Super-Resolution in Clinically Available Spinal Cord MRIs Enables Automated Atrophy Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wattjes MP,
   2. Steenwijk MD,
   3. Stangel M

   . MRI in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an update. Clin Neuroradiol 2015;25 Suppl 2:157–65 doi:10.1007/s00062-015-0430-y pmid:26198879

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Pretorius PM,
   2. Quaghebeur G

   . The role of MRI in the diagnosis of MS. Clin Radiology 2003;58:434–48 doi:10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00089-8 pmid:12788312

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Wattjes MP,
   2. Ciccarelli O,
   3. Reich DS

   ; North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative MRI Guidelines Working Group, et al. 2021 MAGNIMS–CMSC–NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:653–70 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00095-8 pmid:34139157

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Thompson AJ,
   2. Banwell BL,
   3. Barkhof F, et al

   . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 pmid:29275977

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Cortese R,
   2. Giorgio A,
   3. Severa G, et al

   . MRI prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte antibody disease. Front Neurol 2021;12:679881 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.679881 pmid:34867701

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kaunzner UW,
   2. Gauthier SA

   . MRI in the assessment and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an update on best practice. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2017;10:247–61 doi:10.1177/1756285617708911 pmid:28607577

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hemond CC,
   2. Bakshi R

   . Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018;8:a028969

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Chen Y,
   2. Haacke EM,
   3. Bernitsas E

   . Imaging of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis: past, present, future. Brain Sci 2020;10:857 doi:10.3390/brainsci10110857

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Cohen AB,
   2. Neema M,
   3. Arora A, et al

   . The relationships among MRI-defined spinal cord involvement, brain involvement, and disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2012;22:122–28 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00589.x pmid:21447024

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Zeydan B,
    2. Gu X,
    3. Atkinson EJ, et al

    . Cervical spinal cord atrophy: an early marker of progressive MS onset. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2018;5:e435 doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000435 pmid:29435472

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Bischof A,
    2. Papinutto N,
    3. Keshavan A

    ; University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team, et al. Spinal cord atrophy predicts progressive disease in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2022;91:268–81 doi:10.1002/ana.26281 pmid:34878197

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Muccilli A,
    2. Seyman E,
    3. Oh J

    . Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2018;36:35–57 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2017.08.009 pmid:29157403

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Daams M,
    2. Weiler F,
    3. Steenwijk MD, et al

    . Mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) measurement in long-standing multiple sclerosis: relation to brain findings and clinical disability. Mult Scler 2014;20:1860–65 doi:10.1177/1352458514533399 pmid:24812042

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Weeda MM,
    2. Middelkoop SM,
    3. Steenwijk MD, et al

    . Validation of mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) measurement techniques in multiple sclerosis (MS): high reproducibility and robustness to lesions, but large software and scanner effects. Neuroimage Clin 2019;24:101962 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101962 pmid:31416017

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Chien C,
    2. Juenger V,
    3. Scheel M, et al

    . Considerations for mean upper cervical cord area implementation in a longitudinal MRI setting: methods, interrater reliability, and MRI quality control. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:343–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6394 pmid:31974079

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Cohen-Adad J,
    2. Alonso-Ortiz E,
    3. Abramovic M, et al

    . Generic acquisition protocol for quantitative MRI of the spinal cord. Nat Protoc 2021;16:4611–32 doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0 pmid:34400839

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Valošek J,
    2. Cohen-Adad J

    . Reproducible spinal cord quantitative MRI analysis with the spinal cord toolbox. Magn Reson Med Sci 2024;23:307–15 doi:10.2463/mrms.rev.2023-0159 pmid:38479843

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Lukas C,
    3. Steenwijk MD, et al

    . Multicenter validation of mean upper cervical cord area measurements from head 3D T1-weighted MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:749–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4635 pmid:26659338

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Taheri K,
    2. Vavasour IM,
    3. Abel S, et al

