Empowering Data Sharing in Neuroscience: A Deep Learning Deidentification Method for Pediatric Brain MRIs

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Chen RJ,
   2. Wang JJ,
   3. Williamson DFK, et al

   . Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2023;7:719–42 doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8 pmid:37380750

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Wilkinson MD,
   2. Dumontier M,
   3. Aalbersberg IJ, et al

   . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016;3:160018 doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 pmid:26978244

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Mueller SG,
   2. Weiner MW,
   3. Thal LJ, et al

   . Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Alzheimers Dement 2005;1:55–66 doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2005.06.003 pmid:17476317

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Prior FW,
   2. Clark K,
   3. Commean P, et al

   . TCIA: an information resource to enable open science. In: 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2013:1282–85 doi:10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609742 pmid:24109929

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Aberle DR,
   2. Adams AM,
   3. Berg CD, et al

   ; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395–409 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 pmid:21714641

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Buda M,
   2. Saha A,
   3. Walsh R, et al

   . A data set and deep learning algorithm for the detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis images. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2119100 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19100 pmid:34398205

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Schwarz CG,
   2. Kremers WK,
   3. Therneau TM, et al

   . Identification of anonymous MRI research participants with face-recognition software. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1684–86 doi:10.1056/NEJMc1908881 pmid:31644852

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Mazura JC,
   2. Juluru K,
   3. Chen JJ, et al

   . Facial recognition software success rates for the identification of 3D surface reconstructed facial images: implications for patient privacy and security. J Digit Imaging 2012;25:347–51 doi:10.1007/s10278-011-9429-3 pmid:22065158

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Abramian D,
   2. Eklund A

   . Refacing: Reconstructing Anonymized Facial Features Using GANS. In: 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). IEEE; 2019:1104–08 doi:10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759515

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Bischoff‐Grethe A,
    2. Ozyurt IB,
    3. Busa E, et al

    . A technique for the deidentification of structural brain MR images. Hum Brain Mapp 2007;28:892–903 doi:10.1002/hbm.20312 pmid:17295313

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Gulban OF,
    2. Nielson D,
    3. Poldrack R, et al

    . poldracklab/pydeface: v2. 0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/105281/zenodo. 2019;3524401
12. 12.↵
    1. Alfaro-Almagro F,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Bangerter NK, et al

    . Image processing and quality control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK biobank. NeuroImage 2018;166:400–24 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.034 pmid:29079522

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Khazane A,
    2. Hoachuck J,
    3. Gorgolewski KJ, et al

    . DeepDefacer: automatic removal of facial features via U-Net image segmentation. arXiv.org 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15536. Accessed January 26, 2024.
14. 14.↵
    1. Milchenko M,
    2. Marcus D

    . Obscuring surface anatomy in volumetric imaging data. Neuroinform 2013;11:65–75 doi:10.1007/s12021-012-9160-3 pmid:22968671

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. de Sitter A,
    2. Visser M,
    3. Brouwer I, et al

    ; MAGNIMS Study Group and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods. Eur Radiol 2020;30:1062–74 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06459-3 pmid:31691120

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Rubbert C,
    2. Wolf L,
    3. Turowski B, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Impact of defacing on automated brain atrophy estimation. Insights Imaging 2022;13:54 doi:10.1186/s13244-022-01195-7 pmid:35348936

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Theyers AE,
    2. Zamyadi M,
    3. O’Reilly M, et al

    . Multisite comparison of MRI defacing software across multiple cohorts. Front Psychiatry 2021;12:617997 doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.617997 pmid:33716819

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Buimer EEL,
    2. Schnack HG,
    3. Caspi Y, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. De-identification procedures for magnetic resonance images and the impact on structural brain measures at different ages. Hum Brain Mapp 2021;42:3643–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.25459 pmid:33973694

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Familiar AM,
    2. Kazerooni AF,
    3. Anderson H, et al

    . A multi-institutional pediatric data set of clinical radiology MRIs by the Children’s Brain Tumor Network. arXiv.org 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01413. October 15, 2024
20. 20.↵
    1. Schabdach JM,
    2. Schmitt JE,
    3. Sotardi S, et al

    . Brain growth charts of “clinical controls” for quantitative analysis of clinically acquired brain MRI. Radiology 2023;309:e230096

