Hyperperfusion and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption beyond the Diffusion-Restricted Infarct 1 Day after Successful Mechanical Thrombectomy

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Dornbos D,
   2. Ding Y

   . Reperfusion injury in the age of revascularization. Brain Circ 2018;4:40–42 doi:10.4103/bc.bc_5_18 pmid:30276335

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Potreck A,
   2. Mutke MA,
   3. Weyland CS, et al

   . Combined perfusion and permeability imaging reveals different pathophysiologic tissue responses after successful thrombectomy. Transl Stroke Res 2021;12:799–807 doi:10.1007/s12975-020-00885-y pmid:33432454

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Ng FC,
   2. Churilov L,
   3. Yassi N, et al

   . Prevalence and significance of impaired microvascular tissue reperfusion despite macrovascular angiographic reperfusion (no-reflow). Neurology 2022;98:e790–801 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000013210 pmid:34906976

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Shimonaga K,
   2. Matsushige T,
   3. Hosogai M, et al

   . Hyperperfusion after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:1212–18 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.007 pmid:30704865

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Shan-Shan Lu,
   2. Yue-Zhou Cao,
   3. Chun-Qiu Su, et al

   . Hyperperfusion on arterial spin labeling MRI predicts the 90-day functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;53:1815–22 doi:10.1002/jmri.27455 pmid:33300253

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Yu S,
   2. Liebeskind DS,
   3. Dua S, et al

   ; UCLA Stroke Investigators. Postischemic hyperperfusion on arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI is linked to hemorrhagic transformation in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2015;35:630–37 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.238 pmid:25564233

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Bhaskar S,
   2. Bivard A,
   3. Stanwell P, et al

   . Baseline collateral status and infarct topography in post-ischaemic perilesional hyperperfusion: an arterial spin labelling study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:1148–62 doi:10.1177/0271678X16653133 pmid:27256323

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Ng F,
   2. Venkatraman V,
   3. Parsons M, et al

   . Gradient of tissue injury after stroke: rethinking the infarct versus noninfarcted dichotomy. Cerebrovasc Dis 2020;49:32–38 doi:10.1159/000505847 pmid:32069458

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Villringer K,
   2. Sanz Cuesta BE,
   3. Ostwaldt AC, et al

   . DCE-MRI blood-brain barrier assessment in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2017;88:433–40 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003566 pmid:28031392

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Amki ME,
    2. Wegener S

    . Reperfusion failure despite recanalization in stroke: new translational evidence. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience 2021;5:2514183X2110071 doi:10.1177/2514183X211007137

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Shaik NF,
    2. Regan RF,
    3. Naik UP

    . Platelets as drivers of ischemia/reperfusion injury after stroke. Blood Adv 2021;5:1576–84 doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002888 pmid:33687431

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Kang L,
    2. Yu H,
    3. Yang X, et al

    . Neutrophil extracellular traps released by neutrophils impair revascularization and vascular remodeling after stroke. Nat Commun 2020;11:2488 doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16191-y pmid:32427863

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Erdener ŞE,
    2. Tang J,
    3. Kılıç K, et al

    . Dynamic capillary stalls in reperfused ischemic penumbra contribute to injury: a hyperacute role for neutrophils in persistent traffic jams. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021;41:236–52 doi:10.1177/0271678X20914179 pmid:32237951

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Modrau B,
    2. Winder A,
    3. Hjort N, et al

    . Perfusion changes in acute stroke treated with theophylline as an add-on to thrombolysis: a randomized clinical trial subgroup analysis. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;32:345–52 doi:10.1007/s00062-021-01029-x pmid:34259904

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Tan IYL,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Hopyan J, et al

    . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:525–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1408 pmid:19147716

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Wu O,
    2. Østergaard L,
    3. Weisskoff RM, et al

    . Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164–74 doi:10.1002/mrm.10522 pmid:12815691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Patlak CS,
    2. Blasberg RG,
    3. Fenstermacher JD

    . Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983;3:1–7 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1983.1 pmid:6822610

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Smith S

    . A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001;5:143–56 doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6 pmid:11516708

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M, et al

    . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8 pmid:12377157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Brady M,
    3. Smith S

    . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57 doi:10.1109/42.906424 pmid:11293691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Piven J,
    3. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 pmid:16545965

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Ferguson GG,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Barr HW, et al

    . The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1999;30:1751–58 doi:10.1161/01.str.30.9.1751 pmid:10471419

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Knox EG,
    2. Aburto MR,
    3. Clarke G, et al

    . The blood-brain barrier in aging and neurodegeneration. Mol Psychiatry 2022;27:2659–73 doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01511-z pmid:35361905

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bai J,
    2. Lyden PD

    . Revisiting cerebral postischemic reperfusion injury: new insights in understanding reperfusion failure, hemorrhage, and edema. Int J Stroke 2015;10:143–52 doi:10.1111/ijs.12434 pmid:25598025

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Kidwell CS,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Starkman S, et al

    . Diffusion-perfusion MRI characterization of post-recanalization hyperperfusion in humans. Neurology 2001;57:2015–21 doi:10.1212/wnl.57.11.2015 pmid:11739819

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Arenillas JF,
    2. Cortijo E,
    3. García-Bermejo P, et al

    . Relative cerebral blood volume is associated with collateral status and infarct growth in stroke patients in SWIFT PRIME. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018;38:1839–47 doi:10.1177/0271678X17740293 pmid:29135347

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Karonen JO,
    2. Partanen PL,
    3. Vanninen RL, et al

    . Evolution of MR contrast enhancement patterns during the first week after acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:103–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Nadareishvili Z,
    2. Simpkins AN,
    3. Hitomi E, et al

    . Post-stroke blood-brain barrier disruption and poor functional outcome in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy. Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;47:135–42 doi:10.1159/000499666 pmid:30970357

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Ng FC,
    2. Churilov L,
    3. Yassi N, et al

    ; EXTEND-IA TNK Part 1 and 2 Investigators. Reduced severity of tissue injury within the infarct may partially mediate the benefit of reperfusion in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2022;53:1915–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036670 pmid:35135319

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Sarraj A,
    2. Hassan AE,
    3. Abraham MG, et al

    ; SELECT2 Investigators. Endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic stroke across ischemic injury and penumbra profiles. JAMA 2024;331:750–63 doi:10.1001/jama.2024.0572 pmid:38324414

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Rosen BR,
    2. Belliveau JW,
    3. Vevea JM, et al

    . Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:249–65 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910140211 pmid:2345506

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Cuenod CA,
    2. Balvay D

    . Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;94:1187–204 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.10.010 pmid:24211260

    CrossRefPubMed