    . Cervical spinal cord atrophy can be accurately quantified using head images. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2022;8:20552173211070760 doi:10.1177/20552173211070760 pmid:35024164

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Saslow L,
    2. Li DKB,
    3. Halper J, et al

    . An international standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocol for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with multiple sclerosis: advocacy, dissemination, and implementation strategies. Int J MS Care 2020;22:226–32 doi:10.7224/1537-2073.2020-094 pmid:33177959

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Nagel SJ,
    2. Reddy CG,
    3. Frizon LA, et al

    . Spinal dura mater: biophysical characteristics relevant to medical device development. J Med Eng Technol 2018;42:128–39 doi:10.1080/03091902.2018.1435745 pmid:29569970

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Zhao C,
    2. Dewey BE,
    3. Pham DL, et al

    . SMORE: a self-supervised anti-aliasing and super-resolution algorithm for MRI using deep learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2021;40:805–17 doi:10.1109/TMI.2020.3037187 pmid:33170776

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Wolterink JM,
    2. Svoboda D,
    3. Zhao C, et al.

    1. Remedios SW,
    2. Han S,
    3. Zuo L, et al

    . Self-supervised super-resolution for anisotropic MR images with and without slice gap. In: Wolterink JM, Svoboda D, Zhao C, et al., eds. Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging. Springer-Verlag Nature; 2023:118–28
24. 24.↵
    1. Iglesias JE,
    2. Billot B,
    3. Balbastre Y, et al

    . SynthSR: a public AI tool to turn heterogeneous clinical brain scans into high-resolution T1-weighted images for 3D morphometry. Sci Adv 2023;9:eadd3607 doi:10.1126/sciadv.add3607 pmid:36724222

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Lu Z,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Li Z, et al

    . Two-stage self-supervised cycle-consistency transformer network for reducing slice gap in MR images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2023;27:3337–48 doi:10.1109/JBHI.2023.3271815 pmid:37126622

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Du J,
    2. He Z,
    3. Wang L, et al

    . Super-resolution reconstruction of single anisotropic 3D MR images using residual convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing 2020;392:209–20 doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.10.102

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    1. Fischer JS,
    2. Rudick RA,
    3. Cutter GR, et al

    . The multiple sclerosis functional composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Mult Scler 1999;5:244–50 doi:10.1177/135245859900500409 pmid:10467383

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Kurtzke JF

    . Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1983;33:1444–52 doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 pmid:6685237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. De Leener B,
    2. Lévy S,
    3. Dupont SM, et al

    . SCT: spinal cord toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. NeuroImage 2017;145:24–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 pmid:27720818

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Gros C,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Badji A, et al

    . Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. NeuroImage Orlando Neuroimage 2019;184:901–15 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 pmid:30300751

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Bédard S,
    2. Cohen-Adad J

    . Automatic measure and normalization of spinal cord cross-sectional area using the pontomedullary junction. Front Neuroimaging 2022;1:1031253 doi:10.3389/fnimg.2022.1031253 pmid:37555172

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Han S,
    2. Remedios SW,
    3. Schär M, et al

    . ESPRESO: an algorithm to estimate the slice profile of a single magnetic resonance image. Magn Reson Imaging 2023;98:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2023.01.012 pmid:36702167

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Pauly J,
    2. Le Roux P,
    3. Nishimura D, et al

    . Parameter relations for the Shinnar-Le Roux selective excitation pulse design algorithm (NMR imaging). IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:53–65 doi:10.1109/42.75611 pmid:18222800

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bovik AC,
    3. Sheikh HR, et al

    . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13:600–12 doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 pmid:15376593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bovik AC

    . Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process. Mag 2009;26:98–117 doi:10.1109/MSP.2008.930649

    CrossRef
36. 36.↵
    1. Bash S,
    2. Tanenbaum LN,
    3. Segovis C, et al

    . CPT codes for quantitative MRI of the brain: what it means for neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:E19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8286 pmid:38663987

    FREE Full Text