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lilly JV,
    2. Rokita JL,
    3. Mason JL, et al

    . The Children’s Brain Tumor Network (CBTN) - Accelerating research in pediatric central nervous system tumors through collaboration and open science. Neoplasia 2023;35:100846 doi:10.1016/j.neo.2022.100846 pmid:36335802

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    MiDeFace. Free Surfer Wiki. Accessed March 17, 2023. https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MiDeFace#Notes
23. 23.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Pashchinskiy A,
    3. Oguz I, et al

    . User-guided segmentation of multi-modality medical imaging datasets with ITK-SNAP. Neuroinform 2019;17:83–102 doi:10.1007/s12021-018-9385-x pmid:29946897

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Zapaishchykova A,
    2. Liu KX,
    3. Saraf A, et al

    . Automated temporalis muscle quantification and growth charts for children through adulthood. Nat Commun 2023;14:6863 doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42501-1 pmid:37945573

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Isensee F,
    2. Jaeger PF,
    3. Kohl SAA, et al

    . nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 2021;18:203–11 doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z pmid:33288961

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Rohlfing T,
    2. Zahr NM,
    3. Sullivan EV, et al

    . The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31:798–819 doi:10.1002/hbm.20906 pmid:20017133

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Pluta J,
    3. Wang H, et al

    . Fast automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal lobe subregions in 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla T2‐weighted MRI. Alzheimers Dement 2016;12:P126–27
28. 28.↵
    1. Crimi A,
    2. Bakas S

    1. Pati S,
    2. Singh A,
    3. Rathore S, et al

    . The Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (CaPTk): technical overview. In: Crimi A, Bakas S, eds. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2020:380–94 doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46643-5_38 pmid:32754723

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Fathi Kazerooni A,
    2. Arif S,
    3. Madhogarhia R, et al

    . Automated tumor segmentation and brain tissue extraction from multiparametric MRI of pediatric brain tumors: a multi-institutional study. Neurooncol Adv 2023;5:vdad027 doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdad027 pmid:37051331

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Vossough A,
    2. Khalili N,
    3. Familiar AM, et al

    . Training and comparison of nnU-Net and DeepMedic methods for autosegmentation of pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:1081–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8293 pmid:38724204

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Fischl B

    . FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012;62:774–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 pmid:22248573

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Tejani AS,
    2. Klontzas ME,
    3. Gatti AA, et al

    ; CLAIM 2024 Update Panel. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 update. Radiol Artif Intell 2024;6:e240300 doi:10.1148/ryai.240300 pmid:38809149

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Mongan J,
    2. Moy L,
    3. Charles E Kahn J

    . Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): a Guide for Authors and Reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell 2020;2:e200029 doi:10.1148/ryai.2020200029 pmid:33937821

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Pham N,
    2. Hill V,
    3. Rauschecker A, et al

    . Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence–enabled imaging tools using the levels of evidence system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:E21–28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7850 pmid:37080722

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Lee B,
    2. Bae YJ,
    3. Jeong WJ, et al

    . Temporalis muscle thickness as an indicator of sarcopenia predicts progression-free survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021;11:19717 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99201-3 pmid:34611230

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Cho J,
    2. Park M,
    3. Moon WJ, et al

    . Sarcopenia in patients with dementia: correlation of temporalis muscle thickness with appendicular muscle mass. Neurol Sci 2022;43:3089–95 doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05728-8 pmid:34846582

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Muglia R,
    2. Simonelli M,
    3. Pessina F, et al

    . Prognostic relevance of temporal muscle thickness as a marker of sarcopenia in patients with glioblastoma at diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2021;31:4079–86 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07471-8 pmid:33201284

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Nozoe M,
    2. Kubo H,
    3. Kanai M, et al

    . Reliability and validity of measuring temporal muscle thickness as the evaluation of sarcopenia risk and the relationship with functional outcome in older patients with acute stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021;201:106444 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106444 pmid:33395619

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Schwarz CG,
    2. Kremers WK,
    3. Wiste HJ, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Changing the face of neuroimaging research: comparing a new MRI de-facing technique with popular alternatives. NeuroImage 2021;231:117845 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117845 pmid:33582276

    CrossRefPubMed