;11:554205 doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.554205 pmid:34621664

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Obuchowski NA,
    2. Bullen J

    . Multireader diagnostic accuracy imaging studies: fundamentals of design and analysis. Radiology 2022;303:26–34 doi:10.1148/radiol.211593 pmid:35166584

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Andersen BM,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Hatzoglou V, et al

    . Leptomeningeal metastases in glioma: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. Neurology 2019;92:e2483–91 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007529 pmid:31019097

    Abstract/FREE Full Text